A Comprehensive Analysis of Extreme Weather Impacts, Economic Losses, and Institutional Shifts in 2025

Abstract

The year 2025 stands as a watershed moment in the environmental and economic history of the United States and the broader global community. Characterized by an unprecedented accumulation of high-impact meteorological events, the year shattered previous benchmarks for disaster costs, with the United States incurring over $100 billion in damages before the mid-year point.¹ By the close of December, total economic losses in the U.S. were estimated between $378 billion and $424 billion ², a figure that rivals the gross domestic product of mid-sized nations. This report provides an exhaustive reconstruction of the year's events, necessitated by the dismantling of federal climate monitoring infrastructure in May 2025.¹ Through a synthesis of private sector data, non-profit archives, and academic analyses, we examine the "firestorm winter" in California, the hydrological devastation of the Central Texas floods, the thermodynamic anomaly of the June heat dome, and the paradox of a "landfall-free" hurricane season that nonetheless inflicted billions in damages. Furthermore, this analysis explores the widening "protection gap" in the global insurance market, the degradation of federal emergency response capabilities, and the emerging reality of uninsurable risk in the American landscape.

1. Introduction: The New Economic Baseline of the Anthropocene Weather

1.1 The Erosion of the "Abnormal"

For decades, the metric of $100 billion in annual weather-related damages served as a threshold for catastrophe—a line crossed only in years defined by singular, historic events such as Hurricane Katrina in 2005 or the triple-hurricane assault of 2017. In the meteorological epoch of the mid-2020s, however, this figure has ceased to represent an anomaly. Instead, it has become a baseline, a recurring entry in the national ledger that reflects a fundamental shift in the frequency and intensity of what the insurance industry terms "secondary perils".⁵

In 2025, the United States breached the $100 billion mark by June, setting a record for the costliest first half of a year in 45 years of reliable data keeping.¹ Unlike previous years where a single mega-disaster drove the tally, the 2025 accumulation was the result of a "death by a thousand cuts"—or more accurately, a relentless sequence of severe convective storms, wildfires, and floods that battered the continent with little reprieve. By the end of June, 14 separate events had each exceeded $1 billion in losses.⁶ This acceleration forces a re-evaluation of disaster economics. The focus can no longer remain solely on the "peak perils" of earthquakes and hurricanes; rather, it is the chronic, pervasive volatility of the atmosphere that now dictates the economic stability of regions as diverse as the California coast and the Texas Hill Country.

1.2 The Protection Gap and Global Context

While the United States bore the brunt of insured losses—accounting for over 90% of the global total in the first half of the year ⁷—the devastation was a planetary phenomenon. Global economic losses from natural catastrophes reached $162 billion by July 2025, yet insured losses stood at only $100 billion.⁷ This discrepancy, known as the "protection gap," reveals a critical vulnerability in the global financial architecture. In the U.S., the gap manifested in the underinsurance of flood risks in inland Texas; globally, it was seen in events like the Myanmar earthquake, where insurance coverage was less than $100 million against $12 billion in damages.⁷

The divergence between economic loss (the total value of destroyed assets) and insured loss (the amount covered by policies) is widening. In 2025, the global protection gap stood at 38% for the first half of the year.⁷ While this was lower than the 21st-century average of 69%—largely due to the high insurance penetration in the U.S. where most losses occurred—it masks the growing unaffordability of coverage in high-risk zones. As this report will detail, the retreat of major insurers from markets like California and Florida is creating a class of "zombie properties"—assets that retain value on paper but are financially toxic due to their exposure to unmitigated climate risk.

2. The Institutional Crisis: The Twilight of Federal Climate Monitoring

To understand the weather events of 2025, one must first understand the unique political and institutional context in which they unfolded. The year was marked not only by physical storms but by a deliberate dismantling of the federal apparatus designed to track and respond to them.

