Entering the Synthetic Epoch: Living Through the Age of Microplastics and the Plastisphere

Abstract

As the world transitions through the mid-2020s, the ubiquitous presence of microplastics (MPs) and nanoplastics (NPs) has evolved from a recognized ecological contaminant into a defining marker of the Anthropocene and a critical public health emergency. This report provides an exhaustive analysis of the state of plastic pollution as of early 2026, synthesizing pivotal data from the 2024–2025 period that has fundamentally reshaped our understanding of bioavailability, toxicity, and environmental fate. We examine the newly confirmed accumulation of polymeric particles in critical human organs—including the brain, cardiovascular system, and reproductive tissues—and the associated epidemiological risks of neurodegeneration and stroke. Environmentally, the analysis details the catastrophic infiltration of the "plastisphere" into deep-sea ecosystems and agricultural soils, identifying direct causal links to declining crop yields and food security. Furthermore, this document critiques the geopolitical paralysis evident in the failure of the INC-5.2 negotiations in Geneva to produce a binding global treaty, contrasting this inertia with the burgeoning technological renaissance in enzymatic recycling and biomimetic filtration. Drawing upon the Breaking the Plastic Wave 2025 update and recent clinical toxicology reviews, we project future abundance scenarios through 2050, arguing that without immediate systemic intervention, the "plastic cycle" will become an irreversible geological and biological burden.

1. Introduction: The Age of Plasticization

The year 2025 marked a watershed moment in environmental toxicology and global policy. For nearly a century, synthetic polymers have been celebrated as a miracle of modern engineering—cheap, durable, sterile, and infinitely versatile. From the Bakelite radios of the early 20th century to the single-use medical devices of today, plastic has been the scaffolding of modernity. However, the very properties that made it indispensable—specifically its resistance to natural degradation—have rendered it an immortal pollutant. As humanity enters 2026, we face a stark and inescapable reality: the planet is not merely littered with plastic; it is saturated with it. The material has integrated itself into the carbon cycle, the hydrological cycle, and the biological life cycles of organisms ranging from microscopic zooplankton to humans.¹

The trajectory of plastic production has been exponential, a curve that mirrors the acceleration of industrial civilization itself. In 1950, global production stood at a modest 2 million tonnes. By 2019, that figure had exploded to 460 million tonnes, outpacing nearly every other manufactured material. As of 2025, the global system generates approximately 130 million tonnes of environmental plastic pollution annually, a figure that accounts for leakage into land, air, and water.³ Crucially, this mass does not vanish. It fragments. Through photodegradation, mechanical abrasion, and biological weathering, macroplastics break down into an exponentially larger number of micro- (smaller than 5mm) and nano-sized (smaller than 1μm) particles.

These particles possess high surface-area-to-volume ratios, allowing them to act as chemical sponges. They adsorb persistent organic pollutants (POPs), heavy metals, and pathogens from the environment, effectively becoming toxic vectors that can traverse biological barriers previously thought impermeable.⁵ The narrative of the last year has been dominated by two opposing forces: the irrefutable scientific evidence of harm—highlighted by the discovery of plastics in the human brain and arterial plaque—and the paralyzing geopolitical gridlock that has stalled international regulatory efforts. While researchers at institutions like Stanford, Northeastern, and universities globally unveiled data linking MPs to stroke, Alzheimer’s, and crop failure, the United Nations Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC) struggled to finalize a global treaty, hindered by entrenched petrochemical interests.⁶

This report aims to bridge the gap between these scientific revelations and the policy vacuum. It offers a granular examination of where we stand, dissecting the mechanisms of transport and toxicity, and analyzing the technological and political levers available to alter our current trajectory toward a plasticized future.

2. The Environmental Burden: The Planetary Plastic Cycle Leading to Microplastics

The distribution of microplastics is now understood to be truly planetary in scale. The concept of the "plastic cycle," analogous to the water or carbon cycle, has gained acceptance among Earth system scientists. Plastics circulate through the atmosphere, deposit onto land and oceans, settle into sediments, and are resuspended, creating a continuous loop of contamination.⁹

2.1 The Deep Sea Reservoir: The "Missing Plastic" Found

Historically, ocean surface trawls informed our estimates of marine plastic load, leading to the "missing plastic paradox"—a discrepancy between the estimated plastic entering the ocean and the significantly lower amount found floating on the surface. Research conducted throughout 2024 and 2025 has fundamentally corrected these underestimates. A pivotal study published in Nature, combining data from nearly 2,000 sampling stations between 2014 and 2024, revealed that microplastics are not merely floating; they form a "light smog" throughout the entire water column, extending from the surface to the ocean floor.²

