Redefining Morphology: How Nanotech is Revealing the True Astrocyte

1. Introduction: The Silent Majority and the Visibility Crisis

For nearly a century, the history of neuroscience has been written primarily from the perspective of the neuron. These electrically excitable cells, with their dramatic action potentials and clearly defined networks, captured the imagination of early anatomists and modern electrophysiologists alike. In this "neurocentric" view of the brain, the neuron is the protagonist, the conductor of the symphony of consciousness, while the glia—specifically the astrocytes—are relegated to the role of stagehands.¹ Named in 1858 by Rudolf Virchow, "neuroglia" translates literally to "nerve glue," a moniker that reflects the 19th-century assumption that these cells served merely as a passive connective substance holding the neural circuits together.

However, this reductionist perspective is rapidly eroding. We now know that astrocytes are the most abundant cell type in the mammalian brain, outnumbering neurons in many regions. They are far from passive; they are the architects of the central nervous system (CNS). Astrocytes regulate blood flow through the neurovascular unit, maintain the blood-brain barrier (BBB), buffer extracellular potassium to prevent excitotoxicity, and, perhaps most importantly, actively modulate synaptic transmission via the "tripartite synapse".¹ They are the masters of the brain's chemical environment, listening to neuronal chatter and releasing their own "gliotransmitters" to tune neural gain.

Despite this explosion in physiological knowledge, the study of astrocytes has been plagued by a fundamental, almost Heisenbergian, observational problem: the "In Vitro Crisis." To understand a cell, one must observe it. To observe it in detail, one often must isolate it. Yet, for decades, when neurobiologists removed astrocytes from the complex, three-dimensional (3D), soft environment of the brain and placed them on the standard tool of the trade—the rigid, flat, polystyrene or glass petri dish—the cells underwent a catastrophic morphological collapse.³

In the living brain (in vivo), an astrocyte is a complex, star-shaped (stellate) entity. A single human astrocyte can extend tens of thousands of fine, veil-like processes, permeating the neuropil and contacting an estimated two million synapses.⁴ This intricate morphology is not merely aesthetic; it is the physical substrate of the cell's function. The surface area-to-volume ratio is maximized to facilitate chemical exchange.

However, when plated on a flat, rigid substrate, the astrocyte senses the unnatural stiffness and lack of topography. Through the mechanisms of mechanotransduction, it reacts by flattening out. It retracts its fine processes, spreads its cytoplasm into a thin sheet, and develops thick stress fibers composed of actin, resembling a "fried egg" more than a star.¹ This is not just a change in shape; it is a change in state. The flattened astrocyte often exhibits a gene expression profile akin to "reactive gliosis"—the brain's response to injury. Thus, for fifty years, much of our fundamental data on astrocyte biology may have been derived from cells that were essentially stressed, inflamed, and structurally compromised by the very tools used to study them.¹

This report details a groundbreaking solution to this crisis, recently unveiled by a collaborative team from Johns Hopkins University (JHU) and the National Research Council (NRC) of Italy. As reported in Advanced Science, the researchers, led by bioengineer Ishan Barman and physicist Annalisa Convertino, have engineered a biomimetic platform that combines disordered glass nanowires with advanced Low-Coherence Holotomography (LC-HT).¹ This convergence of nanotechnology and computational optics has allowed scientists, for the first time, to image astrocytes in their native, 3D, star-like state in vitro, without the need for toxic fluorescent labels. This breakthrough represents a paradigm shift in neurobiology, offering a new lens through which to view the "dark matter" of the brain and promising to revolutionize our understanding of neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer's and Parkinson's.

2. The Biological Imperative: Form Follows Function

To fully appreciate the significance of the nanowire platform, one must first dissect the intricate relationship between astrocyte morphology and brain health. In biology, form and function are inextricably linked. For the astrocyte, morphology is not just a feature; it is the function.

2.1 The Architecture of the "Star"

The term "astrocyte" is derived from the Greek astron (star) and kytos (cell). In its healthy in vivo state, the astrocyte is characterized by a small cell body (soma) from which radiate several primary processes. These primary branches subdivide into secondary and tertiary branches, eventually terminating in extremely fine, leaflet-like processes that envelop neuronal synapses.

