The Northern Cradle: Re-evaluating the Birthplace of Modern Hominins

1. Introduction: The "Muddle in the Middle" and the African Renaissance

The narrative of human evolution has, for over a century, been a story under constant revision. It is a mosaic of evidence where each new discovery does not merely add a piece to the puzzle but often forces a reconfiguration of the entire picture. As of January 2026, the scientific community stands at the precipice of such a reconfiguration. The announcement of new hominin fossils from the Thomas Quarry I site in Casablanca, Morocco, published in the journal Nature, has fundamentally altered our understanding of the Middle Pleistocene in Africa.¹ This period, stretching roughly from 780,000 to 125,000 years ago, has colloquially been termed the "muddle in the middle" by paleoanthropologists due to the scarcity of well-dated fossils and the bewildering diversity of hominin forms that existed during this time. It was the crucible in which the archaic lineages of Homo erectus were forged into the derived species of Homo sapiens and Homo neanderthalensis, yet the specific mechanisms and locations of these transformations have remained obscured by the fog of deep time.

For decades, the "East Side Story"—a hypothesis favoring the East African Rift Valley as the exclusive engine of human evolution—dominated academic discourse. Sites like Olduvai Gorge and the Omo Valley provided such a density of finds that other regions, particularly North Africa, were often relegated to the periphery, viewed as cul-de-sacs where archaic populations lingered before extinction. The discovery of the Jebel Irhoud fossils in 2017, dated to 315,000 years ago, delivered the first major shock to this system, suggesting that the roots of our species were far deeper and more widespread than previously believed.³ However, Jebel Irhoud left a critical question unanswered: Who were the ancestors of these early Homo sapiens? Where did the population that gave rise to them come from?

The newly described fossils from Thomas Quarry I, dated with exceptional precision to 773,000 years ago, provide the long-sought answer.¹ They represent a population standing at the very base of the lineage that would eventually lead to modern humans. These are not Homo sapiens, nor are they Homo erectus in the classical sense. They are a "mosaic" form, possessing a blend of archaic robustness and derived dental features that position them as a sister group to the European Homo antecessor and a likely ancestor to the later populations of the Maghreb.⁶ This report aims to provide an exhaustive analysis of these findings, dissecting the geological context, anatomical morphology, and archaeological significance of the Thomas Quarry hominins. By doing so, we will demonstrate how the center of gravity in human origins research is shifting, revealing a Pan-African evolutionary process where the green savannas of the North were as vital as the rift valleys of the East.

2. The Geological Archive: The Casablanca Sequence

To understand the significance of a fossil, one must first understand the ground that held it. The preservation of biological remains from the Middle Pleistocene is a rare geological accident, dependent on a conspiracy of favorable conditions. The Atlantic coast of Morocco, specifically the Rabat-Casablanca littoral, stands as a unique "Pleistocene treasure house" because it offered exactly such conditions for over a million years.⁸

2.1 The Staircase of Time

The geology of the Casablanca region is defined by the rhythmic pulse of the Earth's climate. Throughout the Quaternary period, the globe oscillated between glacial periods (Ice Ages) and interglacial periods (warm phases). These cycles, driven by variations in the Earth's orbit known as Milankovitch cycles, caused global sea levels to rise and fall dramatically.

During interglacial periods, when polar ice sheets melted, the Atlantic Ocean rose, carving cliffs and caves into the limestone bedrock of the Moroccan coast. These high-stands of the sea left behind marine deposits—beaches, shells, and sands. Conversely, during glacial periods, the sea retreated, exposing the continental shelf. The prevailing winds picked up the exposed marine sands and blew them inland, forming vast dune systems. Over time, calcium carbonate in the sand acted as a cement, lithifying these dunes into a rock known as eolianite or calcarenite.⁸

This process created a "staircase" of geological formations. As the land slowly uplifted over millions of years, the older beaches and dunes were raised higher and further inland, while newer ones formed below them. This resulted in a predictable, layered sequence where each "step" represents a specific window of time. The Oulad Hamida Formation, which hosts Thomas Quarry I, is one such step, preserving a high-resolution archive of the Early to Middle Pleistocene transition.⁸

2.2 The Grotte à Hominidés

Thomas Quarry I is not a single find-spot but a complex of archaeological localities. The specific site of the recent discovery is known as the Grotte à Hominidés (Hominid Cave).¹ This feature began its life as a sea cave, carved out by the waves during a marine high-stand. As the sea level dropped, the cave was left high and dry. It then began to fill with continental sediments—sands blown in by the wind, clays washed in by rain, and blocks of rock falling from the ceiling.

