The Imposter Queen: Chemical Warfare in the World of Lasius Ants

Abstract

The maintenance of eusociality in the Formicidae relies upon a delicate, evolutionarily stabilized equilibrium of chemical communication, kin recognition, and the absolute reproductive primacy of the queen. In the vast majority of ant societies, the queen represents the genetic future of the colony, protected by a workforce of sterile daughters whose inclusive fitness depends entirely on her survival. However, recent investigations into the colony-founding strategies of temporary social parasites within the genus Lasius have revealed a profound subversion of this social contract. This report provides an exhaustive analysis of the phenomenon of "induced matricide," a newly documented strategy employed by the parasitic queens of Lasius orientalis and Lasius umbratus. Unlike classic models of colony usurpation, where the intruder physically eliminates the resident queen, these parasites employ a form of chemical warfare that manipulates host workers into executing their own mother. By synthesizing findings from recent behavioral assays published in Current Biology (November 2025) with broader principles of chemical ecology, phylogenetics, and evolutionary theory, this paper explores how such a maladaptive behavior—matricide—can be engineered by a third party. We examine the taxonomic relationships between the specific host-parasite pairs (L. orientalis targeting L. flavus and L. umbratus targeting L. japonicus), the chemical properties of the "propaganda substances" utilized, and the evolutionary pressures that drive the diversification of social parasitism. This study highlights the fragility of the superorganism when its communication channels are hijacked, offering new insights into the "arms race" between social parasites and their hosts.

1. Introduction: The Superorganism and the Sanctity of the Queen

1.1 The Theoretical Framework of the Superorganism

The concept of the insect colony as a "superorganism" posits that the colony functions as a single, coherent biological unit, a notion that has dominated myrmecology for over a century. In this analogue, the queen is the reproductive soma, the workers are the supporting somatic tissues (musculature and digestive system), and the exchange of pheromones serves as the neural and endocrine system binding the entity together.¹ This level of integration is achieved through the rigorous suppression of individual reproductive interests in favor of the collective genetic legacy. For millions of years, the evolutionary success of the ant family (Formicidae) has been predicated on the worker caste's unyielding fidelity to the queen.

Aggression in ant colonies is typically directed outward, toward competitors, predators, or non-nestmates. Internal aggression, when it occurs, is rigorously suppressed or regulated through dominance hierarchies that rarely result in the death of the reproductive matriarch, except in specific contexts such as the culling of surplus queens in pleometrotic (multi-queen) foundations or the replacement of failing queens in annual species.² The sanctity of the queen is the cornerstone of colony stability; without her, the sterile workers have no pathway to genetic representation in future generations.

1.2 The Paradox of Matricide

Matricide—the killing of a mother by her offspring—is an evolutionary paradox in eusocial insects. Under Hamilton’s rule of kin selection ($rB > C$), a worker ant maximizes her fitness by rearing the offspring of her mother (sisters), with whom she shares a high coefficient of relatedness ($r=0.75$ in haplodiploid systems). Consequently, the elimination of the mother queen is arguably the most maladaptive behavior a worker could exhibit, effectively terminating the colony’s genetic legacy.

While worker policing and queen execution do occur, they are strictly regulated by colony-level fitness incentives. For example, in Temnothorax species, workers may execute a queen to allow for the rearing of a new, more fertile reproductive, or to eliminate surplus queens that drain resources.³ However, the phenomenon described in recent literature regarding Lasius presents a distinct and chilling scenario: matricide that offers zero fitness benefit to the workers or the colony. It is a behavior engineered entirely by an external agent—a parasite—turning the colony's defensive instincts against its own heart.

1.3 The Phenomenon of Social Parasitism

Nature abhors a vacuum of exploitation. The complex communication systems that maintain colony cohesion also present a vulnerability: if the chemical codes can be cracked, the colony’s resources can be stolen. This is the realm of social parasitism. Social parasites are organisms that coexist with eusocial insects and exploit their social behaviors for their own benefit.⁴

Among ants, social parasitism manifests in a spectrum of dependency:

1. Xenobiosis (Guest Ants): The parasite lives within the host nest, moving freely and soliciting food, but keeps its brood separate.

