top of page

From Liability to Asset: Turning Mars’ Toxic Regolith into Living Architecture

Futuristic Mars habitat with dome structures, hexagonal patterns, and a rover on a red desert. Green lights and moons in the sky.

Abstract

The colonization of Mars presents an engineering paradox: the cost of transporting construction materials from Earth is prohibitive, yet the local Martian regolith contains perchlorates—toxic salts widely assumed to inhibit the biological methods proposed for in-situ construction. A groundbreaking 2026 study by the Indian Institute of Science (IISc), in collaboration with the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO), has overturned this assumption. By isolating a novel bacterial strain (Sporosarcina sp. SI_IISc_isolate) from terrestrial soil, researchers demonstrated that perchlorate exposure triggers a stress-induced "multicellularity-like" response. This biological adaptation, characterized by the secretion of an extracellular matrix (ECM), effectively strengthens the resulting bio-consolidated "space bricks." This article explores the biochemical mechanisms, structural properties, and astrobiological implications of this finding, suggesting that the very toxicity of the Martian surface may be leveraged as an asset in interplanetary architecture.

1. The Tyranny of the Rocket Equation and the Promise of ISRU Through Martian Regolith

The fundamental constraint of space exploration is mass. Under the Tsiolkovsky rocket equation, every kilogram of payload launched to Mars requires a significant multiplier of fuel mass to escape Earth's gravity well. Current logistical estimates place the cost of transporting materials to the Martian surface at approximately one million US dollars per kilogram.1 Consequently, the traditional terrestrial construction model—importing steel, concrete, and glass—is economically unfeasible for establishing permanent off-world habitats.

To bypass this barrier, space agencies have turned to In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU), a strategy that focuses on harvesting and processing local raw materials. For construction, this involves utilizing the Martian regolith, the layer of loose, heterogeneous superficial deposits covering solid rock. However, consolidating this basaltic dust into load-bearing structures requires a binder. While thermal sintering (melting regolith with lasers or microwaves) is a viable physical method, it is energetically costly, demanding gigajoules of power in an environment where energy is a scarce commodity.3

A more energy-efficient alternative is Microbially Induced Calcite Precipitation (MICP). In this biogeochemical process, specific ureolytic bacteria hydrolyze urea (a potential metabolic waste product of astronauts) to produce ammonia and carbonate ions. In the presence of calcium, these ions precipitate as calcium carbonate (calcite), which acts as a bio-cement, binding soil particles together into a sandstone-like material.5

2. The Perchlorate Barrier: Mars' Toxic Signature

While MICP has shown promise in laboratory settings using benign soil simulants, the actual chemical reality of Mars poses a severe biological threat. Since the landing of NASA's Phoenix probe in 2008, and confirmed subsequently by the Curiosity rover, we have known that Martian soil contains high concentrations of perchlorates (ClO4-), ranging from 0.5% to 1.0% by weight.7

Perchlorates are chaotropic salts; they disrupt the hydrogen bonding network of water, leading to the destabilization of proteins and cell membranes. On Earth, perchlorates are environmental contaminants, often associated with rocket fuel and explosives, and are notoriously toxic to most life forms.5 The prevailing consensus in astrobiology was that any biological construction method would require the energy-intensive removal of these toxins before bacterial growth could occur. A failure to address the "perchlorate problem" would render MICP a theoretical curiosity rather than a practical solution.

3. The 2026 IISc Breakthrough: Turning Stress into Strength

In January 2026, a team of researchers from the Indian Institute of Science (IISc), working with the Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) Kolkata and ISRO, published a pivotal study in the journal PLOS One titled "Effect of perchlorate on biocementation capable bacteria and Martian bricks".10 The team, including lead author Swati Dubey, corresponding author Professor Aloke Kumar, and co-author Shubhanshu Shukla—an active Group Captain in the Indian Air Force and ISRO astronaut—sought to test the resilience of MICP in true Martian chemical conditions.2

3.1 The Biological Agent: Sporosarcina sp. SI_IISc_isolate

Rather than relying solely on the standard reference strain Sporosarcina pasteurii (ATCC 11859), the team isolated a native bacterial strain from soil collected in Bengaluru, India, in March 2021.12

Genomic analysis revealed this strain, designated SI_IISc_isolate, to be a distinct variant. With a draft genome size of approximately 3.69 Mb and 4,678 coding sequences, the bacterium possesses the critical ureC gene necessary for urease activity. Crucially, it also contains genes for nitrate reductase, an enzyme often linked to the metabolism or tolerance of oxidized nitrogen and chlorine compounds.12 This genomic profile suggested a potential latent capability to withstand oxidative stress, a hypothesis the researchers set out to test.