2.1 The End of the "Billion-Dollar Disaster" Project

For over a decade, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) maintained the "U.S. Billion-Dollar Weather and Climate Disasters" database. This tool was considered the gold standard for tracking the economic impacts of climate change, providing a standardized methodology for assessing losses across different types of perils.⁸ However, in May 2025, the Trump administration formally abandoned the project.¹

The cessation of this database was part of a broader shift in federal priorities. NOAA communications director Kim Doster stated that the agency was refocusing resources away from "projects based in uncertainty and speculation".¹ This policy shift was accompanied by the departure of hundreds of NOAA staff through firings and voluntary exit programs, severely depleting the agency's institutional memory and analytical capacity.¹ The result was a "data blackout" at the federal level. The official record of the year's climate costs, once a matter of public record, became fragmented and privatized.

2.2 The Privatization of Truth

In the vacuum left by NOAA, non-profit organizations and private firms stepped in to maintain the historical record. Climate Central, a non-profit group, relaunched the disaster database, managed by former NOAA scientist Adam Smith.¹ Simultaneously, private meteorological firms like AccuWeather and reinsurance giants like Aon and Munich Re became the primary arbiters of disaster statistics.²

This privatization has profound implications. While these organizations utilize rigorous methodologies—often based on the same peer-reviewed literature used by NOAA ⁸—the lack of a unified, government-sanctioned number allows for ambiguity in public discourse. Discrepancies in loss estimates, such as those seen in the valuation of the Los Angeles wildfires, become harder to resolve without a federal authority. Furthermore, the reliance on private data introduces a barrier to access; high-fidelity risk data is increasingly a commercial product sold to insurers and hedge funds, rather than a public good available to municipal planners and homeowners.

2.3 The Hollow Force: FEMA in 2025

The degradation of federal capacity extended to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). By the end of 2025, the agency was operating under the shadow of drastic workforce reductions. Leaked documents revealed plans to cut the Cadre of On-Call Response and Recovery (CORE)—the specialized staff deployed to disaster zones—by 41% starting in 2026.⁹

Throughout 2025, FEMA's response capabilities were strained by the sheer volume of events. The Disaster Relief Fund was projected to run out of money by September ¹, necessitating supplemental appropriations that became entangled in partisan gridlock. Critics noted that the agency, bereft of strong leadership and suffering from low morale, went into the hurricane season without robust contingency plans.¹⁰ The consequences of this "hollowing out" were felt acutely on the ground: permitting backlogs in California delayed reconstruction by months ¹¹, and search-and-rescue authorizations in Texas faced critical delays during the July floods.¹⁰

3. The Firestorm Winter: The Southern California Wildfires of January

The year 2025 began with a meteorological anomaly that defied the traditional seasonality of natural disasters. While January is typically the peak of the wet season in Mediterranean climates, Southern California experienced a "firestorm winter" that rewrote the risk models for the region.

3.1 Meteorological Mechanism: The Santa Ana Super-Event

The conditions for the January fires were set by a confluence of long-term climate trends and short-term weather dynamics. Years of oscillation between extreme drought and heavy rainfall had created a "volumetric fuel load"—a dense undergrowth of vegetation that had dried out completely under an unseasonably warm and arid start to the winter.¹

In early January, a high-pressure system parked over the Great Basin, driving a cold, dry air mass southwestward toward the coast. As this air descended from the high desert through the mountain passes of the Transverse Ranges, it compressed and warmed—a classic Santa Ana wind pattern. However, the pressure gradient in January 2025 was extreme. Wind gusts of 80 to 100 mph were recorded across Los Angeles and Ventura counties.¹² These were not merely gale-force winds; they were hurricane-force winds acting on a tinder-dry landscape.

3.2 The Palisades and Eaton Fire Complex

On January 7, 2025, the inevitable sparks occurred. The two primary conflagrations were the Palisades Fire and the Eaton Fire.¹⁰

• The Palisades Fire: Igniting in the precipitous terrain of the Santa Monica Mountains, this fire swept through the Pacific Palisades and Malibu areas. It burned over 23,000 acres ¹³, a figure that belies the density of the destruction. The fire moved through some of the most expensive real estate in the world, consuming thousands of structures.