2. Dulosis (Slave-making): The parasite raids host colonies to steal pupae, which hatch and serve as a worker force in the parasite's nest (e.g., Polyergus).

3. Inquilinism (Permanent Parasitism): The parasite queen invades a host colony, usually tolerating the host queen (or not), and produces no workers of her own, relying entirely on the host workforce (e.g., Teleutomyrmex).

4. Temporary Social Parasitism: The focus of this report. A newly mated parasitic queen invades a host colony, eliminates the resident queen, and uses the host workers to rear her own first brood. Eventually, the host workers die of old age, leaving a pure colony of the parasitic species.⁴

The genus Lasius, a dominant group of Holarctic ants, is a crucible for the evolution of temporary social parasitism. A recent breakthrough in myrmecology, published in Current Biology (November 2025) by Takasuka, Shimada, and Tanaka, has unveiled a startling mechanism of usurpation in this genus.⁶ The study documents how queens of Lasius orientalis and Lasius umbratus do not kill the host queen directly. Instead, they weaponize the host workers against their own mother, inducing a "regicidal frenzy" through chemical manipulation.⁶ This report serves as a deep dive into this newly described behavior, analyzing the mechanisms, chemistry, and evolutionary implications of this "remote-control" regicide.

2. The Protagonists: Taxonomy, Phylogeny, and Natural History of the Genus Lasius

To understand the dynamics of this parasitism, one must first understand the players. The genus Lasius is divided into several subgenera (or species groups) that exhibit varying life histories, ranging from independent colony foundation to obligate hyper-parasitism. The relationships between these groups are critical for evaluating hypotheses like Emery's Rule.

2.1 The Parasites: Lasius orientalis and Lasius umbratus

2.1.1 Lasius orientalis (The "Bad Smell" Ant)

Lasius orientalis belongs to a group of ants often characterized by their potent chemical defenses. Taxonomically, it falls within the Lasius genus, specifically the fuliginosus group, which is often associated with the subgenus Dendrolasius.⁹

• Morphology and Chemistry: These ants are colloquially known in Japan as "bad-smell ants" due to the strong odors they emit.⁸ Members of the fuliginosus group typically possess enlarged mandibular glands producing terpenes like dendrolasin or citronellal, which function as alarm-defense compounds.¹¹ This chemical potency is a double-edged sword: it defends the ant against predators but makes covert infiltration of a host colony chemically difficult, necessitating advanced suppression or camouflage techniques.

• Colony Foundation: Historically, species in the fuliginosus group are known as temporary social parasites or even hyper-parasites (parasites of parasites). For instance, Lasius fuliginosus often parasitizes Lasius umbratus, which in turn parasitizes Lasius niger.¹² However, the current study highlights L. orientalis directly targeting Lasius flavus.¹³ This direct parasitism of a free-living species by a member of the hyper-parasitic clade suggests a plasticity in host selection or a revision of the obligate hyper-parasitism model for this species.

2.1.2 Lasius umbratus (The Shadow Ant)

Lasius umbratus is the type species for the subgenus Chthonolasius.¹⁴

• Habitat and Behavior: As the name suggests ("Chthonos" meaning earth/underworld; "umbratus" meaning shaded), these are subterranean ants. They are photophobic and rarely seen above ground unless swarming for nuptial flights. Their pale coloration and reduced eyes reflect their hypogeic lifestyle.

