top of page
Search

SmallSat Platforms, Giant Leaps: A Technical and Strategic Exhaustive Analysis of the SPARCS, BlackCAT, ICEYE, Araqys-D1, Kepler, and Spire Missions

Satellites orbit Earth with solar panels reflecting sunlight. A glowing network connects them under a starry space backdrop.

1. Introduction: The Disaggregation of Orbital Infrastructure

The history of spaceflight has been dominated by the philosophy of the monolith. For decades, the high cost of launch and the harshness of the orbital environment dictated that spacecraft be massive, redundant, and expensive—engineered to survive for decades because replacement was impossible. These "battlestar" class missions, typified by the Hubble Space Telescope or the Envisat platform, concentrated immense capability into single points of failure. However, a profound phase transition is currently reshaping the Low Earth Orbit (LEO) ecosystem. Driven by the miniaturization of electronics, the standardization of the CubeSat form factor, and the plummeting cost of launch via rideshare missions like SpaceX’s Transporter series, the architecture of space is disaggregating.1

This report presents a comprehensive technical survey of six missions that exemplify this "New Space" paradigm: the Star-Planet Activity Research CubeSat (SPARCS), the Black Hole Coded Aperture Telescope (BlackCAT), the ICEYE synthetic aperture radar constellation, the in-space manufacturing demonstrations of Araqys-D1, the optical data relay network of Kepler Communications, and the radio occultation and optical capabilities of Spire Global.

These missions are not merely smaller versions of their predecessors; they represent a fundamental shift in how scientific and commercial objectives are achieved in the vacuum of space. SPARCS and BlackCAT utilize novel detector physics—delta-doped CCDs and hybrid CMOS sensors—to perform astrophysics observations previously thought impossible for spacecraft smaller than a refrigerator.3 ICEYE and Spire are redefining Earth observation through the physics of synthetic apertures and radio occultation, leveraging constellation effects to achieve revisit rates that no single satellite could match.5 Meanwhile, Kepler and Dcubed (Araqys) are constructing the logistical backbone—optical data relays and physical manufacturing—necessary to sustain this burgeoning ecosystem.7 By analyzing the opto-mechanical designs, detector physics, orbital dynamics, and strategic implications of these missions, we illuminate the converging trends of miniaturization, constellation autonomy, and in-orbit manufacturing that define the current epoch.

2. Astrophysics in the Ultraviolet: The SPARCS SmallSat Mission

2.1 Scientific Motivation: The M-Dwarf Habitability Paradox

The Star-Planet Activity Research CubeSat (SPARCS) is a 6U CubeSat mission funded by NASA’s Astrophysics Research and Analysis (APRA) program. Its scientific mandate addresses one of the most pressing questions in modern astronomy: the habitability of planets orbiting red dwarf stars.3

M-type stars, or red dwarfs, are the most common stellar inhabitants of the Milky Way, accounting for approximately 70% of all stars. Their ubiquity makes them the primary targets for exoplanet hunters; indeed, it is estimated that roughly 50 billion habitable-zone terrestrial planets exist around these low-mass stars in our galaxy alone.10 However, the "Habitable Zone"—the region where liquid water can exist on a planet's surface—lies perilously close to these cool, dim stars. Planets must orbit between 0.1 and 0.4 Astronomical Units (AU) from their host, a distance that subjects them to intense stellar activity.10

Unlike the Sun, which is relatively quiescent, M-dwarfs are magnetically volatile. They are prone to frequent and violent stellar flares, which emit torrents of high-energy ultraviolet (UV) and X-ray radiation. This radiation can have catastrophic consequences for planetary atmospheres. High-energy photons can photodissociate water molecules, breaking them into hydrogen and oxygen. The lighter hydrogen can then escape into space, effectively desiccating the planet and stripping away its potential for life.12 To assess whether an Earth-sized planet discovered around an M-dwarf is a potential cradle for life or a barren rock, astronomers must understand the "space weather" environment created by the host star.

This requires monitoring. A single snapshot of a star's UV output is insufficient because flares are transient, stochastic events. To build a statistical model of flare frequency and energy distribution, astronomers need continuous, long-duration monitoring—what is termed "time-domain astronomy." Large observatories like the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) or the now-retired GALEX mission cannot devote weeks or months to staring at a single star; their time is too valuable and oversubscribed.13 This creates a niche for a dedicated small satellite. SPARCS is designed to stare at selected M-dwarfs for weeks at a time, building the datasets necessary to inform the observations of future flagships like the Habitable Worlds Observatory.9

2.2 Payload Architecture and Optical Design

The SPARCS payload is a marvel of optical engineering within a constrained volume. The entire instrument fits within a 3U volume (approximately 10 x 10 x 30 cm) of the 6U spacecraft.9 The optical train centers on a reflecting telescope with a primary mirror diameter of 9 centimeters.14 While small compared to ground-based behemoths, in the UV, where the background sky is dark, a 9 cm aperture provides significant sensitivity.

To maximize reliability and minimize cost, the optical design avoids moving parts such as filter wheels. Instead, the system relies on a dichroic beam splitter to achieve simultaneous multi-band imaging. Light collected by the telescope impinges on the dichroic element, which is engineered with specialized dielectric coatings. This optic acts as a spectral traffic cop:

  • Reflection: It reflects Far-Ultraviolet (FUV) light (covering the 153–171 nm band) toward one detector.

