115 Billion Dollars Later: How 2025 Redefined the US Climate Baseline

Introduction to the Evolving Climatological Baseline

The climatological landscape of the United States has undergone a measurable transition characterized by the increased frequency, intensity, and geographical distribution of extreme weather events. The period spanning 2025 through the first half of 2026 exemplifies this shift, marked by a series of compounding meteorological hazards that have tested the limits of atmospheric predictability, infrastructural integrity, and socioeconomic resilience. Research indicates that 2025 witnessed 23 individual weather and climate disasters with direct damages exceeding one billion dollars, representing the third-highest annual count on record when adjusted for inflation, trailing only the historic anomalies of 2023 and 2024¹. These events resulted in approximately 115 billion dollars in collective damages and 276 direct and indirect fatalities across the nation¹.

The temporal distribution and frequency of these severe events are statistically significant indicators of a changing baseline. The average interval between billion-dollar disasters in the United States has decreased precipitously from 82 days in the 1980s to approximately 16 days in the current decade⁴. In 2025, the nation experienced a major disaster event an average of once every ten days⁵. This compression of recovery timelines introduces systemic vulnerabilities, particularly as disparate hazards begin to overlap spatially and temporally.

To track these shifting patterns, institutional frameworks have also evolved. In late 2025, the responsibility for tracking and assessing billion-dollar disasters transitioned from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) to the independent research organization Climate Central, following federal staffing reductions and realignments in statutory mandates⁵. Statistical projections utilizing these comprehensive databases suggest an accelerating risk profile. Recent predictive models analyzing historical disaster frequencies and damage distributions indicate a 54 percent probability that total United States disaster damages from 2026 to 2030 will exceed one trillion dollars⁸.

A primary focus for climatologists analyzing the 2025 and 2026 seasons is the concept of hydroclimate whiplash, also referred to as hydrological volatility⁹. This phenomenon describes the increasingly rapid and dramatic swings between extreme wet and extreme dry conditions. Amplified by anthropogenic warming, the atmosphere's moisture-holding capacity increases by approximately four percent per degree Fahrenheit of warming⁹. This thermodynamic reality transforms the atmosphere into a more efficient conduit for moisture, leading to intensified precipitation during humid phases and accelerated evaporation during dry phases, effectively supercharging both drought and flood cycles⁹.

Macro-Scale Atmospheric Climate Drivers and Teleconnections

The extreme weather volatility of 2025 and early 2026 was largely governed by several macro-scale atmospheric anomalies, most notably the transition of the El Nino-Southern Oscillation and severe disruptions to the stratospheric polar vortex.

Following a period of La Nina conditions, the equatorial Pacific Ocean underwent a rapid warming phase beginning in late 2025. Subsurface temperature anomalies reached up to 8 degrees Celsius above normal, fueled by massive downwelling Kelvin waves and anomalous westerly wind bursts in the western Pacific¹⁰. As this oceanic heat surfaced, it established an exceptionally strong El Nino event. Forecasts from the Climate Prediction Center classified the developing pattern as a "Super El Nino," indicating a high probability that sea surface temperature anomalies would exceed 2.0 degrees Celsius in the Nino 3.4 monitoring region¹⁰.

This specific configuration altered the Pacific jet stream, generating an amplified Rossby wave train that influenced precipitation patterns and temperature gradients across North America¹³. To ensure accuracy in classifying the magnitude of this event against a backdrop of global oceanic warming, climatologists increasingly relied on the Relative Oceanic Nino Index. This metric adjusts for baseline ocean warming, ensuring that long-term climate trends do not artificially inflate the categorization of the specific cyclical event¹⁴.

Concurrently, the winter of 2025-2026 was profoundly influenced by a Sudden Stratospheric Warming event that peaked in mid-January 2026¹⁶. This event was characterized by a rapid rise in stratospheric temperatures and pressure over the pole, which precipitated a deceleration and severe deformation of the circumpolar westerly winds¹⁶. The breakdown of the polar vortex resulted in a highly amplified, meandering jet stream. This pronounced meridional flow created deep atmospheric troughs over the central and eastern United States, establishing a direct corridor for Arctic air masses to advect southward into the mid-latitudes, while simultaneously allowing anomalous anomalous warmth to build over the western half of the continent¹⁶. These macro-scale drivers served as the underlying mechanisms for the severe weather volatility observed throughout the period.