This vertical distribution is driven by complex hydrodynamic and biological processes. Mechanisms such as bio-fouling—where microbial growth increases the density of particles—and incorporation into "marine snow" (organic detritus falling to the seafloor) transport lighter-than-water polymers like polyethylene and polypropylene into the abyss.¹¹ Research led by Northeastern University indicated that while sampling has historically been densest in northern waters near population centers, the distribution of deep-sea plastics is surprisingly uniform globally, suggesting efficient mixing by deep-ocean currents.¹⁰

The implications for benthic ecosystems are catastrophic. Organisms in the Mariana Trench and other hadal zones, which rely on scavenging falling organic matter, are now consuming plastic at high rates. This consumption introduces synthetic carbon into the deep-ocean carbon cycle. As these polymers settle, they may alter the chemistry of the sediment and the sequestration of carbon, the long-term consequences of which remain unmodeled but potentially destabilizing to benthic ecology.²

2.2 The Atmospheric Pathway and the Cryosphere

Microplastics have become a permanent component of the Earth's atmosphere. Wind and wave action aerosolize particles from the ocean surface, while agricultural dust and urban wear (particularly from tires and textiles) contribute from land. These particles are transported thousands of kilometers in the upper atmosphere, depositing in pristine environments such as the Antarctic ice sheets and the high Himalayas.⁹

This atmospheric transport vector explains the presence of MPs in remote mountain lakes and polar ice. Beyond the direct pollution, the deposition of dark-colored particles on snow and ice reduces surface albedo (reflectivity), potentially accelerating melting rates. This creates a dangerous feedback loop intertwining plastic pollution with climate change, where melting ice releases legacy plastics trapped years ago, further contaminating downstream ecosystems.

2.3 Freshwater Systems: The Conduits of Contamination

Rivers act as the primary arteries for plastic transport from land to sea, but they are also reservoirs in their own right. Recent assessments indicate that riverbed sediments often contain higher concentrations of MPs than the water flowing above. During flood events, these sediments are resuspended, flushing massive "pulses" of microplastics into estuaries and coastal zones. This dynamic makes freshwater ecosystems particularly vulnerable, as the residency time of plastics in lakes and wetlands allows for significant bioaccumulation in freshwater food webs, affecting species from zooplankton to apex predators like otters and eagles.⁹

3. The Biological Interface: The Plastisphere

One of the most concerning ecological developments identified in late 2024 and throughout 2025 is the detailed characterization of the "plastisphere"—the distinct biofilm of microorganisms that colonizes plastic debris. This is not merely a passive layer of slime; it is an active, thriving biological vector that differs significantly from the surrounding microbial communities.

3.1 A Reservoir for Pathogens and Resistance

The hydrophobic surface of plastics provides a stable, long-lasting substrate for microbial attachment. Recent studies published in Biocontaminant in late 2025 highlighted a critical, under-recognized threat: viruses living on plastic surfaces play a central role in spreading antibiotic resistance. The plastisphere acts as a hotspot for horizontal gene transfer, where bacteria, densely packed on the plastic surface, exchange genetic material with heightened efficiency.¹²

Plastisphere Component	Role in Ecosystem	Public Health Implication
Bacterial Biofilm	Colonization by genera such as Vibrio, E. coli, and Pseudomonas.	Plastics act as "rafts" for pathogens, transporting them across ocean basins to infect aquaculture and bathers.14
Viral Community	Phages and eukaryotic viruses inhabit the biofilm.	Viruses mediate horizontal gene transfer, accelerating the evolution of superbugs.12
Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR)	High concentration of resistance genes (e.g., blaTEM, sul1).	Plastics serve as a mobile reservoir for AMR, complicating the treatment of infections in marine wildlife and humans.13
Hydrocarbonoclasts	Bacteria that degrade hydrocarbons (e.g., Marinobacter).	While potentially aiding degradation, these organisms can disrupt local microbial ecology and nutrient cycling.14

This biological interaction suggests that plastic pollution is directly contributing to the global crisis of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), creating a "mobile genetic reservoir" that travels with ocean currents. A study on mangrove plastispheres confirmed these environments as high-risk zones for AMR genes, posing a direct threat to coastal communities relying on these ecosystems for food and economic stability.¹⁶

4. Physiological Invasion: The Human Health Paradigm Shift

The year 2025 will be remembered as the year the medical community definitively confirmed that microplastics are not inert passengers in the human body but active, systemic toxicants. The "physical hypothesis"—that plastics simply pass through the digestive tract—has been replaced by a "chemical and particle toxicity hypothesis," supported by overwhelming clinical evidence.

