Do Orangutans Have a Cookbook? The Science of Social Learning

1. Introduction: The Cultural Paradigm in Evolutionary Primatology

The intellectual history of ethology and evolutionary anthropology has been characterized by a persistent erosion of the barrier between human and non-human cognition. For much of the 20th century, the capacity for "culture"—defined broadly as the transmission of information, behaviors, and technologies across generations through social learning rather than genetic inheritance—was considered the singular, defining province of Homo sapiens. Animals were viewed as biological automatons, driven by instinct and constrained by the immediate imperatives of their ecological niche. While they might exhibit learning, this was assumed to be individualistic, a result of trial-and-error engagement with the physical world, unmediated by the accumulation of ancestral knowledge.

This anthropocentric paradigm began to fracture with the pioneering field observations of the mid-20th century, most notably the discovery of termite-fishing in Gombe chimpanzees. However, the recognition of tool use was merely the opening salvo in a decades-long debate regarding the depth, breadth, and dependence of non-human animals on socially transmitted information. The contemporary frontier of this debate has shifted from the mere presence of traditions—such as the grooming hand-clasp of Mahale chimpanzees or the stone-handling of Japanese macaques—to the more profound question of necessity. Is animal culture merely a "social release" that facilitates the expression of latent, genetically encoded solutions? Or is it, like human culture, a survival-critical adaptation without which an individual cannot function in its environment?

The publication of "Culture is critical in driving orangutan diet development past individual potentials" by Howard-Spink et al. (2025) in Nature Human Behaviour represents a watershed moment in this discourse.¹ Focusing on the Sumatran orangutan (Pongo abelii), a critically endangered great ape with the most prolonged period of immature dependency of any non-human primate, the study provides empirical validation for the Cultural Intelligence Hypothesis on a scale previously unattainable in wild settings. By integrating over a decade of field observations with sophisticated agent-based modeling (ABM), the researchers demonstrate that the immense dietary repertoire of the Sumatran orangutan—comprising hundreds of distinct plant species and complex processing techniques—is not an innate biological capability. Rather, it is a culturally dependent repertoire, a body of knowledge so vast and complex that no single individual could reconstruct it within a lifetime of independent exploration.⁴

This report provides an exhaustive analysis of the Howard-Spink et al. study, dissecting its methodological innovations, theoretical implications, and applications for conservation. It situates the findings within the broader context of the "Zone of Latent Solutions" (ZLS) debate, explores the ecological drivers of social learning in the complex dipterocarp forests of Indonesia, and traces the evolutionary roots of cultural capacity back 13 million years to the Last Common Ancestor (LCA) of great apes and humans. Furthermore, it examines the critical distinction between "active teaching" and "passive tolerance" in ape societies and analyzes how these findings must reshape rehabilitation protocols for displaced orangutans to prevent "cultural extinction."

2. The Subject: Pongo abelii and the Cognitive Challenge of the Rainforest

To understand the necessity of culture, one must first understand the ecological and biological constraints of the organism. The Sumatran orangutan inhabits a world of profound botanical complexity. The rainforests of Suaq Balimbing, the primary field site for the data underpinning the Howard-Spink study, are characterized by high biodiversity and significant temporal fluctuation in food availability.⁶

2.1 The Ecological Landscape of Suaq Balimbing

Suaq Balimbing is a peat-swamp forest located in the Gunung Leuser National Park ecosystem. Unlike the mast-fruiting dipterocarp forests of Borneo, which experience extreme booms and busts in fruit production, the Sumatran habitat offers a more consistent, albeit complex, food supply. This ecological stability supports a higher population density of orangutans and, crucially, a higher degree of social tolerance compared to their Bornean counterparts (Pongo pygmaeus).⁷

The diet of the Suaq orangutans is encyclopedic. Adult individuals are known to exploit approximately 262 distinct food items, ranging from the pith of palms and the cambium of trees to specific insect species and, most importantly, a wide variety of fruits.⁶ However, this abundance is deceptive. The rainforest is a landscape of chemical warfare; plants have evolved sophisticated defenses against herbivory, including physical barriers (hard shells, spines) and chemical toxins (tannins, alkaloids, saponins).

