Reconstructing the "Wood Age": Functional Morphology of Middle Pleistocene Wooden Tools from Marathousa 1, Greece

1. Introduction: Unearthing the "Wood Age"

1.1 The Bias of Preservation

The narrative of human technological evolution has largely been dictated by the survivability of materials. Stone, bone, and ceramic industries dominate the archaeological record, lending their names to the epochs of prehistory—the Paleolithic, Neolithic, and Bronze Ages. This lithocentric bias, however, distorts the reality of early hominin life. Ethnographic analogies from modern hunter-gatherer societies and observations of non-human primates, particularly chimpanzees, suggest that organic materials—specifically wood—constituted the overwhelming majority of the prehistoric toolkit.¹ Wood offers unique mechanical properties that stone cannot replicate: high tensile strength, elasticity, and lightweight durability. It is the ideal medium for shafts, levers, handles, and projectiles. Yet, due to its rapid biodegradation in aerobic environments, the "Wood Age" remains a phantom in the archaeological record, glimpsed only through rare, serendipitous windows of exceptional preservation.²

1.2 The Significance of Marathousa 1's Wooden Tools

The recent analysis and publication of wooden artifacts from the site of Marathousa 1 (MAR-1) in the Megalopolis Basin of Greece fundamentally alters this landscape. Dated to approximately 430,000 years ago, during the Middle Pleistocene, these finds represent the earliest confirmed handheld wooden tools in the global archaeological record.⁴ While older examples of wood use exist—such as the structural logs from Kalambo Falls, Zambia (~476 ka) and the fragmented polished plank from Gesher Benot Ya'aqov, Israel (~780 ka)—the Marathousa artifacts are distinct. They are portable, shaped implements designed for immediate, dynamic interaction with the environment.³

The assemblage includes a substantial digging stick fashioned from alder (Alnus sp.) and a diminutive, enigmatic tool of willow or poplar (Salix/Populus sp.), possibly used for fine lithic retouching. Recovered from a waterlogged, anoxic context associated with the butchered remains of the straight-tusked elephant Palaeoloxodon antiquus, these artifacts provide an unprecedented resolution of hominin behavior in a glacial refugium.⁴ This report offers an exhaustive examination of the Marathousa 1 findings, synthesizing geological, paleoenvironmental, and technological data to reconstruct the lifeways of the Middle Pleistocene hominins—likely Homo heidelbergensis or early Neanderthals—who crafted them.

2. Geological and Chronological Framework

2.1 The Megalopolis Basin: A Tectonic Trap

The preservation of the Marathousa assemblage is owed entirely to the unique geological history of the Megalopolis Basin. Located in the central Peloponnese, this tectonic depression has acted as a sediment trap since the Pliocene/Pleistocene boundary. The basin is characterized by a thick sequence of lacustrine (lake) and fluvio-lacustrine deposits, interstratified with massive seams of lignite (brown coal).⁷ These lignite beds are the fossilized remains of ancient peat bogs and swamps that periodically filled the basin.

The chemical environment of these lignite-forming swamps is critical. The waterlogged conditions create an anaerobic (oxygen-free) environment that inhibits the growth of aerobic fungi and bacteria, the primary agents of wood decay.⁹ Furthermore, the acidic nature of peat can preserve collagen and cellulose, though it often dissolves bone. Uniquely, the Marathousa sediments maintain a chemical balance that has allowed for the simultaneous preservation of both calcareous bone (such as the elephant skeleton) and organic cellulose (the wooden tools), a rarity in the taphonomic record.⁸

2.2 Stratigraphy of the Marathousa 1 Site

Marathousa 1 is situated within the Choremi Formation, stratigraphically located between Lignite Seam II and Lignite Seam III.⁸ The site stratigraphy records a transition from a high-energy depositional environment to a low-energy, marshy shore.

