Signal Integrity in Public Health: The Consequences of Decoupling Decision-Making from Pathogen Tracking

Abstract

In September 2025, a critical juncture in the history of American public health surveillance was reached when the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) placed an indefinite pause on a flagship Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) initiative. This project, colloquially envisioned as a "National Weather Service for public health," was designed to revolutionize the tracking of infectious diseases by integrating real-time data for 127 notifiable conditions into a user-friendly, public-facing platform. The suspension of this project occurred amidst a tumultuous period of administrative restructuring, high-profile scientific resignations, and shifting policy priorities under the second Trump administration. This report provides an exhaustive, multi-dimensional analysis of the event, dissecting the administrative, technological, and biological layers that constitute the modern surveillance state. We examine the bureaucratic friction that led to the pause, the specific technological architecture of the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System (NNDSS) and the Data Modernization Initiative (DMI), and the profound biological risks posed by severing real-time data streams in an era of climate-driven pathogen expansion. Through a detailed synthesis of epidemiological theory, entomological mechanics, and administrative law, this document argues that the "indefinite pause" represents a systemic decoupling of the nation's sensory apparatus from its decision-making faculties, leaving the populace vulnerable to the accelerating threats of vector-borne and zoonotic diseases.

Part I: The Early 2025 Administrative and Political Public Health Landscape

The decision to halt the CDC’s infectious disease data project was not an isolated administrative hiccup but a symptom of a profound transformation within the federal health apparatus. To understand the significance of the "indefinite pause," one must first navigate the complex currents of personnel changes, policy shifts, and the ideological reorientation of the Department of Health and Human Services in late 2025.

1.1 The September Directive: Anatomy of a Pause

In early September 2025, the CDC stood on the precipice of launching a tool that had been in development for months: a comprehensive, centralized dashboard for infectious disease tracking. The project was born out of the painful lessons of the COVID-19 pandemic, where fragmented data systems left policymakers and the public in the dark. The new platform was designed to aggregate case counts for 127 nationally notifiable conditions, offering a level of transparency and accessibility previously unseen in federal public health reporting.¹

The development team, working under the banner of the CDC's Office of Public Health Data, Science, and Technology, had completed the technical build. They had integrated state-level reporting streams, designed a user-friendly interface, and prepared expert commentary to help the public interpret the raw numbers.³ The system was envisioned as a "one-stop hub," akin to the National Weather Service, where a user could check the "viral weather" of their region just as easily as they check the forecast for rain.⁴

However, the standard protocol for launching such a public-facing asset involves a final clearance review by the parent agency, the HHS. It was at this final gate that the machinery stopped. When CDC officials requested approval to go live, HHS leadership placed the program on "indefinite hold".² The directive effectively froze the project in its tracks, leaving the finished code and the integrated data streams dormant.

The reaction from within the agency was one of palpable frustration. Jennifer Layden, the Director of the Office of Public Health Data, Science, and Technology, who had championed the modernization effort, described the situation as the culmination of mounting operational challenges. In statements captured shortly before her departure, Layden noted that the project was "just one example of the many challenges of the past several months," citing a crippling inability to rehire staff and a deteriorating operational environment that made effective work increasingly difficult.¹ Her exasperation highlighted a critical disconnect: the technical capability to monitor disease existed, but the administrative permission to share that intelligence had been revoked.

1.2 The Exodus of Scientific Leadership

The operational paralysis of the data project coincided with a broader destabilization of the CDC’s leadership structure. In late August 2025, the administration fired CDC Director Susan Monarez, a move that triggered a cascade of resignations among the agency's top scientific tier.⁵ This "exodus" was not merely a rotation of political appointees but the departure of career scientists and center directors who formed the institutional memory and technical backbone of the nation’s biodefense.

The list of departures reads as a roll call of the agency's most critical infectious disease experts. Dr. Daniel Jernigan, the Director of the National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, resigned, citing ethical conflicts with the new direction of the agency.⁷ Jernigan’s center was responsible for monitoring threats like Ebola, Anthrax, and the very vector-borne diseases that the paused dashboard was meant to track. His departure signaled a loss of deep expertise in high-consequence pathogens.