• The Eaton Fire: Simultaneously, the Eaton Fire erupted near Altadena in the foothills of the San Gabriel Mountains. This fire destroyed over 10,000 buildings in Altadena and surrounding communities.¹³

Combined, these fires burned more than 40,000 acres and destroyed over 12,000 structures.¹³ The speed of the fire spread, driven by the ferocious winds, rendered traditional containment strategies useless. Firefighters were relegated to life-safety operations as the fire fronts jumped highways and firebreaks with ease.

3.3 The Economic Reckoning: Valuation and Discrepancy

The economic impact of the Los Angeles fires became a subject of intense analysis and significant revision throughout the year. Initial estimates placed the direct losses at approximately $60 billion.⁶ Even at this preliminary level, the fires were the costliest wildfire event on record, nearly doubling the previous record set by the Camp Fire in 2018.¹³

However, as the full scope of the disaster became clear, private sector analysts revised these numbers dramatically. AccuWeather, utilizing a broader methodology that incorporated business interruption, supply chain disruptions, infrastructure repair, and public health costs from smoke exposure, estimated the total damage and economic loss to be between $250 billion and $275 billion.¹²

Metric	Initial Estimate (Direct)	Revised Estimate (Total Economic)
Source	Early NOAA/Private Reports	AccuWeather / Economic Analysts
Loss Estimate	~$60 Billion	$250 Billion - $275 Billion
Basis	Property damage, insured structures	Property, business interruption, health, infrastructure, displacement
Context	Double the 2018 Camp Fire record	~4% of California's Annual GDP

This disparity illustrates the "multiplier effect" of urban wildfires. The destruction of 12,000 structures in a dense metropolitan area does not just erase capital stock; it displaces a workforce, severs commuter corridors, and places massive strain on the healthcare system due to smoke inhalation and mental health crises. The fires effectively shut down significant portions of the Los Angeles economy for weeks.

3.4 The Regulatory Response and Insurance Freeze

The scale of the destruction precipitated an immediate crisis in the California insurance market. Already teetering on the edge of collapse due to years of heavy losses, the market threatened to seize up entirely. On January 9, Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara issued a mandatory one-year moratorium on insurance cancellations and non-renewals for properties located within and adjacent to the fire perimeters.¹⁵

While this order provided a temporary shield for homeowners, it did not solve the underlying solvency issues. The California FAIR Plan, the state's insurer of last resort, faced an existential liquidity crisis, necessitating special orders to allow it to issue assessments to member companies to pay claims.¹⁶ The fires underscored a grim reality: the private insurance model is fundamentally incompatible with the new fire regime of the American West. By the end of the year, major insurers continued to exit the state, leaving millions of homeowners with few options and skyrocketing premiums.¹⁷

4. The Spring Siege: Convective Storms and the Gulf Coast Freeze

Following the infernos of January, the continental United States was subjected to a relentless assault of "winter" storms that behaved with the ferocity of tropical cyclones.

4.1 The Gulf Coast Winter Storm (January 20-25)

In late January, the jet stream dipped profoundly southward, allowing a lobe of the polar vortex to descend into the Gulf Coast. This event, reminiscent of the 2021 Texas freeze, brought snow, ice, and freezing temperatures to regions completely unadapted to such extremes.

Snowfall records were set in New Orleans, Mobile, and Pensacola.¹² However, the picturesque scenes of snow-covered palms masked a disaster. The region's infrastructure—uninsulated pipes, exposed power generation equipment, and drafty housing stock—failed catastrophically. The "Gulf Coast Winter Storm" caused between $14 billion and $17 billion in damages.¹² These losses were driven by widespread pipe bursts causing water damage to commercial and residential properties, as well as significant agricultural losses in the citrus and winter crop belts.