2.2 The Foraging Dilemma

For a naive omnivore, the forest presents a lethal puzzle. Distinguishing between a nutritious fruit and a toxic look-alike requires precise discrimination. Furthermore, many high-value foods are "cryptic" or require complex processing. The Neesia fruit, a staple of the Suaq diet, contains highly irritating hairs that must be removed using a tool or a specific processing technique to avoid injury.⁸

The central biological constraint for the orangutan is time. While they are long-lived (reaching 50+ years in the wild), they have a slow life history. Females give birth only once every 7 to 9 years, the longest interbirth interval of any land mammal.⁹ This slow reproductive rate means that any mortality event due to dietary error—eating a poisonous mushroom, for example—has catastrophic fitness consequences. Consequently, the strategy of "trial-and-error" learning, which functions well for species with short lifespans and simple diets, is evolutionarily prohibitive for the orangutan. The cost of a single mistake is too high.

2.3 The Ontogenetic Window

This ecological pressure is reflected in the orangutan's developmental timeline. Immatures remain in constant association with their mothers for up to nine years, nursing for the first six or seven.⁹ This extended childhood is not merely a period of physical growth; it is a dedicated window for cognitive programming. The Howard-Spink study investigates this specific phase, asking whether this long apprenticeship is strictly necessary for survival or if it is merely a period of protection while the infant matures physically. The data suggests the former: the "software" of survival is too complex to be pre-loaded; it must be downloaded.⁶

3. Methodology: Digital Ethology and the Agent-Based Model

A fundamental limitation in the study of wild animal culture is the inability to conduct controlled deprivation experiments. We cannot ethically or practically isolate a wild orangutan infant from birth to see if it develops a full diet on its own. To circumvent this, Howard-Spink et al. employed a methodology that is increasingly becoming the gold standard in evolutionary anthropology: Agent-Based Modeling (ABM) calibrated with long-term field data.⁶

3.1 The Empirical Foundation: 22,547 Hours of Observation

The validity of any simulation is entirely dependent on the fidelity of its input parameters. The researchers utilized an unprecedented dataset collected by the Suaq Project, spanning 12 years (2007–2019) and totaling 22,547 hours of direct focal observation on 132 individuals.⁶ This dataset captured the minute-by-minute behavioral realities of orangutan life:

• Foraging Rates: Quantifying that mothers visit approximately 27 feeding patches per day.⁶

• Dietary Breadth: Cataloging the 262 food items that constitute the local "cultural menu".⁶

• Social Interactions: Measuring the frequency and duration of specific social behaviors, such as "peering" (close-range observation), co-feeding, and spatial proximity, across different age classes and sexes.⁶

This massive empirical undertaking allowed the researchers to build a "virtual forest" and "virtual orangutans" that behaved with high statistical fidelity to their biological counterparts.

3.2 The Architecture of the Simulation

The ABM was designed to simulate the life trajectory of a single orangutan from birth to age fifteen, the age at which individuals are typically fully independent and beginning their own reproductive careers.

• The Virtual Environment: The model contained the 262 specific food items found at Suaq. At the initialization of each run, the agent (the immature orangutan) possessed zero knowledge of these foods.

• The Daily Cycle: The model operated on a daily time-step. Each day, the agent would move through the forest, encountering a sequence of feeding patches derived from the real-world movement patterns of orangutan mothers.

• The Decision Matrix: At each patch, the agent faced a decision: Do I eat this? If the item was already "known" (learned previously), the agent fed. If the item was "unknown," the agent had to decide whether to explore it. This decision was probabilistic, influenced by the agent's internal state (hunger, curiosity) and, crucially, its social environment.⁶

3.3 The Three Pillars of Social Learning

The model explicitly differentiated between three mechanisms of social learning, allowing the researchers to toggle them on and off to test their relative importance:

1. Exposure (Socially Facilitated Encounter): This is the most passive form of social learning. By simply following the mother, the infant is brought into the presence of specific food types. The infant does not necessarily watch the mother eat; it simply occupies the same patch.

2. Enhancement (Local Enhancement): This occurs when the infant's attention is drawn to a specific object or location because another individual is interacting with it. In the model, being in close proximity to a feeding conspecific increased the probability that the agent would interact with the same food item.

3. Peering (Observational Learning): This is the most active and information-rich mechanism. Peering is defined as observing another individual's actions at close range (often <2m) for a sustained period (>5s).⁷ In the model, peering significantly boosted the probability of the agent attempting to eat the item and successfully processing it.

3.4 The "In Silico" Experiment

The core of the study was a subtraction experiment. The researchers ran the simulation under different conditions:

• The Social Model: All three mechanisms (Exposure, Enhancement, Peering) were active.