Simultaneously, Dr. Demetre Daskalakis, Director of the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, stepped down. Daskalakis, a key figure in the response to HIV and respiratory viruses, expressed grave concerns in his resignation letter. He warned that the agency was being steered by "people of dubious intent and more dubious scientific rigor," particularly regarding vaccine policy.⁷

Dr. Debra Houry, the CDC Deputy Director, also resigned, emphasizing in her correspondence that science "should never be censored or subject to political pauses or interpretations".⁶ Her statement directly addressed the core issue underlying the dashboard pause: the subordination of scientific data to political oversight.

Perhaps most consequential for the data project itself was the resignation of Dr. Jennifer Layden.⁹ As the head of the Office of Public Health Data, Surveillance, and Technology, Layden was the architect of the Data Modernization Initiative. Her exit left the paused project without its primary advocate and left the office rudderless at a moment when data integration was most critical. The simultaneous vacuum in these four critical positions—Zoonotic Diseases, Immunization, Deputy Leadership, and Data Strategy—created a vulnerability in the national defense posture against biological threats.

1.3 The Policy Paradox: Transparency vs. "Data Integrity"

The justification for the pause and the broader restructuring of the HHS was framed by the administration in the language of "data integrity" and reform. The second Trump administration, with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as HHS Secretary, advanced a policy agenda focused on "Making America Healthy Again".¹⁰ This agenda ostensibly prioritized transparency, with the HHS Deputy Secretary Jim O’Neill claiming that the administration had "more than tripled the number of datasets on HealthData.gov" since taking office in January 2025.¹⁰

The administration’s "Living HHS Open Data Plan" promised to leverage data and AI to fuel public-private partnerships and accelerate scientific breakthroughs.¹⁰ Official communications emphasized the goal of maximizing taxpayer return on investment by ensuring data collection delivered measurable benefits.

However, this narrative of expansion and transparency stood in stark contrast to the targeted suppression of specific data categories. While the quantity of datasets may have increased, the nature of the available data shifted. The administration implemented Executive Orders that precipitated the removal of websites and databases related to health equity, LGBTQ+ health, and climate change.¹¹ The "Silencing Science Tracker," a monitoring project by the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law, recorded the removal of at least 22 webpages on these topics.¹¹

The pause on the infectious disease dashboard was thus part of a larger pattern of "curating" the scientific record. The administration’s focus on "data integrity" was frequently invoked to challenge established scientific consensus, particularly regarding vaccines. For instance, the administration removed all 17 members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), replacing them with individuals described by critics as "vaccine skeptics".⁷ In this context, the pause on the dashboard was likely not a simple technical review but a screening process to ensure the data released did not conflict with the administration's broader policy narratives regarding public health and safety.

The tension was palpable: a stated commitment to "open data" coexisting with a communications freeze that halted the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) and Health Alert Network (HAN) advisories.¹⁴ These publications are the lifeblood of clinical situational awareness. Their suspension, alongside the dashboard pause, created a "data drought" for frontline practitioners, forcing them to rely on fragmented state-level reports or anecdotal evidence during a period of heightened biological activity.¹⁵

Part II: The Architecture of Surveillance

To fully appreciate the impact of the pause, it is necessary to examine the technical infrastructure that was being built. The project was not a standalone website but the user-facing terminal of a vast, complex backend system known as the Data Modernization Initiative (DMI). This initiative represented a billion-dollar effort to drag the U.S. public health system out of the era of fax machines and into the age of cloud computing and real-time analytics.