The Wildland-Urban Interface Crisis: The January 2025 Los Angeles Wildfires

Wildfires have historically been categorized as a summer and autumn hazard in the western United States. However, the events of January 2025 demonstrated the expanding seasonality of extreme fire behavior. Between January 7 and January 31, a cluster of destructive fires, anchored by the Palisades and Eaton fires, burned over 40,000 acres in the Greater Los Angeles region¹. The fires destroyed more than 16,000 structures, forced the evacuation of over 200,000 residents, and resulted in 31 direct fatalities, alongside hundreds of estimated excess deaths due to subsequent smoke exposure². With direct economic losses estimated at 61.2 billion dollars, this event stands as the costliest wildfire disaster in United States history¹.

Meteorological Precursors and Fuel Dynamics

The severity of the Los Angeles fires was a definitive manifestation of hydroclimate whiplash. The two preceding winter seasons were exceptionally wet, which encouraged the prolific growth of grasses, shrubs, and dense underbrush across the Santa Monica and San Gabriel mountain ranges¹⁹. This extended period of vegetative loading was immediately followed by the driest autumn and early winter on record for the region¹⁹.

By early January 2025, the 1000-hour dead fuel moisture—a critical metric representing the moisture content in large, deep woody material—had plummeted to the sixth-lowest value on record for that time of year²¹. Simultaneously, the atmospheric vapor pressure deficit spiked to record levels. The vapor pressure deficit serves as an indicator of the atmosphere's capacity to strip moisture from its surroundings; these elevated levels indicated an environment highly capable of desiccating remaining live plant networks, turning them into volatile fuel²¹.

The Santa Ana Wind Event

The immediate trigger for the catastrophic firestorm was an anomalous and exceptionally powerful Santa Ana wind event. The synoptic setup featured a strong, mid-tropospheric cut-off low positioned south of the Los Angeles basin, operating in tandem with high pressure building over the Great Basin¹⁹. This created a severe barometric pressure gradient that drove strong northerly and northeasterly low-level winds. As this dense air mass descended the lee slopes of the Transverse Ranges, high-amplitude mountain wave activity developed, substantially accelerating the downslope flow through localized topography¹⁹.

Wind gusts routinely reached hurricane force, with high-elevation sensors recording 100 miles per hour on Mount Lukens in the eastern San Gabriel Mountains and 98 miles per hour in the Santa Monica Mountains²⁰. The extreme wind speeds, combined with relative humidity plunging below 15 percent, rendered standard aerial and ground suppression tactics largely ineffective²². The dense wildland-urban interface of the region allowed the fires to transition rapidly from vegetative fuels to structural fuels. Embers launched from hillsides were carried for miles by the sustained winds, igniting densely populated neighborhoods far ahead of the main fire front and overwhelming municipal emergency response capabilities¹⁸.

Subsequent extreme event attribution analysis indicated that human-caused atmospheric warming made the specific fire weather conditions observed during the Palisades and Eaton fires approximately 35 percent more likely to occur, and 6 percent more intense, compared to a simulated pre-industrial baseline².

Convective Extremes: The Escalation of Severe Storm and Tornado Outbreaks

Severe thunderstorm and tornadic activity typically peaks in the late spring and early summer; however, the unique atmospheric thermodynamics of 2025 and 2026 generated historic outbreaks significantly earlier in the calendar year. In 2025 alone, severe convective storms accounted for 21 of the 23 billion-dollar disasters, resulting in approximately 50 billion dollars in cumulative damages¹.

The March 2025 Central Tornado Outbreak

Between March 14 and 16, 2025, a massive storm system swept from the Mid-Mississippi River Valley to the Gulf Coast and into the Mid-Atlantic, spawning more than 115 confirmed tornadoes and resulting in 43 fatalities and 11.0 billion dollars in damages².

The meteorological framework for this event featured a potent upper-level jet stream intersecting a sharp surface boundary between warm, exceptionally moist air advecting northward from the Gulf of Mexico and cooler, drier continental air descending from the north²⁶. Anticipating this volatile environment, forecasting centers utilized advanced machine learning models, such as the Warn-on-Forecast System and ProbSevere algorithms, to identify overshooting cloud tops and specific updraft characteristics from satellite imagery²⁷. These computational models successfully predicted initial tornado formation with an unprecedented 80-minute lead time in some Missouri communities²⁷.

Despite advanced warnings, the outbreak produced multiple violent tornadoes, including two EF-4 tornadoes in Arkansas on the same day—a phenomenon the state had not experienced since 1997¹. One long-track EF-4 tornado carved a continuous path of nearly 120 miles from northern Arkansas into southeastern Missouri¹. The convective system was also accompanied by severe straight-line winds exceeding 90 miles per hour, which triggered massive dust storms across Texas and Oklahoma, severely reducing visibility and causing compounding transportation hazards²⁶.

