The Eight-Hour FAA Interdiction: How Directed Energy and Interagency Discord Grounded El Paso Airspace

Abstract

On the night of February 10, 2026, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issued a directive that effectively erased El Paso, Texas, from the National Airspace System. Citing "special security reasons," the agency designated the skies over the nation's 23rd-largest city as "National Defense Airspace," halting all civil aviation for a projected ten-day period. While the order was rescinded less than eight hours later, the incident—precipitated by the uncoordinated deployment of directed energy weapons (DEW) by the newly rebranded Department of War—exposed a critical fault line between national defense imperatives and civil infrastructure. This article reconstructs the event, analyzes the physics of high-energy lasers that necessitated the shutdown, and examines the legal and human consequences of militarizing the domestic skies.

Introduction: The Night the Sky Closed

For residents of the borderland, the hum of aviation is a constant, a sonic backdrop to life in a metropolis that spans two nations. But in the early hours of February 11, 2026, that rhythm was abruptly severed. At 11:30 PM Mountain Standard Time, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) activated Notice to Air Missions (NOTAM) FDC 6/2233, a directive that carried the weight of a wartime siege. The order defined a ten-nautical-mile radius around El Paso International Airport (ELP) as "National Defense Airspace," strictly prohibiting all flight operations from the surface up to 17,999 feet.¹

The language of the directive was stark, warning that any pilot breaching the invisible dome could be "intercepted, detained and interviewed," and that the United States government was authorized to use "deadly force" against aircraft deemed an imminent security threat.² Most alarmingly, the closure was not scheduled for a few hours, but for ten days, set to expire on February 21.¹

By sunrise, the implications of this "hard stop" were rippling through the city’s arteries. Medical evacuation flights carrying critical patients were diverted to Las Cruces, New Mexico, forty miles away.⁴ Surgical equipment destined for local hospitals was stranded on tarmacs in Dallas and Phoenix.⁴ The city’s mayor, Renard Johnson, awoke to what he described as "chaos," having received no prior warning that his city’s primary economic engine had been shuttered by the federal government.⁴

While the restriction was lifted at 7:24 AM the following morning—after the cancellation of 19% of the day's traffic—the event left a lingering question: What threat was severe enough to warrant the isolation of nearly 700,000 American citizens, yet fleeting enough to vanish by breakfast?.⁵ The answer lies in the convergence of cartel drone tactics, the aggressive posture of the Trump administration’s Department of War, and the unforgiving physics of laser warfare.

The Timeline of Disruption

To understand the friction between the agencies involved, one must look at the sequence of the shutdown. The closure was not a gradual restriction but a guillotine drop on operations.

Time (MST)	Event	Operational Details	Citation
Feb 10, 10:30 PM	Final Arrival	American Airlines Flight 1525 lands from Dallas. It is the last commercial aircraft to enter El Paso airspace before the lockdown.	5
Feb 10, 11:30 PM	NOTAM Activation	NOTAM FDC 6/2233 becomes active. Airspace designated "National Defense Airspace" under 14 CFR 99.7.	1
Feb 11, 01:00 AM	Pilot Confusion	Pilots and air traffic controllers discover the closure via automated feeds. Audio recordings capture confusion: "So for 10 days, you guys are not open?"	6
Feb 11, 06:00 AM	Medical Crisis	City officials confirm medical evacuation flights are diverting to Las Cruces. Surgical supplies fail to arrive.	4
Feb 11, 07:24 AM	Rescission	FAA cancels the NOTAM. The agency releases a statement: "There is no threat to commercial aviation."	5

The Physics of Denial: Why Lasers Clear the Sky

The official explanation from the Trump administration was that a "Mexican cartel drone incursion" had breached U.S. airspace, necessitating a response from the Department of War (DOW)—the entity formerly known as the Department of Defense.⁸ However, subsequent reporting and intelligence leaks painted a more complex picture involving the deployment of a High-Energy Laser (HEL) counter-UAS system.¹⁰

To the layperson, shooting down a small drone seems like a localized event. If a bullet is fired, gravity brings it down within a predictable radius. However, the introduction of directed energy weapons into a civilian environment fundamentally alters the safety calculus. A laser beam does not arc; it travels in a straight line at the speed of light until it is absorbed, scattered, or diffracted.