2.1 The National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System (NNDSS)

The backbone of infectious disease tracking in the United States is the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System (NNDSS). This system serves as the primary conduit for information flow between local health departments and the CDC. The NNDSS tracks a specific list of conditions deemed "nationally notifiable" by the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE).¹⁶

The list of 127 conditions includes a diverse array of pathogens, ranging from ancient scourges like Cholera and Leprosy to modern threats like COVID-19 and Lyme disease. The system categorizes these conditions into groups such as infectious diseases, non-infectious conditions (like lead poisoning), and outbreak events.¹⁸

Table 1: Selected Categories of Nationally Notifiable Conditions (NNDSS)

Category	Representative Conditions	Surveillance Objective
Vector-Borne	Lyme disease, West Nile Virus, Dengue, Malaria, Plague, Tularemia	Track range expansion of vectors; monitor seasonal transmission intensity.
Vaccine-Preventable	Measles, Mumps, Rubella, Diphtheria, Pertussis, Varicella	Monitor vaccine efficacy; detect outbreaks in unvaccinated pockets.
Enteric (Food/Water)	Salmonellosis, Shigellosis, Listeriosis, Cholera, Cryptosporidiosis	Identify common-source outbreaks (e.g., contaminated food supply).
Sexually Transmitted	Gonorrhea, Syphilis, Chlamydia, HIV	Track community transmission rates; guide resource allocation for clinics.
Zoonotic/Rare	Anthrax, Rabies, Brucellosis, Hantavirus, Psittacosis	Early detection of spillover events; bioterrorism surveillance.

Historically, the NNDSS has struggled with data interoperability. Information originates at the point of care—a doctor's office or hospital. It is then sent to a local health department, often via paper forms or legacy electronic systems. From there, it moves to the state level, and finally to the CDC. At each handover, data can be corrupted, delayed, or lost. The sheer variety of data formats used by different jurisdictions—some using HL7 messaging standards, others using proprietary formats—creates a "Tower of Babel" effect that hampers national analysis.¹⁹

The paused project was designed to solve this via the "Generic V2" message mapping guide. This new standard aimed to define "minimal line-level data elements"—a core set of data points (age, sex, location, onset date) that every jurisdiction would report in a standardized format.¹⁹ The dashboard was the visualization layer for this standardized stream, promising to turn raw database entries into actionable maps and trend lines for the 127 conditions.

2.2 The "National Weather Service" Concept: A Paradigm Shift

The conceptual framework for the paused project was the "National Weather Service for Public Health." This analogy, championed by the Center for Forecasting and Outbreak Analytics (CFA), represented a paradigm shift from retrospective reporting to prospective forecasting.⁴

In meteorology, data from thousands of sensors (barometers, thermometers, satellites) is fed into supercomputers to model the atmosphere and predict storms. The CFA aimed to replicate this for biology. By integrating NNDSS case counts with non-traditional data streams like wastewater analysis, emergency department syndromic surveillance, and genomic sequencing, the CFA intended to "forecast" outbreaks.²⁰

The paused dashboard was the "broadcast" mechanism for these forecasts. Just as the National Weather Service issues severe storm warnings to the public, this platform was designed to provide "expert interpretation" alongside the data.³ For example, rather than simply showing a rise in West Nile Virus cases, the dashboard could have provided a "risk map" based on mosquito activity and temperature trends, advising the public on specific preventative actions.

2.3 The Center for Forecasting and Outbreak Analytics (CFA)

The CFA, established in 2022, serves as the operational hub for this new approach. It is tasked with improving outbreak response through advanced analytics and modeling.²² The center works to provide decision support to federal, state, and local leaders. However, the effectiveness of the CFA is entirely dependent on the input data. "Garbage in, garbage out" applies rigorously to epidemiological modeling.

The "indefinite pause" severed the output loop of the CFA. While the center might still generate models internally (assuming the input data from states continues to flow despite the administrative turmoil), the inability to publish this data renders the insights functionally useless for the general public and local health officials who lack security clearances or direct access to internal CDC servers. The vision of a "National Weather Service" requires a broadcast capability; without the dashboard, the CFA is a weather station that cannot issue a forecast.²³

The urgency of this infrastructure is underscored by the current limitations of state-level surveillance. While some states like Washington have robust local dashboards ²⁴, many others do not. A federal platform provides a safety net for states with fewer resources and allows for the tracking of multi-state outbreaks that no single jurisdiction can see in its entirety. The pause effectively dismantled this federal safety net, returning the nation to a patchwork of disparate and disconnected surveillance systems.