The Historic EF5 and the Illinois-Indiana Supercells of March 2026

The following spring featured an even more anomalous convective event. Between March 5 and March 10, 2026, two distinct waves of severe weather struck the Midwest, producing over 30 tornadoes²⁹. The second wave, occurring on March 10, produced some of the most violent tornadic activity ever recorded during the early meteorological spring.

The synoptic environment on March 10 was characterized by a stationary front extending from southeast Iowa into northwest Indiana, which acted as a sharp thermal boundary³⁰. South of the boundary, a highly unstable air mass developed, while low-level wind shear was maximized just to the north³⁰. Convective initiation was initially suppressed by an Elevated Mixed Layer that acted as a strong capping inversion³⁰. However, as a shortwave trough moved into the Upper Midwest during the late afternoon, the cap eroded. Furthermore, a local lake-breeze boundary extending inland from Lake Michigan interacted with the broader warm front, establishing localized zones of extreme storm-relative helicity³¹.

This highly sheared environment birthed a long-track supercell that traveled across northeastern Illinois and into northwestern Indiana. Operating unimpeded in the warm sector, the storm produced a continuous family of 12 tornadoes³³. The most destructive of these was the Kankakee-Roselawn EF-3, which tracked over 36 miles from Aroma Park, Illinois, through Lake Village, Indiana, producing peak winds of 150 miles per hour and causing three fatalities²⁹. The parent supercell exhibited extraordinary updraft strength, lofting moisture high into the troposphere and generating exceptionally large hail. A hailstone measuring 6.0 inches in diameter was recovered in Kankakee, Illinois, breaking historical state records³¹.

Further east along the boundary, the dynamic environment supported the formation of an EF-5 tornado in Wells County, Indiana²⁹. Striking on March 10, the tornado carved a 14.6-mile damage path, exhibiting wind speeds in excess of 200 miles per hour and causing catastrophic destruction²⁹. The occurrence of an EF-5 tornado—a category indicating complete vaporization of well-constructed structures—in early March is considered a profound climatological anomaly, underscoring the extreme instability and wind shear available in the pre-frontal environment²⁹.

The April 2026 Upper Midwest Outbreak

The severe weather pattern continued unabated into mid-April 2026. On April 17, a deep surface low-pressure system and an associated cold front advanced into the Upper Midwest. Ahead of this boundary, unseasonably high moisture was drawn into Wisconsin and Minnesota, with surface dew points climbing into the lower 60s Fahrenheit³⁴. Convective Available Potential Energy (CAPE) values reached up to 3000 joules per kilogram over the central plains, while storm-relative helicity surged above 400 square meters per second squared as the nocturnal low-level jet strengthened³⁶.

This highly volatile environment produced 86 confirmed tornadoes across the region³⁶. The National Weather Service forecasting office in La Crosse issued a record-breaking 26 tornado warnings in a single day³⁷. The outbreak was distinguished by fast-moving supercells and line segments traveling at translation speeds up to 50 miles per hour³⁴.

Two tornadoes reached EF-3 intensity in central Wisconsin. The Cream-Montana tornado touched down in Buffalo County, achieving a maximum width of 125 yards and winds of 140 miles per hour. The cyclonic core scored a direct hit on a family home of good construction, completely ripping away the roof and exterior load-bearing walls, while leveling multiple heavy timber barns³⁵. Shortly after, the Ringle tornado developed in Marathon County, tracking 13.5 miles with winds up to 145 miles per hour. This wider vortex damaged or destroyed approximately 75 homes, with at least three residences suffering complete removal of roofs and failure of exterior walls³⁴. Remarkably, despite the violent nature of these tornadoes and the extensive property damage, proactive warnings and rapid public adherence to safety protocols resulted in zero fatalities across the entire April 17-18 outbreak³⁵.

The May and June 2026 Convective Lull

Following the intense activity of early spring, the months of May and June 2026—typically the statistical peak of the United States tornado season—saw an anomalous suppression of severe weather⁴⁰. May 2026 recorded only 119 confirmed tornadoes nationwide, significantly below the 1991-2020 average of 265⁴⁰. Only three tornadoes reached EF-2 or higher intensity during this period⁴⁰.

