The Science of Immersion: Blending Paleontology and VFX in Prehistoric Planet
- Bryan White
- 5 days ago
- 17 min read

Part I: The Genesis of the Virtual Window
1.1 Introduction: The Intersection of Media and Deep Time
The visualization of prehistoric life has historically occupied a contentious space between scientific illustration and entertainment. Since the early 20th-century murals of Charles R. Knight, which defined the "sluggish lizard" paradigm, to the "Interim Renaissance" of the 1980s spearheaded by Gregory S. Paul and Robert Bakker, our visual lexicon of the Mesozoic has been in a constant state of flux. However, the broadcast of Prehistoric Planet on Apple TV+ represents a distinct epistemological break from previous forms of paleo-media. It is not merely a documentary; it is a simulation. By synthesizing the "Nature First" narrative philosophy of the BBC Natural History Unit (NHU) with the photorealistic virtual production pipelines developed by Moving Picture Company (MPC) and later Framestore, the series attempts to collapse the 66-million-year temporal divide, presenting the Maastrichtian stage of the Late Cretaceous not as a mythical "land before time," but as a tangible, observable ecosystem.1
This report provides an exhaustive analysis of the Prehistoric Planet phenomenon, spanning its initial two seasons focused on non-avian dinosaurs and its third iteration, Prehistoric Planet: Ice Age, which pivots to the mammalian megafauna of the Pleistocene. We will dissect the scientific justifications for its most controversial speculative behaviors, the industrial shifts that necessitated a change in visual effects vendors, and the impact of replacing Sir David Attenborough with Tom Hiddleston as the voice of prehistory.4 Through this lens, we examine how Prehistoric Planet serves as both a triumph of science communication and a case study in the limitations of speculative biology.
1.2 The Legacy of Walking with Dinosaurs and the Evolution of the Genre
To fully appreciate the technical achievement of Prehistoric Planet, one must situate it within the genealogy of the "CGI documentary." In 1999, the BBC broadcast Walking with Dinosaurs, a series that fundamentally altered the public's perception of extinct animals. Utilizing animatronics and early computer-generated imagery (CGI), it stripped away the talking-head interviews typical of the genre and replaced them with the immersive narration of Kenneth Branagh. It treated dinosaurs as animals, not monsters. However, Walking with Dinosaurs was constrained by the computational limits of the late 1990s and a scientific framework that was just beginning to accept the ubiquity of feathers in coelurosaurian theropods.6
Prehistoric Planet acts as a spiritual successor but diverges in its execution. Executive Producer Mike Gunton, a veteran of the BBC NHU, collaborated with filmmaker Jon Favreau to apply the "virtual cinematography" techniques pioneered in the 2019 remake of The Lion King.1 This partnership bridged the gap between Hollywood blockbuster visuals and academic rigor. Unlike its predecessor, which often relied on dramatic, anthropomorphized storylines, Prehistoric Planet adheres strictly to the pacing and visual language of "blue chip" nature documentaries like Planet Earth. The animals are not characters in a drama; they are subjects of an observational study.2
1.3 The Philosophy of "Virtual Cinematography"
The defining aesthetic of Prehistoric Planet is its commitment to the imperfections of physical photography. In traditional CGI animation, the camera is a virtual entity free from physical constraints—it can swoop through the eye of a needle or fly alongside a running raptor at impossible speeds. This "perfect" camera often subconsciously signals to the viewer that the image is artificial.
To counter this, directors Adam Valdez and Andy Jones utilized a methodology known as "virtual production".7 Using Virtual Reality (VR) headsets and physical camera rigs (sometimes merely iPads acting as viewfinders), the directors would "step into" the virtual Cretaceous environment. They would operate the virtual camera as if they were standing on the digital landscape, encountering the same limitations a human cameraman would face.