Part III: The Biological Imperative – Climate and Vector Expansion

The administrative disruption described above is not occurring in a static biological environment. It is unfolding against the backdrop of a rapidly warming planet, where the fundamental thermodynamics of disease transmission are shifting. The "indefinite pause" creates a blind spot exactly when the biological signal is becoming most volatile. This section explores the specific biological mechanisms—driven by temperature and humidity—that make real-time surveillance indispensable.

3.1 Thermodynamics of Viral Replication: The Mosquito Vectors

The transmission of arboviruses (arthropod-borne viruses) like Dengue, West Nile, and Zika is governed by the physiology of the mosquito. As cold-blooded (poikilothermic) organisms, mosquitoes are slaves to ambient temperature. Their metabolic rates, lifespan, and the replication of the viruses they carry are all functions of heat.

3.1.1 The Extrinsic Incubation Period (EIP)

The most critical variable in this equation is the Extrinsic Incubation Period (EIP). The EIP is the time required for a virus to complete its life cycle within the mosquito—from the initial blood meal, through the infection of the midgut, the escape into the hemocoel (body cavity), and finally the invasion of the salivary glands, where it can be transmitted to a new host.²⁵

The duration of the EIP is inversely related to temperature. At cooler temperatures (e.g., 20°C), the EIP for a virus like West Nile might be 20-30 days. Since the average lifespan of a mosquito in the wild is often less than that, the probability of transmission is low; the mosquito dies before it becomes infectious. However, as temperatures rise, viral replication accelerates exponentially.

Research indicates that for Dengue virus in Aedes albopictus, the EIP can shorten to as little as 5 days at 32°C.²⁵ For West Nile Virus in Culex mosquitoes, studies show that viral titers and dissemination rates are significantly higher at 28°C compared to 20°C.²⁶ This nonlinear response means that a small increase in average temperature can result in a massive increase in transmission potential (vectorial capacity).

Table 2: Temperature Dependence of Viral Kinetics in Vectors

Pathogen / Vector	Temperature Condition	Biological Outcome (EIP/Transmission)	Citation
Dengue (Aedes albopictus)	18°C	Virus limited to midgut; no transmission.	25
Dengue (Aedes albopictus)	28°C	Dissemination to salivary glands by day 10.	25
Dengue (Aedes albopictus)	32°C	EIP shortens to 5 days; peak transmission.	25
West Nile (Culex pipiens)	20°C	Low viral load; slow dissemination.	26
West Nile (Culex pipiens)	28°C	High viral load; rapid dissemination; high transmission potential.	26

The pause in data availability means that public health officials cannot overlay real-time temperature anomalies with case data to predict these "EIP contractions." If a heatwave hits a region, the window for transmission opens suddenly. Without a system to visualize this risk, the window may remain open and unmitigated until human cases begin to overwhelm emergency departments.

3.1.2 Range Expansion and "Disease Danger Days"

Climate change is also physically moving the vectors. Aedes aegypti (the yellow fever mosquito) and Aedes albopictus (the Asian tiger mosquito) are expanding their ranges poleward and to higher elevations.²⁷ The warming winters allow these tropical and sub-tropical species to overwinter in regions that were previously lethal to their larvae and eggs.

Analysis shows that the number of "disease danger days"—days with the optimal temperature range for transmission (61°F–93°F)—has increased in 94% of major U.S. cities.²⁸ This expansion places naive populations—people with no prior immunity to these viruses—at risk. The introduction of a pathogen into a naive population often results in explosive outbreaks, as seen with West Nile Virus in 1999 or Zika in 2016.

The CDC’s paused project would have been the primary tool for tracking this "leading edge" of vector expansion. By monitoring the appearance of notifiable vector-borne diseases in new counties, the system would provide the early warning necessary to initiate vector control programs (spraying, larviciding) before the disease becomes endemic.