• Parasitic Nature: L. umbratus is a well-documented temporary social parasite. The classic understanding was that an umbratus queen would kill a Lasius niger or Lasius japonicus worker to acquire host scent, infiltrate the nest, and then eliminate the queen.¹⁶ The new findings refine this view, showing that the elimination of the queen is delegated to the host workers via a chemical trigger.¹³

2.2 The Hosts: Lasius flavus and Lasius japonicus

2.2.1 Lasius flavus (The Yellow Meadow Ant)

• Taxonomy: Belongs to the subgenus Cautolasius.¹⁷

• Ecology: L. flavus is a subterranean species that farms root aphids (myrmecophilous aphids). They form massive, long-lived colonies with thousands of workers. Their nests are often conspicuous grassy mounds which regulate temperature and humidity for their aphid livestock.

• Defenses: Being subterranean and populous, L. flavus relies heavily on chemical defenses and aggressive swarming in tight tunnels. They are generally less aggressive on the surface but formidable underground.¹⁸ Their large colony size makes them an attractive, energy-rich target for a parasite, but their numbers also pose a significant risk to any intruder.

• Role in Study: In the documented research, L. flavus serves as the specific host for Lasius orientalis.¹³

2.2.2 Lasius japonicus (The Japanese Black Ant)

• Taxonomy: A member of Lasius s.str. (the niger clade).¹⁹

• Ecology: This is one of the most common ants in Japan, occupying a niche similar to the European Lasius niger. They are generalist foragers, highly aggressive, and dominant in many urban and rural ecosystems.

• Role in Study: L. japonicus serves as the host for Lasius umbratus.¹³

2.3 Phylogenetic Distance and Specificity

The pairings observed in the study (orientalis targeting flavus; umbratus targeting japonicus) bridge significant phylogenetic gaps, challenging strict interpretations of host-parasite co-evolution.

• L. orientalis (Fuliginosus/Dendrolasius group) $\rightarrow$ attacks L. flavus (Cautolasius group).

• L. umbratus (Chthonolasius group) $\rightarrow$ attacks L. japonicus (Niger group).

This cross-subgeneric parasitism suggests that these parasites are not strictly adhering to the tightest interpretation of Emery's Rule (sister-species parasitism) but are exploiting generic chemical vulnerabilities common across the Lasius genus.¹² The Lasius genus is estimated to have diversified significantly, yet the chemical language of "queen recognition" or "alarm" appears conserved enough to be exploited across these deep divergences.

3. The Mechanics of the Coup: Behavioral Sequence

The findings by Takasuka, Shimada, and Tanaka ⁷ dismantle the previous assumption that parasitic queens are essentially gladiators who storm the castle and behead the monarch. Instead, they function more like chemical saboteurs or "ninjas".¹⁸ The takeover proceeds in distinct phases: Infiltration, Localization, and Induced Matricide.

3.1 Phase 1: Infiltration and Chemical Camouflage

Before a coup can be staged, the assassin must gain entry. Ant colonies are fortresses guarded by chemical checkpoints. Nestmates are recognized by their cuticular hydrocarbon (CHC) profiles—a waxy "bar code" on their exoskeleton. Any individual bearing a foreign profile is immediately attacked.

• The Strategy: The parasitic queen does not rely on brute force to enter. Instead, she employs chemical camouflage (acquiring host scent) rather than simple mimicry (biosynthesizing the scent).²¹

• The Process:

• The L. orientalis or L. umbratus queen locates a target nest.

• She encounters isolated workers on the periphery.

• Through physical contact (and potentially killing/mauling a worker), she rubs against them to transfer their CHCs onto her own body.²³ "Ants live in the world of odors," notes Takasuka; by stealing this "passport," she becomes invisible to the guards.²³

• Once camouflaged, she infiltrates the brood chambers, moving freely among the workers who now perceive her as a nestmate (or at least, not as an enemy).⁸

This "rubbing" behavior is a critical adaptation. Unlike Polyergus (slave-makers) which often kill immediately upon entry, the Lasius parasite must remain undetected long enough to find the queen. The ability to suppress her own "bad smell" (terpenes) while acquiring the host's mild hydrocarbon profile is a feat of chemical suppression and behavioral adaptation.