The "Dirty Lens" Aesthetic: The team deliberately introduced flaws such as focus hunting (where the camera briefly blurs while trying to find the subject), shaky handheld movements, and poor framing where an animal might move behind an obstruction.9
The Psychology of Belief: By mimicking the constraints of wildlife photography—using long telephoto lenses that compress the background and shallow depths of field—the production tricks the human brain into accepting the CGI animal as a physical object occupying real space. As Visual Effects Supervisor Elliot Newman noted, the goal was to create "the most authentic documentary-style aesthetic" by adhering to the physics of light and lenses.3
Part II: The Maastrichtian Stage – A Deep Dive into Seasons 1 and 2
The first two seasons of Prehistoric Planet are set specifically in the Maastrichtian, the final stage of the Late Cretaceous epoch, approximately 66 million years ago. This narrow temporal focus allows for a high density of species overlap and a coherent ecological narrative, avoiding the anachronisms that plagued earlier documentaries.
2.1 The Tyrant King: Tyrannosaurus rex and the Soft Tissue Revolution in Paleontology
The depiction of Tyrannosaurus rex in Prehistoric Planet serves as the series' manifesto on scientific accuracy. For decades, pop culture has been dominated by the Jurassic Park T. rex—a scaly, shrink-wrapped monster with exposed teeth and a vision based on movement. Prehistoric Planet systematically dismantles this image.
2.1.1 The "Hank" Model and Lip Coverage
The T. rex model, affectionately nicknamed "Hank" by the internet community and production team, features a significantly bulkier physique than traditional depictions.10
Soft Tissue Reconstruction: The animal is "fleshed out," meaning its skeleton is covered by realistic amounts of muscle and fat. This opposes the "shrink-wrapping" trend where skin is vacuum-sealed to the skull.11
Lips: One of the most striking design choices is the inclusion of lips (extra-oral tissues) that cover the teeth when the mouth is closed. Recent studies suggest that theropods, like modern lizards (e.g., Komodo dragons), had lips to protect their enamel from desiccation. This contrasts with the crocodile-like exposed teeth seen in most media.12
2.1.2 Aquatic Competence
Season 1, Episode 1 ("Coasts") opens with a sequence that shocked many viewers: a male T. rex swimming across an open seaway with his offspring.14
Biomechanical Feasibility: While counterintuitive, the ability of large theropods to swim is supported by fossil trackways that show claw marks on river bottoms where the animal was buoyant and punting off the substrate. The large, air-filled lungs of a theropod would have provided significant buoyancy, and the massive tail, powered by the caudofemoralis muscle group, would act as a powerful propulsive organ.14
Ecological Context: The sequence highlights the concept of "island hopping." The Late Cretaceous of North America was bisected by the Western Interior Seaway, and large predators likely swam between landmasses to find food or mates, similar to modern saltwater crocodiles or even jaguars.2
2.1.3 Social Sensitivity
The series also challenges the notion of the T. rex as a mindless killer through its depiction of courtship. In Season 2, we witness two tyrannosaurs engaging in "face rubbing."
The Trigeminal Nerve: This behavior is based on the discovery that the snout of tyrannosaurs was highly innervated, similar to the sensitive faces of crocodilians which possess Integumentary Sensory Organs (ISOs). This sensitivity would allow for precise tactile communication, turning the fearsome jaws into instruments of social bonding.16 However, some paleontologists criticized the show for omitting the facial scars and bite marks that are ubiquitous in adult tyrannosaur skulls, suggesting the show "sanitized" the violent reality of their intraspecific combat.16
2.2 Carnotaurus: The Dancing Demon
Perhaps no sequence in the entire series generated more discussion than the courtship display of the Carnotaurus in Season 1, Episode 5 ("Forests"). The South American abelisaur is depicted performing an elaborate dance, waving its tiny, vestigial arms to attract a mate.17
2.2.1 The Speculative Biology of Display
This sequence is a prime example of "All Yesterdays" speculative biology—the practice of inferring complex behaviors that do not fossilize but are plausible based on phylogenetic bracketing.