It was within these infilling sediments that the hominin fossils were entombed. The cave environment provided shelter not only for the hominins and animals that used it but also for their bones after death. Protected from the harsh weathering of the open sun and wind, and rapidly encased in the cementing sands, the fossils were preserved in exceptional detail. The stratigraphy—the layering of these sediments—remained undisturbed, providing what geologists call a "secure context." This security is paramount; it ensures that the objects found together were indeed deposited together, allowing researchers to reconstruct the specific moment in time when these individuals lived.¹

2.3 Chronometric Precision: The Magnetostratigraphic Anchor

In paleoanthropology, a fossil without a date is merely a curiosity. To anchor the Thomas Quarry fossils in the timeline of human evolution, the research team employed magnetostratigraphy, a technique that reads the magnetic history of the Earth recorded in rock.¹

The Earth acts as a giant dipole magnet, generating a magnetic field that shields us from solar radiation. However, this field is not static. At irregular intervals, the polarity of the field reverses—Magnetic North becomes Magnetic South, and vice versa. These reversals are global events that happen simultaneously everywhere on Earth. When sedimentary rocks form, magnetic minerals (like magnetite) align themselves with the prevailing magnetic field, like tiny compass needles frozen in stone.

By analyzing the magnetic orientation of the sediments in the Grotte à Hominidés, the researchers identified a specific, globally recognized event: the Matuyama-Brunhes Boundary (MBB).¹

• The Matuyama Chron: A long period of "reversed" polarity that lasted from approximately 2.58 million years ago until 773,000 years ago.

• The Brunhes Chron: The current period of "normal" polarity, which began 773,000 years ago and continues to the present day.

The fossil-bearing layer at Thomas Quarry I captured the precise moment of this transition. The sediments at the bottom of the sequence showed reversed polarity (Matuyama), while the layers immediately above showed normal polarity (Brunhes). The fossils were situated right at this boundary. Since the date of the MBB is well-established by radiometric dating of volcanic rocks elsewhere in the world, this allowed the Moroccan team to assign an age of 773,000 ± 4,000 years to the hominins.¹

This margin of error—plus or minus 4,000 years—is extraordinarily precise for a site of this antiquity. In a field where dates often come with uncertainties of tens of thousands of years, this is akin to knowing the exact year of a historical event. It allows the Thomas Quarry hominins to be pinpointed to a specific climatic and evolutionary moment, facilitating direct comparisons with other sites like Gran Dolina in Spain (dated to roughly the same interval).¹¹

3. The History of Discovery: A Legacy of Persistence

The revelation of the Thomas Quarry I fossils in 2026 is the culmination of a scientific odyssey spanning more than half a century. It is a testament to the importance of long-term, systematic fieldwork over the "parachute science" of quick expeditions.

3.1 The 1969 Mandible

The story begins in 1969, a time when the fossil record of North Africa was largely a blank slate. Philippe Beriro, an amateur collector exploring the quartzite quarries south of Casablanca, stumbled upon a partial human mandible embedded in the sandstone.² This fossil, later cataloged as the first Thomas Quarry mandible, was clearly ancient. It possessed the robust architecture and large teeth characteristic of archaic humans. However, at the time, the geological context was poorly understood. Was it Homo erectus? Was it something else? Without a firm date or a clear stratigraphic association, the mandible remained an enigma—a tantalizing hint of what might lie hidden in the Moroccan coast.

3.2 The Franco-Moroccan Program

In the late 1970s and 1980s, the investigation of the Casablanca quarries was professionalized under the auspices of the Franco-Moroccan Program "Préhistoire de Casablanca". This international collaboration, led by researchers such as Jean-Paul Raynal and Abderrahim Mohib, brought a multidisciplinary approach to the region.¹ They did not just look for bones; they sought to reconstruct the entire Pleistocene world.