3.2 Phase 2: Localization of the Host Queen

Once inside, the parasitic queen behaves like an "undercover spy".²⁴ She wanders through the nest, ignoring the brood and workers, focused solely on locating the host queen. This phase highlights the parasite's ability to navigate the complex architecture of the host nest and perhaps detect the specific "royal pheromones" emitted by the resident queen. In the dark, subterranean world of the ant nest, this navigation is likely guided by a concentration gradient of queen pheromones.

3.3 Phase 3: The Chemical Trigger (Induced Matricide)

This is the study's most novel finding. Upon locating the host queen, the parasite does not bite or sting her to death. Instead, she utilizes a chemical weapon.

3.3.1 The Attack Behavior

The parasitic queen approaches the host queen, turns her abdomen (gaster) toward the target, and sprays a fluid from her acidopore.⁶

• The Spray: The fluid is suspected to be formic acid, likely mixed with other glandular secretions (Dufour’s gland).⁶

• Reaction of the Host Queen: The sprayed queen is visibly agitated and may flail, but the spray itself is not immediately lethal.

• Reaction of the Host Workers: This is the critical turning point. The fluid masks the queen’s "mother" scent or marks her with a "threat" scent. The workers, detecting this chemical signal, perceive their own mother as an intruder or a dangerous entity.

3.3.2 Species-Specific Differences and the "Efficiency Gap"

The study reveals a fascinating divergence in efficiency between the two parasitic species, suggesting different levels of evolutionary refinement or host susceptibility.¹³

Feature	Lasius orientalis (Parasite)	Lasius umbratus (Parasite)
Host Species	Lasius flavus	Lasius japonicus
Attack Duration	Prolonged (approx. 4 days)	Rapid / Immediate
Spray Frequency	High (~15 sprays over 20 hours)	Low (~2 sprays)
Worker Response	Slow agitation, gradual aggression	Immediate, fatal attack
Outcome	Queen mutilated/killed slowly	Queen dismembered quickly

Analysis of the Divergence:

The L. umbratus strategy appears more derived and efficient. A mere two sprays trigger immediate execution. This suggests that L. umbratus might utilize a more potent "propaganda pheromone" or that L. japonicus workers are more reactive to the specific chemical trigger used (perhaps because L. japonicus is a more aggressive species generally). In contrast, L. orientalis engages in a war of attrition, repeatedly tagging the queen until the workers' threshold for aggression is breached.13 This prolonged interaction (4 days) is risky; it implies that L. orientalis has not yet perfected the "kill code" for L. flavus, or that L. flavus workers possess a higher threshold for attacking their own queen, requiring repeated chemical reinforcement.

3.4 Phase 4: Usurpation and Succession

Once the host queen is dead, the workers' aggression subsides. Crucially, they do not turn on the parasitic queen. Having already acquired the colony odor (Phase 1) and now being the sole reproductive in the nest, the parasite assumes the throne. The host workers, bound by their instinct to care for brood and queen, begin to groom and feed the parasite. She lays her eggs, and the host workers rear them. Over time, the host workers die of old age, and the colony composition shifts entirely to the parasite species.⁶

4. Chemical Ecology: The Weaponization of Odor

To understand how the parasite tricks the workers, we must delve into the chemical ecology of the Formicinae subfamily. The weapon used is not a physical stinger (which formicine ants lack), but a specialized gland system.

4.1 The Chemistry of Recognition

Ants recognize nestmates via Cuticular Hydrocarbons (CHCs). These are long-chain fatty acids and alkanes on the exoskeleton that prevent desiccation and serve as chemical signatures.²⁷

• Queen Pheromones: The queen produces a specific overlay of signals indicating her fertility and dominance. This creates a "colony odor" that workers learn to respect.

• The Disruption: The parasitic queen must override this signal. By spraying the host queen, she likely achieves two effects:

• Masking: The strong, acrid smell of the spray (formic acid + terpenes) physically obliterates the delicate CHC profile of the host queen.⁶

• Alarm/Enemy Labeling: Formic acid is the universal alarm and defense weapon of formicine ants. When an ant detects high concentrations of formic acid on an individual, it signals "Enemy" or "Contaminated."