4.2 The Convective Conveyor Belt (March - June)

As the atmosphere transitioned to spring, the clash between the lingering cool air masses and the warming waters of the Gulf of Mexico set the stage for a hyper-active severe weather season. The "Tornado Alley" mechanism shifted eastward, bringing devastation to the Deep South and the Ohio Valley.

• March 13-17 Outbreak: This multi-hazard event began with an atmospheric river in California causing mudslides, then translated across the Rockies to trigger a severe weather outbreak in the Plains. Hurricane-force winds fueled wildfires in Texas and Oklahoma, while over 100 tornadoes touched down across the region.¹⁸

• The Easter Week Outbreak (March 31 - April 6): This was the defining tornado event of the year. A persistent weather pattern generated over 550 tornado warnings in a week. Confirmed EF-3 tornadoes—with winds exceeding 136 mph—devastated the towns of Selmer, Tennessee; Slayden, Mississippi; and Lake City, Arkansas.¹⁸

The cumulative impact of these storms was immense. By June, severe thunderstorms alone accounted for over $40 billion in losses.¹ These events highlight the rising dominance of "Severe Convective Storms" (SCS) in the loss ledger. Unlike hurricanes, which are low-frequency/high-severity events, SCS are high-frequency/medium-severity. In 2025, they were the relentless drumbeat of disaster, causing "attritional" losses that slowly bled insurance reserves dry.

5. The Thermodynamic Lid: The Heat Dome of June 2025

As the vernal equinox passed, the threat shifted from kinetic energy (wind and tornadoes) to thermal energy. In late June, a massive high-pressure ridge established itself over the Eastern and Central United States, creating a "heat dome" that would test the limits of the nation's energy infrastructure.

5.1 The Physics of the Dome

A heat dome forms when the atmosphere traps hot ocean air like a lid or cap. In June 2025, a high-pressure system parked over the Midwest and Northeast, suppressing cloud formation and forcing air to sink. As the air sank, it compressed and heated up. The dry soil conditions in the Midwest, a legacy of the spring weather patterns, exacerbated the heat through a positive feedback loop: with less moisture to evaporate, the sun's energy went directly into heating the air (sensible heat) rather than evaporating water (latent heat).¹⁹

Between June 20 and June 25, temperatures soared 20°F to 25°F above average across a vast swath of the country.²⁰ More than 100 million people across 726 counties experienced record-breaking heat.²¹ Rhode Island, usually moderated by the ocean, recorded its warmest June nights in history, denying residents the physiological recovery time usually provided by nocturnal cooling.²¹

5.2 Grid Resilience and the Economic Drag

The heat dome was not just a public health emergency; it was a stress test for the U.S. power grid. As air conditioners hummed to life across the industrial Midwest and the densely populated Northeast, electricity demand skyrocketed.

• ISO New England: The grid operator reported a peak demand of over 26,000 MW, the highest in a decade.²² Wholesale electricity prices, which averaged $44 per MWh the previous year, spiked to over $1,000 per MWh.²²

• The Solar Savior: Interestingly, the grid held together largely due to "behind-the-meter" (BTM) solar. In New England, distributed solar panels shaved approximately 4,400 MW off the gross peak demand.²² Without this contribution, the system would have exceeded its all-time peak demand record set in 2006, likely triggering rolling blackouts.

Despite avoiding total grid collapse, the economic cost of the heat was staggering. The intense heat forced the suspension of outdoor labor in construction and agriculture, slowed logistics, and strained the healthcare system. Estimates suggest that such extreme heat costs the U.S. economy over $200 billion annually in lost productivity ²³; the June 2025 event was a major contributor to this hidden tax on the economy.

6. The Hydrological Catastrophe: The Central Texas Floods of July

If the heat dome was a slow-motion disaster, the events of the Fourth of July weekend in Central Texas were a flashpoint of sudden, violent destruction.