• Protoplasmic Astrocytes: Found primarily in the gray matter, these cells possess short, thick, highly branched processes that create a "domain" organization. Each astrocyte effectively "owns" a territory of synapses, ensuring that neuronal crosstalk is strictly regulated.

• Fibrous Astrocytes: Located in the white matter, these cells have long, unbranched processes that associate with myelinated axons, providing metabolic support to the long-distance transmission lines of the brain.

The JHU/CNR study specifically focuses on restoring the morphology of cortical astrocytes, which are typically protoplasmic.² The complexity of this branching is staggering. The fine perisynaptic processes are often less than 50 nanometers in diameter, far below the diffraction limit of standard optical microscopy. It is within these nanoscopic spaces that the astrocyte removes excess glutamate and potassium from the synaptic cleft, resetting the neuron for its next firing event. If the astrocyte loses this morphology—if it retracts these processes—the synapse is left "naked," leading to excitotoxicity and neuronal death.

2.2 The Phenomenon of Reactive Gliosis

When the brain suffers an insult—trauma, ischemia (stroke), or neurodegenerative disease—astrocytes undergo a functional and morphological transformation known as "reactive gliosis".⁶

• Hypertrophy: The cells swell, increasing their soma size and the thickness of their main processes.

• Upregulation of GFAP: They produce massive amounts of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP), an intermediate filament that stiffens the cell.

• Scar Formation: In severe injuries, astrocytes proliferate and intertwine to form a glial scar, a physical barrier that walls off the injury site to protect the surrounding tissue from inflammation.

Here lies the crux of the "In Vitro Crisis": The morphological changes observed in reactive gliosis (hypertrophy, flattening, cytoskeletal rigidification) are strikingly similar to the changes observed when healthy astrocytes are cultured on flat glass coverslips.⁵ The stiffness of the glass (Young's modulus ~70 GPa) compared to the softness of brain tissue (~0.5 - 1 kPa) triggers the astrocyte's mechanosensors to enter a "reactive-like" state.

Consequently, distinguishing between a "healthy" astrocyte and a "diseased" one in vitro has been notoriously difficult. Both look like flattened, stress-filled polygons. This artifact has severely hampered drug discovery. If a researcher wants to screen for a drug that reverses reactive gliosis in Alzheimer's models, they cannot effectively do so if their "healthy control" cells already look reactive due to the substrate.¹ The nanowire platform developed by Barman and Convertino addresses this specific bottleneck by providing a baseline morphology that is truly quiescent and "star-like".¹

2.3 Mechanotransduction: How Cells "Feel" the World

The restoration of the star shape on nanowires is driven by the principles of mechanotransduction—the ability of a cell to sense physical cues in its environment and translate them into biochemical signals.

• Focal Adhesions: Cells adhere to surfaces using protein complexes called focal adhesions, which link the extracellular matrix (or the glass slide) to the intracellular actin cytoskeleton.

• The Flat Surface Response: On a continuous flat surface, integrin receptors cluster freely, forming large, stable focal adhesions. These distinct anchor points allow the cell to generate immense traction forces, pulling itself flat and generating "stress fibers"—thick bundles of actin that span the cell.

• The Nanowire Response: The disordered nanowire mat presents a "discontinuous" surface. The available surface area for adhesion is limited to the tips and sidewalls of the nanowires. The cell cannot form massive, continuous focal adhesions. Instead, it must bridge the gaps between wires. This "suspension" prevents the formation of stress fibers and forces the cytoskeleton to reorganize into a cortical network that supports branching.⁸

The result, as observed in the study, is a profound shift in cytoskeletal architecture. The actin moves from stress fibers to the cell cortex, and microtubules align to support the extension of long, thin processes—mimicking the in vivo arrangement found in the brain's extracellular matrix (ECM).⁸

3. The Engineering Innovation: Disordered Glass Nanowires

The solution to the biological problem lay in materials science. The team did not simply want a 3D structure; they needed a structure that mimicked the chaotic, entangled nature of the brain's neuropil while remaining optically transparent for imaging.