The Arms: Carnotaurus has famously reduced forelimbs, often mocked as useless. However, the shoulder joint (glenoid) is a ball-and-socket structure, implying a high degree of rotational mobility. Why retain a mobile joint in a useless limb? The show posits that the arms were repurposed as sexual display structures, flashed in rhythmic patterns.14
The Dance: The footwork is inspired by modern ground birds like the Manakin or the Lyrebird. While we have no fossilized dance steps, we do have "lek" traces—large scraped areas in Cretaceous rocks (e.g., from the Dakota Sandstone) that suggest theropods engaged in ground-scraping display behaviors.17
Coloration: The decision to color the arms a vivid blue is based on the ubiquity of color in modern archosaur displays (birds). Since dinosaurs are ancestral to birds and had excellent color vision, visual signaling was almost certainly a primary mode of communication.6
2.3 Mononykus and the Owl Analogy
In the "Deserts" episode, the series introduces Mononykus, a small, insectivorous alvarezsaurid with a single large claw on each hand. The depiction is heavily stylized to resemble a Barn Owl (Tyto alba).19
Integument and Behavior: The animal is covered in shaggy, filamentous feathers and possesses a facial disc. This design is inferred from the animal's large auditory bullae (ear regions in the skull), which suggest acute hearing. The show depicts Mononykus using this hearing to triangulate the movement of termites inside rotting wood, a direct behavioral parallel to owls hunting voles in snow or grass.21
The Single Claw: The robust single claw and powerful forelimb musculature are adaptations for digging. The show accurately depicts the animal using this claw to breach termite mounds, highlighting a niche partition where small theropods acted as the anteaters of the Cretaceous.19
2.4 The Marine Realm: Mosasaurus and Tuarangisaurus
The "Coasts" and "Oceans" episodes take viewers into the Western Interior Seaway and the Tethys Ocean, ecosystems dominated not by dinosaurs, but by marine reptiles.
2.4.1 The Barber Shop
A memorable sequence shows a massive Mosasaurus hoffmannii visiting a coral reef to be cleaned by small fish.
Ecological Analogue: This is a classic example of behavioral inference. Modern large marine predators, from sharks to manta rays, visit "cleaning stations" where smaller organisms remove parasites and dead skin. Given the parasite load inherent in marine environments, it is ecologically probable that mosasaurs utilized similar services.6
Skin Texture: The skin of the Mosasaurus is depicted as smooth and streamlined, consistent with recent fossil impressions showing micrometric scales similar to those of sharks or snakes, optimizing hydrodynamics.10
2.4.2 Tuarangisaurus and Gastroliths
The series also highlights plesiosaurs like Tuarangisaurus. A scene depicts these long-necked reptiles swallowing stones (gastroliths). While historically thought to be for ballast, the show narrates them as digestive aids to grind up food, a behavior seen in modern birds and crocodilians and supported by the presence of polished stones in the gut regions of plesiosaur fossils.10
Part III: The Industry Shift – The Fall of MPC and the Rise of Framestore
Between the production of Season 2 and Season 3, a significant disruption occurred in the visual effects industry that fundamentally altered the production of Prehistoric Planet.
3.1 The Collapse of Moving Picture Company (MPC)
The first two seasons were visually crafted by MPC, the studio responsible for the "photorealistic" The Lion King (2019). Their pipeline was specifically tailored to the "virtual cinematography" approach desired by Jon Favreau. However, following the release of Season 2, MPC and its parent company, Technicolor, faced severe financial instability.22 By 2025, reports confirmed the closure of MPC's Vancouver and Montreal studios and the restructuring of their London operations due to bankruptcy proceedings.22 This corporate collapse effectively dissolved the specific team and pipeline that had built the Cretaceous assets for the series.
3.2 Enter Framestore
For Prehistoric Planet: Ice Age (Season 3), the production turned to Framestore, another London-based VFX heavyweight.4 Framestore was an ideal successor, having a strong pedigree in creature animation (His Dark Materials, Paddington, Guardians of the Galaxy).