• Unit Description: The archaeological horizon is embedded within organic-rich clayey sands and silts. These fine-grained sediments indicate a low-energy depositional setting, likely a mudflat or the shallow margin of a paleo-lake.⁷

• Site Formation: Taphonomic analysis suggests that the artifacts and faunal remains were buried rapidly by a "mudflow" or "hyperconcentrated flow." This event gently enveloped the materials, sealing them from oxygen and scavengers without transporting them significant distances, thus preserving the spatial association between the stone tools, wooden artifacts, and elephant carcass.¹²

2.3 Chronometric Methodology and Results

Establishing a precise chronology for Marathousa 1 was a complex undertaking, necessitating a multi-proxy approach to overcome the limitations of any single dating method.

• Electron Spin Resonance (ESR): This method was applied to the enamel of mammalian teeth and mollusk shells found in the horizon. ESR measures the accumulation of trapped electrons in the crystal lattice of minerals, a process driven by natural background radiation. By determining the annual dose rate of radiation in the surrounding sediment, researchers could calculate the burial age. The ESR results consistently clustered around 430,000 to 500,000 years ago.¹³

• Luminescence Dating (pIRIR): Post-Infrared Infrared Stimulated Luminescence (pIRIR) was utilized on potassium-rich feldspar grains. Unlike standard radiocarbon dating, which is limited to ~50,000 years, luminescence dating can reach back hundreds of thousands of years. It measures the time elapsed since mineral grains were last exposed to sunlight. The pIRIR ages provided a robust cross-check, constraining the site to the Middle Pleistocene.⁴

• Magnetostratigraphy: The magnetic polarity of the sediments at Marathousa 1 is reversed, correlating with the Matuyama Chron? No, the site is placed within the Brunhes Chron (normal polarity) or near the transition, but the specific correlation with Marine Isotope Stage (MIS) 12 is derived from the integration of these radiometric dates with biostratigraphic indicators (faunal species turnover).⁴

The convergence of these methods places the Marathousa 1 occupation firmly at ~430 ka, coincident with MIS 12. This is significant because MIS 12 was one of the most severe glacial periods of the Pleistocene, characterized by massive ice sheet expansion in Northern Europe. The presence of a rich ecosystem in Megalopolis during this global freeze highlights the basin's role as a critical glacial refugium.⁴

3. Paleoecology: Life in a Glacial Refugium

3.1 The Concept of the Refugium

During the glacial maxima of the Pleistocene, vast swathes of Europe became uninhabitable polar deserts or tundra. Hominin and animal populations contracted into southern peninsulas—Iberia, Italy, and the Balkans—where temperate conditions persisted. The Megalopolis Basin, shielded by mountains and regulated by large water bodies, served as a "micro-refugium" within the broader Balkan refugium.¹⁷ This ecological stability allowed for the survival of thermophilous (warm-loving) plants and animals that had vanished from the north.

3.2 Flora: The Botanical Landscape

The botanical remains from Marathousa 1, preserved by the same waterlogged conditions that saved the tools, offer a high-resolution picture of the local habitat.

• Arboreal Taxa: Pollen and macro-remains (wood, seeds) indicate a landscape dominated by open woodland rather than dense forest. Key tree species included Alder (Alnus), Willow (Salix), and Poplar (Populus) growing along the wet margins of the lake, with Oak (Quercus), Maple (Acer), and Pine (Pinus) likely inhabiting the drier slopes surrounding the basin.⁴ The presence of these deciduous hardwoods is crucial, as they provided high-quality raw materials for tool production.

• Aquatic Vegetation: The shallow lake waters supported a rich aquatic flora, including White Water Lily (Nymphaea alba), Water Mint (Mentha aquatica), Verbena (Verbena officinalis), and pondweed (Potamogeton). These plants not only indicate a permanent freshwater body but also represent a significant potential food source for both hominins and herbivores.¹⁸

3.3 Fauna: Megafauna and Micro-predators

The faunal assemblage associated with the wooden tools is spectacular in its diversity and preservation.