4.2 Formic Acid and Undecane: The Dual-Use Arsenal

The snippets mention the fluid is likely formic acid.²⁴ However, formic acid alone is a simple molecule ($HCOOH$). In Lasius and Formica species, the poison gland (producing formic acid) works in concert with the Dufour’s gland, which produces hydrocarbons like n-undecane.¹¹

• Synergy: Undecane acts as a wetting agent (lipophilic), allowing the hydrophilic formic acid to penetrate the waxy cuticle and spread effectively. Without undecane, formic acid would bead up and roll off.

• Alarm Pheromones: Undecane is also a potent alarm pheromone in Lasius. It triggers aggression and panic.²⁹

• The Hypothesis: The parasitic queen likely sprays a "super-stimulus" cocktail. She tags the host queen with the chemical equivalent of a neon "KILL ME" sign. The workers, smelling the intense alarm pheromone (undecane) and the enemy marker (formic acid) emanating directly from the queen, are sent into a sensory overload. Their aggressive reflex overrides their recognition of the queen.²⁵ This exploits a "hard-wired" defensive subroutine: "Attack the source of the alarm scent."

4.3 Why "Matricide" and Not Direct Killing?

Why does the parasite not simply kill the queen herself?

1. Risk Mitigation: Lasius flavus and L. japonicus colonies are populous and aggressive. A physical fight with a queen (who is often larger) risks injury to the parasite. If the parasite is injured, she cannot lay eggs. A single bitten leg could doom her colony foundation attempt.

2. Worker Acceptance: If the parasite physically kills the queen, she might be coated in "death pheromones" or "alarm signals" that mark her as the aggressor. By using a remote chemical trigger, she dissociates herself from the act of murder. The workers do the dirty work, and the parasite remains a bystander, untainted by the violence.⁶

3. The "Bad Smell" Advantage: L. orientalis and L. umbratus are naturally equipped with potent chemical glands (hence "bad smell ants"). Evolution has repurposed their defense glands into offensive psychological weapons.⁸

5. Evolutionary Context: From Guest to Assassin

The evolution of such sophisticated parasitism is a subject of intense study in myrmecology. This behavior provides a testing ground for theories of speciation and co-evolution.

5.1 Emery’s Rule and Sympatric Speciation

Emery’s Rule states that social parasites are often closely related to their hosts.

• Strict Rule: Parasite is the sister species of the host (implying sympatric speciation).

• Loose Rule: Parasite belongs to the same genus (implying allopatric speciation followed by secondary contact).³⁰

In this case, we see a "loose" adherence. L. orientalis (Dendrolasius/Fuliginosus group) and L. umbratus (Chthonolasius) are distantly related to their hosts L. flavus (Cautolasius) and L. japonicus (Niger clade).³²

• Implication: This suggests that the matricidal strategy is a "generalist" weapon against the Lasius genus architecture, rather than a highly specific key evolved from immediate sister-species divergence. It points to allopatric speciation followed by secondary contact, or the exploitation of conserved chemical traits across the genus.¹² The chemical language of Lasius alarm (undecane/formic acid) is universal enough that a parasite can evolve in one lineage and successfully exploit a distant cousin.

5.2 The Evolution of Induced Matricide

Matricide is extremely rare in nature because it is genetically costly.² The only beneficiary here is the parasite. This behavior represents a "Manipulated Phenotype." The host workers are extended phenotypes of the parasite's genes.

• Comparison to Other Parasites:

• Direct Killers: Lasius species like L. alienus or L. niger queens often kill each other in pleometrosis (co-founding), but this is intraspecific competition.²

• Throttlers: The parasitic ant Bothriomyrmex decapitans climbs onto the host queen's back and slowly cuts off her head. This is direct physical assassination.¹

• Slave-Makers: Polyergus queens kill the Formica queen directly (biting/piercing) to acquire her scent.³⁴

• The "Ninjas" of the Ant World: The Lasius parasites described here are unique because they use indirect force. They are "ninjas" or "assassins" using poison, rather than gladiators.¹⁸ This suggests a distinct evolutionary trajectory where chemical sophistication reduced the need for physical combat strength.

