Beyond the Dark Side: How Chang'e 6 is Solving the Lunar Dichotomy Through its Sample Return Project

1. Introduction: The Asymmetry of the Earth-Moon System

For the vast majority of human history, the Moon was a two-dimensional object in the sky, presenting a single, unchanging face to observers on Earth. This synchronous rotation—the result of tidal locking over billions of years—meant that the "far side" remained a realm of speculation until the mid-20th century. When the Soviet probe Luna 3 transmitted the first grainy images of the lunar farside in 1959, it revealed a world starkly different from the familiar near side. Where the face we see is dominated by vast, dark maria—ancient plains of basaltic lava that ancient astronomers mistook for seas—the far side is a rugged, heavily cratered highland terrain with a distinct lack of widespread volcanism.¹

This striking difference is known as the "lunar dichotomy," a fundamental asymmetry that has puzzled planetary scientists for decades. The near side boasts a relatively thin crust and is enriched in heat-producing radioactive elements like potassium, rare earth elements, and phosphorus (the so-called KREEP terrane). The far side, conversely, possesses a significantly thicker crust and appears depleted of these geochemical heat sources. Understanding this dichotomy is not merely a matter of lunar cartography; it is essential for reconstructing the thermal evolution of the Earth-Moon system and the violent history of the early solar system.¹

On June 25, 2024, the Chinese National Space Administration (CNSA) successfully concluded the Chang'e 6 mission, the first human endeavor to retrieve physical samples from the lunar far side. By landing in the Apollo crater within the colossal South Pole-Aitken (SPA) basin, Chang'e 6 targeted the oldest and deepest impact structure on the Moon. The 1,935.3 grams of material returned to Earth promise to revolutionize our understanding of lunar geology, offering the first direct evidence of the far side's magmatic history, volatile inventory, and impact chronology.³

This report provides an exhaustive analysis of the Chang'e 6 mission, detailing its complex architecture, the geological context of the landing site, the international scientific cooperation involved, and the groundbreaking preliminary results from the sample analysis. These findings challenge long-held models of lunar evolution, suggesting a dynamic history of "hidden" magmatism and catastrophic volatile loss that shaped the Moon we see today.

2. Geological Context: The South Pole-Aitken Basin

To understand the scientific magnitude of the Chang'e 6 mission, one must first understand its destination. The South Pole-Aitken (SPA) basin is not merely a crater; it is a planetary scar of immense proportions, dominating the southern hemisphere of the lunar far side.

2.1 Formation and Scale of the SPA Basin

The SPA basin stretches approximately 2,500 kilometers in diameter and reaches depths of over 8 kilometers relative to the lunar ellipsoid. It is the largest, deepest, and oldest recognizable impact structure on the Moon, and arguably one of the largest in the entire solar system.⁵ Formed by a cataclysmic impact event roughly 4.2 to 4.3 billion years ago, the basin represents a window into the pre-Nectarian period of lunar history, an epoch from which little surface evidence survives elsewhere.⁶

The sheer energy of the SPA impact event excavated material from great depths. While the typical lunar highland crust is anorthositic (composed largely of the mineral plagioclase feldspar), the floor of the SPA basin is geochemically distinct. Remote sensing data from NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) and the Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL) mission indicate that the crust beneath the SPA basin is anomalously thin—potentially less than 20 kilometers in some regions, compared to the 30-50 kilometer average of the surrounding highlands.¹

This thinning suggests that the impactor may have punched through the primitive lunar crust entirely, exposing the lower crust or even the upper mantle. Consequently, samples retrieved from this region offer a unique opportunity to study the Moon's deep interior composition, which is otherwise inaccessible.⁵

2.2 The Apollo Crater: A Window into Far-Side Volcanism

Within the vast expanse of the SPA basin lies the Apollo crater, a 538-kilometer-wide impact structure located at approximately 41°S latitude and 154°W longitude. This specific crater was selected as the Chang'e 6 landing site for its unique geological diversity.³

Unlike much of the far side, the floor of the Apollo crater contains patches of mare basalt. These lava flows occurred long after the formation of the SPA basin and the Apollo crater itself, offering evidence of secondary magmatic events. This juxtaposition is scientifically critical: it allows researchers to sample both the ancient, deep-seated material excavated by the basin-forming impact and the younger volcanic rock that later flooded the crater floor.⁸