  • Transmission: It allows Near-Ultraviolet (NUV) light (covering the 260–300 nm band) to pass through to a second detector.9

This simultaneity is critical. During a stellar flare, the "color" of the flare—the ratio of FUV to NUV flux—changes rapidly as the plasma cools. Measuring this spectral slope evolution allows astrophysicists to model the physics of the flare and its impact on a planetary atmosphere with far greater fidelity than a single-band measurement could provide.9 The specific bands were chosen to capture key emission lines: the FUV band encompasses the C IV (Carbon IV) and He II (Helium II) lines, which are tracers of the transition region in the stellar atmosphere, while the NUV band centers on the Mg II (Magnesium II) line, a chromospheric tracer.15

2.3 Detector Physics: The Delta-Doped CCD

The scientific viability of SPARCS hinges on its ability to detect UV photons efficiently. Standard silicon Charge-Coupled Devices (CCDs) face a fundamental physics problem when imaging in the ultraviolet.

In a typical CCD, photons enter the silicon and generate electron-hole pairs. These electrons are then collected in "potential wells" to form an image. However, UV photons have very short absorption lengths in silicon; they are absorbed almost immediately upon entering the material, typically within a few nanometers of the surface.16 In a standard front-illuminated CCD, the front surface is covered by polysilicon gate structures (the electrodes used to move the charge). These gates absorb the UV light before it ever reaches the photosensitive silicon, rendering the detector blind in the UV.

Back-illuminated CCDs solve the gate absorption problem by thinning the silicon and illuminating it from the back. However, a new problem arises: the interaction between the silicon surface and the silicon dioxide passivation layer creates a "potential pocket" or trap near the surface. Electrons generated by UV photons (which are produced right at this surface) get trapped in this pocket and recombine, never reaching the collection well. This results in poor and unstable Quantum Efficiency (QE).17

SPARCS utilizes a breakthrough technology developed at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) called delta-doping.9 This process modifies the backside of the CCD at the atomic level. Using Molecular Beam Epitaxy (MBE)—a technique used to grow crystals one atomic layer at a time—technicians deposit a nanometer-thin layer of silicon heavily doped with boron atoms. Specifically, about 30% of a monolayer of boron is incorporated into the crystal lattice.19

The introduction of this high concentration of boron atoms creates a sharp, permanent negative charge density at the surface. This alters the electronic band structure of the silicon, bending the bands in a way that eliminates the surface potential pocket. Instead of being trapped, the photoelectrons are driven away from the surface and into the collection wells.20 The result is a detector with 100% internal quantum efficiency—every photon that enters the silicon and generates an electron is counted.19

To maximize the number of photons that enter the silicon (external QE), the detectors are coated with custom anti-reflection (AR) coatings using Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD). The combination of delta-doping and ALD coatings allows the SPARCS detectors to achieve external QEs greater than 50% in the UV bands, a dramatic improvement over previous technologies.21 Furthermore, delta-doped devices are exceptionally robust against the damaging effects of UV radiation, ensuring the instrument remains stable over its one-year mission.17

2.4 Thermal and Attitude Control Challenges

Detecting faint UV signals requires an extremely low-noise environment. "Dark current"—the thermal generation of electrons within the detector—can easily swamp the signal from a distant M-dwarf. To suppress dark current, the SPARCS detectors must be maintained at a temperature of approximately 238 Kelvin (-35 degrees Celsius).9

Achieving this temperature in a Sun-synchronous orbit without power-hungry cryocoolers requires a passive thermal design. SPARCS employs a large deployable radiator with a surface area of 1200 square centimeters. The thermal control concept of operations (CONOPS) dictates that this radiator must always point toward deep space to dump heat. This imposes a rigorous constraint on the attitude control system: the spacecraft must perform a rotation maneuver every half-orbit to prevent the radiator from facing the warm Earth or Sun.9

The spacecraft bus utilizes a commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) attitude determination and control system (ADCS), likely the Blue Canyon Technologies (BCT) XACT unit. This system uses reaction wheels to maintain precise pointing. The mission requirements allow for a pointing jitter (stability) of approximately 6 arcseconds over a 10-minute exposure.9 To manage the angular momentum that builds up in the reaction wheels (due to external torques like solar pressure and atmospheric drag), the spacecraft uses magnetic torque rods. These rods interact with the Earth's magnetic field to "dump" momentum, avoiding the need for a complex and life-limited propulsive thruster system for reaction wheel desaturation.9

2.5 Operational Profile and Target Selection

SPARCS will operate in a Sun-synchronous terminator orbit (roughly 6 pm / 6 am local time equator crossing). This specific orbit is chosen because the spacecraft rides the line between day and night, allowing the solar panels to see the Sun continuously while the telescope looks out into the dark sky, free from the periodic eclipses that would occur in a noon-midnight orbit.22 This uninterrupted viewing capability is essential for catching the start and end of long-duration stellar flares.

The mission's reference target list includes approximately 10 to 20 stars, covering a range of ages and activity levels (active vs. inactive).9 Specific targets mentioned include BZ Cet (HIP 13976) and TW PsA (GJ 879).23 The spacecraft will stare at each target for 5 to 40 days continuously.13 This "deep drill" approach will provide the most comprehensive catalog of M-dwarf UV activity ever assembled, fundamentally changing our understanding of the habitability of the galaxy's most common planets.