4.1 Bioaccumulation in Vital Organs

Advanced spectroscopy, including pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (Py-GC/MS) and Raman microspectroscopy, has allowed researchers to quantify MPs in tissues previously thought protected by biological barriers. The findings are sobering.

4.1.1 The Brain and Neurodegeneration

Perhaps the most alarming discovery of 2024-2025 was the infiltration of the human brain. A study analyzing autopsy samples from early 2024 found that brain tissue contained, on average, 0.5% plastic by weight.¹⁷ This accumulation was significantly higher in patients with dementia and Alzheimer’s disease, suggesting a potential link to neurodegenerative pathology.

The mechanism of entry involves the breach of the Blood-Brain Barrier (BBB). Molecular dynamics simulations and in vivo studies have shown that nanoplastics, particularly those with hydrophobic properties like polyethylene and polypropylene, can permeate the BBB via passive diffusion. Once inside the neural parenchyma, these particles may promote the aggregation of proteins such as amyloid-beta, a hallmark of Alzheimer’s, or induce chronic neuroinflammation through microglial activation.¹⁸

4.1.2 The Cardiovascular System: Stroke and Heart Attack

In March 2024, the New England Journal of Medicine published a defining study by Marfella et al., the implications of which reverberated throughout 2025. The study examined carotid artery plaques in patients undergoing endarterectomy. The results provided the first direct clinical correlation between plastic burden and mortality.

Patients with detectable microplastics or nanoplastics (MNPs) in their arterial plaque had a 4.53 times higher risk (Hazard Ratio: 4.53; 95% CI, 2.00–10.27) of experiencing a myocardial infarction, stroke, or death from any cause within 34 months compared to those without detectable plastics.²¹ This risk persisted even after adjusting for traditional cardiovascular risk factors. The presence of plastics was associated with higher levels of inflammatory markers, suggesting that the particles destabilize atherosclerotic plaques, making them more prone to rupture.²³

4.1.3 Reproductive and Developmental Impacts

Microplastics have now been detected in every human placenta tested and in every human testicle sample analyzed in recent major studies.²⁴ The presence of MPs in the placenta raises critical concerns about in utero exposure, potentially affecting fetal development through endocrine disruption and physical interference with nutrient transfer. In the male reproductive system, the accumulation of plastics in the testes has been correlated with declining sperm counts and quality, offering a plausible contributing factor to the global crisis in male fertility.²⁵

4.2 Mechanisms of Toxicity

The toxicity of MPs and NPs is multifaceted, stemming from three primary vectors:

1. Particle Toxicity: The physical presence of foreign particles triggers chronic inflammation and oxidative stress. In the vascular system, this immune response destabilizes plaques. In the lungs, inhaled fibers can cause interstitial lung disease and lesions similar to those caused by asbestos.²³

2. Chemical Leaching: Plastics act as delivery vehicles for thousands of additives, including plasticizers (phthalates), UV stabilizers, and flame retardants. As the polymer matrix degrades inside the body (due to lysosomal acidity or enzymatic activity), these chemicals leach directly into the surrounding tissue, often acting as endocrine disruptors.⁹

3. The "Trojan Horse" Effect: Hydrophobic MPs adsorb persistent organic pollutants (POPs) from the environment—such as PCBs, DDT, and PFAS—concentrating them up to a million times higher than background levels. Upon ingestion or inhalation, these toxins desorb into the body’s lipid-rich tissues.²⁷

5. The Agricultural Crisis: Soil Health and Food Security

While marine pollution often dominates the public narrative, the burden on terrestrial ecosystems—specifically agricultural soil—may pose a more immediate and severe threat to human survival through food insecurity. As of 2025, estimates suggest that terrestrial microplastic contamination is 4 to 23 times higher than marine contamination, creating a "silent" crisis beneath our feet.³

5.1 Sources of Soil Contamination

The primary vectors for soil contamination are agricultural plastics ("plasticulture") and the application of sewage sludge (biosolids).