The landing site is also situated near the Chaffee S crater, which likely distributed "exotic" ejecta—material thrown from distant impacts—across the sampling zone. This implies that a single scoop of regolith from the Chang'e 6 site could effectively serve as a "grab bag" of regional geology, containing basalts, breccias (rocks composed of broken fragments), and potentially pieces of the lunar mantle.⁸

2.3 The Lunar Chronology Problem

A primary driver for sampling the Apollo basin was the need to calibrate the "lunar cratering chronology." For decades, planetary scientists have estimated the ages of surfaces on Mars, Mercury, and the Moon by counting craters—the more craters a surface has, the older it is presumed to be. However, to convert these relative counts into absolute ages (in billions of years), the timeline must be anchored by radiometrically dated samples.¹

Prior to Chang'e 6, all calibration points came from the near side (Apollo, Luna, and Chang'e 5 samples). There was a significant gap in the timeline between 3.0 billion years ago (the youngest Apollo samples) and 2.0 billion years ago (the Chang'e 5 samples). Remote sensing suggested the basalts in the Apollo crater were approximately 2.5 billion years old. Retrieving and dating these rocks would provide a crucial anchor point for this "middle age" of the solar system, refining age estimates for planetary surfaces throughout the inner solar system.⁸

3. Mission Architecture and Engineering Challenges

The Chang'e 6 mission represents a high-water mark in robotic spaceflight, demonstrating complex autonomous maneuvers in a deep-space environment where real-time direct communication with Earth is physically impossible.

3.1 The Communication Relay: Queqiao-2

The fundamental constraint of far-side exploration is the Moon's body blocking all radio signals to Earth. To solve this, the CNSA launched the Queqiao-2 ("Magpie Bridge 2") relay satellite on March 20, 2024, nearly two months prior to the lander.¹⁰

Queqiao-2 was inserted into a specialized highly elliptical "frozen" orbit. In orbital mechanics, a frozen orbit is one where natural perturbations (like the Moon's lumpy gravity field) are balanced to keep the orbital parameters stable over time. This specific orbit was designed to maximize the satellite's dwell time over the lunar south pole and the far side, ensuring it had a direct line of sight to both the Chang'e 6 lander and ground stations in China for the majority of its orbital period.¹⁰

Equipped with a massive parabolic antenna 4.2 meters in diameter, Queqiao-2 acted as the nerve center for the mission. It facilitated the transmission of high-definition video, telemetry, and telecommands, effectively bridging the 380,000-kilometer silence of the lunar shadow.²

3.2 The Quad-Module Stack

The Chang'e 6 spacecraft, with a launch mass of roughly 8,350 kilograms, utilized a four-module configuration similar to its predecessor, Chang'e 5 ⁴:

1. The Orbiter: This module served as the "freighter," carrying the lander stack to the Moon and later ferrying the return capsule back to Earth. It provided power, propulsion, and navigation during the trans-lunar and trans-earth cruise phases.

2. The Lander: The workhorse of the surface mission, the lander was equipped with a variable-thrust engine (7500 Newtons) for soft landing. It carried the scientific payloads, the sampling drill and scoop, and the ascent vehicle.

3. The Ascender: Sitting atop the lander, this small spacecraft functioned as a mini-rocket. Its sole purpose was to lift the collected samples from the lunar surface into lunar orbit.

4. The Returner: A bell-shaped reentry capsule housed within the Orbiter during transit. It was designed with a specialized heat shield to survive the extreme velocity of atmospheric entry.

3.3 Autonomous Landing and Obstacle Avoidance

On May 30, 2024, the Lander-Ascender combination separated from the Orbiter and began its descent. The landing sequence on the far side is far more perilous than on the near side due to the rugged topography of the SPA basin.

The spacecraft employed an advanced Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GNC) system powered by onboard artificial intelligence. During the descent, the lander utilized a combination of optical cameras and laser LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) to scan the terrain beneath it in real-time. The system built a 3D elevation map on the fly, identifying hazards such as boulders or steep slopes.

