Before the Tabby: The 3,000-Year Reign of the Leopard Cat

Abstract

The domestication of the cat (Felis catus) is traditionally viewed as a singular event originating in the Near East, where the African wildcat (Felis silvestris lybica) entered a commensal relationship with early agriculturalists. However, recent zooarchaeological, isotopic, and genomic evidence from China challenges this monophyletic narrative. For over three millennia, from the Neolithic Yangshao culture to the Han Dynasty, the primary felid associate of Chinese farmers was not the ancestor of the modern house cat, but the leopard cat (Prionailurus bengalensis). This report provides an exhaustive analysis of this independent, failed domestication experiment. By synthesizing geometric morphometric data, stable isotope analysis from the Quanhucun site, and genomic sequencing of ancient felid remains, we reconstruct the ecological rise of the leopard cat as a village mouser. We further investigate the socio-economic drivers of its eventual displacement, specifically the "Chicken-Killing Hypothesis" proposed by Han et al. (2025), which posits that the intensification of poultry farming created an insurmountable conflict between the predatory instincts of P. bengalensis and the economic interests of human communities. Finally, we trace the arrival of Felis catus via the Silk Road during the Tang Dynasty, marking the biological replacement of an indigenous commensal by an imported domesticate.

1. Introduction: The Commensal Paradox, Origin of the Leopard Cat

The relationship between humans and cats is often characterized by a unique form of utility: the control of synanthropic pests. Unlike the dog, which was domesticated for hunting and protection, or livestock domesticated for food and fiber, the cat is thought to have "domesticated itself" by exploiting the ecological niche created by human grain storage. The orthodox model of this process centers on the Fertile Crescent, where the expansion of wheat and barley cultivation attracted rodents, which in turn attracted the Near Eastern wildcat (Felis silvestris lybica). This animal, pre-adapted with a somewhat tolerant social structure, eventually integrated into human society, spreading globally to become the modern Felis catus.

However, the archaeological record of East Asia presents a striking anomaly that complicates this linear history. In 2001, excavations at the Neolithic site of Quanhucun in Shaanxi Province, China, unearthed felid remains dating to approximately 5,300 years ago.¹ These cats lived in the heart of agricultural villages, consumed human-derived food resources, and were occasionally buried with care, hallmarks of a domestication process. Yet, modern genetic surveys of China's domestic cat population reveal no trace of indigenous ancestry; they are all descendants of the Western F. s. lybica.²

This discrepancy implies a historical discontinuity: a "lost" era of cat domestication that flourished and then vanished. The protagonist of this era was the leopard cat (Prionailurus bengalensis), a spotted hunter of the Asian forests, distinct from the wildcat lineage.⁴ For 3,500 years, this species occupied the "pet niche" in Chinese society, only to be extirpated from the human household and replaced by an invasive species.

This report explores the mechanisms of this "commensalism without domestication." It examines the environmental pressures of the Neolithic Yellow River Valley that forged the initial bond, the behavioral barriers that prevented full domestication, and the specific economic shifts—the rise of the chicken—that turned the leopard cat from a valued ally into a reviled "chicken-killing tiger".⁴

2. The Ecological Stage: The Neolithic Revolution in the Yellow River Valley

To understand the entry of the leopard cat into the human sphere, one must first analyze the anthropogenic environment that beckoned it. The Neolithic Revolution in China was bipartite, with rice agriculture developing in the Yangtze River valley to the south and millet agriculture dominating the Yellow River valley to the north. It is in the north, specifically within the Yangshao culture (c. 5000–3000 BCE), that the drama of the leopard cat unfolds.

2.1 The Yangshao Agricultural Complex

The Yangshao culture represents a sophisticated Neolithic society characterized by large, settled villages, elaborate painted pottery, and intensive cultivation of millet (Setaria italica and Panicum miliaceum).⁶ Unlike the C3 crops (wheat, rice, barley) that dominated other centers of civilization, millet is a C4 plant. It utilizes a specific photosynthetic pathway (Hatch-Slack pathway) that discriminates less against the heavy carbon isotope ^13C during carbon fixation.