6.1 The Setup: A Mesoscale Convective Vortex

The meteorological culprit was a phenomenon known as a Mesoscale Convective Vortex (MCV). This system originated from the remnants of Tropical Storm Barry, which had made landfall in Mexico days earlier. The remnant circulation drifted north into Texas, where it encountered a plume of deep tropical moisture streaming from the Gulf of Mexico.24

The MCV stalled over the Texas Hill Country—a region topographically prone to flash flooding due to its steep terrain and thin soils. To make matters worse, the heat dome of June had baked the soil into a hydrophobic crust, meaning the ground could absorb almost no water.

6.2 The Deluge and the Wall of Water

On the night of July 3rd and the morning of July 4th, the skies opened up. Rainfall rates of 2 to 3 inches per hour were sustained for hours, leading to totals of 10 to over 20 inches in some locations.26

The hydrological response was catastrophic. The Guadalupe River, a popular recreational waterway, transformed into a torrent of lethal force. River gauges near Hunt, Texas, recorded a rise of 26 feet in just 45 minutes, peaking at a record 37.52 feet.12 This was not a rising tide; it was a wall of water moving down the canyon.

6.3 The Human and Economic Toll

The timing of the flood—Independence Day weekend—maximized the tragedy. The river banks were crowded with campers and holidaymakers. The floodwaters swept through campgrounds, including Camp Mystic, a girls' summer camp, leading to a mass casualty event.²⁷

• Fatalities: At least 137 confirmed deaths, with many victims swept away in the darkness of the early morning.²⁴

• Economic Loss: The disaster caused between $18 billion and $22 billion in damages.¹²

6.4 The Insurance Abyss

The Texas floods exposed the most glaring example of the protection gap in 2025. In Kerr County, where the devastation was centered, fewer than 5% of properties in the FEMA 100-year flood zone carried flood insurance.²⁹ Standard homeowners' policies do not cover flood damage. Consequently, the vast majority of the $22 billion loss was uninsured, falling directly on families and the federal taxpayer. The disaster highlighted the failure of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) to penetrate inland markets, leaving communities financially ruined by "surprise" flood events that are becoming statistically probable.

7. The Paradox of the Tropics: The "Silent" Hurricane Season and Hurricane Melissa

The 2025 Atlantic hurricane season offered a deceptive statistic: for the first time in ten years, no hurricane made landfall on the contiguous United States through September.² Yet, AccuWeather estimated the season's total damage at over $300 billion (including the non-tropical events discussed above).³ How does a "landfall-free" season cost so much?

7.1 The Cost of Near Misses and "Potential" Landfalls

The absence of landfall does not mean an absence of impact. The U.S. coastline was repeatedly brushed by systems that caused significant erosion, coastal flooding, and disruption.

• Tropical Storm Chantal (July): This weak storm made landfall in South Carolina but its slow motion caused widespread flooding and ruined the July 4th tourism economy in the Carolinas. Economic loss: $4 billion - $6 billion.²

• The Shadow of Threat: The economic cost of preparing for hurricanes that eventually veer away is substantial. Evacuations, business closures, and offshore oil and gas shutdowns in anticipation of storms contribute billions to the loss column, even if the wind never blows onshore.

7.2 Hurricane Melissa: The Monster of October

The season's defining event arrived late. In late October, Hurricane Melissa formed in the central Atlantic. It moved over waters that were 1.4°C warmer than average—an anomaly attributed directly to human-caused climate change.30

This thermal energy fueled "extreme rapid intensification." Melissa's winds increased by 70 mph in 24 hours, transforming it into a Category 5 behemoth with sustained winds of 185 mph.30

The Impact:

• Jamaica: Melissa made landfall in Jamaica on October 28, becoming the strongest hurricane in the island's history. It caused $10 billion in damages (a massive percentage of Jamaica's GDP) and crippled the nation's infrastructure.³¹

• United States: Melissa recurved to the northeast, sparing the U.S. a direct hit. However, its massive wind field generated high surf, rip currents, and coastal flooding from Florida to Maine. A "tropical wind and rainstorm" associated with the system caused an estimated $3 billion in damages to the U.S. East Coast.²

Melissa served as a warning. The climate attribution study conducted by the IRIS model indicated that a storm of Melissa's intensity is now four times more likely due to climate change.³³ The U.S. escaped a direct hit in 2025 by a matter of steering currents, not a reduction in risk.

