From Winter Storm Uri (2021) to Now: A Five-Year Audit of Texas's ERCOT Power Grid

1. Introduction: The Paradigm of the Isolated Grid

The electrical grid of Texas, managed by the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT), represents a unique experiment in the landscape of North American energy infrastructure. Unlike the Eastern or Western Interconnections, which rely on vast, synchronized networks spanning dozens of states and Canadian provinces to share load and frequency stability, the Texas Interconnection stands effectively alone. It is an electrical island, largely contiguous with the state’s political borders, a design choice born of a desire to avoid federal economic regulation under the Federal Power Act. This isolation has allowed Texas to cultivate a distinct market philosophy: an "energy-only" market design that prioritizes hyper-efficiency and low wholesale prices over the costly redundancy of capacity payments found in other regions.¹

For decades, this model functioned under the assumption that the primary stressor on the system was summer heat. The grid was engineered to withstand the blistering temperatures of July and August, driven by air conditioning load, with winter regarded as a secondary, less critical season. The prevailing operational doctrine assumed that the thermal fleet—natural gas, coal, and nuclear—would be readily available during winter months when demand was historically lower, and that renewable intermittency could be managed through the state's abundant natural gas reserves.³

However, the catastrophic events of February 2021, known as Winter Storm Uri, shattered this paradigm. The storm exposed a critical fragility in the system: the profound interdependence between the natural gas supply chain and electric generation, and the lack of physical hardening against extreme cold. The collapse was not merely a meteorological anomaly but a systemic failure of engineering, market incentives, and regulatory oversight. It revealed that in a system optimized for efficiency, the lack of "steel-in-the-ground" redundancy could lead to catastrophic failure when tail-risk events materialized.⁴

As we assess the grid's status in early 2026, the narrative is one of significant, albeit uneven, transformation. The state has moved from a laissez-faire approach to a regime of mandatory weatherization and heightened inspection. Yet, the ghost of Uri persists in the form of "securitized" debt on ratepayer bills and continued anxiety over "tail risk" weather events. This report provides a comprehensive, academic examination of the Texas grid's evolution from the collapse of 2021 to the fortified, yet still vulnerable, system of today. It analyzes the physics of the failure, the legislative overhaul of Senate Bill 3, the contentious debates over market redesign, and the performance of the grid during subsequent stress tests like Winter Storms Elliott and Heather.

2. Anatomy of a Collapse: Deconstructing Winter Storm Uri

To understand the current resilience measures, one must first rigorously deconstruct the failure modes of February 2021. The crisis was a synchronized breakdown of every component of the energy stack—meteorological, mechanical, and operational.

2.1 The Meteorological Catalyst: Stratospheric Polar Vortex Disruption

The proximal cause of the 2021 crisis was a planetary-scale atmospheric disruption. In early January 2021, a Sudden Stratospheric Warming (SSW) event occurred high above the Arctic. The Stratospheric Polar Vortex (SPV), a band of strong westerly winds that typically confines cold air to the polar region, weakened and reversed. This disruption caused the vortex to stretch and deform, allowing a massive lobe of cryosphere-temperature air to spill southward into the continental United States.⁵

Unlike typical cold fronts that sweep through quickly, the atmospheric blocking patterns associated with SPV disruptions can cause weather systems to stall. In February 2021, the jet stream dipped profoundly south, reaching the Gulf of Mexico. This created a "blocking high" over Greenland that forced the cold air to linger over the central U.S. for nearly a week. The breadth of the cold was critical; typically, weather patterns in Texas allow for regional diversity—if the Panhandle is cold, the Coast might be mild. During Uri, the cold was ubiquitous, enveloping the entire state in sub-freezing temperatures for 160 consecutive hours in some regions.⁷

This meteorological setup is increasingly linked to the phenomenon of Arctic Amplification. As the Arctic warms faster than the equator, the temperature gradient that drives the jet stream weakens, causing it to become "wavier." Recent climatological studies suggest that while the overall frequency of cold days may decrease with global warming, the likelihood of these deep, stalling SPV excursions—what risk analysts call "tail events"—remains elevated or is even increasing.⁹

2.2 The operational Precipice: The Frequency Event

By the early morning of February 15, 2021, the demand for electricity in Texas surged to record winter highs as millions of poorly insulated homes relied on inefficient electric resistance heating. Simultaneously, the supply of electricity began to vanish. As generation units tripped offline, the grid frequency—the heartbeat of the electrical system, which must be maintained at 60 Hertz (Hz)—began to plummet.⁴

At 1:51 AM on February 15, the frequency dropped to 59.302 Hz. This was a critical threshold. If the frequency remains below 59.4 Hz for nine minutes, or drops below 59.3 Hz instantaneously for any significant duration, generation units are programmed to automatically disconnect to protect their physical machinery (turbines and generators) from catastrophic damage due to vibrational resonance.

