Launch First, Target Later: The Accelerated Timeline of ESA’s Comet Interceptor

1. Introduction: The Paradigm Shift in Cometary Exploration

The history of planetary science is often written in the ink of patience. Missions to the outer Solar System require decades of planning, years of cruise time, and the stoic endurance of scientific teams waiting for data to traverse the void. However, the narrative of the European Space Agency's (ESA) Comet Interceptor mission has recently taken a dramatic and unprecedented turn. As reported by SpaceNews on January 14, 2026, the mission—originally tethered to a 2029 launch alongside the ARIEL exoplanet observatory—has been granted an opportunity to advance its departure.¹ This shift, precipitated by delays in a primary ESA mission, creates a rare "move-up" scenario in a launch manifest typically defined by slippage and delay.

This report provides a comprehensive deep-dive into the Comet Interceptor mission, analyzing its scientific mandate, its innovative multi-spacecraft architecture, and the implications of its accelerated timeline. Written for the discerning undergraduate scholar and the professional peer alike, we will traverse the engineering heritage of its components, the celestial mechanics of its unique "park-and-wait" orbit, and the fundamental questions of solar system formation it aims to answer.

1.1 The Legacy of the Short-Period Visit

To understand the revolutionary nature of Comet Interceptor, one must first appreciate the limitations of the past. Humanity’s exploration of comets has been dominated by targets of convenience. The historic flotilla that met Halley’s Comet in 1986—including ESA’s Giotto—visited an object that returns to the inner Solar System every 76 years. NASA’s Deep Impact mission to Tempel 1 and the monumental Rosetta mission to 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko targeted Short-Period Comets (SPCs).³

These objects, while scientifically rich, are fundamentally compromised witnesses to the solar system's birth. Having passed close to the Sun dozens or even hundreds of times, they have been thermally processed. Their surfaces have been baked, their volatiles sublimated, and their structures altered by the violent outgassing that creates their iconic tails. Rosetta found 67P to be a world of hard cliffs and settling dust—a geological landscape evolved through cycles of heating and cooling.⁵ While these missions taught us how comets evolve, they could not fully show us how comets began.

1.2 The Holy Grail: The Dynamically New Comet

The true prize for cosmochemists is a Dynamically New Comet (DNC). These are objects falling into the inner Solar System for the very first time from the Oort Cloud—a vast, theoretical sphere of icy debris surrounding our solar system at distances up to 100,000 Astronomical Units (AU).⁴ A DNC has spent 4.6 billion years in the deep freeze of interstellar space, near absolute zero. Its surface is pristine, preserving the exact chemical and physical conditions of the protosolar nebula at the moment of planet formation.

However, catching a DNC is a problem of time. They are typically discovered only months before they reach their closest approach to the Sun (perihelion). In the traditional paradigm of spaceflight, where missions take years to design and build, intercepting a DNC was impossible. By the time a spacecraft could be readied, the comet would be swinging back out into the darkness, not to return for millions of years.

Comet Interceptor breaks this paradox with a radical strategy: launch first, find the target later. By launching to a holding position at the Sun-Earth Lagrange Point 2 (L2), the spacecraft positions itself as a sentinel, waiting for the sky surveys to announce an incoming target. This architecture, selected as ESA’s first "Fast-class" (F-class) mission, allows humanity to ambush a visitor from the dawn of time.⁷

2. The Genesis of the Interceptor: F-Class Mission Architecture

The European Space Agency’s "Cosmic Vision" program is structured around large (L-class) and medium (M-class) missions. However, in 2018, ESA introduced a new category: the Fast (F-class) mission. The constraints were rigorous: the mission had to move from selection to launch in less than a decade, weigh under 1,000 kilograms, and share a launch vehicle with a larger primary payload to keep costs capped at approximately 150 million Euros.⁵