5.3 Convergent Evolution

The study notes that L. orientalis and L. umbratus are distantly related within the genus, yet both evolved this matricidal strategy. This is a case of convergent evolution.²⁴ The environmental pressure (need to infiltrate populous, well-defended colonies) and the available toolkit (formic acid/Dufour's gland chemistry) led two different lineages to the same solution: inducing the workers to kill the queen. This convergence suggests that "chemical framing" is a highly effective, if rarely evolved, optimum in the landscape of social parasitism.

6. The Study: Methodology and the Role of Citizen Science

6.1 The Discovery

The pathway to this discovery underscores the changing landscape of scientific research. The behavior was first observed not in a university lab, but by Taku Shimada, a citizen scientist and ant enthusiast who runs the blog "AntRoom".⁶

• Timeline: In 2021, Shimada filmed an L. orientalis queen introduced to a host colony. He observed the peculiar "spray and retreat" behavior.

• Collaboration: Keizo Takasuka of Kyushu University recognized the significance of this observation and collaborated with Shimada and Yuji Tanaka to formalize the research.

• Significance: This highlights the immense value of amateur naturalists in ethology. Detailed, patient observation of colony behaviors is time-consuming and often serendipitous—areas where enthusiasts often excel.⁶

6.2 Experimental Design

The formal study published in Current Biology likely involved:

1. Collection: Gathering colonies of hosts (L. flavus, L. japonicus) and queens of parasites.

2. Introduction Assays: controlled introduction of parasitic queens to host laboratory nests.

3. Behavioral Coding (Ethograms): Quantifying sprays, worker aggression levels, and time to queen death.

4. Chemical Analysis (implied): While the snippets don't detail GC-MS data for this specific paper, the hypothesis of formic acid relies on known gland chemistry.

7. Broader Implications

7.1 "Game of Thrones" in the Microcosm

The media has likened this to "Game of Thrones," and the analogy is apt.⁶ The strategy involves:

• Disguise: Wearing the face (scent) of the enemy.

• Infiltration: Walking among the guards.

• Treason: Turning the loyal guard (workers) against the monarch.This narrative power helps publicize the complexity of insect societies, but biologically, it demonstrates the ruthlessness of Social Parasitism. It is a "Zero-Sum Game" where the parasite wins everything, and the host loses its genetic immortality.8

7.2 The Vulnerability of Decentralized Systems

Ant colonies are decentralized systems. There is no central brain; order emerges from local interactions. This study demonstrates that decentralized systems are vulnerable to "Propaganda Attacks." If an agent can introduce a signal that triggers a local rule (e.g., "Attack anything smelling of X"), the system can be made to destroy its own critical nodes (the queen). This has parallels in cybernetics and network theory.

7.3 Future Research Directions

1. Chemical Identification: Definitive GC-MS analysis of the "spray" is needed. Is it pure formic acid? Or does it contain a specific "anti-queen" pheromone mimic?

2. Range of Behavior: Does this occur in other Lasius species? Lasius fuliginosus?

3. Host Counter-Adaptations: Have L. flavus populations evolved better discrimination to detect these chemical impostors before they reach the queen? (e.g., stricter entry requirements).

8. Detailed Comparative Analysis of Parasitic Strategies

To fully appreciate the novelty of the Lasius strategy, it is useful to compare it with other known ant usurpers.