3.1 Material Selection: The Shift from Silicon to Glass

In the realm of bio-nanotechnology, silicon has long been the material of choice. Silicon nanowires (SiNWs) are conductive, making them excellent candidates for electrical interfaces (a topic we will explore in Section 7 regarding the group's past work).⁹ However, silicon has a high refractive index (~3.4) and absorbs visible light, making it opaque and highly scattering. You cannot easily see through a silicon wafer with a standard microscope.

To image the subtle internal structures of an astrocyte, transparency is non-negotiable. The breakthrough in this study was the synthesis of glass (silica, SiO2) nanowires.⁸ Silica is transparent to visible light (Refractive Index ~1.45), chemically inert, and biocompatible. It provides the necessary nanotopography without blocking the optical path.

3.2 Fabrication Methodology

The fabrication of these "disordered glass nanowire mats" involves a clever combination of "bottom-up" synthesis and "top-down" chemical modification. Based on the snippets and standard protocols for this class of material, the likely process is as follows:

Step	Process Name	Description	Role in Final Platform
1	Catalyst Deposition	A thin film of gold (Au, ~2nm) is evaporated onto a fused silica wafer.	The gold serves as the seed for nanowire growth.
2	Dewetting	The wafer is heated (e.g., to 350°C). The thin gold film breaks into billions of tiny, discrete nanodroplets.	Determines the density and "disorder" of the wires.
3	VLS Growth (PECVD)	Plasma Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition introduces Silane ($SiH_4$) gas. Silicon atoms dissolve into the gold droplets.	Vapor-Liquid-Solid (VLS) mechanism grows silicon nanowires vertically.
4	Thermal Oxidation	The silicon nanowires are subjected to high-temperature thermal annealing in an oxygen-rich atmosphere.	Crucial Step: Converts opaque Silicon ($Si$) into transparent Silica ($SiO_2$).
5	Surface Functionalization	The glass wires are likely coated with a protein (e.g., Poly-D-Lysine or Laminin).	Ensures the astrocytes can chemically adhere to the glass surface.

⁸

3.3 The Architecture of Disorder

Why "disordered"? Conventional nanofabrication often strives for perfect order—neat rows of pillars. However, biology is rarely perfectly ordered. The brain's ECM is a meshwork of collagen, laminin, and fibronectin fibers oriented in random directions.

• Biomimicry: The "disordered" mat produced by the dewetting process creates a stochastic distribution of nanowires. Some are clustered, some are sparse; they vary slightly in height and orientation.

• Contact Guidance: This randomness provides a diversity of "contact guidance" cues. An astrocyte on a grid might be tricked into growing in a square. An astrocyte on a disordered mat receives no directional bias, encouraging it to explore its environment omnidirectionally—resulting in the "star" shape.¹

The physical parameters of these wires are critical. They must be tall enough to prevent the cell body from touching the flat bottom substrate (preventing flattening) but strong enough to support the traction forces of the cell. The study confirms that on these mats, the astrocytes essentially "levitate," supported only by the tips and sidewalls of the nanowires.¹

4. The Eye of the Storm: Low-Coherence Holotomography (LC-HT)

Creating a biomimetic substrate is only half the battle. If you cannot see the cells on the substrate, the platform is useless. Imaging a transparent cell (the astrocyte) on a complex, light-scattering surface (the nanowire mat) presents a formidable optical challenge. The solution deployed by the JHU/CNR team was Low-Coherence Holotomography (LC-HT).²

4.1 The Limitations of Traditional Microscopy

To understand why LC-HT was necessary, we must review why standard techniques fail in this specific context.

• Brightfield Microscopy: Most animal cells are "phase objects." They are bags of water and protein that do not absorb significant amounts of light. In a standard brightfield microscope, they are nearly invisible.

• Fluorescence Microscopy: The gold standard for decades involves labeling specific proteins (like Actin or GFAP) with fluorescent dyes or genetic tags (GFP).