2.1 Selection and Heritage

Comet Interceptor was proposed by an international consortium led by University College London (UCL) and the University of Edinburgh.³ It was selected in June 2019 from a competitive field of proposals because it turned the F-class constraints into strategic virtues. The requirement to share a launch meant the mission needed a destination that was compatible with other astronomy missions. The Sun-Earth L2 point—a gravitational sweet spot favored by telescopes like James Webb, Gaia, and Euclid—was the perfect "parking lot".¹⁰

The mission’s accelerated development is enabled by a reliance on high Technology Readiness Level (TRL) components. Rather than inventing new sensors from scratch, the payload suite draws heavily on heritage from Rosetta, the ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter (TGO), and JAXA’s microsatellite programs.⁸ This "heritage approach" reduces the risk of technical delays, a crucial factor in the mission's ability to capitalize on the recent launch manifest opening reported in January 2026.

2.2 The "Park and Wait" Operational Concept

The central innovation of the mission is its operational profile. Upon reaching L2, Comet Interceptor will not immediately begin science operations in the traditional sense. Instead, it enters a halo orbit—a wide, looping path around the L2 point. Here, it maintains a vigil, communicating periodically with Earth while ground-based telescopes scan the heavens.⁵

This waiting phase is designed to last up to three years.³ The mission relies on the next generation of wide-field survey telescopes, specifically the Vera C. Rubin Observatory and its Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST), which is expected to drastically increase the discovery rate of faint, distant comets.⁴ When a suitable target—a Long-Period Comet (LPC) or DNC—is identified that will cross the Earth's orbital plane (the ecliptic) within the spacecraft's fuel range (delta-v budget), the mission controllers will trigger the intercept sequence.

The spacecraft then performs a departure maneuver, breaking free from the L2 hold to place itself on a collision course with the comet. The flyby itself is a fleeting, high-speed encounter, occurring at relative velocities ranging from 10 to 70 kilometers per second.¹³ This high-speed geometry is unavoidable for retrograde or highly inclined comets, and it necessitates the mission's defining physical feature: the separation into three distinct spacecraft.

3. The Launch Manifest Realignment: January 2026 Developments

For years, the planning baseline for Comet Interceptor was a dual launch with the ARIEL exoplanet mission, targeted for 2029.³ ARIEL (Atmospheric Remote-sensing Infrared Exoplanet Large-survey) is an M-class mission also destined for L2. This pairing dictated the Comet Interceptor timeline, forcing the faster, smaller mission to march to the beat of the larger observatory's development drum.

However, the space industry is a fluid environment where launch slots are valuable commodities. On January 14, 2026, SpaceNews correspondent Jeff Foust reported a significant development: "A delay in one European Space Agency mission is creating an opportunity for an earlier, and more capable, launch for another ESA spacecraft".¹ While ESA manages a complex manifest including the PLATO observatory and various Copernicus sentinels, the specific availability of an Ariane 62 slot has allowed Comet Interceptor to decouple from the potentially delayed ARIEL timeline.²

3.1 Implications of the "Move-Up"

The acceleration of the launch date suggests that the Comet Interceptor hardware is mature. Recent programmatic milestones support this. By late 2024, the structural qualification model of the spacecraft had passed mechanical testing, and the Critical Design Review (CDR)—the gate that clears a mission for flight unit integration—was successfully completed in December 2024.¹⁵ This places the spacecraft on a trajectory where it could be flight-ready well before the original 2029 date.

Moving the launch earlier—potentially to 2027 or 2028—has profound scientific implications. It places the "sentinel" at L2 sooner, maximizing the overlap with the early operational years of the Vera Rubin Observatory. The first years of a new survey telescope often yield the most "low-hanging fruit" discoveries, including bright Oort cloud comets that may have been missed by less sensitive predecessors. Being in position to catch these early discoveries increases the probability of finding a "Goldilocks" target: a pristine comet with just the right orbital geometry for an intercept.