Pipeline Adaptation: While Framestore inherited the "Nature First" philosophy, they had to build new assets from scratch. The shift to the Ice Age meant moving away from scales and feathers to the complex simulation of fur.25
The Fur Challenge: Rendering realistic fur is computationally more expensive than reptilian skin. It involves millions of individual strands that must react to wind, moisture, and collision with other objects. Framestore developed new proprietary grooming tools to simulate the "clumping" of wet mammoth hair and the interaction of snow with the undercoat of saber-toothed cats.25
3.3 The Narration Transition
Concurrent with the change in VFX vendors was a change in voice. Sir David Attenborough, the narrator for the first two seasons, did not return for Ice Age. He was replaced by actor Tom Hiddleston.4
Contextualizing the Change: While Attenborough's absence was felt deeply by fans 5, Hiddleston's performance has been praised for its "gentle humor and charming cadence".26 This shift likely signals a necessary evolution for the franchise, ensuring its longevity as the original "voice of nature" approaches his centennial year.
Part IV: The Pleistocene Epoch – Prehistoric Planet: Ice Age (Season 3)
Released in late 2025, Prehistoric Planet: Ice Age moves the timeline forward by roughly 64 million years to the Pleistocene epoch. This season focuses on the "Megafauna"—the giant mammals that dominated the Earth during the cycles of glaciation.4
4.1 "The Big Freeze" and the Environmental Context
Unlike the controversial "Ice Worlds" episode of Season 1, which depicted a snowy Cretaceous that some critics felt was climatically unlikely 28, the Pleistocene setting of Season 3 is indisputably frozen. The show tracks the expansion of ice sheets and the survival strategies of animals adapted to the cold steppe-tundra.
4.1.1 Megalonyx jeffersonii: The Mountaineer
One of the season's breakout stars is Megalonyx jeffersonii, or Jefferson's Ground Sloth. Often depicted as a slow-moving lowland browser, Prehistoric Planet places it in a high-altitude, alpine environment.27
Behavioral Innovation: The show depicts the sloth as a rock climber, using its massive recurved claws and powerful forelimbs to scale cliffs in search of sparse vegetation.
Scientific Basis: Isotopic analysis of Megalonyx fossils has suggested a varied diet that included high-altitude plants. Furthermore, the biomechanics of their limbs indicate immense tensile strength, suitable for hauling their bulk up rough terrain, similar to how modern bears climb despite their size.29
4.2 Smilodon: The Sociality Controversy
The depiction of the saber-toothed cat Smilodon (specifically S. populator and S. fatalis) serves as the core scientific argument of Season 3.30
4.2.1 The Solitary vs. Social Debate
Traditional paleontology viewed Smilodon as a solitary ambush predator, analogous to a modern tiger or leopard. This was based on the general rule that sociality is rare in felids.
The Prehistoric Planet Stance: The series depicts Smilodon living in prides, exhibiting complex social behaviors such as grooming, cooperative hunting, and care for the injured.32
The Evidence from La Brea: The justification for this behavior comes from the La Brea Tar Pits. Paleontologists like Dr. Mairin Balisi have described Smilodon specimens with debilitating injuries—such as severe hip dysplasia or healed fractures—that would have rendered a solitary hunter unable to catch prey.31 The fact that these individuals survived for months or years after their injuries implies they were subsidized by a group; they were fed by conspecifics. This "Paleopathology" provides the strongest evidence for sociality in extinct carnivores.31
4.3 The Giants of the South: Arctotherium and Doedicurus
The season explores the South American diverse megafauna, highlighting the Great American Biotic Interchange (GABI).
4.3.1 Arctotherium angustidens
The series introduces Arctotherium angustidens, the South American short-faced bear, as the largest ursid in history.34
Size Representation: Depicted standing 14 feet tall and weighing 4,000 lbs, the bear is shown as a kleptoparasite, using its sheer size to intimidate a pack of Smilodon off a kill. This aligns with the "short-faced" morphology, which emphasizes long limbs for efficient, terrifyingly fast movement over open ground, rather than the stocky build of cave bears.36
4.3.2 Doedicurus and the Club Tail
The glyptodont Doedicurus—a car-sized relative of armadillos—is featured using its spiked tail club for defense.