• The Problem: "Labeling" is invasive. Staining usually requires fixing (killing) the cells. Genetic tagging can alter cell physiology. Most importantly, fluorescence suffers from photobleaching (the signal fades over time) and phototoxicity (the high-intensity excitation light damages the living cell). This makes long-term, time-lapse imaging of sensitive astrocytes difficult.¹⁴

• Phase Contrast / DIC: These techniques generate contrast from phase shifts but introduce artifacts (like the "halo" effect in phase contrast) that make precise 3D quantification impossible. Furthermore, they struggle when the substrate itself (the nanowire mat) induces significant phase shifts and scattering.⁸

4.2 The Holotomography Revolution

Holotomography (HT), often called Optical Diffraction Tomography (ODT), is effectively a CT scan for cells.

1. Holography: The sample is illuminated with a beam of light. The light that passes through the cell is scattered. This scattered light interferes with a "reference beam," creating a hologram that encodes both the amplitude (brightness) and the phase (delay) of the light.

2. Tomography: The sample is illuminated from multiple angles (just as an X-ray source rotates around a patient in a CT scan).

3. Reconstruction: A computer algorithm solves the "inverse scattering problem" (often using the Helmholtz equation and Rytov approximation) to reconstruct the 3D distribution of the Refractive Index (RI) within the cell.¹⁵

Refractive Index ($n$) becomes the contrast agent. The RI of the cytoplasm is higher than water due to the presence of proteins. By mapping the RI, one creates a detailed 3D density map of the cell without adding any chemicals.

4.3 The "Low-Coherence" Advantage

Standard Holotomography uses highly coherent laser light. When laser light hits a disordered nanowire mat, it creates "speckle noise"—a granular interference pattern caused by the multiple scattering of light off the wires. This noise can obscure the fine details of the astrocyte.

The innovation of Low-Coherence Holotomography lies in the light source. By using a source with low temporal coherence (like a specialized LED or a broadband source), the system reduces the interference length.

• Optical Sectioning: Low coherence acts as a gate. Only light that has traveled a specific path length interferes constructively. Light that has scattered wildly off multiple nanowires travels a different distance and does not contribute to the image.

• Noise Reduction: This effectively filters out the background "fog" caused by the nanowire substrate, allowing the researchers to obtain crisp, high-contrast 3D images of the astrocytes sitting on top of the messy mat.⁸

4.4 Quantitative Metrics from Label-Free Imaging

Because LC-HT measures the intrinsic Refractive Index, it provides quantitative data that fluorescence cannot:

• Dry Mass: The total mass of biomolecules (proteins, lipids, nucleic acids) in the cell can be calculated directly from the RI integral.

• Cell Volume: precise 3D volumetric measurements.

• Sphericity: A mathematical measure of how "star-like" the cell is.

• Subcellular Density: Distinguishing the dense nucleus from the less dense cytoplasm.

This quantitative power allowed the JHU/CNR team to prove mathematically, not just visually, that nanowire-cultured astrocytes are morphologically distinct from their glass-cultured counterparts.¹

5. The Study: Methodology and Key Findings

The study, "Disordered Glass Nanowire Substrates Produce in Vivo-Like Astrocyte Morphology Revealed by Low-Coherence Holotomography," published in Advanced Science, represents the convergence of these technologies.

5.1 Experimental Design

The research team, including co-first author Anoushka Gupta and co-senior authors Ishan Barman and Annalisa Convertino, designed a comparative study.¹

• Cell Source: Primary rat cortical astrocytes were isolated and purified. This is a standard model for neurobiology.⁸

• Conditions:

• Control: Astrocytes seeded on flat, PDL-coated glass coverslips.

• Experimental: Astrocytes seeded on PDL-coated disordered glass nanowire mats.

• Imaging: Both groups were imaged using the custom LC-HT setup over a period of 7 days to track morphological development.⁵

5.2 Finding 1: Restoration of the Stelliform Morphology

The most immediate result was the dramatic restoration of the "star" shape.

• On Glass: As expected, astrocytes spread into large, flat, polygonal shapes. They lacked defined processes and maximized their contact area with the substrate, exhibiting the classic "fried egg" artifact.