8. Global Context: The European Storms and Planetary Losses

While the U.S. dominated the loss statistics, the extreme weather of 2025 was global. Europe, in particular, faced a violent end to the year.

8.1 The European Windstorm Season (Late 2025)

As the U.S. recovered from Melissa, Europe entered a volatile winter.

• Storm Amy (October): Impacted the UK and Scandinavia with 139 mph winds.³⁴

• Storm Lothar (October): A broad system affecting France, Germany, and the Low Countries.³⁴

• Storm Claudia & Wolfgang (November): Continued the assault on the continent.

• Storm Goretti (January 2026): Capped the season with heavy snow and ice across Western Europe, disrupting travel and commerce.³⁵

These storms, while individually less costly than a U.S. hurricane, cumulatively added billions to the global reinsurance burden. Munich Re noted that while the U.S. accounted for the bulk of insured losses, the global economic losses were distributed across flood events in Asia (such as the Myanmar earthquake and flooding) and the European windstorms.⁷

9. The Economic Fallout: Uninsurability and the Market Crash

The cumulative effect of 2025's weather was a profound destabilization of the property insurance market, the bedrock of the U.S. housing economy.

9.1 The Capital Flight

Insurers are in the business of pricing risk. In 2025, the price of risk in California, Texas, and Florida became effectively infinite for many carriers. Following the LA wildfires, major insurers accelerated their exit from California. In Texas, the flood losses drove private insurers to demand a 43% increase in reinsurance coverage for the Texas Windstorm Insurance Association (TWIA).28

This capital flight created a "market failure." In affected zones, homeowners faced premiums that doubled or tripled—if they could find coverage at all. In Texas, premiums averaged $4,049 per year, nearly $1,700 above the national average.29

9.2 The Rise of Zombie Markets

The withdrawal of private capital has forced the state to become the insurer of last resort. The growth of the California FAIR Plan and Florida's Citizens Property Insurance Corporation represents a socialization of climate risk. However, these state-backed entities are themselves undercapitalized. The $40 billion in insured losses from the LA fires placed immense strain on the system.

Economists warn of a looming "climate foreclosure crisis." As insurance becomes unaffordable or unavailable, property values in high-risk zones (the WUI in California, the floodplains of Texas) must eventually correct downward. In 2025, we saw the first signs of this correction, with stalled sales and "distressed" properties lingering on the market in fire-scarred regions.37

10. Conclusion: The Price of Turbulence

The year 2025 was not merely a year of bad weather; it was a year of revealed costs. The $400 billion economic toll—comprising direct damage, business interruption, and productivity loss—represents a significant drag on national prosperity.

Summary of Key Billion-Dollar Events (2025)

Event	Date	Location	Estimated Economic Loss	Primary Hazard
Los Angeles Wildfires	Jan 7-28	California	$250B - $275B	Fire / Wind
Gulf Coast Freeze	Jan 20-25	Gulf Coast	$14B - $17B	Freeze / Grid
Spring Severe Storms	Mar - Jun	Central US	>$40B	Tornado / Hail
Texas Flash Floods	July 4-5	Texas	$18B - $22B	Flood / Rain
Tropical Storm Chantal	July 4-8	Carolinas	$4B - $6B	Flood
Hurricane Melissa	Oct 28-31	US East Coast	~$3B (US Impact)	Surf / Erosion

Table 1: Summary of major loss events based on AccuWeather and reconstructed NOAA data.

The events of 2025 demonstrated that the mechanisms of disaster are evolving. The "heat dome" and the "flash flood" are joining the hurricane and the earthquake as primary drivers of economic loss. Furthermore, the institutional failures—from the blinding of NOAA to the hollowing out of FEMA—exacerbated these losses, turning meteorological hazards into social disasters.