3.2 The Hygroscopic Limits of the Tick: Lyme Disease

While temperature drives the mosquito, humidity rules the tick. Lyme disease, caused by the spirochete bacterium Borrelia burgdorferi, is transmitted by the blacklegged tick (Ixodes scapularis). The biology of this tick presents a different but equally urgent surveillance challenge.

3.2.1 Questing Behavior and Desiccation

Ticks do not fly; they "quest." They climb blades of grass or shrubs and wait for a host to brush past. However, Ixodes ticks are extremely sensitive to desiccation (drying out). They require high humidity to survive while exposed on vegetation. Research has identified a critical humidity threshold, often cited around 82% relative humidity, below which tick questing activity drops significantly as they retreat to the moist leaf litter to rehydrate.²⁹

This physiological constraint explains the "North-South gradient" of Lyme disease. In the southern United States, high temperatures combined with lower humidity (or higher saturation deficit) force ticks to remain hidden under leaf litter, where they feed on lizards and rodents but rarely encounter humans. In the Northeast and Upper Midwest, the microclimate allows for aggressive questing behavior, leading to high human incidence.³¹

3.2.2 The Northward Expansion

Climate change is altering these microclimates. Warmer winters are increasing overwintering survival rates for ticks in the northern latitudes. Snow cover, ironically, acts as an insulator, protecting ticks from lethal freezing temperatures. As winters warm and snow patterns shift, the range of Ixodes scapularis is pushing north into Canada and west into the Great Plains.³²

The CDC’s Climate-Ready States and Cities Initiative (CRSCI) was designed to help jurisdictions use the BRACE framework (Building Resilience Against Climate Effects) to anticipate these shifts.³⁴ However, the data pause blinds these efforts. Tracking the expansion of Lyme disease requires longitudinal data to distinguish between a "bad tick year" (driven by acorn masting cycles and rodent abundance) and a permanent range expansion driven by climate. Without the 127-disease dashboard, local health departments in "frontier" states for Lyme (like the Dakotas or Ohio) lack the comparative data to contextualize their local observations.

3.3 Fungal Pathogens: The Dust and the Drought

The surveillance gap extends beyond vectors to environmental pathogens. Coccidioides, the fungus causing Valley Fever, thrives in the arid soils of the Southwest. Its life cycle is driven by a "grow and blow" dynamic: wet periods allow the fungus to bloom in the soil, followed by drought that dries the soil, and wind that aerosolizes the spores.³⁵

Climate models predict that by 2100, the endemic area for Valley Fever could more than double, spreading north into Idaho, Wyoming, and Montana.³⁶ The incidence of this disease is already rising, yet it remains under-diagnosed outside of known endemic zones because clinicians do not suspect it. The paused dashboard would have provided a national view of fungal disease trends, helping to alert clinicians in expanding endemic zones to consider fungal etiologies for community-acquired pneumonia.³⁷

Part IV: Zoonosis and the One Health Blind Spot

The indefinite pause also undermines the "One Health" approach, which integrates human, animal, and environmental health data to detect zoonotic spillovers. The majority of emerging infectious diseases (EIDs) are zoonotic, originating in animals before jumping to humans.

4.1 The Mechanics of Spillover

Spillover events are often driven by ecological stress. For example, nutritional stress in bats (caused by habitat loss or climate shifts) has been linked to increased shedding of viruses like Hendra and potentially coronaviruses.³⁸ Similarly, the movement of wild birds, altering their migration routes due to climate change, spreads Avian Influenza (H5N1) to new regions and new hosts, including dairy cattle and marine mammals.¹²

Detecting a spillover requires triangulation. It involves overlaying veterinary data (e.g., die-offs in poultry or wildlife) with environmental data (e.g., wastewater surveillance) and human clinical data (e.g., unusual flu-like illness in farm workers).