The team systematically mapped the stratigraphy of the quarries, identifying the distinct formations (like Oulad Hamida) and correlating them with global sea-level curves. They excavated not just for hominins, but for the stone tools and animal bones that would provide context. It was during these renewed excavations in the 1990s and 2000s that the true potential of the Grotte à Hominidés was realized.

3.3 The 2008-2009 Discoveries

The fossils described in the 2026 Nature paper were primarily recovered during excavations in 2008 and 2009.⁹ This lag between discovery and publication highlights the painstaking nature of modern paleoanthropology. Extracting fossils from cemented calcarenite (rock as hard as concrete) requires surgical precision to avoid damage. Once extracted, the fossils must be cleaned, reconstructed, and analyzed.

Simultaneously, the geological samples for dating must be processed, a task that involves measuring the magnetic orientation of hundreds of rock cubes. The delay was also due to the rigorous comparative analysis required. The researchers had to compare the digital scans of these bones with virtually every other known Pleistocene hominin fossil to determine exactly where they fit in the family tree. The result of this decades-long labor is the comprehensive study now before us—a study that fills a massive gap in the African fossil record.

4. Anatomical Morphology: The Mosaic of the Maghreb

The central question posed by the Thomas Quarry I discovery is biological: What did these ancient North Africans look like? The analysis, led by Jean-Jacques Hublin of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, reveals a population defined by a "mosaic" of features. In evolutionary biology, a mosaic form is one that retains some ancestral (primitive) traits while simultaneously evolving new (derived) traits in other parts of the body. The Thomas Quarry hominins are a textbook example of this phenomenon.¹

4.1 The Mandibles: Echoes of Erectus

The collection includes several key specimens, most notably the adult mandibles ThI-GH-1 (the original find) and ThI-GH-10717, as well as a juvenile mandible ThI-GH-10978.¹¹

The overall architecture of these jawbones is robust. They are thick and heavily built, designed to withstand significant biomechanical forces during chewing. Crucially, they lack a mental eminence, or chin.⁹ The presence of a projecting chin is the defining autapomorphy (unique derived trait) of Homo sapiens. Its absence in the Thomas Quarry fossils is a clear indicator that, despite their proximity to the modern human lineage, they were not yet "us." In this respect, they recall the morphology of Homo erectus, the long-lived species that had dominated Africa and Asia for the preceding million years.

However, closer inspection reveals subtle shifts. The shape of the dental arcade—the curve formed by the row of teeth—is parabolic, a shape more characteristic of later Homo than the sub-rectangular or U-shaped arcades of earlier hominins. This suggests that the reshaping of the face, a trend that would continue in Homo sapiens, had already begun.

4.2 The Dentition: The Modern Signal

If the jaws look back to the past, the teeth look forward to the future. Dental morphology is often considered the "black box" of paleoanthropology because teeth are genetically conservative; their shape is tightly controlled by genes and less influenced by the environment than bone.

The researchers used micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) to peer inside the teeth of the Thomas Quarry specimens.² This technology allows for the visualization of the Enamel-Dentine Junction (EDJ), the boundary between the hard outer enamel and the softer inner dentine. The shape of the EDJ is established early in tooth development and is preserved even when the outer enamel is worn away by a lifetime of chewing.

The analysis of the EDJ revealed a stunning result: the teeth of the Thomas Quarry hominins are surprisingly modern.

• Derived Features: They possess derived traits in crown shape and cusp pattern that are shared with Homo sapiens and Neanderthals, distinguishing them from the more primitive teeth of Homo erectus.⁶

• Absence of Neanderthal Traits: Crucially, the teeth lack the specific derived features that characterize the Neanderthal lineage, such as taurodontism (enlarged pulp chambers) or the mid-trigonid crest on the molars.²

This specific combination—modern-like affinities without the specialized Neanderthal traits—is the "smoking gun" that positions these fossils at the base of the modern human lineage. It suggests that the common ancestor of humans and Neanderthals had a dentition that was more "generalized" or modern-like, and that Neanderthals subsequently evolved their unique dental quirks after splitting away.