2.6 Comparative Mission Data

Parameter

Specification

Form Factor

6U CubeSat

Telescope Aperture

9 cm

Bands

FUV (153–171 nm), NUV (260–300 nm)

Detectors

Delta-doped CCDs (JPL)

Cooling

Passive Radiator (238 K)

Orbit

Sun-Synchronous Terminator

Target Duration

5–40 days per star

Primary Science

M-dwarf flare monitoring, Exoplanet habitability

3. The Transient Sky: BlackCAT SmallSat

3.1 Scientific Motivation: The High-Energy Universe

Launching alongside SPARCS on the SpaceX Twilight mission is the Black Hole Coded Aperture Telescope (BlackCAT), a 6U CubeSat mission led by Penn State University.12 While SPARCS is a "starer," focused on individual targets, BlackCAT is a "scanner," designed to monitor wide swathes of the sky for sudden, violent events.

The high-energy universe (X-rays and Gamma-rays) is dominated by transient phenomena—events that flash into existence and then fade. These include Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs), which are the most luminous explosions in the universe, often signaling the birth of a black hole or the collision of neutron stars. The latter events are of particular interest because they are the counterparts to gravitational waves detected by observatories like LIGO and Virgo. Catching the "electromagnetic counterpart" to a gravitational wave event is the holy grail of multi-messenger astronomy, as it provides crucial details about the environment and physics of the merger.4

However, these events are unpredictable. To catch them, you need a telescope with a very wide Field of View (FOV). Traditional focusing X-ray telescopes (like NASA's Chandra or NuSTAR) use grazing-incidence mirrors that are heavy, expensive, and have tunnel-vision FOVs (often less than a degree). They are ill-suited for hunting random flashes in the dark.

3.2 The Physics of Coded Aperture Imaging

To achieve a wide field of view within the compact volume of a CubeSat, BlackCAT employs a technique known as Coded Aperture Imaging. This method avoids the use of lenses or mirrors entirely. Instead, it operates on the principle of the pinhole camera, but with a twist.

A single pinhole allows for imaging but lets in very little light (low throughput). If you simply add more pinholes to increase throughput, the images from the different holes overlap, creating a blurry mess. However, if the pattern of holes is carefully chosen—specifically, if it is a mathematically defined "Uniformly Redundant Array" (URA)—the overlapping shadows can be disentangled mathematically.25

The BlackCAT instrument features a coded mask made of gold-plated nickel. Gold is chosen for its high density and high atomic number, which makes it opaque to X-rays.26 This mask is placed in front of the detector plane. When X-rays from a celestial source illuminate the front of the instrument, they cast a shadow of the mask onto the detectors. Because the source is effectively at infinity, the position of the shadow on the detector depends on the angle of the incoming X-rays.27

By analyzing the shift of the shadow pattern, the onboard computer can reconstruct the location of the source in the sky. The image reconstruction process involves a mathematical operation called deconvolution (or correlation) between the recorded detector image and the known mask pattern. This technique allows BlackCAT to achieve a massive field of view while maintaining the ability to pinpoint the location of new X-ray sources with high precision.28

3.3 Hybrid CMOS Detectors: Speedster-EXD550

The detection plane of BlackCAT represents another technological leap. It utilizes four Speedster-EXD550 Hybrid CMOS Detectors (HCDs) developed by Teledyne and Penn State.26

Traditional CCDs read out their pixels sequentially, shifting charge row by row. This is a relatively slow process. In contrast, the Speedster-EXD550 is a Hybrid CMOS device. The "Hybrid" designation means the detector consists of two layers bonded together: a silicon absorber layer (which detects the X-rays) and a CMOS readout integrated circuit (ROIC).29

Crucially, these detectors are event-driven. They do not read out the entire array every frame. Instead, individual pixels trigger a readout only when they are struck by an X-ray photon. This sparse readout mode allows for extremely high time resolution (microsecond scale) and low power consumption, both of which are vital for a CubeSat monitoring fast transients.4

The Speedster detectors do have higher read noise and a phenomenon known as "random telegraph noise" (fluctuations in the output voltage) compared to the pristine quiet of a CCD. To mitigate this and match the resolution of the coded mask, the instrument employs on-board binning. It combines the signals from physical pixels (40 microns) into "super-pixels" (320 x 320 microns).27 This binning improves the Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) and simplifies the data processing load.

3.4 Operational Strategy

BlackCAT is designed to operate in a dawn-dusk Sun-synchronous orbit. The spacecraft will maintain a fixed attitude, pointing generally in the anti-Sun direction. This "zenith-like" pointing simplifies thermal control (keeping the sun on the solar panels and off the radiator) and ensures the instrument is always looking at the dark sky.26

Upon detecting a transient event (like a GRB), the onboard software will calculate its coordinates in real-time. The mission architecture includes a capability for rapid downlink of these alert coordinates, allowing the global astronomical community to slew massive ground-based and space-based telescopes to the target within minutes. This "trigger" capability makes BlackCAT a force multiplier for the entire field of high-energy astrophysics.

4. Persistent Vision: The ICEYE SmallSat Constellation

4.1 The SAR Revolution

Leaving the realm of astrophysics, we turn our gaze downward to the Earth. ICEYE, a Finnish aerospace company, has pioneered the miniaturization of Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), transforming it from a capability possessed only by superpowers to a commercial commodity available on a microsatellite platform.