4.2 The Broken Link: H5N1 and Beyond

The administration’s policy actions have specifically degraded this triangulation capability. In July 2025, the CDC reportedly deactivated its emergency response for H5N1 influenza and limited the tracking and reporting of data on bird flu infections in humans and animals.¹² This decision, combined with the pause on the general infectious disease dashboard, creates a deliberate blind spot.

If H5N1 were to acquire the mutations necessary for efficient human-to-human transmission, the early signals would likely appear in the NNDSS data as a cluster of "influenza-like illness" (ILI) that tests negative for seasonal flu. The paused dashboard, with its capacity for "expert interpretation," would be the primary tool for spotting such an anomaly. By silencing this signal, the system loses the ability to distinguish between the seasonal noise of the flu and the signal of a pandemic precursor.

Part V: The Mathematics of Delay – The Cost of Silence

Ultimately, the impact of the data pause can be quantified through the mathematics of epidemiology. In outbreak control, time is the scarcest resource. The effectiveness of any intervention—whether it is vaccination, isolation, or vector control—decays rapidly with delay.

5.1 The Value of Information (VOI) and Reporting Lags

The "Value of Information" (VOI) is a concept used to quantify the benefit of reducing uncertainty. In the context of infectious disease, VOI is highest at the beginning of an outbreak. Knowing about a cluster of 10 cases today is infinitely more valuable than knowing about 1,000 cases next month.

Reporting delays introduce a "surveillance lag" that distorts the estimated reproduction number (R_t). If the data feeding a model is two weeks old, the model is "nowcasting" the past, not the present. During the exponential growth phase of an epidemic, a two-week lag can mean the difference between containment and catastrophe.

Table 3: Impact of Surveillance Delays on Outbreak Control

Disease	Reporting Delay Threshold for Control	Consequence of Exceeding Threshold	Citation
Hepatitis A	17 days (median)	Outbreak control remains possible via vaccination.	39
Shigellosis	3 days (median)	Rapid transmission makes control extremely difficult beyond this window.	39
Pertussis	4.5 days	Beyond this, effective control is "Not Possible" due to high transmissibility (R_0).	39
Ebola	Immediate (Real-time)	Delay in isolating cases leads to exponential superspreading events.	40

As shown in Table 3, for highly transmissible diseases like Pertussis (Whooping Cough), the window for effective intervention is incredibly narrow—less than 5 days. The paused CDC dashboard was designed to provide "near real-time" data.³ By reverting to fragmented, slower state-based reporting, the system likely pushes reporting delays well beyond these critical thresholds.

5.2 The Compounding Error

The lack of a centralized dashboard also hinders the detection of "dispersed outbreaks." A foodborne pathogen (like Salmonella in a distributed product) might cause 2 cases in one state, 3 in another, and 1 in a third. Viewed individually by state health departments, these cases appear as background noise. Viewed centrally, they form a clear cluster.

The pause on the 127-disease dashboard effectively dismantles the "radar" that detects these dispersed threats. It forces epidemiologists to rely on slower, manual communication channels (phone calls, email lists) rather than automated algorithmic detection. In an era of global supply chains and rapid travel, this return to analog speed in a digital world is a quantifiable vulnerability.

Conclusion

The indefinite pause of the CDC’s infectious disease data project is a defining moment for the U.S. public health infrastructure. It represents the collision of two opposing forces: the accelerating biological reality of a warming, interconnected world, and the retrenching administrative reality of a politicized bureaucracy.

On one side, the biological imperative is clear. The thermodynamics of mosquito vectors, the hygroscopic limits of ticks, and the stress-driven spillover of zoonotic pathogens are all driving disease risk higher and faster. The mechanisms are well-understood: heat shortens viral incubation, mild winters expand vector ranges, and ecological disruption forces species—and their pathogens—together.

On the other side, the administrative response has been to sever the sensory nerves of the state. The resignation of key scientific leadership, the removal of advisory committees, the censorship of climate and equity data, and the indefinite suspension of the DMI dashboard have collectively degraded the nation’s situational awareness.