As we look to the future, the lesson of 2025 is clear: the cost of inaction is no longer a future projection. It is a bill that is coming due today, payable in the currency of lost homes, shattered infrastructure, and depleted treasuries. The "Price of Turbulence" has been set, and it is rising.

Works cited

1. US Saw Record $101 Billion in Weather Losses Through June - Insurance Journal, accessed January 7, 2026, https://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2025/10/22/844752.htm

2. Press Releases | AccuWeather Newsroom, accessed January 7, 2026, https://corporate.accuweather.com/newsroom/press-releases/

3. Extreme Weather Caused More Than $300 Billion in U.S. Losses in 2025, accessed January 7, 2026, https://programbusiness.com/news/extreme-weather-caused-more-than-300-billion-in-u-s-losses-in-2025/

4. Billion-Dollar Weather and Climate Disasters | National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) - NOAA, accessed January 7, 2026, https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/billions/summary-stats

5. Natural disaster risks - Rising trend in losses | Munich Re, accessed January 7, 2026, https://www.munichre.com/en/risks/natural-disasters.html

6. Now at Climate Central: U.S. Billion-Dollar Weather and Climate Disasters, accessed January 7, 2026, https://www.climatecentral.org/climate-matters/billion-dollar-disasters-oct-2025

7. High U.S. Catastrophe Losses Result in Lowest 1H Insurance Protection Gap - News Releases | Aon, accessed January 7, 2026, https://aon.mediaroom.com/news-releases?item=138469

8. Billion-Dollar Weather and Climate Disasters | National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), accessed January 7, 2026, https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/billions/

9. Emails outline potential cuts affecting thousands of FEMA disaster responders, accessed January 7, 2026, https://www.washingtonpost.com/weather/2026/01/05/fema-disaster-core-cuts-dhs-emails/

10. ‘The perfect storm’: Trump has left the US less prepared for natural disasters, experts say, accessed January 7, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/04/donald-trump-disaster-response-preparedness

11. After Record Trump Aid to L.A., SBA Administrator Loeffler Slams Newsom and Bass for Wildfire Recovery Failures, accessed January 7, 2026, https://www.sba.gov/article/2025/09/09/after-record-trump-aid-la-sba-administrator-loeffler-slams-newsom-bass-wildfire-recovery-failures

12. World's Top 10 Extreme Weather Events in 2025 - Claims Journal, accessed January 7, 2026, https://www.claimsjournal.com/news/national/2025/12/30/334794.htm

13. Events - U.S. Billion-Dollar Weather and Climate Disasters, accessed January 7, 2026, https://www.climatecentral.org/climate-services/billion-dollar-disasters/events

14. MEDIA ADVISORY: AccuWeather increases estimate of total damage and economic loss ascatastrophic wildfires in Southern California continue to ravage the Los Angeles area; updated preliminary estimate is $135-$150 billion, accessed January 7, 2026, https://www.accuweather.com/en/press/media-advisory-accuweather-increases-estimate-of-total-damage-and-economic-loss-ascatastrophic-wildfires-in-southern-california-continue-to-ravage-the-los-angeles-area-updated-preliminary-estimate-i/1732268

15. Commissioner Lara protects insurance coverage for Southern California residents, accessed January 7, 2026, https://www.insurance.ca.gov/0400-news/0100-press-releases/2025/release005-2025.cfm

16. Commissioner Lara takes action to ensure FAIR Plan can continue paying consumer claims after the Southern California wildfires, accessed January 7, 2026, https://www.insurance.ca.gov/0400-news/0100-press-releases/2025/release015-2025.cfm

17. California wildfire disaster: State's insurance industry could see 'catastrophic failures' in the coming days - Northeastern Global News, accessed January 7, 2026, https://news.northeastern.edu/2025/01/10/california-fires-insurance-industry/