3.2 The Ariane 62 Context

The launch vehicle, the Ariane 62, is the lighter configuration of Europe's new heavy-lift rocket, equipped with two solid rocket boosters. The performance of the Ariane 62 is more than sufficient to throw the ~1,000 kg Comet Interceptor stack to L2.¹⁶ The flexibility of the "park and wait" strategy means that Comet Interceptor does not need to launch at a precise second to hit a specific planetary window. It merely needs to catch a ride to L2. This makes it the ultimate "rideshare" payload, capable of filling a vacancy left by any delayed L2-bound mission, whether it be PLATO, ARIEL, or another observatory.

4. Orbital Dynamics and Target Selection Strategy

The mechanics of intercepting an unknown target require a mastery of "manifold dynamics." In the three-body problem (Earth, Sun, Spacecraft), the L2 point is a saddle point in the gravitational potential field. It is akin to balancing a ball on the peak of a hill; it requires little energy to stay there (with minor corrections), but a small push can send the object tumbling down into the inner solar system or out into deep space.

4.1 The L2 Departure Manifold

Comet Interceptor utilizes this instability. The mission designers map out the "unstable manifolds"—the trajectories that naturally flow away from L2 with minimal fuel usage.¹⁸ By calculating which of these natural "highways" intersects with the path of a newly discovered comet, the spacecraft can use its onboard chemical propulsion system (providing about 600 meters per second of delta-v) to fine-tune the encounter.¹³

Because the spacecraft cannot perform massive plane-change maneuvers (which require huge amounts of fuel), the target comet must cross the ecliptic plane (where Earth and the spacecraft reside). This geometric constraint means the interception usually happens at the "node" of the comet's orbit—the point where it pierces the plane of the solar system. The mission is designed to intercept targets at solar distances between 0.9 AU and 1.2 AU.¹²

4.2 The Role of LSST (Vera Rubin Observatory)

The success of the mission is statistically tied to the discovery rate of the Vera Rubin Observatory. Previous surveys like Pan-STARRS or ATLAS scan the sky effectively, but LSST will go deeper, detecting comets while they are still far out beyond the orbit of Saturn.⁷ This early detection provides the critical "warning time"—the months or years needed for mission control to calculate the trajectory, upload the commands, and for the spacecraft to cruise from L2 to the intercept point.

4.3 Backup Targets: The Fragmenting Comet

In the unlikely event that the sky remains empty of suitable Oort cloud visitors during the 3-5 year waiting period, the mission has a robust backup plan. It can deploy to a known Short-Period Comet. The primary backup candidate often cited in mission planning exercises is 73P/Schwassmann–Wachmann 3 [¹³ (inferred context)]. This comet is famous for having shattered into multiple fragments in 1995.

Visiting 73P would be a different kind of scientific triumph. Instead of a pristine surface, the mission would encounter the raw interior of a disintegrated comet. The multi-spacecraft architecture would be particularly valuable here, allowing the probes to weave between the fragments, mapping the internal structure of a cometary body that has been turned inside out.

5. The Mothership: Spacecraft A Detailed Analysis

The mission architecture is a composite stack. The main spacecraft, designated Spacecraft A, acts as the carrier, communications relay, and primary remote sensing platform.

5.1 Bus Design and Survivability

Built by a consortium involving OHB Italy and OHB System, Spacecraft A is a box-like structure roughly cubic in shape when stowed.¹⁶ It carries the propulsion tanks, the high-gain antenna for Earth communications, and the mounting points for the two smaller probes.

Crucially, Spacecraft A is designed for survival. During the flyby, it will not pass as close to the nucleus as the smaller probes. It creates a "safe" flyby distance (likely >1,000 km) to minimize the risk of a catastrophic impact from dust particles. Even at this distance, the 70 km/s relative velocity means a microscopic dust grain packs the punch of a bullet. The spacecraft is equipped with a dedicated dust shield—a multi-layered bumper likely composed of Kevlar and Nextel fabrics designed to vaporize incoming particles before they can penetrate the spacecraft bus.²¹

5.2 Payload A: The Remote Sensing Suite

Spacecraft A carries four primary instruments, providing the global context for the mission.