ERCOT operators were minutes away from a total system collapse. A "black start" scenario—where the entire grid goes dark and must be restarted generator by generator—would have ensued. Restarting a grid from zero is a complex engineering challenge that could have left the state without power for weeks, resulting in unimaginable humanitarian and economic consequences. To avoid this, operators ordered the shedding of 20,000 MW of load, the largest forced blackout in U.S. history.¹¹ While this action saved the physical integrity of the transmission system, it shifted the catastrophe from the grid to the populace.

2.3 The Human and Economic Toll

The consequences of the load shed were devastating. More than 4.5 million Texans lost power, some for four consecutive days. The loss of electricity cascaded into a loss of water, as treatment plants and pumps lost power or froze. The official death toll confirmed by the state was 246, though excess mortality studies suggest the number could be significantly higher, potentially exceeding 700.¹

Economically, the storm was the costliest disaster in Texas history. The Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas estimated the financial losses between $80 billion and $130 billion. This figure encompasses direct physical damage, lost economic productivity, and the destruction of crops and livestock. Furthermore, the wholesale power market incurred billions in costs as prices stayed at the administrative cap of $9,000 per megawatt-hour (MWh) for days, bankrupting the Brazos Electric Power Cooperative and placing massive debt burdens on other utilities.⁴

3. The Engineering of Failure: Thermodynamics and Interdependency

The 2021 blackout was not simply a case of "demand exceeding supply"; it was a widespread mechanical failure of the generation fleet caused by a lack of winterization. Every fuel type struggled, but the specific failure modes revealed deep vulnerabilities in the state’s infrastructure design standards.

3.1 The Natural Gas Failure: Freeze-offs and the Joule-Thomson Effect

Natural gas is the backbone of the ERCOT grid, providing the dispatchable capacity needed to balance renewable intermittency. However, during Uri, 87% of unplanned generation outages due to fuel issues were related to natural gas.¹¹ The failure occurred upstream at the wellheads and processing plants, leading to a fuel starvation of the power plants.

The primary mechanism of failure at the wellhead is known as a "freeze-off." Natural gas emerging from the ground often contains water vapor and other liquids. When the ambient temperature drops below freezing, this water can freeze, blocking the flow of gas. This process is exacerbated by the Joule-Thomson effect, a thermodynamic principle describing the temperature change of a real gas (as opposed to an ideal gas) when it is forced through a valve or porous plug while kept insulated so that no heat is exchanged with the environment.

As natural gas flows from the high-pressure reservoir to the lower-pressure pipeline, it expands and cools significantly. Even if the ambient air temperature is slightly above freezing, the gas temperature can drop well below freezing due to this expansion. Without active mitigation—such as "heat tracing" (electrical heating elements wrapped around pipes), line heaters (gas-fired units that warm the gas stream), or methanol injection (which acts as an antifreeze)—ice forms internally, choking off the well.¹³

In 2021, thousands of wells in the Permian Basin and other regions were not equipped with these weatherization technologies because they had not been designated as "critical infrastructure." They simply froze shut, cutting off the fuel supply to the state’s power plants.¹¹

3.2 The "Death Spiral" of Interdependency

A critical compounding factor was the circular dependency between the gas and electric sectors. Natural gas infrastructure requires electricity to operate; processing plants need power for pumps and control systems, and compressor stations often use electric motors to push gas through the pipelines.

During the initial stages of load shedding, transmission operators (TDUs) cut power to circuits based on outdated critical infrastructure lists. Consequently, power was inadvertently cut to gas processing plants and compressor stations. This created a "death spiral":

1. Power is cut to a gas facility to save the grid.

2. The gas facility shuts down, reducing fuel flow to power plants.

3. Gas-fired power plants trip offline due to low fuel pressure.

4. The generation deficit widens, forcing ERCOT to shed more load.

5. More gas facilities lose power, continuing the cycle.¹¹

This feedback loop was responsible for a significant, persistent loss of capacity throughout the crisis, highlighting a catastrophic lack of coordination between the Railroad Commission (which regulates gas) and ERCOT/PUCT (which regulate electricity).