This dramatic cessation of convective activity was primarily driven by the ongoing transition from La Nina to the developing El Nino phase⁴⁰. This transition suppressed the subtropical jet stream, effectively removing the upper-level wind energy necessary to organize thunderstorms and sustain mesocyclonic rotation⁴⁰. Concurrently, persistent atmospheric troughing in the eastern United States, combined with severe drought conditions developing across the High Plains, allowed cool, dry continental air to spread across the central United States⁴⁰. By removing the low-level moisture and instability required for storm development, the atmosphere temporarily stabilized, providing a stark example of how large-scale oceanic teleconnections dictate mesoscale weather phenomena.

Hydrological Volatility: Extreme Precipitation and Inland Flooding

While severe convective storms drove catastrophic wind and hail events, the atmosphere's overall increased capacity to hold and rapidly transport moisture resulted in unprecedented precipitation extremes and flash flooding.

The July 2025 Central Texas Flash Floods

Between July 4 and July 7, 2025, the Texas Hill Country—a region known geologically and meteorologically as "Flash Flood Alley"—experienced the deadliest inland flash flood in United States history since the Big Thompson Canyon flood of 1976⁴¹. The disaster claimed at least 139 lives and caused approximately 1.1 billion dollars in property damage⁴².

The meteorological origins of the event involved the intersection of multiple overlapping atmospheric disturbances. The remnants of Tropical Storm Barry stalled over the region, interacting with deep tropical moisture advected from the Gulf of Mexico and the remnant moisture of eastern Pacific Hurricane Flossie⁴². Atmospheric soundings taken near Del Rio, Texas, indicated precipitable water values of 2.52 inches. Precipitable water measures the total depth of liquid water that would result if all water vapor in a vertical column of the atmosphere were condensed; a reading of 2.52 inches is exceptionally high, indicating an atmosphere entirely saturated and primed to produce torrential, efficient rainfall⁴⁵.

Compounding these factors was the development of a Mesoscale Convective Vortex—a mid-tropospheric low-pressure center generated by the latent heat released from condensation within the surrounding thunderstorm complex⁴⁵. This vortex effectively locked the heavy precipitation in place over Central Texas, preventing the system from progressing eastward. Rainfall rates were catastrophic; local gauges measured 5.22 inches of rain per hour over the Guadalupe River basin, with multiday storm totals peaking at 20.33 inches⁴³.

The topography of the region exacerbated the meteorological extremes. The steep, rocky terrain and thin limestone soils of the Balcones Escarpment acted as an impervious funnel, rapidly channeling the deluge directly into the river systems⁴¹. Preceding drought conditions had hardened the soil, further reducing infiltration capacity and maximizing surface runoff⁴². The result was an explosive hydrological response. At Hunt, Texas, the Guadalupe River rose over 26 feet in 45 minutes, ultimately cresting at a record 37.52 feet⁴². The stream velocity increased from a baseline of under 10 cubic feet per second to a peak of 177,000 cubic feet per second downstream in Comfort, Texas⁴². The sudden wall of water scoured the riverbed, destroying summer camps, homes, and critical infrastructure before residents could effectively evacuate⁴².

Subsequent attribution science indicated that the thermodynamic conditions present during the event were capable of producing up to 7 percent more precipitation than similar historical analogs, directly linking the severity of the rainfall rates to global atmospheric warming⁴⁴.

The February 2026 Atmospheric Rivers

The winter of 2026 demonstrated significant hydrological volatility on the West Coast, characterized by a series of mid-level troughs and associated atmospheric rivers that impacted California between February 15 and 25⁴⁷. Atmospheric rivers are narrow, elongated corridors of intense water vapor transport in the lower troposphere that are responsible for the majority of the region's annual precipitation⁴⁹.

The February sequence featured brief but highly concentrated plumes of moisture. Integrated Vapor Transport values—a metric used to quantify the horizontal transport of water vapor—exceeded 250 kilograms per meter per second, with some models indicating moderate to strong localized transport exceeding 500 kilograms per meter per second⁴⁷. The first atmospheric river tapped into deep subtropical moisture and featured southwesterly flow, maximizing orographic lift over the Transverse Ranges of Southern California⁴⁷. As the moist air was forced upward by the mountains, it cooled and condensed, leading to intense rainfall rates measuring up to 0.49 inches per hour in areas like Fashion Valley. This intense precipitation triggered rapid urban flooding, swift-water rescues, and localized landslides⁴⁷.

Subsequent atmospheric rivers in the sequence featured a more westerly flow and slightly colder air masses, shifting the focus of orographic enhancement northward to the central Coast Ranges and the Sierra Nevada⁴⁷. Freezing levels plummeted to 4,000 feet, allowing for massive snow accumulations at intermediate elevations. Higher elevations of the Sierra Nevada received in excess of 72 inches of snow over a five-day period⁴⁷. While these storms caused significant short-term infrastructural disruption and a deadly avalanche near Donner Summit, they provided a critical boost to the regional hydrology, raising the statewide snowpack from 52 percent of normal to 75 percent of normal in under a week, alleviating some of the region's prolonged drought concerns⁴⁷.