• Megafauna: The site is dominated by the Straight-tusked Elephant (Palaeoloxodon antiquus). This extinct giant stood up to 4 meters tall at the shoulder, significantly larger than the modern African elephant. The Marathousa individual exhibits cut marks and percussion damage on its bones, direct evidence of butchery by hominins.⁴ Other large mammals included Hippopotamus (Hippopotamus antiquus), which indicates year-round open water, as well as extinct rhinoceros (Stephanorhinus), deer (cervids), and bovids.⁴

• Avifauna: The bird remains are among the first Middle Pleistocene avifaunas described from Greece. Species identified include ducks such as the Northern Pintail (Anas acuta) and Common Teal (Anas crecca), as well as swans (Cygnus) and the darter (Anhinga). The presence of the darter, a bird that requires warm waters to thermoregulate, further supports the mild climatic reconstruction of the refugium.²⁰

• Carnivores: The ecosystem included formidable predators. Bones of wolves (Canis), otters (Lutra simplicidens), and large felids indicate that hominins were not the sole exploiters of this biomass. The presence of carnivore gnawing on wood and bone suggests a competitive environment where hominins had to defend their kills.⁴

4. The Wooden Artifacts: A Deep Dive

The primary significance of Marathousa 1 lies in the two wooden artifacts that were identified after a systematic microscopic survey of hundreds of wood fragments.

4.1 Methodology of Identification

Differentiating an artifact from a piece of driftwood is a challenge in Paleolithic archaeology. The researchers employed a rigorous protocol:

1. Macroscopic Screening: Identifying fragments with anomalous shapes or breakage patterns.

2. Micro-Computed Tomography (Micro-CT): This non-destructive imaging technique allowed the team to look inside the wood, revealing the orientation of growth rings and the density of the material. This was crucial for distinguishing human-made cuts (which slice through cell structures) from natural breaks.⁴

3. Use-Wear Analysis: High-magnification microscopy was used to identify striations, polish, and embedded particles that result from specific activities.⁴

4.2 Specimen MAR-1-39: The Digging Stick

The largest artifact is a fragmented segment of a round wood shaft, identified taxonomically as Alder (Alnus sp.).

• Dimensions: The preserved length is approximately 81 cm, though the original tool was likely significantly longer.⁵

• Raw Material Selection: The choice of alder is not accidental. Alder wood is known for its durability when submerged in water—a property utilized historically for the pilings of Venice and Amsterdam. Middle Pleistocene hominins likely observed that alder trees growing in the swamp did not rot quickly, making them the ideal material for a tool used in wet, abrasive mud.²¹

• Manufacturing Traces: The surface of the tool preserves a "biography" of its creation.

• Branch Removal: Protruding side branches were removed using a chopping motion. Microscopic analysis identified "stop marks" where the stone tool bit into the wood and halted, indicating a controlled application of force directed towards the base of the trunk.⁴

• Bark Peeling: The bark appears to have been stripped, likely scraped away with a lithic flake to create a smooth, comfortable grip.

• Shaping: One end of the stick exhibits modification to create a rounded, slightly pointed tip.

• Functional Interpretation: The use-wear patterns on the tip include deep longitudinal striations, compressive deformation (wood cells crushed by impact), and embedded sediment grains. These features are diagnostic of digging sticks used in abrasive soils.⁴ Digging sticks are the "Swiss Army Knife" of gatherers, used to extract underground storage organs (tubers, rhizomes) or to dig out burrowing animals. In the context of the Marathousa lakeshore, it may also have been used to harvest aquatic plants or, given the association with the elephant carcass, as a lever to maneuver heavy limb bones during butchery.²

4.3 Specimen MAR-1-13: The Enigmatic "Small Tool"

The second artifact is a diminutive object made of Willow (Salix sp.) or Poplar (Populus sp.), measuring only 5.7 cm in length.⁴

• Morphology: This is not a broken fragment of a larger tool; the ends are truncated (cut), and the shape is deliberate. It features a tapered or chamfered end where the annual growth rings have been removed from two directions.⁴

• The "Retoucher" Hypothesis: The function of such a small wooden object is debated, but the leading hypothesis is that it served as a retoucher or compressor. In the production of stone tools, final shaping (retouch) is often done by pressing a softer material (bone, antler, or wood) against the sharp edge of the stone to flake off tiny pieces. This technique, known as pressure flaking or soft-hammer percussion, allows for greater control than striking with a stone hammer.⁵

• If this interpretation is correct, Specimen 13 represents a profound technological leap: a tool made specifically to manufacture other tools (tertiary tool production). The use of wood for this purpose is experimentally viable but rarely preserved. The willow/poplar wood is soft enough to "bite" into the stone edge without shattering, allowing for precise force application.