1. CoCa (Comet Camera):

Provided by a Swiss-led consortium, CoCa is a high-resolution visible imager. It draws direct heritage from the CaSSIS camera on the ExoMars Orbiter.8 CoCa’s role is geomorphology. It will image the nucleus to reveal its shape, rotation state, and surface features (cliffs, pits, boulders). Because the flyby is so fast, CoCa must have a rapid frame rate and autonomous tracking capability to keep the nucleus in the field of view during the close approach.

2. MANiaC (Mass Analyzer for Neutrals in a Coma):

This mass spectrometer is the "nose" of the mission. It measures the neutral gas in the coma. Its primary scientific imperative is to measure the isotopic composition of the gas, specifically the Deuterium-to-Hydrogen (D/H) ratio.22 As we will explore in Section 7, this number is the key to understanding the origin of Earth's water. MANiaC uses a Time-of-Flight (TOF) mechanism, accelerating ionized gas particles down a flight tube to measure their mass with high precision.

3. MIRMIS (Modular Infrared Molecules and Ices Sensor):

MIRMIS operates in the infrared spectrum. It serves as a thermal camera and a chemical scanner. It will map the temperature of the nucleus surface, identifying regions of active sublimation versus cold, dormant crust. Simultaneously, it will look for the spectral signatures of ices—water ice, carbon dioxide ice, and organic compounds—on the surface and in the gas surrounding the comet.20

4. DFP-A (Dust, Fields, and Plasma):

This suite monitors the environment. It includes a magnetometer (FGM) to measure the magnetic field pile-up around the comet, an electron spectrometer to measure the solar wind plasma, and a dust counter to register impacts on the shield.22

6. The Scouts: Probes B1 and B2

The defining feature of Comet Interceptor is the release of two sub-probes, B1 and B2, which will separate from the mothership days or weeks before the encounter to plunge deep into the comet's inner environment.

6.1 Probe B1: The Japanese Micro-Explorer

Provider: JAXA

Probe B1 is a testament to the miniaturization mastery of the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency. It is based on a standard 24U CubeSat form factor but is far more capable than a typical university satellite. Its heritage lies in the PROCYON and EQUULEUS missions.24 PROCYON was the world’s first micro-spacecraft designed for deep space exploration and asteroid flyby, while EQUULEUS demonstrated trajectory control to the Lunar Lagrange points.

Scientific Payload:

• HI (Hydrogen Imager): This is a specialized UV camera designed to image the "hydrogen corona" of the comet. Comets are surrounded by vast clouds of neutral hydrogen gas, extending millions of kilometers, created by the photodissociation of water molecules by sunlight. HI will map this cloud to accurately determine the comet's water production rate.²⁴

• PS (Plasma Suite): B1 carries a magnetometer and an ion mass spectrometer. By flying closer to the comet than Spacecraft A, B1 samples the "inner" plasma environment, providing a second data point for triangulation.

• WAC/NAC (Cameras): B1 carries wide and narrow-angle cameras for close-up imaging. Because B1 is "expendable" relative to the mothership, it can take high-risk trajectories that bring it closer to the nucleus, potentially capturing higher-resolution images of surface textures before dust impacts potentially degrade or destroy the probe.

6.2 Probe B2: The European Spinner

Provider: ESA (with UK/Spain leadership)

Probe B2 is similar in size to B1 but utilizes a different stabilization concept. B2 is spin-stabilized, meaning it rotates around its axis like a gyroscope. This rotation is integral to its primary instrument.27

Scientific Payload:

• EnVisS (Entire Visible Sky): This camera does not just point and shoot; it scans. As the probe spins, EnVisS sweeps a strip of sensors across the sky, building up a 360-degree panoramic image of the coma from inside the dust cloud.²² Crucially, EnVisS includes polarimetric filters. By measuring the polarization of light scattered by dust grains, scientists can deduce the physical structure of the dust (fluffy vs. compact), a key indicator of how the comet formed.

• OPIC (Optical Periscopic Imager for Comets): A compact camera designed for 3D reconstruction and optical navigation.