4.3 Post-Cranial Remains: The Archaic Body

The recovery of post-cranial remains—bones from the body rather than the head—is relatively rare in cave deposits of this age. The Thomas Quarry site yielded eight vertebrae (six cervical and two thoracic) associated with the mandible ThI-GH-10717.¹¹

These vertebrae tell a different story than the teeth. They are described as "small in size" and morphologically more similar to Homo erectus than to recent humans.¹¹ This suggests that while the dentition and perhaps the brain case were beginning to evolve toward the modern condition, the post-cranial skeleton remained conservative. The body plan of Homo erectus, evolved for efficient bipedalism and endurance in the savanna, was evidently still highly successful and had not yet undergone the gracilization (slimming down) that would characterize later Homo sapiens. This disparity between the rate of evolution in the teeth versus the spine is a classic example of mosaic evolution—different parts of the organism evolving at different speeds.

4.4 Table 1: Anatomical Comparison of Middle Pleistocene Hominins

The following table summarizes the key morphological traits of the Thomas Quarry hominins in comparison to their contemporaries and successors.

Trait	Thomas Quarry I (773 ka)	Homo antecessor (800 ka)	Homo erectus (1 Ma)	Homo sapiens (Jebel Irhoud, 315 ka)
Mandible Robustness	High (Robust)	Moderate to High	Very High (Very Robust)	Moderate
Mental Eminence (Chin)	Absent	Absent	Absent	Incipient / Variable
Dental Arcade Shape	Parabolic (Derived)	Parabolic	U-Shaped / Sub-rectangular	Parabolic
Molar Taurodontism	Absent	Absent	Absent	Absent
Mid-trigonid Crest	Absent	Variable / Incipient	Absent	Absent
Vertebral Morphology	Erectus-like (Small)	Modern-like	Robust / Archaic	Gracile / Modern
Canine Fossa	Unknown (Face missing)	Present (Modern-like)	Absent	Present

5. The Archaeological Context: Masters of the Acheulean

The Thomas Quarry hominins were not merely passive inhabitants of their environment; they were active shapers of it. The site is associated with one of the longest and richest archaeological sequences in North Africa, documenting the Acheulean technocomplex.¹²

5.1 The Acheulean Tradition

The Acheulean is the signature technology of the Lower Paleolithic, characterized by the production of Large Cutting Tools (LCTs) such as handaxes and cleavers. These tools represent a significant cognitive leap over the earlier Oldowan pebble tools. To make a symmetrical handaxe, the knapper must possess a "mental template"—a preconceived notion of what the tool should look like—and the motor skills to impose that shape on a raw block of stone.

In Morocco, the Acheulean appears remarkably early. Excavations in the lower units of Thomas Quarry I (Unit L1) have yielded Acheulean tools dated to 1.3 million years ago.¹⁵ These early tools were made primarily from quartzite, a hard and difficult-to-work material abundantly available in the region. The knappers utilized large cobbles to strike off massive flakes, which were then bifacially worked (flaked on both sides) to create sharp, durable edges.

5.2 The Industry of the Grotte à Hominidés

By the time of the hominin occupation at 773,000 years ago, this technological tradition was well-established. The tools associated with the fossils include refined handaxes and a variety of flake tools. The persistence of the Acheulean for over half a million years at the same site suggests a remarkable cultural stability. These populations had developed a toolkit that was perfectly adapted to their environment, allowing them to process a wide range of resources.

The presence of cleavers—large, axe-like tools with a transverse cutting edge—is particularly notable.¹⁶ Cleavers are often associated with the processing of large animal carcasses, serving as heavy-duty butchers' knives for disarticulating limbs and stripping meat. Their abundance at North African sites links the region technologically to East Africa, where cleavers are also common, distinguishing the African Acheulean from the European Acheulean where cleavers are rarer.

5.3 Cognitive Implications

The complexity of the lithic reduction sequences found at Thomas Quarry implies a high degree of planning and foresight. The "techno-economic" analysis of the tools reveals that the hominins were selecting specific raw materials for specific tasks and managing their resources efficiently.¹⁵ They were not simply banging rocks together; they were engaging in a sophisticated interaction with the physical properties of their world. This technological competence aligns with the anatomical evidence for brain evolution, suggesting that the Thomas Quarry hominins possessed the cognitive flexibility necessary to survive in a changing landscape.