SAR differs fundamentally from optical imaging. Optical satellites (like Google Earth or Planet satellites) rely on sunlight reflected off the Earth. This means they are blind at night and blocked by clouds, fog, or smoke. SAR is an "active" sensor. It transmits its own microwave pulses and records the echoes that bounce back. Because microwaves can penetrate clouds and darkness, SAR provides 24/7, all-weather monitoring.5

Achieving SAR on a small satellite is an immense engineering challenge. The "Aperture" in Synthetic Aperture Radar refers to the antenna size. In radar physics, resolution is typically limited by the size of the antenna; a larger antenna yields better resolution. A physical antenna large enough to provide high-resolution images from space would be hundreds of meters long. SAR circumvents this by using the motion of the satellite. As the satellite flies along its orbit, it transmits pulses at a target. By combining the returns from these pulses computationally, it simulates a much larger antenna—one the length of the satellite's flight path during the imaging interval.

4.2 Instrument Specifications and Modes

The ICEYE satellites employ an X-band radar (9.65 GHz).5 The choice of X-band is strategic; the shorter wavelength (approx. 3 cm) allows for smaller physical antennas than L-band or C-band radars while still providing high resolution. The antenna itself is a 3.2-meter by 0.4-meter active phased array.5 This antenna is electronically steerable, meaning the beam can be directed without physically rotating the satellite.

This electronic agility allows ICEYE satellites to operate in several distinct modes:

  • Stripmap Mode: The antenna beam is fixed at a specific angle relative to the satellite. As the satellite moves, it images a continuous strip of the ground. This mode offers a balance between resolution (approx. 3 meters) and coverage area.31

  • Spotlight Mode: This is the high-resolution mode. As the satellite flies over a target, the phased array electronically steers the beam backward to keep it locked on the target for a longer duration. This increases the "dwell time" or the length of the synthetic aperture, improving the resolution to 25 centimeters or better.30 This allows for the identification of specific vehicles, aircraft types, or infrastructure damage.

  • Scan Mode: The beam is swept over a wide area, sacrificing resolution (15 meters) to cover immense swathes of ocean or land (100 x 100 km). This is ideal for maritime surveillance, such as tracking illegal fishing fleets or oil spills.31

The radar system operates with a high Pulse Repetition Frequency (PRF) of 2–10 kHz and generates a peak Radio Frequency (RF) power of roughly 4 kW.5 Generating this level of power on a satellite that weighs less than 100 kg 31 requires advanced power management systems, likely involving high-discharge battery banks that are charged slowly by solar panels and discharged rapidly during imaging passes.

4.3 Interferometry and Propulsion

A critical advanced capability of the ICEYE constellation is Interferometric SAR (InSAR). InSAR is a technique used to measure minute changes in the Earth's surface topography. It works by taking two SAR images of the exact same location from two slightly different positions (or the same position at different times).

When the radar wave travels to the ground and back, it accumulates a phase delay based on the distance. If the ground moves—even by a fraction of a wavelength (millimeters)—between the two acquisitions, the phase of the returned signal will change. By subtracting the phase of the first image from the second, an "interferogram" is generated. This colorful fringe pattern reveals ground deformation with millimeter-level precision.32

For InSAR to work, the satellite must return to the exact same point in space to take the second image; if the baseline (the distance between the two orbital tracks) is too large, the geometric decorrelation ruins the measurement. To achieve this, ICEYE satellites are equipped with electric propulsion systems, specifically ion thrusters (likely Hall-effect thrusters using xenon or iodine propellant).33

Unlike chemical thrusters, which provide high thrust but burn fuel quickly, ion thrusters use electric and magnetic fields to accelerate ions to extremely high velocities. This gives them a very high Specific Impulse (Isp), making them fuel-efficient. ICEYE uses these thrusters to precisely adjust the semi-major axis of the orbit, tuning the orbital period so that the satellite repeats its ground track exactly every day (a "daily coherent ground track repeat").33 This allows the constellation to monitor subsiding cities, shifting fault lines, or the structural integrity of dams with unprecedented temporal resolution.

4.4 Constellation Agility

The power of ICEYE lies not just in the individual satellite, but in the constellation. By launching large numbers of satellites (replenished regularly via missions like Transporter-13) 35, ICEYE reduces the "revisit time"—the time between passes over a specific target. The constellation is optimized to provide sub-hourly monitoring of key latitudes, effectively creating a near-real-time radar video of the planet.30

Parameter

Specification

Mass

~85 kg

Frequency

X-band (9.65 GHz)

Antenna

3.2m x 0.4m Active Phased Array

Peak Power

4 kW

Resolution

Up to 25 cm (Spotlight)

Propulsion

Ion / Electric Propulsion

Key Capability

Daily Coherent Ground Track Repeat (InSAR)

5. Construction in the Void: Araqys and Dcubed - More SmallSats

5.1 The Launch Volume Bottleneck

Every spacecraft ever launched has been constrained by a single physical parameter: the size of the rocket fairing. Whether it is the James Webb Space Telescope folding itself like origami or a CubeSat packing deployable antennas, the need to fit inside a cylinder for launch dictates the design of the spacecraft. This constraint leads to complex, heavy, and failure-prone mechanisms.