6.3 The Dance of Separation

The separation of these probes is a critical phase. They are released via spring mechanisms. Once free, they are passive riders; they do not have large propulsion systems to change course. Their trajectories are set by the release vector from the mothership. This requires extreme precision in the navigation of Spacecraft A prior to release. During the flyby, B1 and B2 transmit their data back to Spacecraft A via a short-range inter-satellite link. Spacecraft A buffers this data and then slowly transmits it to Earth after the encounter is over.²⁴ This "store and forward" architecture ensures that even if the probes are destroyed by dust impacts at the closest approach, their data is safely stored on the mothership.

7. Scientific Objectives: Decoding the Solar Nebula

The elaborate machinery of Comet Interceptor is designed to answer fundamental questions about our origins.

7.1 The Origin of Earth’s Water

One of the oldest debates in planetary science is the source of Earth's oceans. Did water outgas from the mantle, or was it delivered by comets and asteroids during the Late Heavy Bombardment? The key fingerprint is the Deuterium-to-Hydrogen (D/H) ratio.

Deuterium is a heavy isotope of hydrogen. Water formed in the cold outer reaches of the solar nebula tends to be enriched in deuterium. Measurements from the Rosetta mission showed that the water on comet 67P has a D/H ratio three times higher than Earth's ocean water.²⁹ This suggests that Jupiter-family comets like 67P could not have been the primary source of Earth's water.

However, we do not know if Oort Cloud comets (DNCs) have the same D/H ratio. It is possible that they represent a different reservoir of ice. MANiaC on Spacecraft A is specifically tuned to measure this ratio in the gas of a pristine comet.²³ If a DNC is found to have an Earth-like D/H ratio, it would swing the pendulum back toward the theory of cometary delivery.

7.2 Pebble Accretion vs. Collisional Growth

How do planets form? The "standard model" involved violent collisions of increasingly large rocks (planetesimals). A newer theory, "pebble accretion," suggests that planets grew rapidly by gently sweeping up clouds of millimeter-sized pebbles.

The structure of cometary dust holds the answer. If EnVisS and the dust counters (DFP) reveal that the comet is made of "fluffy," fractal aggregates of dust that fall apart easily, it supports the gentle accretion models.²⁸ If the dust is compact and shard-like, it suggests a violent, collisional history. A DNC, having never been heated, preserves these dust grains in their original state.

7.3 Plasma Interaction: Resolving the Ambiguity

The solar wind—a stream of charged particles from the Sun—slams into the comet's atmosphere, creating a bow shock and a magnetic barrier. A single spacecraft flying through this region sees changes in the magnetic field, but it cannot tell if the structure is changing or if the spacecraft is just moving through a static structure.

This is the "spatial-temporal ambiguity." By flying three magnetometers (on A, B1, and B2) through the plasma environment simultaneously, Comet Interceptor creates a triangle of data points. This allows scientists to mathematically separate space and time, creating the first true 3D map of a cometary magnetosphere.⁵

8. The Interstellar Frontier

In 2017, the object 1I/'Oumuamua raced through the solar system on a hyperbolic trajectory, proving that Interstellar Objects (ISOs) are real and more common than previously thought. In 2019, 2I/Borisov followed. These objects are messengers from other stars, composed of material condensed in alien solar nebulas.

Comet Interceptor is currently the only mission capable of intercepting an ISO. If an object like 'Oumuamua were discovered today with a trajectory crossing Earth's orbital plane, we would be helpless to reach it. But with Comet Interceptor parking at L2, we have a chance. The cross-range capability of the spacecraft (its ability to leave L2 and travel to an intercept point) makes it the first line of defense—or reception—for interstellar visitors.³

While the probability of an ISO entering the specific reachable volume of Comet Interceptor during its 5-year lifespan is low (estimated at a few percent), the payoff is infinite. It would be the first contact with solid matter from another star system. The "Move-Up" in launch date potentially places the spacecraft on station during a period of intense sky surveillance, slightly increasing the odds of such a serendipitous encounter.