The dashboard was not just a website; it was the intended interface for a "National Weather Service for Public Health." By pausing it, the administration has effectively decided to fly blind into a storm. The cost of this silence will not be measured in server space or budget dollars, but in the lost days of lead time when the next outbreak arrives—days that the mathematics of epidemiology suggest are the difference between a manageable cluster and an uncontrollable epidemic.

Citations

¹

Works cited

1. HHS Indefinitely Pauses CDC Infectious Disease Data Project, accessed January 8, 2026, https://climate.law.columbia.edu/content/hhs-indefinitely-pauses-cdc-infectious-disease-data-project

2. HHS pauses CDC infectious disease data project - AONL, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.aonl.org/news/HHS-pauses-CDC-infectious-disease-data-project

3. CDC Infectious Disease Data Project Shelved | The Transmission - UNMC, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.unmc.edu/healthsecurity/transmission/2025/09/10/cdc-infectious-disease-data-project-shelved/

4. DRC – The Pandora Report, accessed January 8, 2026, https://pandorareport.org/tag/drc/

5. CDC project that would've included HIV data gets shelved by HHS, reports MedPage Today, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.positivelyaware.com/articles/cdc-project-wouldve-included-hiv-data-gets-shelved-hhs-reports-medpage-today

6. Exclusive: Inside the CDC Exodus and RFK Jr.'s Anti-Vaccine Crusade - Time Magazine, accessed January 8, 2026, https://time.com/7314702/cdc-officials-resignations-rfk-jr-vaccines-exclusive/

7. Time for a temporarily privatized CDC policymaking process, sponsored and funded by provider & payer organizations, professional societies and states. - Reward Health, accessed January 8, 2026, https://rewardhealth.com/archives/3784

8. Public Health in Peril: Why Recent CDC Resignations Matter to Us All - Belfer Center, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.belfercenter.org/research-analysis/public-health-peril-why-recent-cdc-resignations-matter-us-all

9. Article | High-ranking official departing CDC - POLITICO Pro, accessed January 8, 2026, https://subscriber.politicopro.com/article/2025/08/high-ranking-official-departing-cdc-00529697

10. Living HHS Open Data Plan Published, HealthData.gov Refreshed to Provide Greater Transparency, Encourage Innovation, and Eliminate Information Silos, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.hhs.gov/press-room/living-open-data-plan-healthdatagov-launch.html

11. Silencing Science Tracker - Sabin Center for Climate Change Law, accessed January 8, 2026, https://climate.law.columbia.edu/Silencing-Science-Tracker

12. Tracking Key HHS Public Health Policy Actions Under the Trump Administration - KFF, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.kff.org/other-health/tracking-key-hhs-public-health-policy-actions-under-the-trump-administration/

13. FDA Changes in Motion: A Live View of Staff, Structural, and Policy Changes, accessed January 8, 2026, https://accortoreg.com/news/fda-live-timeline/

14. HHS External Communications Pause Prevents Critical Updates on Current Public Health Threats - Shea-Online.org, accessed January 8, 2026, https://shea-online.org/hhs-external-communications-pause-prevents-critical-updates-on-current-public-health-threats/

15. Stymied by a federal health communications pause, journalists worry about what comes next, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.poynter.org/reporting-editing/2025/hhs-cdc-fda-epa-communications-freeze-bird-flu-information/

16. National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System (NNDSS) - CDC, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.cdc.gov/ncird-surveillance/about/nndss.html

17. Summary of Notifiable Infectious Diseases and Conditions — United States, 2015 | MMWR, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/64/wr/mm6453a1.htm

18. Condition Search Results - Surveillance Case Definitions - CDC, accessed January 8, 2026, https://ndc.services.cdc.gov/search-results/

19. CDC Advisory Committee to the Director (ACD), accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.cdc.gov/about/advisory-committee-director/pdf/11-14-23-ACD-Minutes_WGMinutes_FinalSigned.pdf