• Comparison: This artifact has no direct parallel in the Lower Paleolithic record. While bone retouchers are known from later Neanderthal sites, a wooden analogue from 430 ka suggests that the "toolkit for making tools" was more diverse and organic-heavy than previously realized.²³

4.4 The Carnivore-Modified Wood

A third significant wood specimen initially displayed deep, parallel grooves that mimicked tool marks. However, detailed taphonomic analysis re-classified these as claw marks from a large carnivore.⁴ This misidentification (and subsequent correction) serves as a cautionary tale in the study of ancient wood but also adds to the ecological narrative. It proves that large predators—potentially lions or hyenas—were active on the same mudflats as the hominins, possibly scavenging the same elephant carcasses. The modification of wood by carnivores (likely incidental scratching or marking) is a rare taphonomic signature that helps distinguish the anthropogenic signal in the rest of the assemblage.

5. Associated Material Culture: The "Small Tool" Industry

The wooden artifacts must be understood within the context of the stone tools found alongside them. Marathousa 1 yields a lithic assemblage that differs markedly from the Acheulean handaxe industries often associated with this period.

5.1 The Microlithic Trend

The stone tools at Marathousa are characterized as a "small tool" industry. The assemblage consists of thousands of small flakes, scrapers, and denticulates, mostly under 3 cm in length.¹⁸

• Raw Materials: The hominins utilized locally available river pebbles, primarily radiolarite, quartz, and chert.

• Reduction Strategy: The small size of the raw material nodules necessitated specific knapping techniques. The bipolar technique (placing the core on an anvil and striking it from above) was frequently used to shatter small pebbles and extract sharp flakes.¹²

• Technological Integration: The presence of the "small wooden tool" (Specimen 13) aligns perfectly with this microlithic industry. Small stone flakes are difficult to hold and retouch by hand; a small wooden compressor or punch would have been an essential aid in working these diminutive edges. This suggests a fully integrated technological system where wood and stone were complementary—wood provided the precision leverage to shape the stone, and stone provided the cutting edge to shape the wood.⁵

6. Hominin Behavior and Cognition

6.1 Standardization and Planning

The Marathousa artifacts are not expedient, "throw-away" tools. They evidence a high degree of standardization and planning depth.

• Raw Material Selectivity: The hominins did not grab random branches. They selected Alnus for the heavy-duty digging stick (utilizing its rot resistance and strength) and softer Salix/Populus for the precision small tool. This implies a deep botanical knowledge and an understanding of material physics.⁴

• Chaîne Opératoire: The manufacturing sequence—felling, branching, peeling, shaping—requires the maker to hold a mental template of the finished object for an extended period. This level of cognitive control is consistent with the increasing brain size observed in Middle Pleistocene hominins.

6.2 The Makers: Homo heidelbergensis or Early Neanderthals?

Who were the artisans of Marathousa? The date of 430 ka places the site at a critical evolutionary junction. In Europe, this period corresponds to the transition from Homo heidelbergensis to early Neanderthals (Homo neanderthalensis). The hominins from the Sima de los Huesos in Spain (dated to ~430 ka) are genetically confirmed as early Neanderthals. Given the geographic location and date, the Marathousa hominins were likely members of this nascent Neanderthal lineage.²⁶ The behaviors evidenced at Marathousa—complex woodworking, large game hunting/butchery, and adaptation to temperate refugia—are foundational traits of the Neanderthal adaptation that would dominate Europe for the next 300,000 years.

7. Broader Implications and Conclusion

The discovery at Marathousa 1 is a watershed moment in Paleolithic archaeology. It forces a recalibration of our timeline for technological innovation.

• Predating the Famous: These tools predate the celebrated Schöningen spears (~300 ka) and the Clacton spear (~400 ka). They sit chronologically between the ephemeral wood of Gesher Benot Ya'aqov and the specialized hunters of Schöningen, filling a crucial gap in the record.³

• The "Wood Age" Reality: The sophisticated nature of the Marathousa tools suggests that wood was not a secondary material but the primary medium of technological interaction with the world. Stone tools were likely often just the means to produce the wooden toolkit.