9. Conclusion

The acceleration of the Comet Interceptor launch, as revealed in the developments of January 2026, marks a pivotal moment in planetary science. It transitions the mission from a distant plan on a Gantt chart to an imminent reality. By decoupling from the ARIEL timeline and seizing an early flight opportunity on the Ariane 62, ESA is demonstrating a laudable agility.

Comet Interceptor is a sniper in the cosmic grass. It is a mission of patience, waiting for a target that has not yet been discovered. It represents a shift from "destination-driven" exploration to "opportunity-driven" exploration. Whether it intercepts a pristine visitor from the Oort Cloud, a shattering short-period comet, or, against the odds, an emissary from another star, its legacy is assured. It will be the first to peel back the processed layers of cometary evolution and show us the raw, frozen building blocks of our solar system, exactly as they were 4.5 billion years ago.

In the cold halo orbit of L2, the tripartite hunter will soon wait. And somewhere in the dark, deep beyond Neptune, its target is already beginning the long fall toward the Sun.

Table 2: Comparative Analysis of Comet Mission Architectures

Feature	Giotto (1986)	Rosetta (2004-2016)	Comet Interceptor (2028+)
Target Type	Short-Period (Halley)	Short-Period (67P)	Long-Period / DNC (Primary)
Encounter Type	Fast Flyby (68 km/s)	Orbiter / Lander	Fast Flyby (10-70 km/s)
Spacecraft	Single	Single (+ Lander)	Multi-Point (3 Spacecraft)
Launch Strategy	Direct to Target	Gravity Assists	Park at L2 & Wait
Target Knowledge	Orbit known for centuries	Orbit known for years	Target unknown at launch
Key Innovation	First close nucleus image	In-situ evolution monitoring	Pristine Target / 3D Plasma Map

Table 3: Comet Interceptor Instrument Heritage & Function

Instrument	Spacecraft	Heritage	Physical Measurement	Scientific Goal
CoCa	A (ESA)	CaSSIS (ExoMars)	Visible Light Imaging	Nucleus Geomorphology
MANiaC	A (ESA)	ROSINA (Rosetta)	Mass Spectrometry (TOF)	D/H Ratio, Gas Composition
MIRMIS	A (ESA)	New Design	IR Spectroscopy	Thermal Inertia, Surface Ices
EnVisS	B2 (ESA)	New Design	Polarimetric Imaging	Dust Grain Structure (Fluffy vs Compact)
HI	B1 (JAXA)	PROCYON/Reimei	Lyman-alpha Imaging	Water Production Rate (H-cloud)
PS	B1 (JAXA)	Arase/MMS	Ion Mass / Mag	Plasma Boundaries (Point 2)
FGM	A/B2	Cluster/Rosetta	Magnetometry	Magnetic Field (Points 1 & 3)

(Note: Heritage indicates the technological lineage of the sensor design.)

Works cited

1. ESA's Comet Interceptor mission moves up launch - Copernical.com, accessed January 15, 2026, https://www.copernical.com/news-public/item/55869-2026-01-14-21-55-18

2. ESA's Comet Interceptor mission moves up launch - Space Launch Schedule, accessed January 15, 2026, https://www.spacelaunchschedule.com/space-news/esas-comet-interceptor-mission-moves-up-launch/

3. A Blueprint For Visiting An Interstellar Comet - Universe Today, accessed January 15, 2026, https://www.universetoday.com/articles/a-blueprint-for-visiting-an-interstellar-comet

4. ESA - Comet Interceptor factsheet - European Space Agency, accessed January 15, 2026, https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Space_Science/Comet_Interceptor/Comet_Interceptor_factsheet

5. The Comet Interceptor Mission - Keck Institute for Space Studies, accessed January 15, 2026, https://www.kiss.caltech.edu/workshops/FastResponse/presentations/Jones.pdf

6. The ESA Comet Interceptor enters mission analysis phase with significant Finnish contributions | Aalto University, accessed January 15, 2026, https://www.aalto.fi/en/news/the-esa-comet-interceptor-enters-mission-analysis-phase-with-significant-finnish-contributions