20. Public Health Data Strategy Milestones for 2025 and 2026 | The PHDS - CDC, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.cdc.gov/public-health-data-strategy/php/about/phds-milestones-2025-and-2026.html

21. CDC – The Pandora Report, accessed January 8, 2026, https://pandorareport.org/tag/cdc/

22. New CDC Center for Forecasting and Outbreak Analytics (CFA) launched at WH Summit (4.19.22) - American Economic Association, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.aeaweb.org/forum/2577/new-center-forecasting-outbreak-analytics-launched-summit

23. The Elusive Goal of Nationwide Disease Prediction - Undark Magazine, accessed January 8, 2026, https://undark.org/2024/12/31/the-elusive-goal-of-nationwide-disease-prediction/

24. Data Modernization Initiative Planning | Washington State Department of Health - | WA.gov, accessed January 8, 2026, https://doh.wa.gov/public-health-provider-resources/data-modernization-initiative-planning

25. The temperature sensitivity of arboviral disease extrinsic incubation periods: a systematic review | bioRxiv, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.08.08.669272v1.full-text

26. Temperature influences West Nile virus evolution and adaptation | bioRxiv, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.02.28.640855v1.full-text

27. Climate Change and Vector-Borne Disease Transmission: The Role of Insect Behavioral and Physiological Adaptations - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed January 8, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12053451/

28. Disease Danger Days on the Rise | Climate Central, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.climatecentral.org/climate-matters/disease-danger-days-on-the-rise-2018

29. Linkages of Weather and Climate With Ixodes scapularis and Ixodes pacificus (Acari: Ixodidae), Enzootic Transmission of Borrelia burgdorferi, and Lyme Disease in North America - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed January 8, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4844560/

30. Adverse moisture events predict seasonal abundance of Lyme disease vector ticks (Ixodes scapularis) - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed January 8, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3991885/

31. It's the Heat and the Humidity, New Study Finds: Why Lyme Disease is Common in the North, Rare in the South | U.S. Geological Survey - USGS.gov, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.usgs.gov/news/national-news-release/its-heat-and-humidity-new-study-finds-why-lyme-disease-common-north-rare

32. Adult ticks (Ixodes scapularis) infected with B. burgdorferi have increased overwintering survival, with implications for tick p - bioRxiv, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.12.07.519462v1.full.pdf

33. Effects of Micro-Scale Environmental Factors on the Quantity of Questing Black-Legged Ticks in Suburban New York - MDPI, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/20/11587

34. CDC's Climate-Ready States & Cities Initiative - Regulations.gov, accessed January 8, 2026, https://downloads.regulations.gov/NHTSA-2022-0075-0024/attachment_27.pdf

35. Climate Change, Wildfire & the Spread of Valley Fever - Risk Assessment - EPA, accessed January 8, 2026, https://assessments.epa.gov/risk/document/&deid%3D363179

36. Expansion of Coccidioidomycosis Endemic Regions in the United States in Response to Climate Change (Journal Article) | OSTI.GOV, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.osti.gov/pages/biblio/1623734

37. Surveillance for Coccidioidomycosis, Histoplasmosis, and Blastomycosis — United States, 2019 | MMWR - CDC, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/ss/ss7107a1.htm

38. Drivers of Zoonotic Viral Spillover: Understanding Pathways to the Next Pandemic - MDPI, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.mdpi.com/2813-0227/5/3/18

39. Quantifying Reporting Timeliness to Improve Outbreak Control - PMC - NIH, accessed January 8, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4313625/

40. A Quantitative Framework for Defining the End of an Infectious Disease Outbreak: Application to Ebola Virus Disease - PMC - NIH, accessed January 8, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8024054/

41. About National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System - CDC, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.cdc.gov/nndss/about/index.html

42. Vector-Borne Diseases | Climate and Health - CDC, accessed January 8, 2026, https://www.cdc.gov/climate-health/php/effects/vectors.html

43. accessed January 8, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12053451/#:~:text=Multiple%20predictive%20models%20suggest%20that,2019).