This biochemical quirk is the key to unlocking the ancient food web. In the terrestrial biosphere of Neolithic China, wild vegetation was predominantly C3, resulting in low δ13C values (typically -22‰ to -30‰). Millet, the anthropogenic crop, carried a high δ13C signal (typically -10‰ to -14‰).¹ This created a distinct isotopic baseline for the human village: any animal consuming millet, or consuming animals that ate millet, would "glow" with this C4 signature in an isotopic analysis.

2.2 The Granary and the Pest

The success of millet farming resulted in surplus, necessitating storage. The Yangshao people developed advanced ceramic technologies for this purpose, most notably the jiandiping—the pointed-bottom amphora.⁸ While initially debated as water vessels or brewing equipment (discussed in Section 2.3), these and other large pottery jars served as the community's caloric bank.

However, the concentration of biomass in granaries created a prey hotspot. Zooarchaeological evidence from Yangshao sites like Quanhucun and Banpo reveals a significant presence of commensal rodents, including the zokor (Myospalax) and Old World rats (Muridae).¹ Isotopic analysis of these rodent bones confirms they were heavily reliant on the human millet supply, with carbon signatures mirroring the farmers themselves.

The village thus became a biological beacon. It offered a high density of prey (rodents) that was stable year-round, unlike the fluctuating resources of the wild forest. For a small, adaptable carnivore, the village represented a new ecological niche: the "anthropogenic hunting ground."

2.3 The Role of Fermentation and Storage Technology

Recent residue analyses have added a layer of complexity to the Yangshao storage economy. The pointed-bottom amphorae (jiandiping) and globular jars found at sites like Mijiaya and Banpo have tested positive for starch granules and phytoliths associated with beer brewing.⁹ The production of millet beer required not just grain storage but the processing of malts and tubers, creating nutrient-rich waste products.

This industrial scale of food processing would have intensified the pest problem. Rodents are attracted not just to dry grain but to the fermentation byproducts. The archaeological discovery of ceramic vessels specifically designed to exclude rodents—some with lids or narrow necks—indicates that pest control was a daily struggle for the Yangshao farmer.¹ Into this struggle stepped the leopard cat.

3. The Protagonist: Prionailurus bengalensis

Before examining the archaeological remains, it is crucial to characterize the animal that responded to this ecological opportunity. Prionailurus bengalensis, the leopard cat, is taxonomically and behaviorally distinct from the ancestor of the modern domestic cat.

3.1 Taxonomy and Morphology

The leopard cat belongs to the genus Prionailurus, which diverged from the Felis lineage millions of years ago. It is a small felid, roughly the size of a domestic cat but with a more slender, elongated body and longer legs.¹² Its most striking feature is its coat: a pale tawny background covered in distinct, solid black spots, resembling a miniature leopard. This camouflage is adapted for the dappled light of forests and scrublands.

In contrast to the African wildcat (F. s. lybica), which has a cryptic, tawny-striped coat adapted for deserts and savannahs, the leopard cat is a creature of the dense cover.

3.2 Behavioral Ecology: The Solitary Hunter

The most significant barrier to the domestication of the leopard cat lies in its social structure.

• Solitary Nature: P. bengalensis is strictly solitary. Telemetry studies in modern Asia show that individuals maintain exclusive territories (average 2–12 km²) and rarely interact outside of mating.¹⁴

• Aggression: Comparative ethological studies indicate that leopard cats exhibit higher levels of intraspecific aggression and lower levels of social play compared to Felis species.¹⁶ While domestic cat kittens engage in complex social play that facilitates group living, leopard cat kittens are more prone to "play fighting" that escalates to aggression, reflecting a hard-wired solitary existence.

• Dietary Plasticity: The leopard cat is a hyper-carnivorous generalist. Its diet includes small mammals (rodents), lizards, amphibians, and, crucially, birds.¹⁸ It is an agile climber, capable of hunting arboreal prey, but does much of its hunting on the ground.

This behavioral profile makes the leopard cat an unlikely candidate for domestication. It lacks the "pre-adaptation" for sociality found in the African wildcat, which forms loose colonies around resource-rich areas. Yet, the isotopic data from Neolithic China suggests that for thousands of years, this biological barrier was suspended.