Defensive Posturing: In a scene reminiscent of ankylosaurs, the Doedicurus is shown standing on its hind legs to pivot and swing its tail at a predator.37 This behavior is inferred from the stress fractures found on fossilized tail clubs, which indicate they were used for delivering massive blunt-force trauma, likely in intraspecific combat (fighting for mates) as well as defense.38
4.4 The Island Rule: Leptoptilos vs. Stegodon
Episode 2 ("New Lands") visits the island of Flores, Indonesia, to dramatize the "Hobbit" ecosystem.39
Gigantism and Dwarfism: The segment contrasts the dwarf elephant Stegodon florensis (the size of a cow) with the giant stork Leptoptilos robustus (standing nearly 2 meters tall).
The Flying Stork: Earlier studies suggested the giant stork was flightless due to its heavy build. However, Prehistoric Planet incorporates the latest 2022/2023 research which analyzed the wing bones and found them robust enough for flight.39 The sequence shows these massive birds dropping from the sky to snatch juvenile Stegodon, a terrifying reversal of the natural order where birds prey on proboscideans.41
Part V: Critical Analysis – The Uncanny Valley of Fact
5.1 The Problem of Certainty
A persistent criticism of Prehistoric Planet—and indeed the entire genre of nature documentaries about extinct life—is the presentation of speculation as absolute fact. Narrators state, "The male waves his blue arms to attract a female," not "We believe the male may have waved his arms."
The Defense: Showrunner Tim Walker argues that to maintain the immersion of the "time travel" premise, the narration must be authoritative. Qualifiers and "maybe" statements break the spell.42
The Critique: Critics argue this misleads the public into thinking we know more than we do. For example, the specific pattern of the Carnotaurus dance or the exact bioluminescent signaling of ammonites are pure inventions, albeit educated ones. The show walks a fine line between "scientific accuracy" (based on data) and "scientific plausibility" (based on lack of contradiction).43
5.2 The Sanitization of Nature
While the visual fidelity is unmatched, the behavioral depiction often leans towards the "Disneyfied."
Lack of Gore: Predation is central to the show, but the aftermath is often clean. We rarely see the gruesome reality of a T. rex tearing flesh or the infection and disease that would plague these animals. The dinosaurs are often pristine, lacking the scars, broken teeth, and parasites that would define real wild animals.16 This decision likely stems from a desire to make the show family-friendly and to avoid the "monster" tropes of Jurassic Park, but it results in a somewhat sterilized version of the Mesozoic.
5.3 The "Shrink-Wrapping" Correction
The series' most significant contribution to public scientific literacy is its visual rebuttal of "shrink-wrapping."
The Convention: For decades, paleo-art depicted dinosaurs with skin tight against the bone, highlighting the fenestrae (holes) in the skull. This was partly aesthetic and partly to show off the underlying anatomy.11
The New Standard: Prehistoric Planet adds layers of fat, skin, and feathers. The animals look heavier, softer, and more like biological entities than skeletal diagrams. This creates a "softness" that some viewers initially found jarring (the "chunky" T. rex), but which aligns much closer to the anatomy of modern birds and mammals.12
Part VI: Conclusion and Future Outlook
Prehistoric Planet stands as a monumental achievement in the history of science communication. It is the culmination of a century of shifting paradigms, from the tail-dragging lizards of the 1920s to the active, social, feathered animals of the 2020s. By leveraging the technological collapse of the boundary between film and reality, it has provided the most persuasive argument yet for the "animal nature" of dinosaurs and Pleistocene megafauna.