3.3 Power Plant Vulnerabilities

The failures were not limited to fuel supply. The generating units themselves suffered from mechanical failures due to the extreme cold.

• Instrumentation Freezing: Many power plants rely on sensing lines (small tubes filled with water or air) to monitor pressure and flow. If these lines freeze, the plant's control system receives bad data and trips the unit offline for safety. This was a common failure mode for coal and gas plants.³

• Wind Turbine Icing: While wind is an intermittent resource and was not counted on for full capacity, freezing rain caused significant ice buildup on turbine blades. This altered the aerodynamic profile of the blades, forcing turbines to shut down to prevent damage. While wind underperformance was a factor, it is crucial to note that thermal generation failures (gas, coal, nuclear) accounted for the majority of the missing megawatts relative to expected capacity.³

• Nuclear Trips: Even nuclear power was affected. One of the units at the South Texas Project tripped offline because a sensor on a feedwater pump froze, triggering an automatic safety shutdown. This single trip removed over 1,000 MW of baseload power from the grid instantly.¹¹

4. The Legislative and Regulatory Response: Senate Bill 3

In the aftermath of the disaster, the 87th Texas Legislature moved quickly to enact reforms. The resulting legislation, primarily Senate Bill 2 (SB 2) and Senate Bill 3 (SB 3), signed by Governor Greg Abbott in June 2021, fundamentally altered the regulatory landscape.¹⁶

4.1 The Weatherization Mandate

The most direct response was the mandate for weatherization. SB 3 amended the Texas Utilities Code to require the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT) to establish mandatory weather emergency preparedness standards for generation assets. This marked a decisive shift from the voluntary guideline approach that had been recommended—and largely ignored—after the 2011 winter storm.¹⁸

4.1.1 Implementation and Inspection

Under the new regime, ERCOT established a rigorous Weatherization Inspection Program. Generation entities are now required to certify their readiness for both winter (December–February) and summer (June–September) seasons. They must protect "cold weather critical components," utilizing methods such as installing windbreaks, applying thermal insulation to pipes, and ensuring heat tracing systems are functional.²⁰

ERCOT was empowered to conduct on-site inspections to verify compliance. By early 2025, ERCOT had completed over 3,200 weatherization inspections of generation and transmission facilities. The program imposes a structured checklist: by December 1 of each year, every facility must complete its winter preparations. The stakes for non-compliance were raised significantly, with the legislature increasing the maximum administrative penalty to $1,000,000 per day per violation.¹⁸

4.2 The Mapping Committee and Critical Infrastructure

To resolve the "death spiral" of gas-electric interdependency, SB 3 established the Texas Electricity Supply Chain Security and Mapping Committee. This body, composed of the PUCT, the Railroad Commission (RRC), and ERCOT, was tasked with creating a unified, high-fidelity map of the state’s critical energy infrastructure.¹⁸

The objective was operational clarity: ensuring that Transmission and Distribution Utilities (TDUs) know exactly which feeder circuits supply power to critical natural gas facilities (processing plants, compressor stations, and high-volume wellheads). These circuits are now prioritized for "critical load" status, meaning they are excluded from the rotation of load shedding during an energy emergency. This ensures that even if the grid is shedding load, the fuel supply required to generate that power remains energized.²²

4.3 The Natural Gas Loophole: Form CI-X

While the electricity side (PUCT/ERCOT) moved toward strict mandates, the regulation of the natural gas supply chain (under the RRC) has been the subject of intense scrutiny and criticism regarding potential loopholes.

The RRC adopted Rule 3.65, which requires operators of natural gas facilities to designate themselves as "critical." Critical facilities are then subject to the weatherization requirements of Rule 3.66.²³ However, the rule includes a provision that allows operators to apply for an exception to this critical designation by filing Form CI-X.²⁵

4.3.1 The Mechanics of the Exception

An operator can file Form CI-X and pay a $150 fee to opt out of critical designation if they can provide "objective evidence" and justification. Acceptable justifications include claims that the facility does not produce a significant volume of gas (thresholds were raised to 250 Mcf/day for gas wells) or, controversially, that the facility is "not prepared to operate during a weather emergency".²⁷