In the final moments of descent, the lander entered a hovering phase roughly 100 meters above the surface. It autonomously selected a safe, flat landing site, adjusted its trajectory, and descended vertically, cutting its engine just meters above the ground to reduce dust plume interference. It touched down successfully on June 1, 2024, at 22:23 UTC.³

4. Surface Operations: A Race Against Time

Once on the surface, the mission entered a high-intensity operational phase. Unlike NASA's Mars rovers, which operate for years, the Chang'e 6 sampling mission was designed as a "sprint," limited to roughly 48 hours. This short duration was dictated by thermal constraints and the orbital geometry required for the ascender to rendezvous with the orbiter.¹²

4.1 Intelligent Sampling: Drill and Scoop

To ensure scientific diversity, the lander employed two distinct sampling mechanisms ⁴:

1. The Deep Drill:

A rotary-percussive drill was deployed to bore into the lunar regolith. The goal was to retrieve a subsurface core sample that preserved the stratigraphy (layering) of the soil. This is crucial because the surface layer is constantly "gardened" (mixed) by micrometeorite impacts and solar wind, whereas deeper layers preserve the ancient history of the site. The drill was capable of penetrating up to 2 meters, depending on the hardness of the underlying rock.

2. The Robotic Arm:

A multi-jointed robotic arm was used to scoop surface regolith and small rock fragments. This process was heavily automated. The lander captured stereo images of the workspace, and ground control (assisted by AI) designated sampling targets. The arm then calculated its own trajectory to scoop the material and deposit it into the sample container.

During the scooping operation, the pattern of excavations left a trench that resembled the Chinese character "Zhong" (中). While this was a serendipitous result of the engineering plan—"Zhong" simply means "center" or "middle" and is the first character of "China" (Zhongguo)—it became a potent symbol of the mission's national achievement.⁴

4.2 The "Jinchan" Mini-Rover

A previously unannounced payload was deployed following the sampling activities: a miniature autonomous rover named "Jinchan" (Golden Toad). Weighing approximately 5 kilograms, this tiny vehicle was a marvel of miniaturization and material science.

Developed by the China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC), the rover's wheels and chassis utilized advanced lightweight composites. Its optical systems incorporated large-sized tellurium dioxide crystals developed by the Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, which provided superior acoustic and optical properties for its infrared imaging spectrometer.¹³

The rover's primary mission was photographic. Upon deployment, it autonomously navigated away from the lander, identified the optimal angle for lighting and composition, and captured the now-iconic image of the Chang'e 6 lander with its solar arrays deployed and the Chinese flag unfurled against the dark lunar sky. This marked the first autonomous "selfie" taken by a rover of its host lander on the far side of the Moon.⁵

5. International Scientific Payloads: Diplomacy in Orbit

Chang'e 6 was not a solitary endeavor. The lander and orbiter hosted scientific instruments from France, Italy, Sweden, and Pakistan, marking a significant expansion of international cooperation in China's lunar program.

5.1 DORN (France): Tracing the Lunar Atmosphere

The Detection of Outgassing RadoN (DORN) instrument, developed by the French space agency CNES, was the first French instrument to operate on the lunar surface. Its scientific objective was to detect radon-222, a radioactive noble gas produced by the decay of uranium in the lunar soil.¹⁵

Radon acts as a tracer for gas transport. Because the Moon has an incredibly thin exosphere, volatiles (like water molecules) migrate from the equator toward the cold poles through "ballistic hopping"—jumping in arcs under low gravity. By measuring radon, DORN provided data on how gases move across the lunar surface, which is critical for understanding the water cycle and the stability of ice deposits at the lunar poles.¹⁶ DORN operated for 19 hours on the surface and successfully detected the alpha particles characteristic of radon decay.¹⁷

5.2 NILS (Sweden/ESA): The Solar Wind Connection

The Negative Ions at the Lunar Surface (NILS) instrument was a collaboration between the Swedish Institute of Space Physics and the European Space Agency (ESA). It was designed to detect negative ions—charged particles created when the solar wind crashes into the lunar surface.¹⁸

The Moon lacks a global magnetic field, so it is constantly bombarded by the solar wind (a stream of plasma from the Sun). When these protons hit the regolith, they can knock electrons onto neutral atoms, creating negative ions. NILS was the first instrument to successfully detect these ions on the lunar surface, providing new insights into the plasma environment and the electrostatic charging of lunar dust—a phenomenon that poses significant hazards to future explorers and machinery.¹⁹

5.3 INRRI (Italy): A Permanent Marker

The Italian contribution, INRRI (INstrument for landing-Roving laser Retroreflector Investigations), is a passive laser retroreflector. It consists of a dome housing eight cube-corner mirrors made of fused silica.²⁰