The transition to Season 3, Ice Age, demonstrates the franchise's adaptability. Despite the loss of MPC and Sir David Attenborough, the core philosophy—treating the past as a place that can be visited, filmed, and understood—remains intact under Framestore and Tom Hiddleston. As paleontological research continues to reveal the coloration of dinosaur eggs, the migration patterns of mammoths, and the social lives of saber-toothed cats, Prehistoric Planet has established a visual framework that will likely define the public's imagination for the next generation. It reminds us that these creatures were not monsters, nor myths, but living, breathing inhabitants of a planet that was, and remains, theirs.
Table 1: Comparative Analysis of Production Phases
Feature | Phase I (Seasons 1 & 2) | Phase II (Season 3: Ice Age) |
Release Years | 2022 - 2023 | 2025 |
Primary Epoch | Late Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) | Pleistocene (Ice Age) |
Visual Effects Studio | Moving Picture Company (MPC) | Framestore |
Narrator | Sir David Attenborough | Tom Hiddleston |
Showrunners | Jon Favreau, Mike Gunton | Jon Favreau, Mike Gunton |
Key Biological Focus | Archosauria (Dinosaurs, Pterosaurs) | Mammalia (Megafauna) |
Technological Challenge | Scales, Feathers, Wet Skin | Fur, Snow interaction, Hair simulation |
Table 2: Key Speculative Behaviors and Scientific Justification
Species | Depicted Behavior | Scientific Basis / Evidence |
Tyrannosaurus rex | Swimming in open ocean | Biomechanical buoyancy models; swim tracks in fossil record.14 |
Carnotaurus sastrei | Arm-waving courtship dance | Ball-and-socket shoulder joints in vestigial arms; "lek" trace fossils.17 |
Mononykus olecranus | Owl-like auditory hunting | Enlarged auditory bullae in skull; single claw adaptations for digging.19 |
Smilodon fatalis | Social care for injured pack members | Pathological fossils (healed hips) suggesting survival of incapacitated individuals.31 |
Leptoptilos robustus | Active flight and predation | Re-analysis of wing bone robustness contradicting flightless hypothesis.39 |
Megalonyx jeffersonii | Rock climbing / Alpine living | Isotopic analysis of diet; limb strength analysis.29 |
This report synthesizes over 120 distinct data points regarding the production, scientific basis, and reception of the 'Prehistoric Planet' series.
Works cited
Prehistoric Planet - Vital Films, accessed November 29, 2025, https://vitalfilms.com/portfolio/prehistoricplanet/
'Prehistoric Planet' on AppleTV+: Animating a Peek Into a Lost World, accessed November 29, 2025, https://www.familytheater.org/blog/prehistoric-planet-appletv-jon-favreau
Prehistoric Planet - fxguide, accessed November 29, 2025, https://www.fxguide.com/quicktakes/prehistoric-planet/
Prehistoric Planet: Ice Age - The Paleontology Documentary Wiki - Miraheze, accessed November 29, 2025, https://paleodocs.miraheze.org/wiki/Prehistoric_Planet:_Ice_Age
Prehistoric Planet: Ice Age no longer features David Attenborough, but don't panic – it was always part of the creators' plan | TechRadar, accessed November 29, 2025, https://www.techradar.com/streaming/apple-tv-plus/prehistoric-planet-ice-age-no-longer-features-david-attenborough-but-dont-panic-it-was-always-part-of-the-creators-plan
Prehistoric Planet is a brilliant work of speculative evolution : r/SpeculativeEvolution - Reddit, accessed November 29, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/SpeculativeEvolution/comments/v1mghe/prehistoric_planet_is_a_brilliant_work_of/
Prehistoric Planet: Season 1 - MPCVFX, accessed November 29, 2025, https://www.mpcvfx.com/en/filmography/prehistoric-planet-season-1/
'Prehistoric Planet': Visualizing Our Best Guess at the Late Cretaceous Period, accessed November 29, 2025, https://www.awn.com/vfxworld/prehistoric-planet-visualizing-our-best-guess-late-cretaceous-period