Critics, including the watchdog group Commission Shift, argue that this creates a circular loophole: an operator can avoid the requirement to weatherize by simply asserting that they are not weatherized. If a facility declares it is not prepared to operate in an emergency, it is not designated as critical, and therefore is not required to weatherize under Rule 3.66. While the RRC asserts that they review these applications and can deny them, the existence of this pathway raises concerns about the aggregate volume of gas that might be unavailable during a severe freeze.²⁵

The RRC counters that the rule captures the vast majority of the state's gas volume (nearly 80%), and that forcing marginal wells to weatherize would be economically prohibitive, potentially driving them out of business and reducing overall supply. They emphasize that "Tier One" facilities—major processing plants and large pipelines—are rigorously inspected.²⁷ Nevertheless, the Form CI-X exception remains a focal point of debate regarding the robustness of the fuel supply chain.

5. Market Design Evolution: The Economics of Resilience

Beyond physical hardening, the post-Uri era has seen a tumultuous debate over market design. The central tension lies in modifying the "energy-only" market—which pays only for electricity produced—to incentivize "reliability" (capacity availability) without transitioning to a full, federally-style capacity market.

5.1 The Rise and Fall of the Performance Credit Mechanism (PCM)

For nearly two years, the PUCT and ERCOT championed a concept called the Performance Credit Mechanism (PCM). This novel design was intended to act as a reliability overlay on the energy market. It would have retroactively awarded "performance credits" to generators that were available during the tightest grid hours of the year. Load Serving Entities (LSEs) would be required to purchase these credits, theoretically creating a revenue stream that incentivizes generators to be available during peaks.³¹

However, the PCM faced intense opposition. Consumer advocates and industrial energy users argued it would transfer billions of dollars to existing generators without guaranteeing new steel-in-the-ground. Independent market monitors warned it would be opaque and difficult to administer. By late 2024, amidst legislative pressure and regulatory pivot, the PCM was effectively shelved and canceled as a policy direction.³³

5.2 The Dispatchable Reliability Reserve Service (DRRS)

In place of the PCM, the focus shifted to a more targeted ancillary service product: the Dispatchable Reliability Reserve Service (DRRS). Mandated by House Bill 1500 (passed in 2023), DRRS is designed to address operational uncertainty. It pays resources that can:

1. Come online within two hours.

2. Run for at least four hours at their high sustained limit.

3. Provide flexibility to address inter-hour operational challenges.³⁴

Implementation of DRRS is slated for late 2025. This product specifically targets the "duck curve" issues and forecast errors associated with high renewable penetration. For instance, if wind generation drops off more rapidly than forecasted, or if a thermal unit trips unexpectedly, DRRS resources provide the immediate, dispatchable bridge to stabilize the grid. This represents a move toward valuing attributes (speed, flexibility) rather than just raw capacity.³⁵

5.3 Real-Time Co-optimization (RTC)

Another major structural upgrade scheduled for late 2025 is Real-Time Co-optimization (RTC). Currently, ERCOT procures ancillary services (reserves) in the Day-Ahead market and energy in the Real-Time market separately. This can lead to inefficiencies where a generator might be locked into providing reserves when it would be more valuable providing energy, or vice versa.

RTC will use a unified software engine to solve for both energy and ancillary services simultaneously every five minutes. This will allow the grid to dynamically allocate resources to their highest-value use. While primarily an efficiency upgrade, RTC has significant reliability implications. By more accurately pricing scarcity and reserves in real-time, it should provide sharper price signals to flexible resources like batteries and fast-start gas turbines, encouraging their development and availability.³³

5.4 Securitization: The "Uri Tax"

The financial fallout of Uri required a massive intervention to prevent the collapse of the retail electric market. With wholesale prices pinned at $9,000/MWh for days, utilities incurred debts that exceeded their total capitalization. To manage this, the legislature authorized "securitization" through House Bill 4492 (Subchapters M and N).³⁸

Securitization allows the state (via ERCOT) to issue state-backed bonds to pay off the immediate debts owed to generators. These bonds are then repaid by ratepayers over a period of decades through a non-bypassable surcharge on monthly electric bills.

• Subchapter N: Covered $2.1 billion in "uplift" costs for Load Serving Entities.

• Subchapter M: Covered $800 million for default balances.