INRRI does not transmit data; rather, it reflects laser pulses sent from orbiting spacecraft. By measuring the time it takes for a laser pulse to bounce back, scientists can determine the distance to the lander with millimeter-level precision. This establishes a permanent "fiducial marker" on the far side, essential for lunar geodesy (measuring the Moon's shape and gravity) and for navigating future landings.²¹

5.4 ICUBE-Q (Pakistan): The First Steps

Deployed from the Orbiter, ICUBE-Q was a CubeSat developed by Pakistan's Institute of Space Technology. It carried two cameras to image the Moon and the Chang'e 6 orbiter, as well as sensors to map the lunar magnetic field.²² Its successful deployment and data transmission marked Pakistan's entry into lunar exploration, symbolizing the broadening participation of developing nations in deep space activities.²³

6. Sample Return: The Orbital Ballet

The return of the samples required a sequence of maneuvers that had never been attempted from the far side of the Moon.

6.1 Ascent and Rendezvous

On June 3, 2024, the Ascender module ignited its engine, using the Lander as a launchpad. This was the first extraterrestrial launch from the lunar far side. Because the launch site was out of direct view of Earth, the Ascender relied on autonomous guidance to achieve a precise lunar orbit.³

Once in orbit, the Ascender had to locate the Orbiter. This "Lunar Orbit Rendezvous" (LOR)—the same strategy used by Apollo—requires extreme precision. The two spacecraft, traveling at thousands of kilometers per hour, had to align perfectly. The Ascender used microwave radar and laser sensors to close the distance, guided by the Orbiter's beacon. On June 6, the two vehicles docked, and a robotic mechanism transferred the sample container from the Ascender to the Returner capsule.¹⁰

6.2 The Skip Reentry

After jettisoning the Ascender (which was de-orbited to prevent space debris), the Orbiter fired its engines to leave lunar orbit. The transit back to Earth took five days. On June 25, the Returner capsule separated from the Orbiter roughly 5,000 kilometers from Earth.

To survive the reentry speed of nearly 11 kilometers per second (roughly 25,000 mph), the capsule executed a "skip reentry." It dipped into the atmosphere to bleed off speed, bounced back up like a stone skipping on a pond to cool down, and then plunged back in for the final descent. This technique reduces the G-forces and heat load on the samples. The capsule landed safely in the Siziwang Banner region of Inner Mongolia, delivering 1,935.3 grams of far-side material to waiting recovery teams.³

7. Scientific Discoveries: Unlocking the Far Side

The samples were transported to Beijing for analysis, where they were unsealed in a pristine nitrogen atmosphere. The initial findings have been transformative, confirming some hypotheses while completely upending others.

7.1 Physical Properties and Soil Mechanics

The physical nature of the Chang'e 6 regolith proved distinct from near-side samples. Technicians noted that the soil was "clumpier" and more cohesive. Tests revealed a high "angle of repose," meaning the soil could be piled steeply without collapsing.

Detailed analysis showed this was not due to moisture or clays, but rather the unique electrostatic and morphological properties of the particles. The soil contains a high percentage of "agglutinates"—glass-welded aggregates formed by micrometeorite impacts—and sharp, angular fragments. The lack of atmospheric weathering preserves these jagged edges, increasing friction between particles. Furthermore, the interplay of Van der Waals forces and electrostatic charging (enhanced by the direct solar wind exposure measured by NILS) makes the far-side dust significantly "stickier" than terrestrial sand.²⁴

7.2 Mineralogy and the "Breccia" Nature

The mineralogical composition of the samples is a testament to the violent history of the SPA basin. The soil is a mixture of local mare basalts and "exotic" materials. It is rich in plagioclase (32.6%), augite (19.7%), and amorphous glass (29.4%), but notably depleted in olivine compared to Chang'e 5 samples.⁸

This composition identifies the soil largely as a "breccia"—a rock type formed by the smashing together of different rock fragments during impacts. The presence of high-calcium pyroxene (augite) and low-calcium pyroxene (pigeonite) confirms the presence of evolved volcanic rocks, while the plagioclase hints at the ancient anorthositic crust that underlies the basin.²⁵

7.3 Chronology: A New Era of Volcanism

One of the most significant findings is the age of the basalt fragments. Radioisotope dating (likely U-Pb or Rb-Sr methods) of the Chang'e 6 samples yielded an age of approximately 2.8 billion years.²⁶

This date is a revelation. On the near side, Chang'e 5 proved that volcanism continued until 2.0 billion years ago. The Chang'e 6 date indicates that volcanism on the far side ceased nearly a billion years earlier. This confirms the hypothesis that the far side cooled much faster than the near side.