18. 2025 US Tornadoes and Severe Storms - Center for Disaster Philanthropy, accessed January 7, 2026, https://disasterphilanthropy.org/disasters/2025-us-tornadoes-and-severe-storms/

19. Sizzling Start to Summer - NASA Science, accessed January 7, 2026, https://science.nasa.gov/earth/earth-observatory/sizzling-start-to-summer-154475/

20. Almost half of the U.S. affected by climate change-driven heat wave, accessed January 7, 2026, https://www.climatecentral.org/climate-shift-index-alert/central-eastern-us-june-2025

21. Assessing the U.S. Climate in June 2025 - National Centers for Environmental Information, accessed January 7, 2026, https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/news/national-climate-202506

22. Grid Action Report – June Heat Wave | Acadia Center, accessed January 7, 2026, https://acadiacenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Fact-Sheet-June-30-2025-Grid-Action-Report-June-Heat-Wave.pdf

23. Heat Waves Make the Grid Less Reliable | Article | EESI, accessed January 7, 2026, https://www.eesi.org/articles/view/heat-waves-make-the-grid-less-reliable

24. July 2025 Central Texas floods - Wikipedia, accessed January 7, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/July_2025_Central_Texas_floods

25. Texas Hill Country Hit by Powerful Floods - NASA Scientific Visualization Studio, accessed January 7, 2026, https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/5569/

26. Summary of the Central Texas floods in early July 2025 - CW3E, accessed January 7, 2026, https://cw3e.ucsd.edu/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/14Jul2025_TexasFloods_EventSummary/TexasFloods_EventSummary.pdf

27. Central Texas floods of 2025 | Causes, Location, Deaths, & Facts | Britannica, accessed January 7, 2026, https://www.britannica.com/event/Central-Texas-floods-of-2025

28. Catastrophic Texas Floods of July 2025: A Watershed Moment for Insurance, accessed January 7, 2026, https://captives.insure/insights/texas-floods-of-july-2025

29. The Texas homeowners insurance crisis | TPR, accessed January 7, 2026, https://www.tpr.org/podcast/the-source/2025-07-21/the-texas-homeowners-insurance-crisis

30. Hurricane Melissa (2025) | Climate Central, accessed January 7, 2026, https://www.climatecentral.org/tropical-cyclones/melissa-2025

31. Hurricane Melissa - Wikipedia, accessed January 7, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurricane_Melissa

32. Hurricane Melissa turned sharply to devastate Jamaica − how forecasters knew where it was headed | WLRN, accessed January 7, 2026, https://www.wlrn.org/weather/2025-10-29/hurricane-melissa-turned-sharply-to-devastate-jamaica-how-forecasters-knew-where-it-was-headed

33. Hurricane Melissa: four times more likely in the 2025 climate - PreventionWeb.net, accessed January 7, 2026, https://www.preventionweb.net/news/hurricane-melissa-four-times-more-likely-2025-climate

34. 2025–26 European windstorm season - Wikipedia, accessed January 7, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025%E2%80%9326_European_windstorm_season

35. Western European countries brace for new wave of snow and ice, accessed January 7, 2026, https://www.bna.bh/en/National/WesternEuropeancountriesbracefornewwaveofsnowandice.aspx?cms=q8FmFJgiscL2fwIzON1%2BDv5Tv9hGiXnUI66W0RAmUGo%3D

36. Natural disasters in the first half of 2025 - Munich Re, accessed January 7, 2026, https://www.munichre.com/content/dam/munichre/mrwebsitespressreleases/MunichRe-NatCat-HY-2025-Factsheet.pdf/_jcr_content/renditions/original./MunichRe-NatCat-HY-2025-Factsheet.pdf

37. Gallagher Re H1 2025 Natural Catastrophe and Climate Report, accessed January 7, 2026, https://www.ajg.com/gallagherre/-/media/files/gallagher/gallagherre/news-and-insights/2025/july/h1-2025-natural-catastrophe-and-climate-report.pdf