• Mulch Films: Polyethylene mulch films, used extensively to suppress weeds and retain moisture, degrade into macro- and micro-fragments. Even "biodegradable" alternatives often fail to mineralize completely under real-world field conditions, leaving behind transient microplastics that alter soil hydrology.²⁹

• Biosolids: Wastewater treatment plants capture MPs from domestic and industrial drains in the sludge. When this nutrient-rich sludge is applied as fertilizer—a common practice globally to close nutrient loops—it inadvertently seeds agricultural soil with millions of synthetic fibers and fragments.³¹

5.2 Impact on Crop Yields and Photosynthesis

A landmark study reported in 2025 by The Guardian and Environmental Health News revealed a catastrophic interaction between microplastics and crop physiology. The research indicated that microplastics damage the photosynthetic mechanism of staple crops, leading to significant yield reductions.

• Affected Crops: Wheat, rice, and maize (corn).

• Yield Loss: The study estimates global yield reductions of 4% to 14% due to microplastic stress.²⁸

• Mechanism: Microplastics physically block root pores and alter soil bulk density, reducing water retention and nutrient uptake. Furthermore, nanoplastics can penetrate root cell walls, accumulating in the vascular system (xylem and phloem), where they inhibit fluid transport and induce oxidative stress that hampers carbon fixation.³²

The implications of a 14% yield loss in staple crops are profound. In a world already grappling with climate-induced droughts and heatwaves, this additional stressor could push food systems to the breaking point. Researchers estimate this reduction in food production could put an additional 400 million people at risk of starvation over the next two decades.²⁸

5.3 Trophic Transfer in Terrestrial Webs

The contamination of soil ripples up the food chain. Earthworms and soil arthropods ingest MPs, which causes gut inflammation, reduces their growth rates, and impairs their ability to aerate soil and cycle nutrients. This disruption affects soil fertility and transfers plastics to secondary consumers like birds and small mammals.³³ The bioaccumulation of MPs in crops—literally "from soil to salad"—represents a direct route of exposure for humans, independent of seafood consumption, challenging the notion that a plant-based diet avoids plastic ingestion.³¹

6. Chemical Burden: Additives and Vectors

The hazard of plastic is not limited to the polymer itself but extends to the complex cocktail of chemicals added to enhance performance. In 2025, specific focus turned to the additive UV-328, a UV stabilizer used widely in plastics, coatings, and personal care products.

6.1 The Case of UV-328

UV-328 is a phenolic benzotriazole that prevents degradation from sunlight. It is persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic (PBT). Following rigorous review, the Stockholm Convention's POPs Review Committee recommended its global elimination.³⁵ UV-328 exemplifies the chemical burden of plastic pollution; it has been detected in marine debris, seabirds, and human tissue, and is linked to liver and kidney damage in mammals. Its listing as a Persistent Organic Pollutant (POP) represents a major regulatory milestone, yet it remains prevalent in legacy plastics and continues to leach into the environment.³⁷

This regulation highlights the "regrettable substitution" challenge: as one toxic additive is banned, manufacturers often switch to a chemically similar but less regulated alternative, perpetuating the cycle of toxicity. The focus on UV-328 signals a broader regulatory shift toward targeting groups of additives rather than single chemicals.

7. Global Policy: The Failure of INC-5.2 and Geopolitical Stagnation

The governance of plastic pollution reached a critical juncture in August 2025 with the second part of the fifth session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC-5.2) in Geneva. The mandate was to finalize an international legally binding instrument to end plastic pollution. The outcome, however, was a stalemate that exposed deep geopolitical rifts.

7.1 The Breakdown of Negotiations

Despite the urgency, INC-5.2 adjourned without a treaty. The failure was driven by a fundamental schism between two primary blocs:

• The High Ambition Coalition (HAC): Led by the European Union, Rwanda, Peru, and Pacific Island states, this bloc argued that recycling alone is insufficient. They pushed for binding global rules, including caps on virgin plastic production and bans on problematic chemicals and single-use items.³⁸

• The Like-Minded Group: A bloc of petrochemical-producing nations, including Saudi Arabia, Russia, Iran, and China. This group, often aligned with the United States on specific points regarding production limits, opposed any binding caps on virgin plastic production. They argued that the treaty should focus strictly on "waste management" and downstream measures, viewing plastic production as a sovereign economic right.³⁸

7.2 Key Points of Contention

1. Production Caps: The core disagreement. The HAC viewed production cuts as essential to meeting climate and pollution goals. The Like-Minded Group viewed plastic as a critical export—essentially solidified fossil fuel—and refused to limit output.⁴⁰

2. Lifecycle Approach: Disagreement persisted on whether the treaty should cover the entire lifecycle (including design and chemical additives) or strictly the disposal phase.