6. Paleoecology: Life in the Green Sahara

To fully appreciate the significance of the Thomas Quarry hominins, we must reconstruct the world they inhabited. Today, the Sahara Desert acts as a formidable barrier separating North Africa from the rest of the continent. However, this was not always the case.

6.1 The Mechanism of Connectivity

During the Early and Middle Pleistocene, the climate of North Africa was dictated by the strength of the West African Monsoon. During "Green Sahara" intervals, increased insolation (solar energy) drove the monsoon northward, bringing heavy rains to the desert.¹ The arid sands were transformed into a network of rivers, lakes, and grasslands. These "humid phases" opened ecological corridors across the Sahara, allowing for the free movement of flora and fauna between the Maghreb and Sub-Saharan Africa.

The Thomas Quarry site, located on the Atlantic littoral, would have been a prime beneficiary of these climatic upticks. The region was a mosaic of open savannas, coastal dunes, and riparian woodlands, supported by a mild, oceanic climate.

6.2 The Faunal Assemblage

The animal bones found alongside the hominins in the Grotte à Hominidés provide a vivid snapshot of this ecosystem. The fauna is remarkably diverse, including:

• Megaherbivores: Elephants (Elephas), hippopotamuses, and rhinoceroses. The presence of hippos is a definitive indicator of permanent surface water nearby.¹⁷

• Ungulates: Vast herds of gazelles, antelopes, and equids (horses/zebras). These animals are grazers, signaling the presence of extensive grasslands.⁵

• Primates: The site contains fossils of Theropithecus oswaldi, a giant extinct species of gelada baboon.⁵ This primate is a key biogeographic marker. Theropithecus is a grass-eating baboon that evolved in East Africa. Its presence in Casablanca is irrefutable proof of the connection between the two regions. If the baboons could cross the Sahara, so could the hominins.

• Carnivores: The caves were also home to formidable predators, including hyenas, bears, and large felids (big cats).⁵

6.3 The Hominin-Carnivore Interface

The relationship between the hominins and these carnivores was not peaceful. One of the most chilling finds from the Thomas Quarry cave is a human femoral diaphysis (thigh bone) that bears the distinct tooth marks of a large carnivore, likely a hyena.⁹

This bone provides the first direct evidence of carnivore consumption of human remains in a North African cave context. It is unclear whether the hyenas hunted the human or scavenged the body after death. However, it serves as a stark reminder that these early humans were not top predators in the modern sense. They were part of the food web, competing with hyenas and big cats for carcasses and caves. The Grotte à Hominidés likely served as a shelter for both groups at different times, or perhaps a trap where the unwary fell victim to the den's inhabitants.

7. Phylogenetic Implications: The Roots of the Tree

The primary scientific impact of the Thomas Quarry I study lies in its contribution to the phylogeny (family tree) of the genus Homo. Where exactly do these 773,000-year-old fossils fit in the complex web of human ancestry?

7.1 Basal to Homo sapiens

The authors of the study argue that the Thomas Quarry population represents a lineage that is "basal" to Homo sapiens.²⁰ In phylogenetic terms, this means they branch off near the root of the tree that eventually leads to modern humans.

Genomic studies of ancient DNA have estimated that the split between the modern human lineage and the Neanderthal/Denisovan lineage occurred between 550,000 and 765,000 years ago.¹³ The Thomas Quarry fossils, dated to roughly 773,000 years ago, sit right at the lower bound of this divergence window. Anatomically, they fit the profile of the "Last Common Ancestor" (LCA) of these groups—or a population very closely related to it. They possess the generalized derived features that would be retained by Homo sapiens, but they lack the specialized traits that would later define the Neanderthals.

7.2 The Homo antecessor Connection

For years, the European species Homo antecessor, found in Spain and dated to roughly 850,000 years ago, was proposed as a potential common ancestor. However, this hypothesis faced a geographical problem: if the ancestor was European, why did the main trunk of the human lineage (leading to us) evolve in Africa?