• Survival in the Cold: The ability to craft diverse wooden tools—from heavy digging sticks for tubers to fine tools for lithic maintenance—was likely a key adaptation that allowed these hominins to survive the severe climatic oscillations of the Middle Pleistocene.

In conclusion, the Marathousa 1 assemblage reveals that 430,000 years ago, the shores of the Megalopolis lake were the scene of complex engineering. Early humans, armed with an intimate knowledge of their botanical environment, crafted tools that allowed them to exploit everything from underground tubers to the carcasses of giant elephants. These artifacts, preserved by the mud of a long-vanished swamp, stand as a testament to the ingenuity of the "Wood Age" and the invisible complexity of our ancestors' lives.

8. Data Summary Tables

Table 1: Key Artifacts from Marathousa 1

Artifact ID	Material	Length	Key Features	Proposed Function
MAR-1-39	Alnus sp. (Alder)	~81 cm (frag)	Branch removal scars, scraped bark, rounded tip	Digging stick (USOs/Aquatic plants), Butchery lever
MAR-1-13	Salix/Populus	5.7 cm	Truncated ends, tapered/chamfered tip	Retoucher (pressure flaking), Composite component
Carnivore Wood	Alnus sp.	Fragmentary	Deep parallel striations, lack of stop marks	Natural/Taphonomic (Claw marks from predator)

Table 2: Paleoenvironmental Indicators

Category	Key Taxa	Ecological Implication
Flora (Trees)	Alnus, Salix, Populus	Riparian/Wetland margin; Source of tool wood
Flora (Aquatic)	Nymphaea alba, Mentha aquatica	Permanent freshwater body; Potential food source
Fauna (Mega)	Palaeoloxodon antiquus	Open woodland/grassland; Primary prey/scavenge resource
Fauna (Micro)	Castor fiber (Beaver), Lutra (Otter)	Permanent water; Wet environment
Avifauna	Anhinga (Darter), Anas (Ducks)	Warm, temperate climate (Refugium indicator)

Table 3: Chronometric Data

Method	Material Dated	Result	Significance
ESR	Tooth Enamel / Mollusks	430 - 500 ka	Primary dating of biological uptake
pIRIR	K-Feldspar	Consistent with ESR	Constraints on sediment burial time
Biostratigraphy	Faunal Assemblage	Middle Pleistocene	Corroborates radiometric dates
Correlation	-	MIS 12 (~430 ka)	Places site in Glacial Period (Refugium)

Citations:.¹

Works cited

1. World’s oldest wooden tools found in Greece push early human technology history back, accessed February 2, 2026, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/rest-of-world/worlds-oldest-wooden-tools-found-in-greece-push-early-human-technology-history-back/articleshow/127776733.cms

2. 430,000-Year-Old Discovery Reveals Earliest-Known Evidence of Humans Using Wooden Tools | Discover Magazine, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.discovermagazine.com/430-000-year-old-discovery-reveals-earliest-known-evidence-of-humans-using-wooden-tools-48617

3. This ancient stick may be the world's oldest handheld wooden tool - Science News, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.sciencenews.org/article/stick-oldest-handheld-wooden-tool

4. Evidence for the earliest hominin use of wooden handheld tools found at Marathousa 1 (Greece) | PNAS, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2515479123

5. 430,000-Year-Old Wooden Handheld Tools are Earliest Ever Found | Sci.News, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.sci.news/archaeology/earliest-handheld-wooden-tools-14512.html

6. Oldest portable wooden tools used by humans 430,000 years ago discovered in Greece, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.labrujulaverde.com/en/2026/01/oldest-portable-wooden-tools-used-by-humans-430000-years-ago-discovered-in-greece/

7. The Lower Palaeolithic site of Marathousa 1, Megalopolis, Greece: overview of the evidence - Zenodo, accessed February 2, 2026, https://zenodo.org/record/3569205/files/Panagopoulou%20et%20al%202018.pdf

8. Marathousa 1: a new Middle Pleistocene archaeological site from Greece | Antiquity Journal, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.antiquity.ac.uk/projgall/panagopoulo343