The Mechanics of Ocular Hazard

The FAA’s drastic decision to close the airspace was likely driven by the concept of Nominal Ocular Hazard Distance (NOHD). High-energy lasers designed to burn through the plastic or composite shell of a drone (typically in the kilowatt class) possess an NOHD that can extend for tens of miles.¹²

• Flash Blindness: Even if the laser misses the target or "spills over" (passes through a destroyed target), the beam retains enough intensity to cause flash blindness or permanent retinal damage to pilots flying miles behind the engagement zone.¹³

• Sensor Saturation: Modern commercial aircraft rely on complex arrays of optical and infrared sensors for navigation and situational awareness. A sweep of a military-grade laser across a cockpit or fuselage sensor suite can fry sensitive focal plane arrays, rendering avionics useless.¹⁴

Atmospheric Variables

The 10-nautical-mile radius and 18,000-foot ceiling were not arbitrary figures. They represent a safety buffer accounting for atmospheric phenomena such as "beam wander" and "thermal blooming." As a high-energy beam travels through the atmosphere, it heats the air, creating a lens effect that can scatter the light unpredictably.¹⁵ In the dusty, turbulent air of the Chihuahuan Desert, this scattering effect increases the probability of the beam deviating from its intended path, turning a precision weapon into a wide-area hazard for any aircraft in the vicinity.¹³

The "10-day" duration initially cited in the NOTAM likely corresponded to a testing window or a planned deployment cycle that the Department of War initiated without completing the necessary safety integration with the FAA. When the laser was activated—reportedly to engage a target that may have been as innocuous as a Mylar balloon—the FAA, adhering to its safety mandate, had no choice but to sterilize the airspace immediately.¹⁰

Bureaucratic Friction: The Department of War vs. The FAA

The El Paso incident cannot be viewed solely as a technical failure; it was a symptom of a deeper administrative rupture following the executive restructuring of the U.S. military. In 2025, President Trump signed Executive Order 14265, renaming the Department of Defense to the "Department of War" (DOW).⁹ While the administration touted this rebranding as a move to signal "readiness and resolve," critics warned it would encourage a more aggressive, forward-leaning posture that prioritized kinetic action over interagency coordination.⁸

The Communication Void

Under 49 U.S.C. § 40103, the United States Government holds "exclusive sovereignty" over the national airspace, a sovereignty administered by the FAA to ensure the "public right of transit".¹⁷ Typically, the integration of military operations into civil airspace requires a delicate "equitable solutions" process, where defense needs are balanced against commercial flow.¹⁹

In El Paso, this balance collapsed. Intelligence experts suggest that the DOW and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) bypassed standard coordination channels with the FAA. Stefano Ritondale, a former intelligence officer, characterized the incident as a "breakdown" where the operational arm of the DOW acted unilaterally to test or use the laser system.⁸ The FAA, blindsided by the activation of a weapon system with a massive hazard radius, was forced to issue the NOTAM as a defensive measure to protect civil traffic, rather than as part of a coordinated defense strategy.¹⁰

This disconnect is further evidenced by the conflicting narratives. While the White House claimed a "cartel drone incursion" was neutralized, industry sources indicated the closure was triggered by the FAA's discovery of the uncoordinated laser use.⁴ The "impasse" between the agencies regarding the safe operation of the laser suggests that the DOW prioritized the immediate neutralization of the border threat over the procedural requirements of the National Airspace System.⁴

The Human Cost of "National Defense Airspace"

The legal instrument used to close the sky—14 CFR § 99.7—is a powerful tool. Unlike standard Temporary Flight Restrictions (TFRs) used for VIP visits or sporting events, "National Defense Airspace" carries the explicit threat of deadly force.³ This designation effectively treats the airspace over a domestic city as a combat zone.

The impact of this designation on El Paso was immediate and potentially life-threatening.

• Medical Logistics: El Paso serves as a regional medical hub for West Texas and Southern New Mexico. The airspace closure severed the air bridge used to transport organs, radioisotopes, and trauma patients. Mayor Johnson noted that surgical equipment "did not show up," and air ambulances were forced to divert to Las Cruces.⁴ In trauma medicine, where the "golden hour" dictates survival, a forty-mile diversion via ground transport from a secondary airport can be fatal.

• Municipal Paralysis: The lack of notification to local leadership exposed a dangerous gap in the national security chain of command. Mayor Johnson’s statement that "You cannot restrict airspace over a major city without coordinating with the city" highlights the vulnerability of local municipalities to federal unilateralism.⁴ The city was left to manage the "chaos" of stranded passengers and disrupted supply chains based on a Twitter post by the FAA, rather than a secure briefing.⁴

Conclusion: A Precedent for the Borderlands

The February 11 incident was a false start—a 10-day shutdown that lasted only eight hours. However, it established a precedent that likely foretells the future of the U.S. borderlands. As cartel drone tactics evolve, utilizing swarms for surveillance and smuggling, the U.S. response is shifting from passive monitoring to kinetic denial. The tools of this denial—high-energy lasers, high-power microwaves, and electronic jamming—are fundamentally incompatible with the congested airspace of a modern city.

The "Department of War" era appears defined by a lower threshold for domestic military action. The willingness to risk a "hard stop" of a major economic hub to test or deploy a counter-measure suggests that in the calculus of the current administration, border security holds primacy over civil aviation continuity.