The "gap" in lunar volcanism—between the 3.0+ billion-year-old Apollo samples and the 2.0 billion-year-old Chang'e 5 samples—has effectively been filled. This 2.8 billion-year date provides a critical new calibration point for the lunar cratering chronology, allowing scientists to more accurately date surfaces on Mars and other bodies that possess similar crater densities.⁸

7.4 Isotopic Evidence of the Giant Impact

Perhaps the most profound discovery relates to the "volatiles"—elements like potassium, zinc, and gallium that vaporize easily. Isotopic analysis revealed that the Chang'e 6 basalts are significantly enriched in heavy isotopes (e.g., Potassium-41) compared to light isotopes (Potassium-39).⁶

In planetary science, this is a "smoking gun" for a high-temperature event. When rock is melted and vaporized, lighter isotopes boil away into space faster than heavier ones, leaving the remaining residue enriched in the heavy versions. The degree of enrichment found in the Chang'e 6 samples suggests that the SPA basin was subjected to a cataclysmic heating event—likely the basin-forming impact itself—that stripped the far-side mantle of its volatiles.²⁷

This "impact-driven differentiation" explains why the far side is so chemically different from the near side. It suggests that the giant impact didn't just dig a hole; it fundamentally altered the chemistry of half the Moon, depleting it of the heat-producing elements and volatiles that kept the near side geologically active for longer.⁶

7.5 Hidden Magmatism: The Mg-Suite Mystery

Researchers from the University of Hong Kong (HKU) identified another surprise in the samples: fragments of "Mg-suite" rocks (magnesium-rich plutonic rocks). On the near side, these rocks are almost always associated with the KREEP terrane. Their presence in the KREEP-poor SPA basin was unexpected.²⁸

The study suggests that these rocks are evidence of "hidden magmatism." Even though the far side shows fewer surface volcanoes, extensive magmatic activity was occurring deep underground, forming "intrusions" (dikes and sills) that never breached the thick crust. The impact that created the nearby Chaffee S crater likely excavated these deep-seated plutonic rocks and scattered them onto the surface where Chang'e 6 collected them. This finding challenges the simple model that KREEP is required to form Mg-suite rocks, hinting at alternative mechanisms for melting the lunar mantle.²⁹

8. Broader Implications for Lunar Science

The data from Chang'e 6 is reshaping our narrative of the Moon's evolution.

1. The Cause of the Dichotomy: The mission strongly supports the theory that the lunar dichotomy is a result of a "double whammy": an initial asymmetry in crustal formation (possibly due to Earth's heat or a second moonlet) followed by the catastrophic SPA impact, which stripped the far side of its heat-producing elements. This left the far side with a thick, cold, rigid crust that suppressed volcanism, while the near side remained thin, hot, and active.¹

2. Solar System Chronology: By providing a definitive age (2.8 Ga) for a surface with a specific crater density, Chang'e 6 fixes a "wobbly" part of the ruler we use to measure time in the solar system. This refinement will ripple out to studies of Martian river valleys and Mercury's volcanic plains, potentially adjusting their estimated ages by hundreds of millions of years.²⁶

3. Resource Utilization (ISRU): For future explorers, the mission offers a cautionary tale. The far-side regolith is mechanically more difficult (stickier, more abrasive) and chemically depleted of volatiles compared to the near side. Strategies for extracting water or building structures using "lunar bricks" will need to be adapted to these harsher local realities.²⁴

9. Future Outlook: The International Lunar Research Station (ILRS)

Chang'e 6 is not an isolated scientific sortie; it is a foundational step in a grander strategy. The technologies demonstrated—far-side relay communications, autonomous landing, and intelligent sampling—are the prerequisites for the International Lunar Research Station (ILRS), a planned permanent lunar base led by China and Russia.³¹

The upcoming Chang'e 7 (2026) and Chang'e 8 (2028) missions will target the lunar south pole to hunt for water ice and test in-situ resource utilization technologies (such as 3D printing with lunar soil). The success of Chang'e 6 proves that the logistical chain for these ambitious missions—launch, relay, landing, and return—is robust.