4. The Archaeological Evidence: Unearthing the "Chicken-Killing Tiger"

The identification of the Chinese commensal cat has been a subject of intense scientific debate, evolving from assumptions of Near Eastern origins to the confirmation of an indigenous process.

4.1 The Quanhucun Findings (2014): Isotopic Proof of Commensalism

The seminal study by Hu et al. (2014) analyzed eight felid bones from the site of Quanhucun (5,560–5,280 cal BP).¹ The study combined radiocarbon dating with stable isotope analysis of carbon and nitrogen.

Table 1: Isotopic Data from Quanhucun Felids and Fauna (Data derived from ¹)

Specimen Group	δ13C (Carbon) Mean	δ15N (Nitrogen) Mean	Dietary Interpretation
Humans	-10.5 ± 0.8‰	9.0 ± 1.0‰	C4-heavy diet (Millet) + meat (Pig/Dog)
Pigs (Domestic)	-11.2 ± 1.5‰	7.8 ± 1.2‰	C4-heavy diet (Millet fodder/scraps)
Wild Herbivores	-21.0 ± 1.3‰	4.2 ± 0.8‰	C3 diet (Wild vegetation)
Rodents (Zokor)	-8.5‰	8.5‰	C4-heavy diet (Millet raiding)
Quanhucun Cat 1	-16.1‰	~7.6‰	Mixed C3/C4 diet (Hunting wild & commensal prey)
Quanhucun Cat 2	-12.3‰	5.8‰	Strong C4 signal, Low N (Scavenging/Fed?)

Analysis of Cat 2: The isotopic signature of "Cat 2" is particularly revelatory.

1. High C4 Signal (-12.3‰): This value is nearly identical to the humans and domestic pigs. It indicates that the cat was not hunting in the C3-dominated wild forests. Its diet consisted almost entirely of animals that ate millet (rodents in the granary) or millet itself.

2. Low Nitrogen (5.8‰): As an obligate carnivore, a cat hunting rodents should have a nitrogen value 3–5‰ higher than its prey (trophic enrichment). A value of 5.8‰ is anomalously low, falling into the herbivore range. Hu et al. proposed that this cat might have been scavenging millet gruel or leftovers, or perhaps eating agricultural byproducts, indicating a level of dependency on direct human feeding rather than just predation.¹

Furthermore, one of the mandibles from the site belonged to an aged individual with heavily worn teeth. In the wild, a predator with such dental wear would likely starve. Its survival suggests it was cared for or allowed to scavenge soft foods within the settlement.¹¹

4.2 The Geometric Morphometrics Revolution (2016)

While Hu et al. (2014) initially suspected these cats might be related to Felis silvestris due to their small size, a 2016 study by Vigne et al. corrected the taxonomic record using Geometric Morphometrics (GMM).²

GMM analyzes the shape of the bone independent of its size by mapping homologous landmarks (e.g., the condylar process, the mental foramen) and superimposing the geometries. The study compared the Quanhucun mandibles against a reference dataset of modern Felis and Prionailurus specimens.

• The Result: The Quanhucun mandibles, along with specimens from other Neolithic sites in Shaanxi and Henan, clustered tightly with Prionailurus bengalensis. They fell completely outside the phenotypic range of Felis silvestris.

• Implication: This confirmed that the "domestic" cats of the Yangshao culture were indeed leopard cats. The size reduction observed by Hu et al. was likely a result of the "domestication syndrome"—a common morphological change where captive animals become smaller than their wild ancestors—or a specific local adaptation.²⁰

4.3 The Genomic Confirmation (2025)

The definitive confirmation came from a comprehensive study by Han et al. (2025), which analyzed ancient DNA from 22 felid remains across 14 sites in Northern China, spanning 5,000 years.⁴

• Holocene Dominance: Every single felid sample dated between the Neolithic (5,000 BP) and the end of the Han Dynasty (200 CE) was genetically identified as Prionailurus bengalensis.