3. Financing: Developing nations demanded a dedicated multilateral fund to support transition costs, modeled after the Montreal Protocol's Multilateral Fund. Developed nations pushed for voluntary contributions or reliance on existing structures like the Global Environment Facility (GEF), which developing nations deemed insufficient.⁴²

7.3 The "Like-Minded" Strategy and Consequences

The Like-Minded Group successfully utilized consensus rules to block majority decision-making. By delaying proceedings with procedural objections and "bracketing" text (indicating disagreement), they prevented the adoption of a draft that included production cuts. The United States, while not formally part of the Like-Minded bloc, faced criticism for opposing binding global caps in favor of national action plans, a position that many environmental advocates argued effectively supported the petrochemical agenda.⁸

The failure to reach an agreement at INC-5.2 means the world remains on a "Business as Usual" (BAU) trajectory. The Breaking the Plastic Wave 2025 report paints a grim picture of this path: plastic pollution is set to double by 2040, ocean plastic leakage will nearly triple, and greenhouse gas emissions from the plastic lifecycle will increase by 58%.³

8. Technological Frontiers: Remediation and Innovation

While politics stalled, science accelerated. The 2025–2026 period witnessed significant breakthroughs in remediation technologies, moving from theoretical concepts to pilot-scale realities.

8.1 Enzymatic Recycling: The Biological Solution

The "Holy Grail" of plastic management is a circular economy where polymers are infinitely recyclable without degradation. Mechanical recycling leads to "downcycling" (e.g., turning bottles into carpet), which eventually ends in a landfill. Enzymatic recycling, however, uses biological catalysts to deconstruct plastics into their constituent monomers, allowing for the re-creation of virgin-quality plastic.

In 2025, a collaboration between the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), the University of Portsmouth, and other institutions announced a massive leap forward in the efficiency of PETase and MHETase enzymes. These enzymes, originally discovered in the bacterium Ideonella sakaiensis, were engineered to work faster and at industrial temperatures.⁴³

Key 2025 Breakthroughs in Enzymatic Recycling:

• Cost Parity: NREL's techno-economic analysis showed that optimized enzymatic recycling could reduce energy use by 65% and greenhouse gas emissions by wide margins compared to virgin PET production, finally approaching cost competitiveness.⁴⁴

• Contaminant Tolerance: New enzyme variants were developed that are robust against contaminants, a major failure point in traditional recycling processes.

• Speed: Researchers at King's College London developed biocatalytic strategies 84 times faster than industrial composting for bioplastics like PLA.⁴⁵

8.2 Nanotechnology and Filtration

Removing microplastics from water is notoriously difficult due to their microscopic size and neutral charge. In 2025, biomimicry provided a novel solution. Researchers at the University of Waterloo discovered that coral mucus has natural adhesive properties that trap microplastics. Leveraging this, they designed nanostructured filters mimicking this mucus to capture particles efficiently without clogging.⁴⁶

Simultaneously, "water microcleaners" based on dendritic colloids (soft, branched particles) were developed at NC State. These particles self-disperse in water, capture microplastics through hydrophobic interactions, and then float to the surface for easy skimming and removal.⁴⁸

8.3 Source Reduction Technologies

With textiles being a primary source of microfibers (a single load of laundry can release 700,000 fibers), filtration at the source is critical. Startups like Matter and CLEANR launched commercial-grade, self-cleaning filters in 2025 capable of capturing over 90% of microfibers. These technologies are increasingly being integrated into new washing machines, driven by impending regulations in France and potentially the broader EU.⁴⁹

9. Future Trends and Forecasts (2026–2050)

Based on the data available in early 2026, we can extrapolate three distinct scenarios for the future of the global microplastic burden.

9.1 Scenario A: Business as Usual (BAU)

If the stalemate at the UN continues and national policies remain fragmented:

• Accumulation: By 2050, the amount of plastic in the ocean is projected to quadruple.⁵¹ The "plastisphere" will likely alter global nutrient cycling.

• Health: Microplastic presence in human organs will become universal. The incidence of "plastic-associated" cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases will likely rise, potentially becoming a recognized comorbidity in medical diagnostics and actuarial tables.

• Economy: The economic cost of plastic pollution, considering healthcare, cleanup, and ecosystem loss, could reach a cumulative $281 trillion by 2040.⁴⁰

9.2 Scenario B: The "High Ambition" Treaty

If a treaty is ratified with production caps (capping production at 2020 levels) and mandatory design standards:

• Reduction: Plastic pollution could be reduced by roughly 90% by 2050.⁵²

• Substitution: A massive shift toward compostable biomaterials and reuse systems would occur.