• The Asocial Model: All social learning mechanisms were disabled. The agent still moved through the forest (encountering food), but its decision to eat was based solely on individual trial-and-error exploration.

• The Restricted Models: Various combinations where only Exposure or only Enhancement were active, isolating the specific contribution of Peering.

4. Results: The Quantifiable Failure of Individual Learning

The results of the simulation were stark and provided the central evidence for the study's conclusions.

4.1 The Triumph of the Social Model

When the simulation was run with full social learning capabilities (Scenario A), the virtual orangutans developed dietary repertoires that closely matched the developmental trajectories observed in the wild. By approximately 7.5 years of age—coinciding with the natural age of weaning—the agents had acquired an "adult-like" repertoire of roughly 224 food items.⁶ This validation step confirmed that the model parameters were accurate and that the combination of exposure, enhancement, and peering is sufficient to explain the complex reality of orangutan diet.

4.2 The Collapse of the Asocial Agent

The crucial finding emerged from the "Asocial" scenario (Scenario B). In this version, agents were stripped of their ability to use social cues to guide exploration. They were "blind" to their mother's choices.

• The Data Point of Failure: Despite the simulation running for 15 virtual years, and despite the agents encountering an average of nearly 148,000 feeding patches during that time, none of the asocial agents achieved a dietary breadth comparable to a wild adult.⁴

• The Plateau: The repertoires of asocial learners grew slowly and plateaued significantly below the adult threshold. They effectively starved in a supermarket, surrounded by food they did not recognize or did not know how to process.

• Implication: This result mathematically demonstrates that individual innovation is insufficient. The probability of independently discovering 250+ specific food interactions within a single lifetime is statistically negligible.

4.3 The Necessity of Peering

The "Restricted" models revealed that mere proximity (Exposure and Enhancement) is also insufficient. When Peering was disabled but Exposure remained, diet development stalled at about 85% of the adult repertoire.⁶ This gap—the missing 15%—likely represents the most difficult, rare, or complex food items. These are the items that require specific processing techniques (like Neesia) or are rarely encountered. Without the focused attention of peering, these high-difficulty items are never mastered.

Table 1: Comparative Outcomes of Learning Models (Simulated at Age 15)

Model Scenario	Social Mechanisms Active	Final Diet Breadth (% of Adult)	Outcome
Social (Natural)	Exposure + Enhancement + Peering	~100% (approx. 224 items)	Success: Matches wild ontogeny.
Partial Social	Exposure + Enhancement (No Peering)	~85%	Partial Failure: Stalls at generalist level; misses complex foods.
Asocial	None (Individual Exploration Only)	<50% (Variable)	Total Failure: Incompetent for survival.
Exposure Only	Exposure (No Enhancement/Peering)	Low	Failure: Proximity alone is insufficient.

5. Mechanisms of Transmission: The Anatomy of Peering

The study identifies "peering" as the primary vehicle for high-fidelity information transfer. Understanding the mechanics of peering is essential to understanding orangutan culture.

5.1 Defining the Behavior

Peering is a distinct behavioral category in primatology. It is not a casual glance. It is characterized by intense, focused attention, often with the observer's face within centimeters of the demonstrator's hands or mouth. This behavior is most frequently observed in immatures watching their mothers, but it also occurs between migrants and residents.⁷

5.2 Who Peers and When?

The Howard-Spink study, supported by previous work from the Suaq Project, highlights specific patterns in peering behavior:

• Age Dynamics: Peering rates are highest in immatures and peak around the age of weaning (6-7 years).⁶ This suggests a "graduation" drive—an intense period of information gathering before nutritional independence.

• Context Specificity: Peering is not random. It is significantly more likely to occur when the demonstrator is processing a complex or rare food item. Immatures do not waste time peering at simple fruit eating; they focus on the difficult tasks. This "selective attention" is a hallmark of intelligent social learning.⁹

• Migrant Peering: Interestingly, the phenomenon extends beyond childhood. Adult male migrants, who disperse from their natal groups to new ranges with potentially different flora, have been observed peering at local residents. This "observe and do as the locals do" strategy allows migrants to update their cultural knowledge to the local ecology.⁷

5.3 Active Teaching vs. Passive Tolerance

A critical distinction in the study of animal culture is the role of the "teacher." In human pedagogy, the teacher actively modifies their behavior to facilitate learning (demonstrating slowly, correcting errors). In orangutans, as in chimpanzees, active teaching is virtually absent.¹⁰

• The Reactive Mother: The Howard-Spink model and field observations confirm that orangutan mothers do not actively teach. They do not point to food or hand it to the infant for educational purposes.¹²

• Passive Tolerance: However, they exhibit extreme tolerance. Mothers allow infants to steal food from their mouths and stare into their faces while they eat. This tolerance creates the opportunity for learning. The burden of acquisition lies entirely with the learner (the infant). The culture is "learner-driven" rather than "teacher-driven."