• No Felis Presence: There was zero genetic evidence of Felis catus or Felis silvestris in China during this 3,500-year period. The leopard cat was the only commensal felid.²¹

5. Life in the Neolithic Village: Mutualism and Ritual

For 3,500 years, the leopard cat and the Chinese farmer engaged in a mutualistic dance. This was not merely a predator raiding a barn; it was a culturally integrated relationship.

5.1 The Commensal Niche

The relationship likely began as "synanthropy"—the cats were attracted to the rodent explosion in the millet stores. Over time, farmers recognized the utility of the "chicken-killing tiger" (a colloquial name for the leopard cat) in protecting their harvest.

• Pest Control: With ceramic vessels offering imperfect protection against burrowing zokors, a resident predator was a valuable asset.

• Tolerance: The survival of aged individuals and the isotopic evidence of low-protein (millet) consumption suggests that humans actively tolerated these cats, perhaps tossing them scraps or allowing them to den in the village.¹

5.2 Cultural Integration

The leopard cat was not just a tool; it was a symbol.

• Burials: At sites like Quanhucun and Wuzhuangguoliang, entire cat skeletons have been found in ash pits and burial contexts, suggesting they were not eaten but disposed of with a degree of intentionality, or died naturally within the settlement.¹⁹

• Artistic Depiction: Artifacts from the period depict spotted felines, distinct from the striped tabby patterns of the Western wildcat. These depictions suggest the leopard cat was a recognized and observed member of the village fauna.²¹

However, despite this long cohabitation, the leopard cat never fully crossed the threshold into "true" domestication. There is no evidence of breeding isolation from the wild population, nor of the extreme morphological changes (coat color variation, ear floppiness) seen in other domesticates. They remained "tame wild animals" rather than "domesticated animals."

6. The Turning Point: The Han Dynasty and the "Chicken-Killing" Crisis

If the relationship was so beneficial, why did it end? Why are modern Chinese households filled with descendants of the African wildcat? The answer lies in the shifting agricultural economy of the Han Dynasty (202 BCE – 220 CE).

6.1 The Rise of Poultry Farming

During the Neolithic, the primary domestic animals were pigs and dogs. Chickens (Gallus gallus) were present but relatively scarce. However, by the Han Dynasty, agricultural intensification led to a boom in poultry farming.

• Economic Shift: Historical texts and archaeological finds (such as clay models of chicken coops in Han tombs) indicate that chickens became a ubiquitous source of protein and a key household asset.²¹

• Housing: Chickens were often kept in confined courtyards or coops to protect them from theft and predators—and to collect manure.²⁴

6.2 The Interspecies Conflict

This economic shift placed the leopard cat in an untenable position.

• Predatory Instinct: Prionailurus bengalensis is an evolved hunter of ground-dwelling birds. In the wild, pheasants and junglefowl are natural prey. Unlike Felis catus, which can show some plasticity in prey choice, the leopard cat retains a high aggression toward poultry.¹⁸

• The Conflict: As chicken populations in villages exploded, the leopard cat likely switched from hunting rats to hunting chickens. The "village mouser" became the "poultry thief."

• The "Chicken-Killing Tiger": The Han et al. (2025) study explicitly links the disappearance of the leopard cat to this conflict. They term the animal the "chicken-killing tiger," reflecting the farmers' shifting perception. The cost of losing livestock (chickens) outweighed the benefit of pest control (rats).⁴

Conservation studies on modern leopard cats support this. In contemporary Asia, retaliatory killing by farmers due to poultry predation is a primary threat to the species.¹⁴ It is highly probable that Han Dynasty farmers engaged in similar culling, driving the leopard cat out of the settlement and back into the wild.

7. The Interregnum: The 600-Year Gap

Following the collapse of the Han Dynasty (c. 220 CE), the leopard cat vanishes from the archaeological record of human settlements. For approximately 600 years, there are almost no felid remains found in Chinese agricultural sites.²¹

This "felid gap" is significant. It suggests that the commensal niche was vacant. The leopard cat had been evicted due to the poultry conflict, but no other animal had yet arrived to take its place. Rodent populations likely surged during this period, unchecked by a resident predator. This vacuum created an ecological opening for an invader.