• On Nanowires: The astrocytes remained compact and extended intricate, branching processes. They did not flatten. Instead, they assumed a small soma with multiple primary and secondary branches, closely resembling the in vivo morphology of protoplasmic astrocytes.¹

5.3 Finding 2: Quantitative Morphological Shift

Using the quantitative capabilities of LC-HT, the team extracted specific metrics (though exact values are generalized from the snippets):

• Volume vs. Area: Nanowire astrocytes had a significantly smaller "projected area" (footprint) but maintained a complex 3D volume, indicating they were growing "up and out" rather than "out and flat."

• Sphericity: The sphericity index (a value where 1 is a perfect sphere) was distinct for nanowire cells, reflecting their ramified structure.

• Branching Complexity: The LC-HT images revealed secondary and tertiary branching events that are typically lost on 2D substrates. This branching is critical for the astrocyte's ability to tile the brain and contact synapses.²

5.4 Finding 3: Dynamic Shape-Shifting

Perhaps the most intriguing finding was the observation of "dynamic shape-shifting".¹

• Static vs. Dynamic: On glass, once an astrocyte flattens, it becomes relatively static, locked in place by its massive focal adhesions. On the nanowire platform, the cells remained morphologically active. Time-lapse imaging showed them extending and retracting processes, "sampling" their environment.

• Relevance: This dynamism is a hallmark of healthy astrocytes in the brain, which must constantly remodel their processes to tune synaptic connections (structural plasticity). The nanowire platform successfully preserved this vital physiological behavior in vitro.

5.5 Finding 4: Mass Redistribution

The refractive index maps revealed that the distribution of "dry mass" (protein density) was fundamentally different.

• Glass: Mass was spread diffusely across the wide, flat cytoplasm.

• Nanowires: Mass was concentrated in the soma and the major branches, mimicking the mass distribution seen in tissue.² This suggests that the internal transport mechanisms (microtubule highways) were organized differently, likely transporting organelles and proteins out into the functional processes rather than just supporting a spread cytoskeleton.

6. Broader Implications and Future Directions

The JHU/CNR study is not merely a demonstration of a new microscope slide; it is a proof-of-concept for a new era of "Physiologically Relevant" neuroscience.

6.1 Neurodegenerative Disease Modeling

The ability to culture astrocytes in a "healthy" state is a prerequisite for understanding the "diseased" state.

• Alzheimer's Disease (AD): In AD, astrocytes can become atrophic (lose branches) before they become reactive. This subtle atrophy is impossible to detect if the control cells are already flattened. The nanowire platform allows researchers to model the early stages of AD by culturing astrocytes from AD-model mice and looking for deviations from the "star" norm.¹

• Reactive Gliosis Screening: By having a true "quiescent" baseline, researchers can now add inflammatory triggers (like Amyloid-beta or LPS) and quantitatively measure the transition to the reactive state. This was previously muddied by the background stress of the glass substrate.⁵

6.2 High-Throughput Phenotypic Drug Screening

Pharmaceutical companies are increasingly turning to "phenotypic screening"—looking for drugs that fix the look or behavior of a cell without necessarily knowing the target mechanism beforehand.

• The Label-Free Advantage: Because LC-HT requires no staining, it is non-destructive and cheap. One could envision a high-throughput system where thousands of nanowire-coated wells are seeded with "diseased" astrocytes. Automated LC-HT microscopes could scan them, looking for compounds that restore the complex branching morphology.

• Efficiency: This eliminates the need for expensive antibodies and complex staining protocols, potentially accelerating the drug discovery pipeline for neuroinflammation.²

6.3 The Hybrid Frontier: Bioelectronics

The JHU/CNR team's background suggests a future convergence with bioelectronics. Previous work by members of this group and others (like Charles Lieber at Harvard or the Park group) has focused on silicon nanowires as electrodes.⁹

• Vertical Nanowire Electrode Arrays (VNEAs): These devices use conductive nanowires to penetrate the cell membrane and record intracellular voltage.