• Legacy: Even in this scenario, legacy plastics will continue to fragment, necessitating remediation efforts for centuries.

9.3 The Emerging Reality: "Managed Toxicity"

The most likely outcome is a middle path. We will see strict bans on specific high-toxicity items (like those containing UV-328, PFAS, or PVC) and the proliferation of enzymatic recycling for high-value plastics like PET. However, the background level of microplastics in soil and water will likely remain high. Humanity may have to adapt to a "plasticized" physiology, much as we adapted to background levels of lead before its ban, though the long-term genetic and evolutionary consequences remain the greatest unknown.

10. Conclusion

The year 2025 was a year of revelation. We learned that the plastic crisis is not just an environmental issue of litter or aesthetics; it is a physiological issue of poisoning. The detection of microplastics in the brain and the statistical link to stroke mortality have removed any lingering doubt about the threat to human health.

The burden is heavy: 4-14% of staple crop yields lost, deep-sea ecosystems chemically altered, and a human population increasingly permeated by synthetic polymers. While the failure of INC-5.2 represents a catastrophic lapse in political will, the technological strides in enzymatic recycling and filtration offer a lifeline. The path forward requires a "pincer movement": a bottom-up technological revolution to manage waste and a top-down geopolitical realignment to cap production. Without both, the Anthropocene risks being definitively renamed the "Plasticene," marking a geological era defined not by human achievement, but by our synthetic residue.

Appendix: Key Data Summary Table

Domain	Key Metric / Finding (2025/2026)	Significance	Source
Human Health	0.5% of brain weight in dementia patients consists of plastics.	Suggests link to neurodegeneration and Alzheimer's.	17
Cardiovascular	4.53x higher risk of stroke/death with MPs in carotid plaque.	First direct clinical evidence of mortality risk.	21
Agriculture	4-14% yield loss in wheat/rice/maize due to MPs.	Threatens food security for 400M+ people.	28
Ocean	Deep sea accumulation confirmed; "light smog" throughout water column.	Resolves "missing plastic" paradox; threatens benthic life.	10
Policy	INC-5.2 negotiations failed to reach consensus.	Delays global binding rules; BAU trajectory continues.	40
Recycling	Enzymatic recycling energy usage reduced by 65%.	Approaches cost parity with virgin plastic.	44
Projections	Plastic waste to double by 2040 under BAU.	Indicates urgent need for production caps.	3
Additives	UV-328 recommended for elimination.	Highlights chemical toxicity of additives.	36

Works cited

1. Microplastics: Are we facing a new health crisis – and what can be done about it?, accessed January 3, 2026, https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/02/how-microplastics-get-into-the-food-chain/

2. Sea of plastic: Global study finds thousands of microparticles even in the Mariana Trench, accessed January 3, 2026, https://english.elpais.com/climate/2025-04-30/sea-of-plastic-global-ocean-study-detects-thousands-of-microparticles-even-in-the-mariana-trench.html

3. Breaking the Plastic Wave 2025 | The Pew Charitable Trusts, accessed January 3, 2026, https://www.pew.org/en/research-and-analysis/reports/2025/12/breaking-the-plastic-wave-2025

4. Plastic Pollution - Our World in Data, accessed January 3, 2026, https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution

5. Microplastics in the Marine Environment: Sources, Fates, Impacts and Microbial Degradation, accessed January 3, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7927104/

6. Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee on Plastic Pollution - UNEP, accessed January 3, 2026, https://www.unep.org/inc-plastic-pollution

7. Tracking microplastics from sea to body | Stanford Report, accessed January 3, 2026, https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2025/09/microplastics-environment-human-health-impacts-research

8. Still no Plastics Treaty: How the fossil fuel industry keeps polluting negotiations, accessed January 3, 2026, https://www.greenpeace.org/international/story/78037/still-no-plastics-treaty-how-the-fossil-fuel-industry-keeps-polluting-negotiations/

9. Plastic pollution under the influence of climate change: implications for the abundance, distribution, and hazards in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems - Frontiers, accessed January 3, 2026, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/science/articles/10.3389/fsci.2025.1636665/full

10. Plastics found to be abundant at deep-sea levels, new research reports - Northeastern Global News, accessed January 3, 2026, https://news.northeastern.edu/2025/05/01/ocean-plastics-deep-sea-levels-research/