Strategy Type	Species Example	Mechanism	Role of Host Workers
Direct Combat	Lasius niger (pleometrosis)	Physical fighting, stinging.	Bystanders or join the winner.
Throttling	Bothriomyrmex decapitans	Cuts off host queen's head.	Passive; ignore parasite on queen's back.
Chemical Mimicry	Polyergus breviceps	Kills queen, acquires scent.	Accept parasite after queen death.
Induced Matricide	Lasius orientalis	Sprays host queen; workers kill her.	Active executioners.
Inquilinism	Teleutomyrmex	Rides on host queen; no killing.	Care for parasite and host queen.

The Lasius orientalis/umbratus strategy stands out because it active weaponizes the host workforce during the assassination phase, not just the post-assassination phase.

9. Conclusion

The discovery of induced matricide in Lasius orientalis and Lasius umbratus represents a significant addition to our understanding of social parasitism. It reveals a level of behavioral and chemical sophistication where the parasite effectively "hacks" the social immunity of the host colony. By triggering the host workers to execute their own mother, the parasitic queen minimizes her own risk and exploits the rigid, chemically-driven stimulus-response nature of ant aggression.

This research, bridging the gap between citizen science observation and rigorous academic inquiry, underscores the complexity of the chemical language that governs the insect world. It serves as a stark reminder that in the evolutionary arms race, even the strongest bonds—those between a mother and her daughters—can be dissolved by a single, well-placed drop of poison.

Works cited

1. The Ants Chapter 12 - AntWiki, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.antwiki.org/wiki/The_Ants_Chapter_12

2. Socially parasitic ant queens chemically induce queen-matricide in host workers - DOI, accessed November 25, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2025.09.037

3. Queen execution in a monogynous ant - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed November 25, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7882922/

4. Social Parasitism - AntWiki, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.antwiki.org/wiki/Social_Parasitism

5. accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.zmescience.com/science/parasitic-queens-trick-ant-daughters-into-murdering-their-own-mothers/#:~:text=The%20villains%20are%20the%20queens,to%20replace%20the%20sitting%20queen.

6. These Parasitic Ant Queens Found a Sneaky Way to Stage a Coup: Trick a Colony Into Killing its Mother, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/these-parasitic-ant-queens-found-a-sneaky-way-to-stage-a-coup-trick-a-colony-into-killing-its-mother-180987707/

7. Socially parasitic ant queens chemically induce queen-matricide in host workers - PubMed, accessed November 25, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41253115/?utm_source=FeedFetcher&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=None&utm_content=0MPwOl0fe2ynd4BYPbLe7SwdidnLGPwmzTUk8-541oI&fc=None&ff=20251123105049&v=2.18.0.post22+67771e2

8. Parasitic ant tricks workers into killing their queen, then takes the throne | EurekAlert!, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1104837

9. Lasius orientalis - AntWiki, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.antwiki.org/wiki/Lasius_orientalis

10. 1 Phylogeny, evolution, and classification of the ant genus Lasius, the tribe Lasiini, and the 2 subfamily Formicinae (Hy - ResearchGate, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353275120_Phylogeny_evolution_and_classification_of_the_ant_genus_Lasius_the_tribe_Lasiini_and_the_subfamily_Formicinae_Hymenoptera_Formicidae/fulltext/60f0fa9116f9f313008769df/Phylogeny-evolution-and-classification-of-the-ant-genus-Lasius-the-tribe-Lasiini-and-the-subfamily-Formicinae-Hymenoptera-Formicidae.pdf

11. The Evolution of the Alarm-Defense System in the Formicine Ants - The University of Chicago Press: Journals, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/282724

12. Phylogeny of Lasius ants based on mitochondrial DNA and morphology, and the evolution of social parasitism in the Lasiini (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) | Request PDF - ResearchGate, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/8197405_Phylogeny_of_Lasius_ants_based_on_mitochondrial_DNA_and_morphology_and_the_evolution_of_social_parasitism_in_the_Lasiini_Hymenoptera_Formicidae

13. Parasitic matricide, ants chemically compel host workers to kill their ..., accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.kyushu-u.ac.jp/en/researches/view/360/