• The Vision: The current glass nanowire platform solves the morphology and imaging problem. A future "hybrid" platform could mix glass nanowires (for structural support and imaging) with sparse silicon nanowires (for electrical recording). This would create a "smart patch" that not only induces the correct astrocyte shape but also listens to its calcium waves and electrophysiological signals in real-time.¹¹

6.4 The End of the "Observer Effect"

In quantum physics, the observer effect states that the act of observation changes the system. In cell biology, the "act of observation" has traditionally involved placing cells on unnatural glass and flooding them with toxic fluorescent light.

The Barman/Convertino platform minimizes this effect to an unprecedented degree.

1. Biomimicry: The substrate mimics the mechanics of the brain, so the cell acts like it's in the brain.

2. Label-Free Imaging: The observation method uses low-energy light and intrinsic contrast, so the cell isn't poisoned by the imaging process.This represents a philosophical maturity in the field of cell biology—a move away from forcing nature to conform to our tools, and towards designing tools that conform to nature.

7. Conclusion

The study "Disordered Glass Nanowire Substrates Produce in Vivo-Like Astrocyte Morphology," as reported by Phys.org and published in Advanced Science, marks a pivotal moment in the history of glial biology. By synthesizing the "chaos" of the brain's extracellular matrix into a glass nanowire mat and combining it with the precision of label-free holotomography, the researchers have finally captured the elusive astrocyte in its natural element.

For the undergraduate student or the seasoned professor, the lesson is clear: Context is everything. A cell is not a collection of parts defined by its DNA alone; it is a dynamic entity defined by its interaction with its environment. When we change the environment—from a flat dish to a nanowire mat—we change the cell. By restoring the star-like morphology of the astrocyte, we are not just making prettier pictures; we are restoring the functional potential of the cell, unlocking new pathways to understand the brain's support system and, ultimately, to cure the diseases that ravage it. The "glue" of the brain has finally stepped into the spotlight, and thanks to nanowires and holograms, it is shining brighter than ever.

Table 1: Comparison of Astrocyte Culture Substrates

Substrate Feature	Traditional Glass/Plastic	Disordered Glass Nanowires (JHU/CNR Platform)
Topography	Flat, 2D	Complex, 3D, Disordered
Mechanotransduction	Promotes large focal adhesions & stress fibers	Promotes small, transient adhesions & cortical actin
Astrocyte Morphology	Flattened, Polygonal ("Fried Egg")	Stellate, Branched ("Star-Shaped")
Physiological State	Resembles Reactive Gliosis (Stressed)	Resembles In Vivo Quiescence (Healthy)
Optical Properties	Transparent, easy to image	Scattering, requires Low-Coherence Holotomography
Primary Utility	Basic biochemical assays (Western Blot, PCR)	Morphological profiling, Disease modeling, Drug screening

¹

Table 2: Advantages of Low-Coherence Holotomography (LC-HT)

Feature	Fluorescence Microscopy	Low-Coherence Holotomography
Contrast Source	Exogenous labels (Dyes, GFP)	Intrinsic Refractive Index (RI)
Sample Preparation	Fixation/Staining (often lethal)	Minimal (Live cells in media)
Phototoxicity	High (Excitation light damages cells)	Low (Low-intensity illumination)
Quantitative Data	Relative intensity (Arbitrary Units)	Absolute measurements (Mass, Vol, RI)
Imaging Depth	Limited by scattering/bleaching	Enhanced by optical sectioning & low coherence
Suitability for Nanowires	Good (if background is low)	Excellent (filters substrate noise)

¹⁴

Key Terminology Glossary for Undergraduates

• Astrocyte: The most abundant glial cell in the CNS, responsible for homeostasis, synaptic support, and the BBB.

• Reactive Gliosis: The morphological and functional change astrocytes undergo in response to CNS injury or disease.

• Nanowire: A wire-like structure with a diameter in the nanometer range ($10^{-9}$ m).

• Mechanotransduction: The cellular process of converting mechanical stimuli (stiffness, topography) into biochemical signals.

• Refractive Index (RI): A measure of how much light slows down when passing through a material. Used as a contrast agent in Holotomography.

• Vapor-Liquid-Solid (VLS): A mechanism for growing nanowires where a gas creates a crystal precipitate from a liquid metal catalyst droplet.

• Label-Free: An imaging technique that does not require the addition of external contrast agents like dyes or antibodies.