Furthermore, the integration of European and Pakistani payloads on Chang'e 6 signals a shift in the geopolitics of space. It demonstrates China's capability to lead complex international coalitions, offering an alternative to the US-led Artemis Accords. The mission data, now being shared with the global scientific community, serves as a powerful tool for science diplomacy.¹⁰

10. Conclusion

The return of 1,935.3 grams of dust from the Apollo basin marks the end of the "terra incognita" era of lunar exploration. For the first time, we hold pieces of the Moon's hidden face.

These samples tell the story of a world that evolved along a divergent path from the one we see in the night sky. They speak of a youth marked by unimaginable violence, where impacts boiled the crust and stripped the land of its volatile blood. They reveal a hemisphere that cooled early, sealing its magmatic fire deep beneath a thickened crust, while its sibling remained molten and active.

Chang'e 6 has done more than just fill a blank spot on a map; it has added a new dimension to our understanding of planetary evolution. As laboratories around the world continue to probe these precious grains, we are likely to find that the far side of the Moon has even more secrets to tell—secrets that are central to the story of the Earth, the Moon, and the chaotic early years of our solar system.

Table 1: Comparative Mission Architecture

Parameter	Chang'e 5 (2020)	Chang'e 6 (2024)
Target Region	Oceanus Procellarum (Near Side)	South Pole-Aitken Basin (Far Side)
Communication	Direct to Earth	Relay via Queqiao-2 (Frozen Orbit)
Landing Logic	Optical Obstacle Avoidance	Enhanced Laser/Optical + Autonomous Selection
Sampling Time	~22 Hours	~14 Hours (Accelerated/Intelligent)
Sample Mass	1,731 g	1,935.3 g
Sample Age	~2.0 Billion Years	~2.8 Billion Years

Table 2: Key Scientific Findings from Chang'e 6 Samples

Domain	Finding	Implication
Chronology	Basalts dated to 2.8 Ga.	Fills the 3.0–2.0 Ga gap; proves far-side volcanism ended earlier.
Isotopes	Enrichment of Heavy Potassium (K-41).	Evidence of massive volatile loss due to the giant SPA impact event.
Petrology	Presence of Mg-Suite rocks.	Proves "hidden" intrusive magmatism existed in KREEP-poor regions.
Mechanics	High Angle of Repose & cohesion.	Far-side soil is "stickier" due to electrostatics and lack of weathering.

Table 3: International Payload Specifications

Instrument	Origin	Type	Primary Detection
DORN	France (CNES)	Alpha Spectrometer	Radon-222 (Tracer for exosphere transport)
NILS	Sweden (ESA)	Ion Analyzer	Negative Ions (Solar wind-surface interaction)
INRRI	Italy (INFN)	Retroreflector	Laser Ranging (Geodesy/Distance)
ICUBE-Q	Pakistan (IST)	CubeSat	Optical Imaging & Magnetic Field

Date: Data reported as of January 18, 2026

Works cited

1. The two-faced Moon | The Planetary Society, accessed January 18, 2026, https://www.planetary.org/articles/the-two-faced-moon

2. Chang'e-6 launch: What to expect | The Planetary Society, accessed January 18, 2026, https://www.planetary.org/articles/change-6-launch-what-to-expect

3. Chang'e 6 - For All Moonkind Moon Registry, accessed January 18, 2026, https://moonregistry.forallmoonkind.org/change-6/

4. Chang'e 6 - Wikipedia, accessed January 18, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chang%27e_6

5. Chang'e-6, collecting the first lunar farside samples - The Planetary Society, accessed January 18, 2026, https://www.planetary.org/space-missions/change-6

6. Analysis of Chang'e-6 Samples Addresses Mysteries About the Far ..., accessed January 18, 2026, https://www.universetoday.com/articles/analysis-of-change-6-samples-addresses-mysteries-about-the-far-side-of-the-moon

7. The Crust of the Moon as Seen by GRAIL - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH, accessed January 18, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6693503/

8. Nature of the lunar far-side samples returned by the Chang'E-6 mission - Oxford Academic, accessed January 18, 2026, https://academic.oup.com/nsr/article/11/11/nwae328/7758366

9. Geological context of the Chang'e-6 landing area and implications for sample analysis, accessed January 18, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11283046/

10. About China's lunar mission: Timeline of Chang'e-6 mission, accessed January 18, 2026, https://www.cnsa.gov.cn/english/n6465652/n6465653/c10573102/content.html