6. Theoretical Battlegrounds: The Zone of Latent Solutions vs. Cultural Intelligence

The findings of Howard-Spink et al. act as a critical intervention in one of the most heated theoretical debates in evolutionary biology: the nature of the "Zone of Latent Solutions" (ZLS).

6.1 The ZLS Hypothesis

Proposed and championed by researchers like Claudio Tennie (a co-author on the Howard-Spink paper), the ZLS hypothesis challenges the idea that animal culture involves "copying" or the transmission of knowledge that an individual could not invent on its own.¹⁴

• The Core Argument: ZLS argues that most great ape behaviors (like nut-cracking or stick use) are "latent solutions"—behaviors that are biologically prepared or easily reinvented given the right materials. Social learning, in this view, is merely a catalyst. It draws attention to the materials (stones, nuts), but the individual reinvents the technique.

• The Prediction: If ZLS were universally true, then the "Asocial" agents in the Howard-Spink simulation should have eventually succeeded. Given 15 years of exposure to the forest and the "materials" (food), they should have reinvented the diet.

6.2 The Rebuttal: Cultural Dependence

The failure of the Asocial model provides strong evidence against a strict ZLS interpretation for orangutan diet.

• Beyond Latency: The specific knowledge of 262 food items cannot be a "latent solution." There is no innate biological template that tells an orangutan "this specific liana is safe, but that one is not." This information is arbitrary and ecological. It must be learned.

• The "Copying" Necessity: The study validates the Cultural Intelligence Hypothesis.¹⁶ It suggests that orangutans (and likely other great apes) have evolved specific cognitive adaptations for social learning because the complexity of their survival niche exceeds individual innovation capacity.

• Cumulative Culture: While the study does not prove "cumulative culture" in the human sense (ratcheting technology to the moon), it proves "culturally dependent repertoires." The diet is a cumulative product of generations of exploration. An individual is standing on the shoulders of ancestors to survive.

Table 2: Theoretical Frameworks in Primate Cognition

Theory	Core Mechanism	View of Animal Culture	Supported by Howard-Spink Study?
Zone of Latent Solutions (ZLS)	Individual Reinvention (Socially Catalyzed)	Behaviors are latent potentials; sociality just triggers them.	Challenged (in context of diet breadth). Asocial agents failed to reinvent the diet.
Cultural Intelligence Hypothesis	Social Learning Adaptations	Cognition evolved specifically to acquire social information.	Supported. High complexity requires social downloading.
Copying / Imitation	High-Fidelity Transmission	Learners copy the form and action of the model.	Supported. Peering facilitates copying of processing techniques.

7. Ecological Drivers: Why Sumatra?

The study focuses on Sumatran orangutans (Pongo abelii), but the comparison with Bornean orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) reveals how ecology shapes culture.

7.1 The Sociality Gradient

Sumatran forests are generally more productive than Bornean forests. They do not experience the severe "mast fruiting" cycles (booms and busts) typical of Borneo. This stability allows Sumatran orangutans to be more social; they can afford to travel together and aggregate at large fruit trees without intense competition.⁷

• The Social Learning Dividend: This higher rate of association leads to higher rates of peering.⁷

• Cultural Repertoire Size: Consequently, Sumatran orangutans exhibit a larger repertoire of tool use and social behaviors than Bornean orangutans. The environment permits the sociality that fuels the culture.

7.2 The "Forest School" of the Wild

The sheer diversity of the Sumatran rainforest necessitates a broader diet. In a simpler environment, an animal might survive on a few staple foods. In the biodiversity hotspot of Sumatra, survival requires a generalist strategy—knowing a little bit about everything. This ecological complexity is the evolutionary pressure that selected for the "cultural capacity."

8. Evolutionary Deep Time: The 13 Million Year Legacy

One of the most profound implications of the Howard-Spink study is the timeline it establishes for the evolution of culture.