11. Modeling Microplastic Accumulation Under the Ocean Surface - AIP Publishing LLC, accessed January 3, 2026, https://publishing.aip.org/publications/latest-content/modeling-microplastic-accumulation-under-the-ocean-surface/

12. Viruses on plastic waste pose new antibiotic resistance risks - News-Medical.Net, accessed January 3, 2026, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20251231/Viruses-on-plastic-waste-pose-new-antibiotic-resistance-risks.aspx

13. Viruses on Plastic Pollution May Be Fueling Antibiotic Resistance - Discover Magazine, accessed January 3, 2026, https://www.discovermagazine.com/viruses-on-plastic-pollution-may-be-fueling-antibiotic-resistance-48480

14. Full article: Plastisphere - a new habitat of microbial community: Composition, structure and ecological consequences - Taylor & Francis, accessed January 3, 2026, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/27658511.2025.2516898

15. Exploiting microplastics and the plastisphere for the surveillance of human pathogenic bacteria discharged into surface waters in wastewater effluent - PubMed, accessed January 3, 2026, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40184703/

16. Mangrove plastisphere as a hotspot for high-risk antibiotic resistance genes and pathogens, accessed January 3, 2026, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40043931/

17. Microplastics Are Infiltrating Brain Tissue, Human Organs, Studies Show - SEJ.org, accessed January 3, 2026, https://www.sej.org/headlines/microplastics-are-infiltrating-brain-tissue-human-organs-studies-show

18. Impact of micro- and nanoplastics exposure on human health: focus on neurological effects from ingestion - Frontiers, accessed January 3, 2026, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1681776/full

19. Nanoplastics Penetration Across the Blood-Brain Barrier - bioRxiv, accessed January 3, 2026, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.09.10.675462v1.full.pdf

20. Nano- and Microplastics in the Brain: An Emerging Threat to Neural Health - PMC, accessed January 3, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12429919/

21. Microplastics and Nanoplastics in Atheromas and Cardiovascular Events - PubMed - NIH, accessed January 3, 2026, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38446676/

22. Tiny plastics in carotid plaque tied to elevated risk for heart attack, stroke, death - Healio, accessed January 3, 2026, https://www.healio.com/news/cardiology/20240307/tiny-plastics-in-carotid-plaque-tied-to-elevated-risk-for-heart-attack-stroke-death

23. Plaque buildup in the necks of stroke survivors may be loaded with microplastics, accessed January 3, 2026, https://www.heart.org/en/news/2025/04/22/plaque-buildup-in-the-necks-of-stroke-survivors-may-be-loaded-with-microplastics

24. Levels of microplastics in human brains may be rapidly rising, study ..., accessed January 3, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/feb/03/levels-of-microplastics-in-human-brains-may-be-rapidly-rising-study-suggests

25. Microplastics early '25 science round-up: presence in humans and health impacts, accessed January 3, 2026, https://foodpackagingforum.org/news/microplastics-early-25-science-round-up-presence-in-humans-and-health-impacts

26. Impact of Microplastics on Human Health: Risks, Diseases, and Affected Body Systems, accessed January 3, 2026, https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8929/4/2/23

27. Microplastics and human health: unraveling the toxicological pathways and implications for public health - PMC - NIH, accessed January 3, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12213550/

28. Microplastics may worsen global hunger by harming crop growth ..., accessed January 3, 2026, https://www.ehn.org/microplastics-may-worsen-global-hunger-by-harming-crop-growth

29. Editorial: Effects of microplastics on soil ecosystems - Frontiers, accessed January 3, 2026, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1686836/full

30. Optimizing microplastic pollution in a terrestrial environment: a case for soil-biodegradable mulches | Agricultural and Resource Economics Review - Cambridge University Press & Assessment, accessed January 3, 2026, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/agricultural-and-resource-economics-review/article/optimizing-microplastic-pollution-in-a-terrestrial-environment-a-case-for-soilbiodegradable-mulches/2EDF48F1454A620B73FF3AEE503CEF98

31. New 2026 Study Shows Microplastics Are Most Concentrated in Foods Nobody Expected, accessed January 3, 2026, https://www.cleanr.life/news/new-2026-study-shows-microplastics-are-most-concentrated-in-foods-nobody-expected

32. Beyond Human Health: Microplastics Could Be a Big Problem for Crop Farmers - Ambrook, accessed January 3, 2026, https://ambrook.com/offrange/crops/plastic-in-the-corn