7. Comet Interceptor, accessed January 15, 2026, https://www.cometinterceptor.space/

8. Comet Interceptor, accessed January 15, 2026, https://www.dlr.de/en/wr/research-transfer/projects/planetary-research/comet-interceptor

9. Comet Interceptor: ESA selects new mission to an ancient world | UCL News, accessed January 15, 2026, https://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/2019/jun/comet-interceptor-esa-selects-new-mission-ancient-world

10. The European Space Agency's Comet Interceptor lies in wait - PMC - NIH, accessed January 15, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6882810/

11. Into the unknown: How Comet Interceptor will study a comet that has not yet been discovered, accessed January 15, 2026, https://www.ohb.de/en/magazine/into-the-unknown-how-comet-interceptor-will-study-a-comet-that-has-not-yet-been-discovered

12. COMET INTERCEPTOR: A RAPID RESPONSE MISSION TO A PRISTINE WORLD. M. Küppers1, H. Kawakita2, N. Bowles3, H. Rotkaehl4, M. Rubin5 - Universities Space Research Association, accessed January 15, 2026, https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2024/pdf/1086.pdf

13. COMET INTERCEPTOR - ESA Science & Technology, accessed January 15, 2026, https://sci.esa.int/documents/34923/36148/CometInterceptor_CDF_Study_Report.pdf

14. ESA - Comet Interceptor - European Space Agency, accessed January 15, 2026, https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Space_Science/Comet_Interceptor

15. Mission Status & Plan - Comet Interceptor - ESA Cosmos, accessed January 15, 2026, https://www.cosmos.esa.int/web/comet-interceptor/mission-status-plan-with-table

16. Comet Interceptor - Wikipedia, accessed January 15, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comet_Interceptor

17. Comet Interceptor | CNES, accessed January 15, 2026, https://cnes.fr/en/projects/comet-interceptor

18. Transfer trajectory and operational orbit selection for Earth-Moon L2 near rectilinear halo orbits through invariant manifolds - POLITesi, accessed January 15, 2026, https://www.politesi.polimi.it/retrieve/f54f9400-5534-402a-862d-5c87ca7ce43c/Enis_ARIKAN_10775709_Thesis.pdf

19. ESA F-Class Comet Interceptor: Trajectory Design to Intercept a Yet-to-be-discovered Comet. - arXiv, accessed January 15, 2026, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2107.12999

20. The Comet Interceptor Mission - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH, accessed January 15, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10808369/

21. ESA - Comet Interceptor construction moves forward - European Space Agency, accessed January 15, 2026, https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Space_Science/Comet_Interceptor/Comet_Interceptor_construction_moves_forward

22. Comet Interceptor's spacecraft and instruments - ESA, accessed January 15, 2026, https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Space_Science/Comet_Interceptor/Comet_Interceptor_s_spacecraft_and_instruments

23. Application to the Comet Interceptor mission - Diva-portal.org, accessed January 15, 2026, https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1941048/FULLTEXT01.pdf

24. Conceptual Design for Small Probe on the Comet Interceptor Mission - researchmap, accessed January 15, 2026, https://researchmap.jp/jaxasaki/published_papers/48553284/attachment_file.pdf

25. PROCYON | Spacecraft | ISAS, accessed January 15, 2026, https://www.isas.jaxa.jp/en/missions/spacecraft/past/_procyon.html

26. JAXA's Solar System Exploration Program With Small Satellites - DigitalCommons@USU, accessed January 15, 2026, https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6043&context=smallsat

27. Comet Interceptor mission - Deimos Space, accessed January 15, 2026, https://deimos-space.com/comet-interceptor/

28. Abstract EPSC-DPS2025-1989 - CO Meeting Organizer, accessed January 15, 2026, https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EPSC-DPS2025/EPSC-DPS2025-1989.html

29. Rosetta Instrument Reignites Debate on Earth's Oceans, accessed January 15, 2026, https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/rosetta-instrument-reignites-debate-on-earths-oceans/