3.2 Experimental Methodology

The researchers utilized a "slurry casting" method to simulate brick manufacturing. The matrix consisted of Mars Global Simulant (MGS-1), a mineralogically accurate analog of the regolith found at Gale Crater.13 To this, they added:

  1. Magnesium Perchlorate: To mimic Martian toxicity at 0.5% to 1% concentrations.14

  2. Guar Gum: A natural polysaccharide derived from cluster beans (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba), serving as a moisture-retaining hydrogel and initial adhesive.1

  3. Nickel Chloride (NiCl2): A vital cofactor for the urease enzyme.8

  4. Urea and Calcium: The chemical feedstock for biocementation.

4. Mechanisms of Adaptation: The "Clumping" Phenomenon

The study's most profound finding was not merely that the bacteria survived, but how they survived. Under standard conditions, Sporosarcina cells exist in a planktonic (free-floating) state. However, when exposed to the toxic stress of perchlorates, the SI_IISc_isolate exhibited a dramatic morphological shift.

Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Gram staining revealed that the bacteria began to aggregate, exhibiting "multicellularity-like behavior".7 This clumping is a defensive response, analogous to circling the wagons. To facilitate this aggregation and protect themselves from the chemical attack of the perchlorate ions, the bacteria secreted copious amounts of Extracellular Matrix (ECM)—a sticky, complex blend of proteins and polysaccharides.8

This stress response had an unintended engineering benefit. The secreted ECM did not just shield the cells; it acted as a secondary biological glue. The SEM imagery captured "microbridges" of this organic matrix spanning the gaps between regolith particles and calcite crystals.12 In effect, the toxicity of the environment forced the bacteria to produce a superior composite binder, blending the rigidity of calcium carbonate with the viscoelastic toughness of the bacterial slime.

5. Structural Analysis and Material Performance

The utility of a construction material is defined by its mechanical properties. The researchers subjected the bio-consolidated bricks to compressive strength testing, a standard measure of a material's ability to withstand crushing loads.

The results, summarized in Table 1, highlight the synergistic role of the additives and the stress response.

Table 1: Comparative Compressive Strength of Martian Regolith Consolidates


Brick Composition

Compressive Strength (MPa)

Observations

Source

MGS-1 + Water

0.17 MPa

Structurally unsound; crumbled under self-weight.

12

MGS-1 + Bacteria + Guar Gum (Control)

3.07 MPa

Successful consolidation under Earth-like conditions.

11

MGS-1 + Bacteria + Guar Gum + NiCl2

4.40 MPa

Optimal strength; Nickel enhances enzymatic efficiency.

11

MGS-1 + Bacteria + Guar Gum + NiCl2 + Perchlorate

~3.00 - 4.00 MPa

Key Finding: Despite toxicity, strength is maintained or enhanced relative to non-Nickel controls due to ECM bridging.

7

While the absolute maximum strength was observed in the non-toxic control supplemented with Nickel (4.4 MPa), the bricks containing perchlorate maintained structural viability, significantly outperforming the water-only control and showing resilience comparable to the benign samples. The "strengthening" effect noted in media reports refers to the counter-intuitive finding that the presence of a lethal toxin did not cause the material to fail, but rather induced a biological response that preserved structural integrity.7

The addition of guar gum was critical. In the presence of perchlorate, the guar gum likely acted as both a physical stabilizer (preventing immediate desiccation) and a nutrient source, aiding bacterial recovery from the osmotic shock.12

6. Comparative Advantages Over Abiotic Methods

To contextualize the MICP approach, it is necessary to compare it with abiotic alternatives like sintering (melting) or sulfur concrete. While thermal sintering can produce bricks with compressive strengths exceeding 20 MPa, it requires temperatures above 1100°C.16

Table 2: Energy and Logistic Comparison of Martian Construction Techniques


Method

Process Temperature

Energy Demand

Logistics

Source

Thermal Sintering

>1100°C

High (~1,372 MJ/tonne)

Heavy equipment for heating required.

3

Microwave Sintering

High

Moderate (~206 MJ/tonne)

Requires substantial electrical power infrastructure.

3

Sulfur Concrete

~140°C

Moderate

Risk of sublimation in vacuum; low melting point.

17

Bio-Cementation (MICP)

Ambient (20-30°C)

Low

Requires only light bacterial cultures and small amounts of growth media; self-replicating.

4

The biological approach offers a unique logistical advantage: exponential multiplication. Unlike chemical binders or heavy machinery, a small vial of bacteria can be cultured in situ to produce unlimited quantities of binding agent, provided local water and urea are available.

7. Implications for Future Exploration

The findings of the IISc study have reshaped the roadmap for Martian habitation.