For the average Texan, this means that a portion of their monthly bill in 2026 and beyond—often visible as a specific line item or embedded in TDU charges—is paying the "mortgage" on the disaster of 2021. For example, some electric cooperatives have implemented a charge of roughly 1.05 cents per kWh to service this debt. This financial mechanism stabilized the market but effectively socialized the cost of the failure across the entire population for a generation.¹⁸

6. Performance Under Pressure: The Stress Tests (2022–2025)

The reforms enacted since 2021 have been tested by several significant winter weather events. These "stress tests" provide empirical data on the grid's improved resilience and highlight persisting vulnerabilities.

6.1 Winter Storm Elliott (December 2022)

Winter Storm Elliott was the first major test of the post-SB 3 grid. Temperatures dropped significantly, and demand reached a new winter peak of 74,100 MW.

• Performance: The grid held without load shedding.

• Improvement: Thermal generation outages were significantly lower than in Uri, validating the weatherization efforts.

• Issues: There were still some natural gas supply limitations due to freeze-offs, and ERCOT experienced discrepancies between forecasted and actual demand, partly due to software issues. However, reserves remained sufficient throughout the event.⁴⁰

6.2 Winter Storm Heather (January 2024)

Winter Storm Heather was a severe event, ranking as the third coldest storm in recent years but generating a higher peak demand than Elliott, reaching 78,138 MW.⁴¹

• Thermal Resilience: Thermal generation (gas, coal, nuclear) performed robustly, supplying approximately 87% of the energy during the peak intervals. Forced outages for thermal resources were approximately 3,000 MW, a fraction of the losses seen during Uri.⁴¹

• Gas-Electric Coordination: The mapping committee's work appeared to pay off. While there were some gas production declines, the "death spiral" of cutting power to gas facilities was avoided. Gas storage withdrawals played a crucial role in supplementing pipeline flow when wellhead production dipped.⁴²

• Renewable Performance: Wind and solar output was low during the peak demand hours, which is typical for winter high-pressure systems. This underscored the grid's continued reliance on dispatchable thermal capacity during extreme cold.⁴³

6.3 Winter Storms Cora and Enzo (January 2025)

The most recent tests in early 2025, Storms Cora and Enzo, demonstrated a maturing system.

• No Reliability Events: Neither storm resulted in conservation calls or reliability issues for the bulk grid.

• Transmission Issues: Storm Enzo caused icing in Southeast Texas that led to localized transmission outages (wires down), but generation capacity remained high.⁴⁴

• Forecasting Accuracy: A key success story was the improvement in forecasting. ERCOT's models, now incorporating wind chill and more sophisticated renewable profiles, predicted the demand peaks with high accuracy (less than 3% error at peak), allowing operators to commit resources well in advance.⁴⁵

Table 1: Comparative Analysis of Winter Storm Impacts on ERCOT

Feature	Winter Storm Uri (2021)	Winter Storm Elliott (2022)	Winter Storm Heather (2024)
Duration of Freeze	~160 Hours (consecutive below freezing)	~80 Hours	~90 Hours
Peak Demand (MW)	69,871 (constrained by shedding)	74,100	78,138
Load Shed (MW)	20,000 (Max)	0	0
Generation Outages	>50,000 MW (Weather/Fuel)	<4,000 MW (Weather related)	~3,000 MW (Weather related)
Gas Supply Issues	Widespread freeze-offs & power cuts	Moderate freeze-offs	Minor freeze-offs; storage utilized
Regulatory Context	Pre-SB 3	SB 3 Implementation (Phase 1)	Full Weatherization Rules in Effect

Source Data: ⁷

7. Future Risks: The Race Against Growth and Climate

While the physical grid is undeniably stronger than it was in 2021, the environment in which it operates is evolving rapidly. The target for reliability is not static; it is moving due to two powerful forces: aggressive load growth and climate destabilization.

7.1 The Demand Shock: Crypto, AI, and Electrification

Texas is experiencing an industrial renaissance that is placing unprecedented strain on the grid.

• Data Centers & AI: The explosion of Artificial Intelligence requires massive data centers that run 24/7 with flat, high load profiles. Unlike residential load, which fluctuates with weather, these facilities consume power constantly.

• Crypto Mining: Texas has become a global hub for Bitcoin mining. While these loads are technically "interruptible" (they can shut down when prices spike), they add gigawatts of potential demand to the system.