14. Lasius umbratus - Wikipedia, accessed November 25, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lasius_umbratus

15. Lasius umbratus - NatureServe Explorer, accessed November 25, 2025, https://explorer.natureserve.org/Taxon/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.820324/Lasius_umbratus

16. Lasius umbratus - AntWiki, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.antwiki.org/wiki/Lasius_umbratus

17. Yellow meadow ant - Wikipedia, accessed November 25, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellow_meadow_ant

18. Parasitic Queens Trick Ant Daughters into Murdering Their Own Mothers - ZME Science, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.zmescience.com/science/parasitic-queens-trick-ant-daughters-into-murdering-their-own-mothers/

19. Lasius japonicus - AntWiki, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.antwiki.org/wiki/Lasius_japonicus

20. The evolution of social parasitism in Formica ants revealed by a global phylogeny - NIH, accessed November 25, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8463886/

21. accessed November 25, 2025, https://myrmecologicalnews.org/cms/index.php?option=com_download&view=download&filename=volume11/mn11_173-181_printable.pdf&format=raw#:~:text=Chemical%20mimicry%20(in%20which%20the,systems%20(VANDER%20MEER%20%26%20al.

22. Chemical strategies to deal with ants: a review of mimicry, camouflage, propaganda, and phytomimesis by ants (Hymenoptera - Myrmecological News, accessed November 25, 2025, https://myrmecologicalnews.org/cms/index.php?option=com_download&view=download&filename=volume11/mn11_173-181_printable.pdf&format=raw

23. Parasitic Ant Queens Use Chemical Warfare To Incite Revolutions Against Reigning Queens - IFLScience, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.iflscience.com/parasitic-ant-queens-use-chemical-warfare-to-incite-revolutions-against-reigning-queens-81578

24. Meet the parasitic invader that tricks ants into killing their own queen - New Atlas, accessed November 25, 2025, https://newatlas.com/biology/parasite-ants-kill-queen/

25. Game of tiny thrones: Parasitic ants grab power by turning workers against their queen, accessed November 25, 2025, https://news.mongabay.com/short-article/2025/11/game-of-tiny-thrones-parasitic-ants-grab-power-by-turning-workers-against-their-queen/

26. Identification of Undecane as an Alarm Pheromone of the Ant Formica argentea | Request PDF - ResearchGate, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257590422_Identification_of_Undecane_as_an_Alarm_Pheromone_of_the_Ant_Formica_argentea

27. Parasitic Ants and Their Slaves - California Academy of Sciences, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.calacademy.org/explore-science/parasitic-ants-and-their-slaves

28. Chemically Insignificant Social Parasites Exhibit More Anti-Dehydration Behaviors than Their Hosts - PubMed Central, accessed November 25, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8624806/

29. Behavioral Responses to the Alarm Pheromone of the Ant Camponotus obscuripes (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) - BioOne Complete, accessed November 25, 2025, https://bioone.org/journalArticle/Download?urlId=10.2108%2Fzsj.23.353

30. Emery's rule - Wikipedia, accessed November 25, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emery%27s_rule

31. The Evolution of Social Parasitism in Insects, accessed November 25, 2025, https://cales.arizona.edu/classes/ento596c/topic/session5.html

32. 1 Phylogeny, evolution, and classification of the ant genus Lasius, the tribe Lasiini, and the 2 subfamily Formicinae (Hy - bioRxiv, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.07.14.452383.full.pdf

33. Social parasitism among ants: a review (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) - Alfred BUSCHINGER - Myrmecological News, accessed November 25, 2025, https://myrmecologicalnews.org/cms/index.php?option=com_download&view=download&filename=volume12/mn12_219-235_printable.pdf&format=raw

34. The Effect of Social Parasitism by Polyergus breviceps on the Nestmate Recognition System of Its Host, Formica altipetens | PLOS One - Research journals, accessed November 25, 2025, https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0147498

35. Polyergus breviceps - Wikipedia, accessed November 25, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyergus_breviceps