The Thomas Quarry discovery resolves this tension. It reveals that a population similar to Homo antecessor—but distinct and African—existed in Morocco at the same time. The researchers propose that the Thomas Quarry group is an "African sister population" to Homo antecessor.²

This supports a scenario where a widespread, ancestral population inhabited both sides of the Mediterranean (connected perhaps via the Levant or Gibraltar during low sea levels). The European branch became Homo antecessor (and possibly went extinct or contributed to Neanderthals), while the African branch (represented by Thomas Quarry) persisted, evolving over the next 400,000 years into the archaic Homo sapiens found at Jebel Irhoud.

7.3 The Pan-African Model of Evolution

The Thomas Quarry findings are the final nail in the coffin of the simple, linear "Garden of Eden" model of human origins. Instead, they support a Pan-African model.¹¹

In this view, human evolution was not restricted to a single "cradle" in East Africa. Instead, the entire continent served as a cradle. Hominin populations were dispersed across Africa—in the North, East, South, and likely the West. These populations were separated by environmental barriers (like the Sahara or the Congo Rainforest) during dry periods, leading to local diversification (allopatric speciation). When the climate improved, these barriers dissolved, and the populations expanded and mixed, exchanging genes and innovations.

The Thomas Quarry fossils show that North Africa was a vibrant, populated hub in this network, not a peripheral dead-end. The population there was large enough, stable enough, and genetically diverse enough to be a key player in the emergence of our species. The "modern" traits we see in the Jebel Irhoud fossils at 315,000 years ago did not appear out of nowhere; they were the result of a long, deep process of evolution that we can now trace back to the 773,000-year-old inhabitants of Casablanca.

8. Conclusion: A New Horizon

The publication of the Thomas Quarry I research in January 2026 marks a pivotal moment in our quest to understand ourselves. By filling the chronological gap between the early Homo erectus and the first Homo sapiens, these fossils allow us to see the transition in motion. We see it in the changing shape of the teeth, in the persistence of the Acheulean tools, and in the enduring struggle for survival on the Pleistocene savanna.

The "muddle in the middle" is clearing. What emerges is not a single line of ancestors marching towards modernity, but a rich, braided stream of populations spanning a continent. The Thomas Quarry hominins were our distant grandfathers and grandmothers, living at the edge of the known world, unaware that the genetic legacy they carried would one day give rise to a species capable of reconstructing their story from the stones they left behind. As we gaze upon the mandible ThI-GH-1, we look into the deep mirror of time and see, for the first time clearly, the face of the generation that stood at the crossroads of humanity.

9. Appendix: Summary of Data

Table 2: Chronology of Key North African Hominin Sites

Site	Location	Age	Key Specimen	Significance
Ain Hanech	Algeria	~1.8 Ma	Stone Tools (Oldowan)	Earliest evidence of hominin presence in North Africa.
Thomas Quarry I (Unit L1)	Morocco	1.3 Ma	Stone Tools (Acheulean)	Earliest Acheulean technology in the Maghreb.
Tighennif (Ternifine)	Algeria	~1.0 Ma	Mandibles (H. erectus)	Classic North African Homo erectus (formerly Atlanthropus).
Thomas Quarry I (GH)	Morocco	773 ka	Mandibles, Teeth	Basal to H. sapiens; African sister to H. antecessor.
Salé	Morocco	~400 ka	Cranium	Archaic human with some pathological deformities.
Jebel Irhoud	Morocco	315 ka	Crania, Mandibles	Earliest known Homo sapiens.

This report synthesizes the latest findings as of January 2026, integrating geological, biological, and archaeological data to present a comprehensive overview of the Thomas Quarry I discovery. The integration of high-resolution dating with detailed morphological analysis provides a robust framework for understanding the origins of our species in a Pan-African context.

Works cited

1. Early hominins from Thomas Quarry I (Morocco) reveal an African ..., accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.mpg.de/25951868/0105-evan-early-hominins-from-thomas-quarry-i-morocco-150495-x

2. Human Ancestors in Morocco Reveal an African Lineage Near the Root of Modern Humans, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.nyu.edu/about/news-publications/news/2026/january/human-ancestors-in-morocco-reveal-an-african-lineage-near-the-ro.html

3. Jebel Irhoud - Wikipedia, accessed January 8, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jebel_Irhoud

4. 315,000-Year-Old Fossils From Morocco Could Be Earliest Recorded Homo Sapiens, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.ksmu.org/2017-06-07/315-000-year-old-fossils-from-morocco-could-be-earliest-recorded-homo-sapiens