8.1 The Last Common Ancestor (LCA)

If both orangutans (Asian apes) and chimpanzees/humans (African apes) possess the capacity for culturally dependent repertoires, the principle of parsimony suggests this trait was present in their Last Common Ancestor.

• Dating the Split: Molecular clock analyses estimate the divergence of the Pongo lineage from the Homo/Pan lineage occurred approximately 13 to 14 million years ago.⁵

• The "Cultured" Ancestor: This pushes the origin of "culture" (in the sense of socially dependent survival repertoires) back to the Miocene. It suggests that the LCA was not a brutish solitary forager, but a socially sophisticated ape capable of transmitting environmental knowledge.

8.2 Convergent Evolution or Homology?

While some argue for convergent evolution (similar traits evolving separately), the underlying cognitive mechanisms—peering, tolerance, and the mother-offspring bond—are so similar across the great ape taxa that homology is the more likely explanation. This means that human culture is not a de novo invention but an extreme amplification of a 13-million-year-old adaptation.⁵

9. Conservation Applications: The Crisis of the Uncultured Ape

The findings of Howard-Spink et al. have urgent, life-or-death implications for orangutan conservation, particularly in the realm of rehabilitation and reintroduction.

9.1 The Rehabilitation Dilemma

Across Indonesia, rehabilitation centers care for hundreds of orphaned orangutans, victims of the illegal pet trade and habitat destruction (primarily for palm oil). These orphans are often confiscated as infants, traumatized and deprived of their mothers.

• The Knowledge Gap: The study proves that these orphans are not just emotionally damaged; they are culturally destitute. They lack the "mental catalog" of the 250 food items necessary for survival.⁴

• Reintroduction Mortality: Historically, reintroduction programs have suffered from high mortality rates. Released ex-captives often starve, even in food-rich forests, because they do not recognize food or cannot process fallback foods during lean times.²³ They are like humans dropped in a foreign city without a map or language.

9.2 Toward "Cultural Rehabilitation"

The study mandates a shift in rehabilitation philosophy. It is not enough to ensure the orphans are healthy and can climb trees. They must be enculturated.

• Surrogate Models: Human caregivers often act as surrogate mothers. However, a human cannot model canopy foraging effectively.

• Peer-to-Peer Learning: The most effective strategy, supported by the study's emphasis on peering, is the use of "forest schools" where younger orphans are paired with older, more competent orphans or "mentor" orangutans.²³

• The "Cantik" Effect: The study references successful cases where competent orphans (like individuals named Amalia and Cantik in the JP program) served as role models for naive infants. This "horizontal" transmission can partially compensate for the loss of "vertical" (maternal) transmission.²³

9.3 The Definition of "Wild"

Conservationists must recognize that a "wild" orangutan is defined not just by its genetics, but by its culture. Releasing a genetically wild but culturally naive orangutan is releasing an animal that is functionally incomplete. Preservation efforts must focus on keeping populations intact, as the culture resides in the network of connections between individuals, not just in the DNA.

10. Conclusion

The research presented by Howard-Spink et al. in Nature Human Behaviour serves as a definitive correction to the lingering notion of the "instinctual" animal. By mathematically demonstrating that the Sumatran orangutan cannot master its complex diet without social learning, the authors have elevated "culture" from a biological curiosity to a survival necessity.

The image of the orangutan—often perceived as a solitary, slow-moving stoic of the canopy—must be revised. They are, in fact, members of a distributed cognitive network, linked by invisible threads of knowledge passed from mother to offspring over thousands of generations. This "cultural heritage" is their primary adaptation to the complex rainforest environment.

The implications extend far beyond the species. The study anchors the roots of human cultural capacity in the deep soil of the Miocene, 13 million years ago. It challenges us to view culture not as a unique human spark, but as a deep evolutionary strategy that has allowed great apes to conquer their environments. As we face the potential extinction of Pongo abelii due to anthropogenic pressure, we risk losing more than a biological species. We risk destroying a unique cultural library, a way of knowing the world that has been refined over millions of years and, once lost, can never be reinvented.

References

• ¹: Howard-Spink, E. et al. (2025). Nature Human Behaviour.

• ⁶: ScienceBlog, "Orangutan childhoods run on culture not instinct," detailing model methodology.

• ⁴: Mirage News, "Orangutans Rely On Culture For Complex Diet."

• ⁶: ScienceBlog, detailing the 22,547 hours of observation.