Dcubed, a German space hardware manufacturer, is challenging this paradigm with its Araqys program. The goal is simple but revolutionary: In-Space Manufacturing (ISM). Instead of folding a large structure to fit in a rocket, Araqys proposes to launch the raw materials and manufacture the structure in orbit.8

5.2 The Araqys Roadmap

The Araqys program is structured as a series of increasingly ambitious demonstration missions, culminating in the ability to produce kilowatt-scale power systems for small satellites.

  1. Araqys-D1 ("Boom! There It Is"): Scheduled for Q1 2026, this 3U CubeSat will demonstrate the fundamental manufacturing process. Its objective is to manufacture a 60-centimeter structural boom in the vacuum of space.8

  2. Araqys-D2 ("Watts New in Space"): Launching shortly after D1, this mission will fly aboard an Exotrail SpaceVan (an orbital transfer vehicle). It will take the manufacturing process a step further by printing a structure to support a flexible solar blanket, creating a functional 1-meter-long solar array.8

  3. Araqys-D3: Planned for Q1 2027, this mission will combine the technologies to manufacture a massive 15-meter solar array capable of generating 2 kilowatts of power.8

5.3 Photopolymer Extrusion Technology

The core technology enabling Araqys is photopolymer extrusion. This is essentially a form of 3D printing adapted for the harsh environment of space.37

The process works as follows:

  • Pre-Launch Storage: The structural material is stored as a liquid photopolymer resin inside the satellite. This is extremely volume-efficient compared to a folded solid structure.

  • Extrusion: Once in orbit, the resin is pumped through a nozzle. The nozzle shapes the resin into the desired cross-section (e.g., a truss or a rod).

  • Curing: As the resin exits the nozzle, it is exposed to UV light. This light can come from onboard LED arrays or, in some designs, directly from the Sun. The UV photons trigger a chemical reaction (polymerization) in the resin, causing it to cross-link and harden instantly into a rigid solid.37

This process addresses several key challenges. Unlike "tape spring" booms (like a carpenter's tape measure), which are flimsy and have complex dynamic behaviors (wobbling), the printed trusses can be designed with high stiffness and specific geometries optimized for the mission.37 The D1 mission is critical for validating the physics of this process in LEO. Key questions include: Will the volatile components of the resin boil off or outgas explosively in the vacuum before curing? How will the extreme thermal gradients (sunlight vs. shadow) affect the curing uniformity? Experiments on sounding rockets and parabolic flights suggest the process is viable, but D1 will be the definitive orbital test.38

5.4 Strategic Implications

The success of Araqys would decouple satellite power from satellite size. Currently, a high-power satellite (e.g., for radar, jamming, or edge computing) must be large to support large solar panels. With ISM, a small 6U CubeSat could extrude a solar array larger than that of a traditional 500 kg satellite. This would dramatically lower the cost of high-power space applications, enabling new classes of missions such as orbital data centers or high-power electric tugs.8

6. The Optical Backbone: Kepler and the AETHER SmallSat Network

6.1 The Downlink Bottleneck

As sensors improve (like BlackCAT's event-driven detectors or ICEYE's high-res radar), the amount of data generated in orbit is exploding. However, the pipe to the ground remains narrow. Traditional Radio Frequency (RF) downlinks are limited by bandwidth and geometry. A satellite can only downlink data when it is physically visible to a ground station antenna—typically for only 10 minutes out of a 90-minute orbit.

Kepler Communications is solving this latency and bandwidth problem with the Kepler Network (formerly known as AETHER).1 Kepler is building an Internet-like infrastructure in LEO. Instead of a satellite storing data and waiting to fly over a ground station ("Store-and-Forward"), it transmits its data to a Kepler satellite via an inter-satellite link. The data is then routed through the Kepler constellation and down to the ground immediately.

6.2 Optical Inter-Satellite Links (OISL)

The key enabler for this network is Optical Inter-Satellite Links (OISL), or laser communications. RF signals spread out as they travel, requiring large antennas and high power to close links over long distances. Lasers, however, are highly collimated. They can transmit massive amounts of data over thousands of kilometers with relatively low power.

The Kepler Gen2 satellites are equipped with Optical Communication Terminals (OCTs), specifically the Tesat SCOT80.40 These terminals can transmit data at speeds of up to 2.5 Gigabits per second (Gbps).7

Crucially, Kepler has aligned its technology with the Space Development Agency (SDA) standards.41 The SDA is building a massive mesh network for the US Department of Defense (the Proliferated Warfighter Space Architecture). By adopting the SDA optical standard, Kepler ensures that its commercial satellites can talk to government satellites, as well as satellites from other commercial vendors who follow the standard. This interoperability is akin to the standardization of Wi-Fi or Ethernet; it allows for a heterogenous network where different satellites can seamlessly exchange data.

In mid-2024, Kepler demonstrated the first successful SDA-compatible optical links between two of its Pathfinder satellites, verifying the acquisition, tracking, and data transfer protocols.41

6.3 Hybrid Network Architecture

While the space segment relies on lasers, the link to the ground remains a challenge for optics due to clouds (which block lasers). To ensure high reliability, the Kepler Network employs a hybrid architecture:

  • Space-to-Space: Optical (Laser) links for high-speed, low-latency relay between satellites.