8. The Silk Road and the Arrival of Felis catus

The solution to the rodent problem arrived from the West. The 2025 genomic study identified the first true domestic cat (Felis catus) in China during the Tang Dynasty (618–907 CE).²¹

8.1 The Genomic Evidence

The earliest Felis catus specimen, dated to 706–883 CE, was found in Shaanxi Province.

• Clade IV-B: Mitochondrial DNA analysis assigned this cat to Clade IV-B. This specific haplogroup is not native to East Asia. It is associated with the Near Eastern wildcat lineages that were domesticated in the Fertile Crescent.²⁶

• The Kazakhstan Link: Crucially, this Chinese specimen shared an identical genetic signature with a domestic cat found at Jankent, a medieval trading hub in Kazakhstan.²¹

8.2 The Mechanism of Dispersal

This genetic link provides the "smoking gun" for the Silk Road hypothesis.

• Trade Route: The Silk Road connected the Tang capital of Chang'an (modern Xi'an) with Central Asia and the Near East. Cats were likely transported along this route, not just as stowaways, but as valuable commodities.

• Exotic Pets: Initially, these "western cats" were likely luxury items for the elite. Historical records from the Tang period describe "lion cats" (Persians or longhairs) as prized pets of the aristocracy.²⁸

• Utility: However, their utility as mousers would have driven their rapid expansion into the general populace.

9. Displacement and Replacement: Why Felis Won

When Felis catus arrived, it encountered a niche that was either empty or poorly serviced by the indigenous leopard cat. The domestic cat possessed critical advantages that allowed it to permanently replace Prionailurus bengalensis.

9.1 Behavioral Plasticity and Sociality

The ancestor of the domestic cat, Felis silvestris lybica, is naturally more social than the leopard cat. It tolerates higher population densities and, critically, tolerates human handling. The leopard cat, even after 3,500 years, remained solitary and aggressive.¹⁵ The "tamability" of Felis catus made it a better companion.

9.2 The Poultry Factor

While domestic cats do kill chickens, they are generally less aggressive toward large poultry than leopard cats, and their diet is more easily subsidized by human scraps. Felis catus had already undergone thousands of years of selection in the West for coexistence with mixed-farming systems (including chickens). It arrived in China as a "finished product"—a mouser that could live in a chicken-filled courtyard without causing economic devastation.²⁴

9.3 Genetic Swamping?

Interestingly, the 2025 study found no evidence of hybridization between the invading Felis catus and the native Prionailurus bengalensis in ancient samples.⁵ The two species belong to different genera and do not naturally interbreed (the modern "Bengal" breed requires human intervention). This was a case of competitive exclusion, not genetic assimilation. The domestic cat simply outcompeted the leopard cat for the role of "village mouser."

10. Conclusion

The story of the Chinese leopard cat is a powerful corrective to the simplified narratives of domestication. It demonstrates that the path to domestication is not linear, nor is it guaranteed. The Neolithic farmers of the Yellow River Valley forged a unique, independent bond with a native predator, driven by the ecological pressures of millet farming and rodent infestation. For 3,500 years, the leopard cat was the "cat" of China.

However, the bond was fragile. It relied on a specific economic configuration. When that configuration changed—with the introduction of intensive poultry farming—the biological limitations of the leopard cat (its solitary nature and high prey drive) became fatal liabilities. The "Chicken-Killing Tiger" was evicted from the niche it had helped construct.

The arrival of Felis catus via the Silk Road represents a second wave of commensalism, one that succeeded where the first had failed due to the superior pre-adaptation of the African wildcat lineage. Today, the leopard cat has returned to the wild, a ghost of a domestication that almost was, while the descendants of the Silk Road travelers curl up by the hearths of modern China.

Detailed Appendix: Methodology and Data Analysis

To substantiate the narrative above, the following sections detail the specific scientific methodologies used in the key studies referenced.

A.1 Geometric Morphometrics (GMM) Analysis

The 2016 study by Vigne et al. utilized GMM to resolve the taxonomic status of the Quanhucun cats.

• Landmark Selection: The study digitized 14 homologous landmarks on the mandibles of archaeological specimens and modern reference collections.

• Canonical Variate Analysis (CVA): This statistical method maximizes the separation between known groups (modern Felis vs. Prionailurus).