11. Chang'E-6 Mission - UNOOSA, accessed January 18, 2026, https://www.unoosa.org/documents/pdf/copuos/stsc/2025/ListOfTechnicalPresentations/7_Tuesday11th/1b_-_CHINA_ChangE-6_mission_Mr._Yang_Ruihong_China.pdf

12. China launches Chang'e-6 to retrieve samples from moon's far side | english.scio.gov.cn, accessed January 18, 2026, http://english.scio.gov.cn/chinavoices/2024-05/04/content_117166083.htm

13. Up-close Look at China's Chang'e-6 Mini-rover (Updated) - Leonard David's INSIDE OUTER SPACE, accessed January 18, 2026, https://www.leonarddavid.com/up-close-look-at-chinas-change-6-mini-rover/

14. China's tiny rover used AI to take an epic photo on the moon's far side (video) | Space, accessed January 18, 2026, https://www.space.com/china-change-6-mini-moon-rover-training-video

15. Chang'e 6 / DORN - CNES, accessed January 18, 2026, https://cnes.fr/en/projects/dorn

16. The French DORN instrument successfully completes its lunar mission aboard the Chang'E 6 lunar probe - Institut de Recherche en Astrophysique et Planétologie, accessed January 18, 2026, https://www.irap.omp.eu/en/2024/07/the-french-dorn-instrument-successfully-completes-its-lunar-mission-aboard-the-change-6-lunar-probe/

17. First results from the DORN experiment onboard the Chang'E 6 mission - CO Meeting Organizer, accessed January 18, 2026, https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU25/EGU25-14816.html?pdf

18. Negative Ions at the Lunar Surface (NILS) instrument - CO Meeting Organizer EPSC2022, accessed January 18, 2026, https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EPSC2022/EPSC2022-992.html

19. China's Chang'e 6 spacecraft finds long-sought particles on far side of the moon | Space, accessed January 18, 2026, https://www.space.com/change-negative-ions-moon-surface-detection

20. The First Lunar Far-Side Laser Retroreflector Deployed on Chang'e-6 Lander and Prospect for Chang'e-7 Mission, accessed January 18, 2026, https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU25/EGU25-8557.html?pdf

21. THE FIRST LASER RETROREFLECTOR ON THE LUNAR FAR SIDE ONBOARD CHINA'S CHANG'E-6 LANDER AND FUTURE DEPLOYMENT ON CHANG'E-7 P - Universities Space Research Association, accessed January 18, 2026, https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2025/pdf/1405.pdf

22. ICUBE-Q - Wikipedia, accessed January 18, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICUBE-Q

23. China hands over Chang'e-6 mission CubeSat satellite data to Pakistan, accessed January 18, 2026, https://english.spacechina.com/n17212/c4128334/content.html

24. Chinese Scientists Decipher Mystery of Sticky Soil on Moon's Far Side, accessed January 18, 2026, https://english.cas.cn/newsroom/cas_media/202511/t20251125_1133174.shtml

25. Nature of the lunar far-side samples returned by the Chang'E-6 mission - PubMed, accessed January 18, 2026, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39440270/

26. Chang'e-6 Sample Studies Cast Light on the Moon's Far Side, accessed January 18, 2026, https://english.cas.cn/newsroom/cas_media/202411/t20241118_694563.shtml

27. Chang'e-6 study reveals early massive impact heated deep materials on lunar far side: report - Global Times, accessed January 18, 2026, https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202601/1353053.shtml

28. HKU Geologists Discover Hidden Magmatism at the Chang'e-6 ..., accessed January 18, 2026, https://www.hku.hk/press/news_detail_27621.html

29. HKU Geologists Discover Hidden Magmatism at the Chang'e-6 Lunar Landing Site, Shedding Light on Solving Fundamental Scientific Questions Relating Early Evolution of the Moon - Press Releases - Media, accessed January 18, 2026, https://www.hku.hk/press/press-releases/detail/27621.html

30. Researchers Detect “Hidden” Activity Beneath the Lunar Surface on the Far Side of the Moon - The Debrief, accessed January 18, 2026, https://thedebrief.org/researchers-detect-hidden-activity-beneath-the-lunar-surface-on-the-far-side-of-the-moon/

31. A multi-objective multi-factor integrated method for comprehensive luna base site selection, accessed January 18, 2026, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10095020.2025.2495682