7.1 The Astronaut as Scientist

The involvement of Group Captain Shubhanshu Shukla highlights a paradigm shift in the astronaut corps. No longer solely pilots or system operators, modern astronauts are becoming active participants in foundational research. Shukla's dual role—pursuing a Master's at IISc while training for the Axiom-4 mission—demonstrates the deep integration of academic science with operational spaceflight.2

7.2 From Contamination to Construction

The confirmation that earth-based bacteria can adapt to perchlorate concentrations found on Mars suggests that we may not need to "scrub" the soil perfectly before building. This reduces the energy budget for site preparation. Furthermore, the genomic presence of nitrate reductase in the SI_IISc_isolate hints at the possibility of genetic engineering to enhance this trait, potentially creating bacterial strains that can metabolize the perchlorate, detoxifying the soil while simultaneously building the habitat walls.6

8. Conclusion

The "Space Bricks" developed by the IISc team represent a triumph of biological adaptability. By subjecting a humble soil bacterium to the harsh chemistry of an alien world, researchers discovered that life does not merely survive stress—it restructures itself to withstand it. The transition from planktonic isolation to multicellular cooperation, mediated by the secretion of a strengthening extracellular matrix, turns the "perchlorate problem" into a structural solution.

As humanity looks toward the Red Planet, this study suggests that our most valuable construction tool may not be a laser or a 3D printer, but a microscopic ally capable of knitting together the dust of a new world, one cell—and one clump—at a time.

Works cited

  1. Bacteria could be key to Mars exploration, accessed January 30, 2026, https://bangaloremirror.indiatimes.com/bangalore/others/bacteria-could-be-key-to-mars-exploration/articleshow/127809880.cms

  2. Bengaluru Soil Bacteria Could Help Build Bricks on Mars: Shubhanshu Shukla's Study, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.deccanchronicle.com/science/science/bengaluru-soil-bacteria-could-help-build-bricks-on-mars-shubhanshu-shuklas-study-1933935

  3. From Earth to Mars: a perspective on exploiting biomineralization for Martian construction - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed January 30, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12705609/

  4. A Roadmap to Exploiting Biocementation for Martian Construction: Pathways, Challenges, and Research Gaps - Preprints.org, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202506.2121

  5. Overview of Bacterial Protein Toxins from Pathogenic Bacteria: Mode of Action and Insights into Evolution - PubMed Central, accessed January 30, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11054074/

  6. From Earth to Mars: a perspective on exploiting biomineralization for Martian construction - Frontiers, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1645014/full

  7. Toxic chemical in Martian soil leads to stronger brick-building bacteria - The Hindu, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/karnataka/toxic-chemical-in-martian-soil-leads-to-stronger-brick-building-bacteria/article70570019.ece

  8. Effect of perchlorate on biocementation capable bacteria and Martian bricks - ResearchGate, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/389484169_Effect_of_perchlorate_on_biocementation_capable_bacteria_and_Martian_bricks?_tp=eyJjb250ZXh0Ijp7InBhZ2UiOiJzY2llbnRpZmljQ29udHJpYnV0aW9ucyIsInByZXZpb3VzUGFnZSI6bnVsbCwic3ViUGFnZSI6bnVsbH19

  9. Perchlorate and halophilic prokaryotes: Implications for possible halophilic life on Mars | Request PDF - ResearchGate, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258036663_Perchlorate_and_halophilic_prokaryotes_Implications_for_possible_halophilic_life_on_Mars

  10. Results | PLOS One, accessed January 30, 2026, https://journals.plos.org/plosone/browse/chemical_elements?dateRange=ALL_TIME&sortOrder=DATE_OLDEST_FIRST&resultView=cover&page=663

  11. Effect of perchlorate on biocementation capable bacteria and Martian bricks - PMC - NIH, accessed January 30, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12854443/

  12. Effect of perchlorate on biocementation capable bacteria ... - bioRxiv, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.02.24.639804v1.full.pdf

  13. Effect of perchlorate on biocementation capable bacteria and Martian bricks | PLOS One, accessed January 30, 2026, https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0340252

  14. Effect of perchlorate on biocementation capable bacteria and Martian bricks | PLOS One, accessed January 30, 2026, https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figures?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0340252

  15. Shubhanshu Shukla, IISc-IISER team, find how brick-building bacteria react to toxin in Martian soil, accessed January 30, 2026, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/shubhanshu-shukla-iisc-iiser-team-find-how-brick-building-bacteria-react-to-toxin-in-martian-soil/articleshow/127797274.cms

  16. Synthetic space bricks from lunar and martian regolith via sintering - ResearchGate, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373451849_Synthetic_space_bricks_from_lunar_and_martian_regolith_via_sintering

  17. Microbial induced calcite precipitation can consolidate martian and lunar regolith simulants | PLOS One - Research journals, accessed January 30, 2026, https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0266415

  18. 'Brick by brick': Astronaut Shubhanshu Shukla at IISc works on Mars construction tech, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.deccanherald.com/science/brick-by-brick-astronaut-shubhanshu-shukla-at-iisc-works-on-mars-construction-tech-3880511

  19. Building materials come alive with help from bacteria | CU Boulder Today, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.colorado.edu/today/2020/01/15/building-materials-come-alive

Comments


bottom of page