  • Space-to-Ground: High-capacity Ku-band RF links for the backhaul to Earth.42

  • Telemetry: Always-on S-band links for command and control.40

This architecture allows a customer satellite (like a Spire weather satellite) to offload its data via laser to a Kepler satellite, which then routes it to a Kepler gateway ground station via RF. This allows for "real-time, all-the-time" connectivity, fundamentally changing how satellite constellations are operated.40

7. The Atmosphere Scanner: Spire Global SmallSat (nanosat) Constellation

7.1 Radio Occultation Physics

Spire Global operates the world's largest multi-purpose constellation of nanosatellites, known as LEMURs. While Spire is known for tracking ships (AIS) and planes (ADS-B), its most scientifically complex capability is GNSS Radio Occultation (GNSS-RO).6

Radio Occultation is a remote sensing technique that treats the atmosphere as a lens. Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS)—like GPS, Galileo, and GLONASS—constantly broadcast radio signals toward the Earth. A Spire satellite in LEO "listens" for these signals as a GPS satellite rises or sets behind the Earth's limb.

As the radio signal passes through the atmosphere, it interacts with the air molecules. The density of the atmosphere changes the refractive index of the medium, causing the radio wave to slow down and bend (refract). By measuring the precise phase delay and bending angle of the signal, Spire's instrument—called STRATOS—can mathematically reconstruct the properties of the atmosphere along the signal path.44

From this bending angle, scientists can derive vertical profiles of temperature, pressure, and water vapor with high vertical resolution. These profiles are distinct from the data provided by traditional weather satellites (which look down and measure infrared or microwave radiance) and are free from calibration drift. This makes GNSS-RO data incredibly valuable for Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) models, such as the ECMWF model or NOAA's GFS, where it is used to correct biases in the initial conditions of the forecast.46

7.2 Polarimetric RO and Ionosphere Monitoring

The capabilities of the LEMUR platform have evolved. Recent satellites are equipped with Polarimetric Radio Occultation (PRO) sensors. Traditional RO uses unpolarized or circularly polarized signals. However, heavy precipitation (large raindrops or ice crystals) is often non-spherical (oblate). This asymmetry causes the horizontal and vertical components of the radio wave to experience different phase delays (a phenomenon called differential phase shift).

By measuring this difference, Spire can detect heavy precipitation events and distinguish between rain, snow, and ice within the cloud structure.47 This provides a unique internal view of storm systems that complements the cloud-top views from geostationary satellites.

Furthermore, before the GPS signal reaches the atmosphere, it passes through the ionosphere—the layer of charged particles at the edge of space. The electrons in the ionosphere also delay the signal. Spire processes this data to map the Total Electron Content (TEC), providing global monitoring of space weather. Space weather events (solar storms) can disrupt communications and GPS accuracy, making this data vital for aviation and military users.48

7.3 Convergence: Optical Integration

In a move that mirrors Kepler, Spire has begun integrating Optical Inter-Satellite Links (OISL) onto its LEMUR satellites. The Transporter-13 mission included LEMURs equipped with optical terminals.49

For a weather company, speed is product. A weather observation is a perishable commodity; its value drops rapidly as time passes. By linking its satellites with lasers, Spire can route weather data through its own constellation to the nearest ground station immediately, rather than storing it on board. This convergence of sensing (RO) and transport (Optical) on a single platform illustrates the increasing sophistication of the CubeSat ecosystem.

8. Conclusion: The Integrated LEO Ecosystem

The six missions analyzed in this report—SPARCS, BlackCAT, ICEYE, Araqys, Kepler, and Spire—collectively demonstrate that the era of the "SmallSat" as a mere educational tool or technology demonstrator is over. We have entered an era of specialization and integration.

  • Specialization: SPARCS and BlackCAT prove that even the most demanding scientific fields—UV and X-ray astrophysics—can be addressed by CubeSats through the use of specialized, physics-based innovations like delta-doped CCDs and coded aperture masks. These missions are not toys; they are filling critical data gaps left by billion-dollar flagships.

  • Infrastructure: Kepler and Araqys are building the "roads and power lines" of space. Kepler's optical network solves the data transport problem, while Araqys's in-space manufacturing attempts to solve the power and structure problem.

  • Constellation Physics: ICEYE and Spire demonstrate that quantity has a quality all its own. By deploying swarms of sensors, they achieve temporal resolutions (revisit rates) that are physically impossible for monolithic satellites, changing how we monitor the Earth's changing surface and atmosphere.

As these technologies mature in the 2025-2026 timeframe, the LEO environment will transition from a collection of isolated experiments into a cohesive, interoperable ecosystem where data flows at the speed of light between sensors, relays, and the ground, and where satellites can potentially repair or upgrade themselves. The monolith is dead; long live the swarm.