• Electrification: The oil and gas industry in the Permian Basin is increasingly electrifying its operations (using electric motors for compression and pumping), adding significant industrial load in West Texas.⁴⁷

NERC’s 2025-2026 Winter Reliability Assessment highlights this risk, noting that electricity demand has grown by 20 GW since the previous winter—a staggering increase that significantly outpaces the addition of new dispatchable generation. This erosion of the reserve margin means that even with perfect weatherization, the grid could face shortages simply because the raw demand for electrons exceeds the installed capacity.⁴⁷

7.2 Climate Change: Arctic Amplification and Tail Risk

The "100-year storm" designation for Uri may be a statistical mirage in the era of climate change. The phenomenon of Arctic Amplification—where the Arctic warms four times faster than the rest of the planet—is destabilizing the jet stream. A weaker temperature gradient between the pole and the equator causes the jet stream to slow down and meander, increasing the probability of "blocking events" where weather patterns stall for days or weeks.⁸

This means that while average winters may be warmer, the "tail risk" of deep, prolonged freeze events is persisting. NERC warns that in these extreme scenarios, actual demand can topple forecasts by as much as 25%. The grid is being fortified against the last war (Uri), but the next war could feature even more extreme temperature deviations or longer durations that exhaust on-site fuel supplies.¹⁰

7.3 The Resource Adequacy Gap

The fundamental math of the grid remains precarious. While solar power has boomed, providing massive energy during the day, it provides zero output during the critical winter peak hours of 5:00 AM to 9:00 AM. Wind is variable. The grid therefore relies heavily on thermal generation (gas) and the emerging fleet of batteries to bridge the gaps.

However, the investment signals for new gas plants remain mixed. The cancellation of the PCM and the uncertainty around the DRRS have left developers cautious. While some new gas capacity is coming online, it is barely keeping pace with the retirement of older units and the surge in demand. This creates a "resource adequacy gap" where the system relies on everything going right—no major mechanical failures, no gas shortages, and accurate forecasts—to maintain reliability.⁴⁹

8. Conclusion: A Fortified but Fragile System

Five years after the trauma of Winter Storm Uri, the Texas power grid has undergone a profound transformation. The laissez-faire approach of the past has been replaced by a regime of mandatory weatherization, rigorous inspection, and improved coordination. The "island" is no longer undefended.

The legislative response via Senate Bill 3 successfully addressed the most glaring physical vulnerabilities. Power plants are now hardened against the cold, and the "death spiral" of gas-electric disconnection has been largely resolved through better mapping and communication. The successful performance of the grid during Winter Storm Heather in 2024 is empirical evidence that these measures have improved resilience.

However, the state has arguably solved the "mechanical" problems while the "structural" risks remain. The natural gas supply chain, regulated by the RRC, retains loopholes like Form CI-X that obscure the true reliability of the fuel supply. The market design is still in flux, struggling to find the right economic signals to ensure enough dispatchable capacity is built to match the explosive growth of AI and industrial demand.

Most critically, the risk has shifted from "fragile equipment" to "resource adequacy." The danger is no longer just that the plants will freeze; it is that there simply may not be enough of them to meet the converging forces of a destabilized climate and a voracious economy. The financial burden of the 2021 failure will weigh on Texans for decades through securitization charges, a lingering reminder of the cost of unreliability.

In the final analysis, the Texas grid of 2026 is far more resilient than the grid of 2021, but it is not invulnerable. It operates in a race against physics and growth, fortified against the known risks of the past but still exposed to the volatile uncertainties of the future. The state has moved from negligence to preparation, but in the high-stakes arena of grid reliability, preparation is a continuous process, not a final destination.

Works cited

1. Winter Storm Uri 2021 - Texas Comptroller, accessed January 22, 2026, https://comptroller.texas.gov/economy/fiscal-notes/archive/2021/oct/winter-storm-impact.php

2. ERCOT-2024-State-of-the-Grid.pdf, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.ercot.com/files/docs/2025/03/14/ERCOT-2024-State-of-the-Grid.pdf

3. Explained: Causes of Three Recent Major Blackouts and What Is Being Done in Response - Publications, accessed January 22, 2026, https://docs.nrel.gov/docs/fy24osti/87308.pdf

4. The Winter Storm of 2021 | Hobby School of Public Affairs - University of Houston, accessed January 22, 2026, https://uh.edu/hobby/winter2021/storm.pdf

5. Understanding the Arctic polar vortex | NOAA Climate.gov, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/understanding-arctic-polar-vortex