• ⁷: PubMed, "Migrant orangutan unflanged males learn from local orangutans."

• ²²: Tempo.co, quoting Caroline Schuppli on rehabilitation implications.

• ¹⁴: Tennie, C. et al., regarding the Zone of Latent Solutions hypothesis.

• ²³: MDPI, "Orangutan Reintroduction: Successes, Failures, and Role in Conservation."

• ¹⁹: IFLScience, discussing the 13 million year divergence date.

• ⁷: PMC, discussing Sumatran vs. Bornean sociality and food availability.

• ⁹: Max Planck Institute, discussing migrant peering behavior.

Works cited

1. accessed December 31, 1969, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-025-02350-y

2. Orangutans Can't Master Their Complex Diets Without Cultural Knowledge [IMAGE], accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.eurekalert.org/multimedia/1102738

3. Orangutans Can't Master Their Complex Diets Without Cultural Knowledge - YouTube, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W_eOg7vsL_M

4. Orangutans Rely on Culture for Complex Diet Mastery, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.miragenews.com/orangutans-rely-on-culture-for-complex-diet-1576528/

5. Orangutans can't master their complex diets without cultural knowledge, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.mpg.de/25748327/orangutans-can-t-master-their-complex-diets-without-cultural-knowledge

6. Orangutan Childhoods Run On Culture, Not Instinct - Wild Science, accessed November 25, 2025, https://scienceblog.com/wildscience/2025/11/24/orangutan-childhoods-run-on-culture-not-instinct/

7. Orangutan males make increased use of social learning opportunities, when resource availability is high - PubMed Central, accessed November 25, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10850741/

8. Culture in great apes: using intricate complexity in feeding skills to trace the evolutionary origin of human technical prowess - PMC - NIH, accessed November 25, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2346518/

9. Orangutans use local knowledge - Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.ab.mpg.de/541857/news_publication_20588035_transferred

10. Wild Orangutan Tool Use - suaq, accessed November 25, 2025, https://suaq.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Dissertation_E.Meulman_2013.pdf

11. Begging, Stealing, and Offering: Food Transfer in Nonhuman Primates - ResearchGate, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251450113_Begging_Stealing_and_Offering_Food_Transfer_in_Nonhuman_Primates

12. Social learning and cultural transmission in the context of migration: insights from two orangutan populations Von der Fakultät - MPG.PuRe, accessed November 25, 2025, https://pure.mpg.de/rest/items/item_3625784_2/component/file_3629369/content

13. (PDF) Social learning of diet and foraging skills by wild and immature Bornean orangutans: Implications for culture. - ResearchGate, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/26856952_Social_learning_of_diet_and_foraging_skills_by_wild_and_immature_Bornean_orangutans_Implications_for_culture

14. The zone of latent solutions and its relevance to understanding ape cultures - PMC - NIH, accessed November 25, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7548278/

15. (PDF) The zone of latent solutions and its relevance to understanding ape cultures, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346192255_The_zone_of_latent_solutions_and_its_relevance_to_understanding_ape_cultures

16. Social learning and evolution: The cultural intelligence hypothesis - ResearchGate, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/50226346_Social_learning_and_evolution_The_cultural_intelligence_hypothesis

17. Social learning and evolution: the cultural intelligence hypothesis | Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences - Journals, accessed November 25, 2025, https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/abs/10.1098/rstb.2010.0304

18. In wild orangutans social learning is affected by ecology - Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.mpg.de/21503546/in-wild-orangutans-social-learning-is-affected-by-ecology

19. Ancestors Of Humans And Chimps May Have Begun Diverging 13 Million Years Ago, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.iflscience.com/ancestors-humans-and-chimps-may-have-begun-diverging-13-million-years-ago-24817

20. Human evolution - Wikipedia, accessed November 25, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_evolution

21. Culture extends the scope of evolutionary biology in the great apes - PNAS, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1620733114

22. Study: Orangutans Need Years of Guidance to Learn How to Eat, accessed November 25, 2025, https://en.tempo.co/read/2068721/study-orangutans-need-years-of-guidance-to-learn-how-to-eat

23. Learning to Be an Orangutan—Implications of Life History for Orangutan Rehabilitation - MDPI, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/3/767

24. Orangutan rehabilitation and reintroduction - York University, accessed November 25, 2025, http://www.yorku.ca/arusson/Papers/23-Wich-Russon-rehab-small.pdf