9. Data Tables

Table 1: Comparative Mission Parameters

Mission

Type

Key Technology

Primary Goal

Orbit

SPARCS

6U CubeSat

Delta-doped CCDs (UV)

M-dwarf Habitability

Sun-Sync Terminator

BlackCAT

6U CubeSat

Coded Aperture / Hybrid CMOS

X-ray Transients (GRBs)

Sun-Sync Dawn-Dusk

ICEYE

Microsat (~85kg)

X-band Phased Array SAR

Earth Obs / InSAR

Sun-Sync / Inclined

Araqys-D1

3U CubeSat

Photopolymer Extrusion

In-Space Manufacturing

LEO

Kepler

6U+ CubeSat

Optical Inter-Satellite Links

Data Relay Network

LEO (Various Planes)

Spire

3U/6U CubeSat

GNSS-RO / Polarimetry

Weather / Maritime

LEO (Various Planes)

Table 2: Detector Technology Comparison

Instrument

Detector Type

Mechanism

Advantage

SPARCS UV Camera

Delta-doped Silicon CCD

Atomic surface passivation via MBE

100% Internal QE in UV; Stability

BlackCAT X-ray

Hybrid CMOS (Speedster-EXD550)

Event-driven readout

Microsecond timing; Low power

ICEYE Radar

Active Phased Array Antenna

Electronic Beam Steering

Agility; InSAR precision

Spire STRATOS

GNSS Receiver (Software Defined)

Phase/Doppler shift measurement

Vertically resolved atmospheric profiles

Works cited

  1. Kepler to launch historic satellite network on SpaceX rocket this Sunday, accessed January 11, 2026, https://betakit.com/kepler-to-launch-historic-satellite-network-on-spacex-rocket-this-sunday/

  2. Twilight Mission - SpaceX, accessed January 11, 2026, https://www.spacex.com/launches/twilight

  3. Star-Planet Activity Research CubeSat (SPARCS) - Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, accessed January 11, 2026, https://lpl.arizona.edu/missions/sparcs

  4. Current Projects – The Falcone Group - Sites at Penn State, accessed January 11, 2026, https://sites.psu.edu/headilab/current-projects/

  5. ICEYE Microsatellites Constellation - eoPortal, accessed January 11, 2026, https://www.eoportal.org/satellite-missions/iceye-constellation

  6. Satellite: Lemur-2 - WMO OSCAR, accessed January 11, 2026, https://space.oscar.wmo.int/satellites/view/lemur_2

  7. Delivering Data at Lightspeed - Kepler Communications, accessed January 11, 2026, https://kepler.space/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Optical-Datasheet-v6-2025-1.pdf

  8. Dcubed To Demo In-Space Solar Manufacturing in 2026, accessed January 11, 2026, https://payloadspace.com/dcubed-to-demo-in-space-solar-manufacturing-in-2026/

  9. SPARCS (Star-Planet Activity Research CubeSat) - eoPortal, accessed January 11, 2026, https://www.eoportal.org/satellite-missions/sparcs

  10. SPARCS: Home page, accessed January 11, 2026, https://sparcs.asu.edu/

  11. About | SPARCS - Arizona State University, accessed January 11, 2026, https://sparcs.asu.edu/about

  12. A cereal-box-sized space telescope heads for the stars | ASU News, accessed January 11, 2026, https://news.asu.edu/20260108-science-and-technology-asu-built-cubesat-sparcs-spacex-launch-weekend

  13. Building SPARCS, an ultraviolet science CubeSat for exoplanet habitability studies, technology advancements, and mission training - SPIE Digital Library, accessed January 11, 2026, https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/journals/Journal-of-Astronomical-Telescopes-Instruments-and-Systems/volume-11/issue-4/042212/Building-SPARCS-an-ultraviolet-science-CubeSat-for-exoplanet-habitability-studies/10.1117/1.JATIS.11.4.042212.full

  14. Monitoring the high-energy radiation environment of exoplanets around low-mass stars with SPARCS (Star-Planet Activity Research CubeSat) - Arizona State University, accessed January 11, 2026, https://sparcs.asu.edu/sites/g/files/litvpz1881/files/2021-10/scowen_sparcs_spie.pdf

  15. The Star-Planet Activity Research CubeSat (SPARCS): A Mission to Understand the Impact of Stars in Exoplanets - DigitalCommons@USU, accessed January 11, 2026, https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4251&context=smallsat

  16. Delta - Space Telescope Science Institute, accessed January 11, 2026, https://www.stsci.edu/stsci/meetings/space_detectors/nikzad.htm

  17. Surface Passivation by Quantum Exclusion: On the Quantum Efficiency and Stability of Delta-Doped CCDs and CMOS Image Sensors in Space - NIH, accessed January 11, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10747789/

  18. Orbital - Microdevices Laboratory - NASA, accessed January 11, 2026, https://microdevices.jpl.nasa.gov/capabilities/advanced-detectors/orbital/

  19. Delta-Doped CCDs for Enhanced UV Performance - NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS), accessed January 11, 2026, https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20210004375

  20. Surface Passivation by Quantum Exclusion: On the Quantum Efficiency and Stability of Delta-Doped CCDs and CMOS Image Sensors in Space - MDPI, accessed January 11, 2026, https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/24/9857

  21. Delta-doped electron-multiplied CCD with absolute quantum efficiency over 50% in the near to far ultraviolet range for single photon counting applications - Caltech Authors, accessed January 11, 2026, https://authors.library.caltech.edu/records/zdazr-48k32

  22. The Star-Planet Activity Research CubeSat (SPARCS): A Mission to Understand the Impact of Stars in Exoplanets - NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS), accessed January 11, 2026, https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20210008700

  23. Building SPARCS, an Ultraviolet Science CubeSat for Exoplanet Habitability Studies, Technology Advancements, and Mission Training - arXiv, accessed January 11, 2026, https://arxiv.org/html/2507.03102v1