6. How Climate Change May Be Affecting the Polar Vortex - Newsroom, accessed January 22, 2026, https://sebsnjaesnews.rutgers.edu/2024/02/how-climate-change-may-be-affecting-the-polar-vortex/

7. The February 2021 Cold Weather Outages in Texas and the South Central United States - North American Electric Reliability Corporation, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.nerc.com/globalassets/standards/projects/2021-07/ferc-presentation-phase-2.pdf

8. More-Persistent Weak Stratospheric Polar Vortex States Linked to Cold Extremes in - AMS Journals, accessed January 22, 2026, https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/bams/99/1/bams-d-16-0259.1.xml

9. Rapid Arctic warming likely drives extreme winter weather events in the US - NSF, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.nsf.gov/news/rapid-arctic-warming-likely-drives-extreme-winter

10. Research Links Extreme Cold Weather in the United States to Arctic Warming, accessed January 22, 2026, https://cpo.noaa.gov/research-links-extreme-cold-weather-in-the-united-states-to-arctic-warming/

11. Final Report on February 2021 Freeze Underscores Winterization Recommendations | Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.ferc.gov/news-events/news/final-report-february-2021-freeze-underscores-winterization-recommendations

12. 2021 Texas power crisis - Wikipedia, accessed January 22, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021_Texas_power_crisis

13. RRC Report on Natural Gas Facility Weatherization Best Practices - The Railroad Commission of Texas, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.rrc.texas.gov/media/ka3llgtk/rrc-best-practices-report.pdf

14. RRC Weatherization Practices Guidance Document – Gas Supply Chain Facilities and Pipeline Facilities, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.rrc.texas.gov/media/voxij53y/rrc-weatherization-practices-and-recommendations-report.pdf

15. FERC/NERC Report on Winter Storm Uri Recommends Enhanced Cold Weather Preparation - Morgan Lewis, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/2021/09/ferc-nerc-report-on-winter-storm-uri-recommends-enhanced-cold-weather-preparation

16. Senate Bill 3 - Texas Legislature Online, accessed January 22, 2026, https://capitol.texas.gov/billlookup/BillSummary.aspx?LegSess=87R&Bill=SB3

17. Governor Abbott Signs ERCOT Reforms, Power Grid Weatherization Legislation Into Law, accessed January 22, 2026, https://gov.texas.gov/news/post/governor-abbott-signs-ercot-reforms-power-grid-weatherization-legislation-into-law

18. Winter Storm Uri 2021 The 87th Legislature Takes on Electricity Reform - Texas Comptroller, accessed January 22, 2026, https://comptroller.texas.gov/economy/fiscal-notes/archive/2021/oct/winter-storm-reform.php

19. Bill Text: TX SB3 | 2021-2022 | 87th Legislature | Engrossed - LegiScan, accessed January 22, 2026, https://legiscan.com/TX/text/SB3/id/2350590

20. ERCOT Trending Topics - TOPIC: WEATHERIZATION, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.ercot.com/files/docs/2025/02/14/trending_topic_weatherization.pdf

21. Weatherization Technology and Equipment Resilience Investment Guide - Department of Energy, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2024-11/111524_Weatherization_Technology_and_Equipment.pdf

22. Critical Infrastructure - The Railroad Commission of Texas, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.rrc.texas.gov/critical-infrastructure/

23. Railroad Commission of Texas Adopts Weatherization Rule for Natural Gas Facilities, accessed January 22, 2026, https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/w-036-7748?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)

24. Weatherization - The Railroad Commission of Texas, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.rrc.texas.gov/critical-infrastructure/weatherization/

25. Summary of recommendations - The Railroad Commission of Texas, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.rrc.texas.gov/media/yjnpyaxs/3-65-3-107-comments-commissionshift.pdf

26. CID CIX Online Filing Updates - The Railroad Commission of Texas, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.rrc.texas.gov/media/uxrhzpzg/filing-the-form-cix-2024.pdf

27. Texas RRC Amends Rule on Critical Designation of Natural Gas Infrastructure - Baker Botts, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.bakerbotts.com/thought-leadership/publications/2022/november/texas-rrc-amends-rule-on-critical-designation-of-natural-gas-infrastructure

28. RRC Publishes FAQ on Critical Designation of Natural Gas Infrastructure Forms, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.rrc.texas.gov/announcements/011122-rrc-publishes-faq-on-critical-designation-of-natural-gas-infrastructure-forms/