5. This ancient human may be the root of the Homo sapiens family tree | National Geographic, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/ancient-human-origins-fossils-morocco

6. "What We Have Is A Very Good Candidate": Has The Ancestor Of Homo Sapiens Finally Been Found In Africa?, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.iflscience.com/what-we-have-is-a-very-good-candidate-has-the-ancestor-of-homo-sapiens-finally-been-found-in-africa-82127

7. Remains of hominids dating back 770,000 years found in Morocco reveal an African lineage prior to Homo sapiens, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.atalayar.com/en/articulo/society/remains-of-hominids-dating-back-770000-years-found-in-morocco-reveal-an-african-lineage-prior-to-homo-sapiens/20260107224941222075.html

8. Early hominins from Morocco reveal an African lineage near the root of Homo sapiens, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.mpg.de/25951868/0105-evan-early-hominins-from-thomas-quarry-i-morocco-150495-x?c=2249

9. Fossils unearthed in Morocco are first from little-understood period of human evolution, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.newspressnow.com/cnn/2026/01/07/fossils-unearthed-in-morocco-are-first-from-little-understood-period-of-human-evolution/

10. Geomagnetic polarity epochs: A new polarity event and the age of the Brunhes-Matuyama boundary | U.S. Geological Survey - USGS.gov, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.usgs.gov/publications/geomagnetic-polarity-epochs-a-new-polarity-event-and-age-brunhes-matuyama-boundary

11. Ancient Moroccan Fossils Reveal Early Human Lineage from 773,000 Years Ago, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.moroccoworldnews.com/2026/01/274280/ancient-moroccan-fossils-reveal-early-human-lineage-from-773000-years-ago/

12. Morocco team hails stone age tool site dating back 1.3m years - The Guardian, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jul/28/morocco-team-hails-stone-age-tool-site-dating-back-13m-years

13. Fossils found in Morocco that could belong to a close ancestor of 'Homo sapiens', accessed January 8, 2026, https://en.ara.cat/culture/fossils-found-in-morocco-that-could-belong-to-close-ancestor-of-homo-sapiens_1_5611371.html

14. 773000-Year-Old Fossils Capture a Moment Before Human Lineages Split, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.discovermagazine.com/773-000-year-old-fossils-capture-a-moment-before-human-lineages-split-48511

15. Early North African Acheulean techno-economic systems at Thomas Quarry I - L1 (Casablanca, Morocco) - PubMed, accessed January 8, 2026, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36587282/

16. Acheulean Cleaver - Museum of Stone Tools, accessed January 8, 2026, https://stonetoolsmuseum.com/artefact/africa/cleaver/1137/

17. Mammalian faunas from the Pliocene and Pleistocene of Casablanca (Morocco) - ResearchGate, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jean-Paul-Raynal-2/publication/273316202_Mammalian_faunas_from_the_Pliocene_and_Pleistocene_of_Casablanca_Morocco/links/54fdaf2e0cf20700c5ec0add/Mammalian-faunas-from-the-Pliocene-and-Pleistocene-of-Casablanca-Morocco.pdf

18. Pleistocene Hominins as a Resource for Carnivores: A c. 500,000-Year-Old Human Femur Bearing Tooth-Marks in North Africa (Thomas Quarry I, Morocco) | PLOS One, accessed January 8, 2026, https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0152284

19. Pleistocene Hominins as a Resource for Carnivores: A c. 500000-Year-Old Human Femur Bearing Tooth-Marks in North Africa (Thomas Quarry I, Morocco) - PubMed Central, accessed January 8, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4847923/

20. 773,000-Year-Old Hominin Fossils from Morocco Offer New Clues to Roots of Homo sapiens, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.sci.news/archaeology/hominin-fossils-morocco-14468.html

21. Paleontology: Moroccan hominin fossils shed light on the emergence of modern humans (Nature), accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.natureasia.com/en/info/press-releases/detail/9199

22. Discovery in Morocco Points to Oldest Homo Sapiens Fossils - NYU, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.nyu.edu/about/news-publications/news/2017/june/discovery-in-morocco-points-to-oldest-homo-sapiens-fossils-.html