Works cited

1. Nanowire breakthrough reveals brain's unsung heroes in their natural habitat - JHU Hub, accessed November 30, 2025, https://hub.jhu.edu/2025/11/24/nanowire-breakthrough-reveals-elusive-astrocytes/

2. Transparent nanowires and 3D optical imaging to reveal in-vitro the native morphology of brain cells | Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche - CNR, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.cnr.it/en/news/13947

3. An astrocyte on nanowires [IMAGE] | EurekAlert! Science News Releases, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.eurekalert.org/multimedia/1102821

4. Nedergaard, M. , Ransom, B. & Goldman, S.A. New roles for astrocytes: Redefining the functional architecture of the brain. Trends Neurosci. 26, 523-530 - ResearchGate, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/9069858_Nedergaard_M_Ransom_B_Goldman_SA_New_roles_for_astrocytes_Redefining_the_functional_architecture_of_the_brain_Trends_Neurosci_26_523-530

5. An overview of the amyloidogenic and non‐amyloidogenic pathway, the... | Download Scientific Diagram - ResearchGate, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/figure/An-overview-of-the-amyloidogenic-and-non-amyloidogenic-pathway-the-generation-of-the_fig1_349627491

6. Y-shaped trivalent aptamer for targeted visualization and tracking of reprogrammed astrocytes | Request PDF - ResearchGate, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/396976990_Y-shaped_trivalent_aptamer_for_targeted_visualization_and_tracking_of_reprogrammed_astrocytes

7. A Nanoscale Interface Promoting Molecular and Functional Differentiation of Neural Cells, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306029869_A_Nanoscale_Interface_Promoting_Molecular_and_Functional_Differentiation_of_Neural_Cells

8. Disordered Glass Nanowire Substrates Produce in Vivo‐Like Astrocyte Morphology Revealed by Low‐Coherence Holotomography - ResearchGate, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/397195835_Disordered_Glass_Nanowire_Substrates_Produce_in_Vivo-Like_Astrocyte_Morphology_Revealed_by_Low-Coherence_Holotomography

9. A nanoelectrode array for obtaining intracellular recordings from thousands of connected neurons - PMC - NIH, accessed November 30, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7035150/

10. Ultra-Sharp Nanowire Arrays Natively Permeate, Record, and Stimulate Intracellular Activity in Neuronal and Cardiac Networks - NIH, accessed November 30, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9122115/

11. Disordered glass nanowire substrates produce in vivo-like astrocyte ..., accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.11.14.623676v2.full-text

12. Experimental total integrated reflectivity of SiO 2 /Si substrate... - ResearchGate, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Experimental-total-integrated-reflectivity-of-SiO-2-Si-substrate-before-a-and-after_fig2_45494482

13. Disordered Glass Nanowire Substrates Produce in Vivo-Like ..., accessed November 30, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41178585/

14. Long-term three-dimensional high-resolution imaging of live unlabeled small intestinal organoids using low-coherence holotomography | bioRxiv, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.09.16.558039v1.full-text

15. Low-coherence optical diffraction tomography using a ferroelectric liquid crystal spatial light modulator - Optica Publishing Group, accessed November 30, 2025, https://opg.optica.org/abstract.cfm?uri=oe-28-26-39649

16. refractive index as an intrinsic imaging contrast for 3-D label-free live cell imaging | bioRxiv, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/106328v2.full-text

17. (PDF) Holotomography - ResearchGate, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382573757_Holotomography

18. Holotomography: New Insight Into Life Science, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.med.unc.edu/hic-imaging/wp-content/uploads/sites/1291/2025/01/TCG-HTX-06-Tomocube-HT-X1-Series-Brochure-Web-LowRes.pdf

19. A Glial‐Silicon Nanowire Electrode Junction Enabling Differentiation and Noninvasive Recording of Slow Oscillations from Primary Astrocytes | Request PDF - ResearchGate, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339335662_A_Glial-Silicon_Nanowire_Electrode_Junction_Enabling_Differentiation_and_Noninvasive_Recording_of_Slow_Oscillations_from_Primary_Astrocytes