For the students and citizens of El Paso, the lesson is stark. The sky above is no longer solely a commons for travel and commerce; it is a contested domain. The technology that protects the border also possesses the power to isolate the city, turning the "public right of transit" into a privilege that can be revoked at the speed of light. As the DOW and FAA continue to negotiate the protocols for these weapons, the residents of the borderlands must prepare for a future where the sound of jet engines can be silenced by the silent, invisible heat of a laser beam.

Data Appendix: Flight Disruption Statistics

Category	Impact
Total Cancellations	14 flights (Arrivals/Departures)
Total Delays	13 flights
Traffic Reduction	19% of daily scheduled traffic cancelled
Affected Radius	10 Nautical Miles (SFC - 17,999 ft MSL)
Diversion Airport	Las Cruces International (LRU) - 40 miles West

** ⁴

Works cited

1. Federal Aviation Administration - Graphic TFRs - FAA TFR, accessed February 12, 2026, https://tfr.faa.gov/tfr3/?page=detail_6_2233

2. US FAA closes El Paso, New Mexico airspace, accessed February 12, 2026, https://news.az/news/us-faa-closes-el-paso-new-mexico-airspace

3. El Paso airspace closed for 10 days: 10 points for all Texans to take note - The Economic Times, accessed February 12, 2026, https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/us/el-paso-airspace-closed-for-10-days-texas-travel-advisory-10-points-for-all-texans-to-take-note/articleshow/128211575.cms

4. Drone use at center of El Paso airspace shutdown, accessed February 12, 2026, https://www.texastribune.org/2026/02/11/el-paso-air-space-closed-faa/

5. FAA closes El Paso airspace for 10 days | Flightradar24 Blog, accessed February 12, 2026, https://www.flightradar24.com/blog/live/faa-closes-el-paso-airspace-for-10-days/

6. 'The airport's totally closed?' | El Paso airport closure surprises pilots - listen to their real-time reaction, accessed February 12, 2026, https://www.wfaa.com/article/travel/el-paso-airport-airspace-closed-closure-pilots-reaction-audio-texas-airports-updates/287-65d6bac1-00f9-438d-bd57-102b57f6fff7

7. El Paso Airspace Closed After Party Balloon Zapped With CPB Laser - AvBrief.com, accessed February 12, 2026, https://avbrief.com/el-paso-airspace-reopens-after-mysterious-closure/

8. El Paso Airspace Closure, Federal Government Messaging Shows 'Breakdown', accessed February 12, 2026, https://www.military.com/daily-news/2026/02/11/el-paso-airspace-closure-federal-government-messaging-shows-breakdown.html

9. Trump Renames DOD to Department of War, accessed February 12, 2026, https://www.war.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/4295826/trump-renames-dod-to-department-of-war/

10. Breakdown between Pentagon, FAA led to flight stoppage, officials say, accessed February 12, 2026, https://www.washingtonpost.com/transportation/2026/02/11/el-paso-us-airport-texas-faa-restrictions/

11. Why was El Paso airspace shut down? Drones, security fears and ..., accessed February 12, 2026, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/2/12/why-was-el-paso-airspace-shut-down-drones-security-fears-and-confusion

12. Preventing Laser Strikes on Aircraft - FBI, accessed February 12, 2026, https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/preventing-laser-strikes-on-aircraft

13. Visions for the next 40 years of U.S. Department of Defense Directed ..., accessed February 12, 2026, https://www.afrl.af.mil/Portals/90/Documents/RD/Directed_Energy_Futures_2060_Final29June21_with_clearance_number.pdf

14. Counter Directed Energy Weapons and the Defense of Naval Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, accessed February 12, 2026, https://nps.edu/documents/10180/142489929/JDE_7-2_Johnson.pdf

15. Laser weapon - Wikipedia, accessed February 12, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_weapon

16. El Paso airspace closure due to use of U.S. military anti-drone technology, accessed February 12, 2026, https://www.cfpublic.org/2026-02-11/el-paso-airspace-closure-due-to-use-of-u-s-military-anti-drone-technology

17. 49 USC 40103: Sovereignty and use of airspace - OLRC Home, accessed February 12, 2026, https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-1999-title49-section40103&num=0&edition=1999

18. 49 U.S. Code § 40103 - Sovereignty and use of airspace - Law.Cornell.Edu, accessed February 12, 2026, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/49/40103

19. Section 2. Authority and Order Use - FAA, accessed February 12, 2026, https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/pham_html/chap1_section_2.html

20. El Paso airspace closure was tied to Mexican cartel drones, officials say, after FAA lifts 10-day grounding, accessed February 12, 2026, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/faa-grounds-all-flights-into-and-out-of-el-paso-until-late-on-feb-20-for-special-security-reasons/