9. First Things | National Affairs, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.nationalaffairs.com/blog/detail/findings-a-daily-roundup/first-things

10. Conservation of Waterlogged Wood—Past, Present and Future Perspectives - MDPI, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/12/9/1193

11. Lake-Level Changes and Their Paleo-Climatic Implications at the MIS12 Lower Paleolithic (Middle Pleistocene) Site Marathousa 1, Greece - Frontiers, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/earth-science/articles/10.3389/feart.2021.668445/full

12. (PDF) Small flakes for sharp needs: Technological behaviour in the Lower Palaeolithic site of Marathousa 1, Greece - ResearchGate, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/393176885_Small_flakes_for_sharp_needs_Technological_behaviour_in_the_Lower_Palaeolithic_site_of_Marathousa_1_Greece

13. ESR Dating Ungulate Teeth and Molluscs from the Paleolithic Site Marathousa 1, Megalopolis Basin, Greece - MDPI, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.mdpi.com/2571-550X/1/3/22

14. ESR Dating the Fossil-Bearing Layers at the Marathousa 1 Site, Megalopolis, Greece, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349173063_ESR_Dating_the_Fossil-Bearing_Layers_at_the_Marathousa_1_Site_Megalopolis_Greece

15. Luminescence Dating Methods - ResearchGate, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285991966_Luminescence_Dating_Methods

16. The small mammal fauna from the palaeolithic site Marathousa 1 (Greece) | Request PDF, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327819172_The_small_mammal_fauna_from_the_palaeolithic_site_Marathousa_1_Greece

17. Life-history of Palaeoloxodon antiquus reveals Middle Pleistocene glacial refugium in the Megalopolis basin, Greece - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed February 2, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10791645/

18. Small flakes for sharp needs: Technological behaviour in the Lower Palaeolithic site of Marathousa 1, Greece | PLOS One - Research journals, accessed February 2, 2026, https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0324958

19. The Late Early–Middle Pleistocene Mammal Fauna from the Megalopolis Basin (Peloponnese, Greece) and Its Importance for Biostratigraphy and Paleoenvironment - MDPI, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.mdpi.com/2571-550X/7/4/41

20. 1 The ornithological remains from Marathousa 1 (Middle Pleistocene; Megalopolis Basin, Greece) Dimitrios Michailidisa*, George E - Semantic Scholar, accessed February 2, 2026, https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/dda1/ad78c0e182d947aa3e8fb9ad27dbf523f155.pdf

21. 430000-year-old well-preserved wooden tools are the oldest ever found, accessed February 2, 2026, https://archaeologymag.com/2026/01/430000-year-old-wooden-tools-marathousa/

22. Evidence for the earliest hominin use of wooden handheld tools found at Marathousa 1 (Greece) | Request PDF - ResearchGate, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/400095399_Evidence_for_the_earliest_hominin_use_of_wooden_handheld_tools_found_at_Marathousa_1_Greece

23. Beyond the main function: An experimental study of the use of hardwood boomerangs in retouching activities - PubMed Central, accessed February 2, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9380927/

24. Full article: Experimental Investigation of Knapping Characteristics of Dolerite and Implications for the Interpretation of Middle Stone Age Technologies - Taylor & Francis, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01977261.2024.2388964

25. Small flakes for sharp needs: Technological behaviour in the Lower Palaeolithic site of Marathousa 1, Greece - PubMed Central, accessed February 2, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12208439/

26. 430000-Year-Old Wooden Tools Found in Greece - Archaeology Magazine, accessed February 2, 2026, https://archaeology.org/news/2026/01/28/430000-year-old-wooden-tools-found-in-greece/

27. Archaeologists Unearthed a 430,000-Year-Old Stick. After Careful ..., accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/archaeologists-unearthed-a-430000-year-old-stick-after-careful-analysis-they-say-it-could-be-the-oldest-wooden-tool-ever-discovered-180988073/

28. Articles – Popular Archeology, accessed February 2, 2026, https://popular-archaeology.com/article/?rcp_action%252

29. The expression of the MIS 12 glacial stage in Southeastern Europe and its impact over the Middle Pleistocene hominins in Megalopolis, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/73/410673.pdf