• Results: The first two canonical variates explained >80% of the variance. The Quanhucun specimens fell within the 95% confidence ellipse of Prionailurus bengalensis, with a Mahalanobis distance significantly closer to leopard cats than to wildcats.²⁰

A.2 Stable Isotope Fractionation Mechanics

The interpretation of the Quanhucun isotopes relies on the principles of fractionation.

• Carbon (^13C):

• Millet (C4) δ13C ≈ -12‰.

• Rice/Trees (C3) δ13C ≈ -27‰.

• Trophic Shift: Biological tissues enrich in ^13C by ~1‰ relative to diet.

• Cat 1 Data: δ13C = -16.1‰.

• Calculation: If diet was 100% C3 prey (-27 + 1 = -26‰). If diet was 100% C4 prey (-12 + 1 = -11‰).

• Conclusion: -16.1‰ represents a mixed diet, roughly 40-50% C4-derived carbon.

• Cat 2 Data: δ13C = -12.3‰.

• Conclusion: This is a near-pure C4 signal, implying the cat ate animals that ate nothing but millet.

• Nitrogen (^15N):

• Trophic Shift: Tissues enrich by 3–5‰ per trophic level.

• Cat 2 Data: δ15N = 5.8‰.

• Baseline: Herbivores at the site (Deer) had δ15N ≈ 4–5‰.

• Conclusion: A carnivore should be at 8–10‰. A value of 5.8‰ is impossible for a strict predator of wild game. It implies the consumption of low-trophic level foods (plants/gruel) or protein from a different, lower-N source (waste scavenging).¹

A.3 Chronology of Felid Succession

Table 2: Timeline of Human-Felid Interaction in China

Period	Timeframe	Dominant Felid	Evidence Type	Key Site/Event
Middle Neolithic	5,500 – 5,000 BP	Prionailurus bengalensis	Isotope, GMM	Quanhucun (Commensalism starts)
Late Neolithic	4,500 – 4,000 BP	Prionailurus bengalensis	Zooarchaeology	Wuzhuangguoliang (Burials)
Han Dynasty	202 BCE – 220 CE	Prionailurus bengalensis	Genomics (aDNA)	Rise of Poultry ("Chicken-Killing")
The Gap	220 CE – 700 CE	None	Absence of remains	Post-Han interregnum
Tang Dynasty	618 – 907 CE	Felis catus	Genomics (Clade IV-B)	Silk Road import (Kazakhstan link)
Modern Era	Present	Felis catus	Genetics	Extirpation of P. bengalensis from niche

This chronology highlights the stark replacement event following the Han Dynasty, aligning perfectly with the genomic data provided by Han et al. (2025).

Works cited

1. Earliest evidence for commensal processes of cat domestication - PNAS, accessed November 29, 2025, https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1311439110

2. Earliest “Domestic” Cats in China Identified as Leopard Cat (Prionailurus bengalensis) - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed November 29, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4723238/

3. Rewriting Cat History: How New Genetic Evidence Challenges Everything We Thought We Knew About Domestic Cats, accessed November 29, 2025, https://bigcatrescue.org/conservation-news/rewriting-cat-history-how-new-genetic-evidence-challenges-everything-we-thought-we-knew-about-domestic-cats

4. Articles by Chris Simms, Live Science Contributor, accessed November 29, 2025, https://www.livescience.com/author/chris-simms

5. (PDF) Leopard Cats Occupied Human Settlements in China for 3,500 years before the Arrival of Domestic cats in 600-900 CE around the Tang Dynasty - ResearchGate, accessed November 29, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388732323_Leopard_Cats_Occupied_Human_Settlements_in_China_for_3500_years_before_the_Arrival_of_Domestic_cats_in_600-900_CE_around_the_Tang_Dynasty

6. The Xia and Shang: The original Black civilizations of China - Realhistoryww.com, accessed November 29, 2025, https://www.realhistoryww.com/world_history/ancient/China_1.htm

7. Earliest evidence for commensal process of cat domestication - ResearchGate, accessed November 29, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259350659_Earliest_evidence_for_commensal_process_of_cat_domestication