29. The Latest - Commission Shift, accessed January 22, 2026, https://commissionshift.org/news/

30. RRC Preparations for Winter 2025 - The Railroad Commission of Texas, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.rrc.texas.gov/news/010625rrc-preparations-for-winter-2025/

31. Texas Wholesale Electricity Market Redesign | Thought Leadership - Baker Botts, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.bakerbotts.com/thought-leadership/publications/2023/april/2022-energy-memo_texas-wholesale-electricity-market-redesign

32. Public Utility Commission of Texas Unanimously Adopts Performance Credit Mechanism Reliability Service, accessed January 22, 2026, https://ftp.puc.texas.gov/public/puct-info/agency/resources/pubs/news/2023/PUCT_Adopts_Performance_Credit_Mechanism_Reliability_Service.pdf

33. New Energy Market Regulations and Trends in 2025, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.yesenergy.com/blog/new-energy-market-regulations-and-trends-in-2025

34. PowerPoint Presentation - ERCOT, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.ercot.com/files/docs/2024/11/21/3__20241122%20SAWG%20ERCOT%20DRRS%20Presentation_final.pptx

35. • Capstone believes upcoming market design changes in the, accessed January 22, 2026, https://capstonedc.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/20230905-ERCOT-Thermal-Generators-to-Benefit-as-Public-Utility-Commission-Clarifies-New-Incentives.pdf

36. Item 6.1: Dispatchable Reliability Reserve Service Ancillary Service - ERCOT.com, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.ercot.com/files/docs/2025/12/04/6.1-NPRR1309-Dispatchable-Reliability-Reserve-Service-Ancillary-Service-and-NOGRR283.pdf

37. Item 5: High-Impact Policy Discussions in the Stakeholder Process - ERCOT.com, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.ercot.com/files/docs/2025/12/01/5-High-Impact-Policy-Discussions-in-the-Stakeholder-Process.pdf

38. HB 4492 Securitization - ERCOT.com, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.ercot.com/about/hb4492securitization

39. Securitization after Winter Storm Uri - United Cooperative Services, accessed January 22, 2026, https://ucs.net/securitization

40. Winter Storm Elliott Public Report - ERCOT.com, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.ercot.com/files/docs/2023/03/27/December-2022-Cold-Weather-Operations-Public-Report.pdf

41. ercot - monthly, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.ercot.com/files/docs/2024/01/31/ERCOT-Monthly-January-2024.pdf

42. Largely Supported by Natural Gas, the Texas Electric Grid Remains Resilient Amid Winter Storm Heather, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.txoga.org/largely-supported-by-natural-gas-the-texas-electric-grid-remains-resilient-amid-winter-storm-heather/

43. Operation of the U.S. Power Grid During the January 2024 Storm, accessed January 22, 2026, https://americaspower.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/2024_02_14-Jan-2024-Winter-Storms-Analysis-FINAL.pdf

44. Item 9.2: System Operations Update REVISED * - ERCOT.com, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.ercot.com/files/docs/2025/01/30/9-2-system-operations-update-revised.pdf

45. January 2025 Arctic Events - North American Electric Reliability Corporation, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.nerc.com/globalassets/programs/event-analysis/25_arctic_storms_performance_review_0416.pdf

46. Item 10.2: System Operations Update - ERCOT.com, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.ercot.com/files/docs/2024/02/19/10.2%20System%20Operations%20Update_v3.pdf

47. Rising Demand, Evolving Resources Continue to Challenge Winter Grid Reliability, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.nerc.com/newsroom/2025-winter-reliability-assessment

48. ERCOT and the Future of Electric Reliability in Texas - Baker Institute, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.bakerinstitute.org/sites/default/files/2024-01/BIPP-CES-ERCOT-Reliability-020724.pdf

49. 2024 STATE OF THE MARKET REPORT FOR THE ERCOT ELECTRICITY MARKETS Independent Market Monitor for ERCOT May 2025 - Potomac Economics, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.potomaceconomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/2024-State-of-the-Market-Report.pdf

50. Assessment of Resource Adequacy Needs in ERCOT and Impact of Market Design Changes, accessed January 22, 2026, https://www.ercot.com/files/MarketNotice/2025/11/310252/Aurora%20Assessment%20of%20Resource%20Adequacy%20Needs%20in%20ERCOT%20Region%20and%20Impact%20of%20Market%20Design%20Changes%20%282025.11.10%29.pdf