33. Impact of Microplastics on Soil's Biodiversity and Public Health | 7 | - Taylor & Francis eBooks, accessed January 3, 2026, https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.1201/9781003487579-7/impact-microplastics-soil-biodiversity-public-health-zakia-gueboudji-sabrina-lekmine-sara-mechaala-kenza-kadi

34. Scientists say microplastics are 'silently spreading from soil to salad to humans', accessed January 3, 2026, https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2025/05/250522125353.htm

35. Guidance on best available techniques and best environmental practices relevant to UV-328 listed under the Stockholm Convention, accessed January 3, 2026, https://www.pops.int/Portals/0/download.aspx?d=UNEP-POPS-BATBEP-GUID-UV-328-202501.En.pdf

36. UV-328 Research Update - IPEN International Pollutants Elimination Network, accessed January 3, 2026, https://stoppoisonplastic.org/blog/portfolio/uv-328-research-update/

37. UV-328 elimination proposal gaining global attention | Food Packaging Forum, accessed January 3, 2026, https://foodpackagingforum.org/news/uv-328-elimination-proposal-gaining-global-attention

38. Who's who at the plastics treaty talks, from delegates to lobbyists | Grist, accessed January 3, 2026, https://grist.org/international/plastics-treaty-coalitions-guide-groups-geneva-inc-5-2/

39. UN plastic pollution summit fails to reach agreement despite majority supporting ambitious measures - World Wildlife Fund, accessed January 3, 2026, https://www.worldwildlife.org/news/press-releases/un-plastic-pollution-summit-fails-to-reach-agreement-despite-majority-supporting-ambitious-measures/

40. INC-5.2: The global plastics treaty talks - here's what just happened | World Economic Forum, accessed January 3, 2026, https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/08/global-plastics-treaty-inc-5-2-explainer/

41. Global Plastics Treaty, INC-5.2 ends without agreement and amid controversy, accessed January 3, 2026, https://www.renewablematter.eu/en/global-plastics-treaty-inc-5-2-ends-without-agreement

42. Summary report 5–15 August 2025 - Earth Negotiations Bulletin, accessed January 3, 2026, https://enb.iisd.org/plastic-pollution-marine-environment-negotiating-committee-inc5.2-summary

43. Plastic-Eating Microbes & Biotech: The 2025 Breakthrough in Microplastic Pollution Solutions - YouTube, accessed January 3, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nitMCco8eTo

44. Plastics Recycling With Enzymes Takes a Leap Forward | NLR - NREL, accessed January 3, 2026, https://www.nrel.gov/news/detail/program/2025/plastics-recycling-with-enzymes-takes-a-leap-forward

45. Revolutionising plastic recycling: a breakthrough in enzyme-based depolymerisation, accessed January 3, 2026, https://www.diamond.ac.uk/Science/Research/Highlights/2025/20250117-B23-hydrolytic-enzyme.html

46. Breakthrough study uncovers how microplastics stick to coral reefs - University of Waterloo, accessed January 3, 2026, https://uwaterloo.ca/chemical-engineering/news/breakthrough-study-uncovers-how-microplastics-stick-coral

47. Polyp-ethylene: Cause of microplastic build up on coral uncovered - Oceanographic, accessed January 3, 2026, https://oceanographicmagazine.com/news/polyp-ethylene-cause-of-microplastic-build-up-on-coral-uncovered/

48. New Water Microcleaners Self-Disperse, Capture Microplastics and Float Up for Removal, accessed January 3, 2026, https://research.ncsu.edu/new-water-microcleaners-self-disperse-capture-microplastics-and-float-up-for-removal/

49. To Design a Microplastics Filter, This Company Copied Nature - CLEANR, accessed January 3, 2026, https://www.cleanr.life/to-design-a-microplastics-filter-this-company-copied-nature

50. Matter - The Earthshot Prize 2025 Finalist, accessed January 3, 2026, https://earthshotprize.org/winners-finalists/matter/

51. Ocean plastic pollution to quadruple by 2050, pushing more areas to exceed ecologically dangerous threshold of microplastic concentration | WWF, accessed January 3, 2026, https://wwf.panda.org/wwf_news/?4959466/Ocean-plastic-pollution-to-quadruple-by-2050-pushing-more-areas-to-exceed-ecologically-dangerous-threshold-of-microplastic-concentration

52. Yes, we can eliminate plastic pollution (by 2050) - University of California, accessed January 3, 2026, https://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/news/yes-we-can-eliminate-plastic-pollution-2050