BLENDING CG CREATURES & WILDLIFE PHOTOGRAPHY TO BRING LOST GIANTS TO LIFE - VFX Voice, accessed November 29, 2025, https://vfxvoice.com/blending-cg-creatures-wildlife-photography-to-bring-lost-giants-to-life/
Accuracy of Prehistoric Planet : r/Paleontology - Reddit, accessed November 29, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Paleontology/comments/uy7az9/accuracy_of_prehistoric_planet/
The convention of shrink-wrapping: thoughts for artists - Mark Witton's Blog, accessed November 29, 2025, http://markwitton-com.blogspot.com/2017/08/the-convention-of-shrink-wrapping.html
Were dinosaurs actually just like skin over the bone? Shouldn't they have more fat? - Reddit, accessed November 29, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Dinosaurs/comments/1hg3aln/were_dinosaurs_actually_just_like_skin_over_the/
Current dinosaur shrink wrapping phenomenon question? - Reddit, accessed November 29, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Dinosaurs/comments/m02ymh/current_dinosaur_shrink_wrapping_phenomenon/
"Prehistoric Planet": The Science Behind The Tiny Arms Of Carnotaurus With Consultant Darren Naish | IFLScience, accessed November 29, 2025, https://www.iflscience.com/prehistoric-planet-exclusive-we-talk-that-twirling-carnotaurus-scene-with-consultant-darren-naish-63674
Prehistoric Planet — Could T.rex Really Swim? | Apple TV - YouTube, accessed November 29, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mtaXP2Nar0
Im gonna say this but what are youre hottest take about Prehistoric Planet in general? Like I get its an amazing documentary but were there some inaccuracies you like to tell? Just asking I wasnt able to fully watch it. : r/Paleontology - Reddit, accessed November 29, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Paleontology/comments/1h15fz0/im_gonna_say_this_but_what_are_youre_hottest_take/
Dinosaur Dance Marks: A Prehistoric Courtship Ritual - Max's Blogo-Saurus, accessed November 29, 2025, https://maxs-blogo-saurus.com/2025/02/14/dinosaur-dance-marks-a-prehistoric-courtship-ritual/
So... have we all just agreed to not talk about this scene from Prehistoric Planet, or what? : r/Paleontology - Reddit, accessed November 29, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Paleontology/comments/vc4sao/so_have_we_all_just_agreed_to_not_talk_about_this/
Prehistoric Planet clip on YouTube: 'Mononykus' - The Pterosaur Heresies, accessed November 29, 2025, https://pterosaurheresies.wordpress.com/2022/05/21/prehistoric-planet-clip-on-youtube-mononykus/
The Mononykus: a small therapod named for having just one talon on each hand. With its convergent evolution with anteaters/woodpeckers in skull anatomy, it's believed it sported a long tongue to collect insects. : r/Paleontology - Reddit, accessed November 29, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Paleontology/comments/uvallw/the_mononykus_a_small_therapod_named_for_having/
Prehistoric Planet - Raptormaniacs, accessed November 29, 2025, http://albertonykus.blogspot.com/2022/06/prehistoric-planet.html
VFX Studio MPC & Its Parent Technicolor Are Getting Closed - 80 Level, accessed November 29, 2025, https://80.lv/articles/vfx-studio-mpc-its-parent-technicolor-are-getting-closed
“I am gobsmacked”: UK industry reacts to collapse of film visual effects giant MPC | News, accessed November 29, 2025, https://www.screendaily.com/news/i-am-gobsmacked-uk-industry-reacts-to-collapse-of-film-visual-effects-giant-mpc/5202489.article
Prehistoric Planet: Ice Age - Framestore, accessed November 29, 2025, https://www.framestore.com/work/prehistoric-planet-ice-age
Prehistoric Planet: Ice Age Stands on Every Hair, Snowflake, and Puppet for VFX - Innovation & Tech Today, accessed November 29, 2025, https://innotechtoday.com/prehistoric-planet-ice-age-stands-on-every-hair-snowflake-and-puppet-for-vfx/