8. Amphora - Wikipedia, accessed November 29, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amphora

9. Revealing a 5,000-y-old beer recipe in China | PNAS, accessed November 29, 2025, https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1601465113

10. Neolithic beers in China (7000-3000 BC)., accessed November 29, 2025, https://beer-studies.com/en/world-history/Birth-of-brewing/Archaic-beers/Neolithic-China

11. Meow! The History of Cat Domestication, accessed November 29, 2025, https://historycollection.com/meow-the-history-of-cat-domestication-and-how-our-furry-friends-domesticated-themselves/

12. Dangerous trend: wild cats on the couch - AniForte, accessed November 29, 2025, https://www.aniforte.de/en/blogs/cats/dangerous-trend-wildcats

13. Leopard cat - Wikipedia, accessed November 29, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leopard_cat

14. Asian Leopard Cats - WildCat Ridge Sanctuary, accessed November 29, 2025, https://wildcatridgesanctuary.org/residents/asian-leopard-cats/

15. Prionailurus bengalensis (leopard cat) | INFORMATION - Animal Diversity Web, accessed November 29, 2025, https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Prionailurus_bengalensis/

16. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON VISUAL AND TACTILE COMMUNICATION IN THE DOMESTIC CAT (Felis silvestris catus) AND UNDOMESTICATED SMALL, accessed November 29, 2025, https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/463206/1/525707.pdf

17. (PDF) Social play changes reflect differences in biology and development of three felids, accessed November 29, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338136555_Social_play_changes_reflect_differences_in_biology_and_development_of_three_felids

18. Spatial Distribution and Dietary Niche Breadth of Leopard Cats (Prionailurus bengalensis) Inhabiting Margalla Hills National Park, Pakistan - PubMed Central, accessed November 29, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8652417/

19. How Cats and People Grew to Love Each Other | National Geographic, accessed November 29, 2025, https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/article/how-cats-and-people-grew-to-love-each-other

20. Earliest “Domestic” Cats in China Identified as Leopard Cat (Prionailurus bengalensis) | PLOS One - Research journals, accessed November 29, 2025, https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0147295

21. Leopard Cats Occupied Human Settlements in China for 3,500 years before the Arrival of Domestic cats in 600-900 CE around the Tang Dynasty | bioRxiv, accessed November 29, 2025, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.01.31.635809v2.full-text

22. Leopard Cats Occupied Human Settlements in China for 3,500 years before the Arrival of Domestic cats in 600-900 CE around the Ta - bioRxiv, accessed November 29, 2025, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.01.31.635809v1.full.pdf

23. Poultry - Wikipedia, accessed November 29, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poultry

24. Domestic Cats Were Not the First Felines To Live With Humans, Study Reveals - Newsweek, accessed November 29, 2025, https://www.newsweek.com/domestic-cats-not-first-felines-live-humans-study-reveals-china-11120746

25. Factors influencing local attitudes towards the conservation of leopard cats Prionailurus bengalensis in rural Taiwan | Oryx, accessed November 29, 2025, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/oryx/article/factors-influencing-local-attitudes-towards-the-conservation-of-leopard-cats-prionailurus-bengalensis-in-rural-taiwan/55B7A8989E61582D64DC3BF6B420481E

26. A New Study Finds That Domestic Cats Traveled the Silk Road to China About 1,400 Years Ago - Smithsonian Magazine, accessed November 29, 2025, https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/a-new-study-finds-that-domestic-cats-traveled-the-silk-road-to-china-about-1400-years-ago-180986206/

27. (PDF) The earliest domestic cat on the Silk Road - ResearchGate, accessed November 29, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342804070_The_earliest_domestic_cat_on_the_Silk_Road

28. Study reveals cats arrived in China via the Silk Road around 600 CE | The Jerusalem Post, accessed November 29, 2025, https://www.jpost.com/archaeology/archaeology-around-the-world/article-845422

29. Leopard cats and domestics: the rise and fall of cats in China - Optimal Selection, accessed November 29, 2025, https://optimal-selection.com/blogs/news/leopard-cats-and-domestics-the-rise-and-fall-of-cats-in-china