  24. Penn State astrophysicist to lead $5.8 million NASA CubeSat mission, accessed January 11, 2026, https://www.psu.edu/news/research/story/penn-state-astrophysicist-lead-58-million-nasa-cubesat-mission

  25. Design of the Coded Aperture Mask - AstroSat - IUCAA, accessed January 11, 2026, https://astrosat.iucaa.in/node/39

  26. Calibration measurements for the BlackCAT CubeSat x-ray coded aperture telescope - SPIE Digital Library, accessed January 11, 2026, https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of-spie/13625/136251R/Calibration-measurements-for-the-BlackCAT-CubeSat-x-ray-coded-aperture/10.1117/12.3065260.full

  27. BlackCAT: an upcoming soft x-ray coded aperture telescope on a 6U CubeSat - SPIE Digital Library, accessed January 11, 2026, https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of-spie/13093/1309317/BlackCAT--an-upcoming-soft-x-ray-coded-aperture-telescope/10.1117/12.3020370.full

  28. Coded aperture - Wikipedia, accessed January 11, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coded_aperture

  29. [1807.03333] BlackCAT CubeSat: A Soft X-ray Sky Monitor, accessed January 11, 2026, https://ar5iv.labs.arxiv.org/html/1807.03333

  30. Design | Satellites - ICEYE, accessed January 11, 2026, https://www.iceye.com/satellites/design

  31. ICEYE Overview - ESA Earth Online - European Space Agency, accessed January 11, 2026, https://earth.esa.int/eogateway/missions/iceye/description

  32. Interferometry - NASA Science, accessed January 11, 2026, https://science.nasa.gov/mission/nisar/interferometry/

  33. Technology - ICEYE, accessed January 11, 2026, https://www.iceye.com/technology

  34. SAR PRODUCT GUIDE - ESA Earth Online, accessed January 11, 2026, https://earth.esa.int/eogateway/documents/20142/37627/ICEYE-SAR-Product-Guide-V4.pdf

  35. Exolaunch Hits 500th Satellite Deployed Milestone During the Transporter-13 Rideshare Mission with SpaceX, Completing First Flight of New “Quadro” Separation System, accessed January 11, 2026, https://www.exolaunch.com/news_122.html

  36. Dcubed Powers Ahead: Introducing ARAQYS – The Power Solution for Space, accessed January 11, 2026, https://dcubed.space/dcubed-powers-ahead-introducing-araqys-the-power-solution-for-space/

  37. ARAQYS-D2: Towards the first On-Orbit Demonstration of In-Space Manufacturing for Large-Area Solar Arrays, accessed January 11, 2026, https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/pdf/10.2514/6.2026-0614

  38. In-Space Manufacturing by Photopolymer Extrusion: Investigation of different photopolymers under vacuum conditions - Technical University of Munich, accessed January 11, 2026, https://portal.fis.tum.de/en/publications/in-space-manufacturing-by-photopolymer-extrusion-investigation-of/

  39. Dcubed's New ARAQYS Platform Could 3D Print Kilowatts of Power in Space by 2027, accessed January 11, 2026, https://3dprint.com/322514/dcubeds-new-araqys-platform-could-3d-print-kilowatts-of-power-in-space-by-2027/

  40. KEPLER SELECTS TESAT TO PROVIDE OPTICAL TERMINALS FOR NEXT GENERATION CONSTELLATION, accessed January 11, 2026, https://www.tesat.de/news/press/926-kepler-selects-tesat-to-provide-optical-terminals-for-next-generation-constellation

  41. Results of SDA-standard-compatible optical inter-satellite link testing between Kepler Communications LEO satellites - SPIE Digital Library, accessed January 11, 2026, https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of-spie/13355/1335502/Results-of-SDA-standard-compatible-optical-inter-satellite-link-testing/10.1117/12.3043717.full

  42. High-Speed Downlink Solutions - Kepler Communications, accessed January 11, 2026, https://kepler.space/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/HSD-Ku-Datasheet-v1.1.pdf

  43. Spire Global Nanosatellite Constellation - eoPortal, accessed January 11, 2026, https://www.eoportal.org/satellite-missions/spire-global

  44. GNSS-RO | GNSS Radio Occultation - geodesy.science - IAG website, accessed January 11, 2026, https://geodesy.science/glossary/gnss-ro-gnss-radio-occultation/

  45. Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) radio occultation climatologies mapped by machine learning and Bayesian interpolation - AMT, accessed January 11, 2026, https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/18/57/

  46. GNSS radio occultation lecture 2 impact/some applications - ECMWF Events (Indico), accessed January 11, 2026, https://events.ecmwf.int/event/437/contributions/4756/attachments/2701/4934/gnssro_lecture2_SH_2025_nwpsaf.pdf

  47. Initial Polarimetric Radio Occultation Results from Spire's Nanosatellite Constellation: Satellite Payload, Collection, and Calibration in - AMS Journals, accessed January 11, 2026, https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/bams/106/4/BAMS-D-23-0314.1.xml

  48. CSDA Vendor - Spire - NASA Science, accessed January 11, 2026, https://science.nasa.gov/earth-science/csda/vendor-spire/

  49. Spire Achieves Two-Way Laser Communication Between Satellites in Space, accessed January 11, 2026, https://spire.com/press-release/spire-achieves-two-way-laser-communication-between-satellites-in-space/

Comments

bottom of page