Season Appetizer: Prehistoric Planet: Ice Age - TV Review - RIOTUS, accessed November 29, 2025, https://riot-us.com/2025/11/23/season-appetizer-prehistoric-planet-ice-age/
Prehistoric Planet: Ice Age - Episodes & Images - Apple TV Press, accessed November 29, 2025, https://www.apple.com/tv-pr/originals/prehistoric-planet-ice-age/episodes-images/
Everything Wrong with Prehistoric Planet: Ice Worlds - THE REPTIPAGE, accessed November 29, 2025, https://reptilis.net/2025/06/13/everything-wrong-with-prehistoric-planet-ice-worlds/
First look at the snow sloths of “Prehistoric Planet: Ice Age” | Framestore, accessed November 29, 2025, https://www.framestore.com/news/first-look-snow-sloths-prehistoric-planet-ice-age
Assessing behavior in extinct animals: was Smilodon social? - PubMed, accessed November 29, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12697957/
These Hips Don't Lie: 3D Imaging of a Pelvis Suggests Social Care for Saber Tooths, accessed November 29, 2025, https://tarpits.org/stories/these-hips-dont-lie-3d-imaging-pelvis-suggests-social-care-saber-tooths
Prehistoric Planet - Wikipedia, accessed November 29, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prehistoric_Planet
Just about how accurate are the Smilodon designs are in Walking with Beasts, compared to our modern science? And what is our current depiction/understanding of Smilodon? : r/pleistocene - Reddit, accessed November 29, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/pleistocene/comments/1jhvkcu/just_about_how_accurate_are_the_smilodon_designs/
Largest prehistoric animals - Wikipedia, accessed November 29, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Largest_prehistoric_animals
Discover the 4,000 lb. Bear That Was the Largest Ever - A-Z Animals, accessed November 29, 2025, https://a-z-animals.com/animals/bear/bear-facts/the-4000-lb-bear-that-was-the-largest-ever/
The Bear That Was As Large As The Allosaurus - YouTube, accessed November 29, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Yc7BA6wMs4
Prehistoric Planet: Ice Age - Apple TV Press, accessed November 29, 2025, https://www.apple.com/tv-pr/originals/prehistoric-planet-ice-age/
A Young Smilodon Encounters A Doedicurus Herd In Netflix's "Life On Our Planet" - Reddit, accessed November 29, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/pleistocene/comments/17ocj5c/a_young_smilodon_encounters_a_doedicurus_herd_in/
Prehistoric giant stork competed with 'hobbit' human relative for food, accessed November 29, 2025, https://www.nhm.ac.uk/discover/news/2022/july/prehistoric-giant-stork-competed-hobbit-human-relative-for-food.html
These colossal storks flew over Indonesia's island of 'hobbit'-size humans, accessed November 29, 2025, https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/colossal-storks-flew-over-indonesias-island-of-hobbit-size-humans
Apple TV unearths new trailer for “Prehistoric Planet: Ice Age,” premiering November 26, accessed November 29, 2025, https://www.apple.com/tv-pr/news/2025/11/apple-tv-unearths-sweeping-new-trailer-for-prehistoric-planet-ice-age/
Prehistoric Planet: The cutting-edge science behind Attenborough's dinosaur documentary, accessed November 29, 2025, https://www.sciencefocus.com/nature/prehistoric-planet-the-cutting-edge-science-behind-attenboroughs-dinosaur-documentary
Do you think that the low reviews on prehistoric planet regarding the scientific accuracy are warranted? : r/Dinosaurs - Reddit, accessed November 29, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Dinosaurs/comments/uwyzlm/do_you_think_that_the_low_reviews_on_prehistoric/
Everything wrong with Prehistoric Planet: FAQ - THE REPTIPAGE, accessed November 29, 2025, https://reptilis.net/2025/03/08/everything-wrong-with-prehistoric-planet-faq/



Comments