Cryospheric and Winter Extremes

Paradoxically, a warming global climate does not preclude the occurrence of severe winter weather; rather, it alters the boundary layer dynamics that contain polar air masses, often leading to more intense and displaced winter storm events. The winter of 2025-2026 was defined by intense cold outbreaks and explosive cyclogenesis over the eastern half of the North American continent.

The January 2026 North American Winter Storm

Following the mid-January Sudden Stratospheric Warming event and the subsequent stretching of the polar vortex, a deep corridor of Arctic air plunged southward across the continent¹⁶. Between January 23 and 27, a massive winter storm leveraged this extreme thermal contrast, resulting in a complex compound hazard event. Near-surface temperature anomalies dropped 5 to 10 degrees Celsius below average, bringing life-threatening wind chills of -20 to -40 degrees Fahrenheit across the Midwest and Great Plains¹⁶.

The storm system originated in the Southern Plains, drawing moisture from the Gulf of Mexico over the advancing, shallow layer of dense Arctic air. This atmospheric overriding resulted in widespread freezing rain and ice accumulation across Texas, Louisiana, and the mid-South¹⁶. As the system moved northeastward along the baroclinic zone, strong moisture convergence along the frontal boundaries generated heavy snowfall. Accumulations exceeded 30 to 40 centimeters across parts of the Midwest and Northeast¹⁷. The combination of heavy ice accretion—reaching up to an inch in some locations—and sustained near-surface winds exceeding 50 kilometers per hour devastated power grids, leaving over one million customers without electricity in sub-freezing conditions⁵⁰. The socio-economic toll was immense, with 174 fatalities attributed to traffic accidents, hypothermia, and infrastructure failures, marking it as one of the deadliest winter events in recent history¹⁷.

The Great Blizzard of February 2026

Less than a month later, the Northeast United States was struck by a Category 3 "Major" blizzard, colloquially referred to as Storm Hernando⁵¹. Spanning February 22 to 24, the storm represented a classic, yet exceptionally intense, nor'easter.

The synoptic evolution began with a shortwave trough moving from the West Coast across the continent. Upon reaching the warm waters of the Gulf Stream off the coast of North Carolina, explosive cyclogenesis occurred⁵¹. A surface low developed and began a period of rapid deepening, a process meteorologically referred to as bombogenesis. The central pressure plummeted by an estimated 41 millibars in 24 hours, bottoming out at 965 millibars⁵¹. This rapid intensification generated a massive pressure gradient along the coast, producing hurricane-force wind gusts that peaked at 98 miles per hour in Wellfleet, Massachusetts⁵¹.

The intense circulation wrapped vast amounts of Atlantic moisture into the cold sector of the storm. Intense mesoscale snowbands developed, producing localized snowfall rates of 2 to 3 inches per hour, accompanied by dynamic convective phenomena such as thundersnow⁵¹. The highest accumulations occurred in southeastern New England. Providence, Rhode Island, recorded an all-time record of 37.9 inches of snow, surpassing benchmarks set during the historic Blizzard of 1978⁵¹. The storm resulted in 30 fatalities, over 600,000 power outages, and approximately 500 million dollars in damages⁵¹. The event achieved a score of 9.69 on the Regional Snowfall Index, reflecting its profound impact on a densely populated region⁵¹.

The Expanding "Danger Season" and Heatwave Dynamics

The shift in extreme weather frequencies has led scientific organizations to reframe the period from May to October as the "Danger Season," denoting the time when North America experiences its most severe, climate-intensified weather hazards, including extreme heat, drought, flooding, and hurricanes⁵⁴. The 2025 and 2026 seasons underscored this framing, as extreme heat and drought conditions emerged earlier in the year and persisted with greater intensity.

During late June 2025, an unusually potent heatwave developed across the central and eastern United States⁵⁶. A persistent, high-pressure system—commonly referred to as a heat dome—settled over the region, creating stable atmospheric conditions that suppressed cloud formation and precipitation while trapping heat near the surface⁵⁷. Between June 22 and June 25, more than 100 million people across 726 counties experienced record-breaking heat, with temperatures routinely rising 10 to 20 degrees Fahrenheit above historical averages⁵⁶. During the peak of the event, 136 million individuals were under "major heat risk," with heat index values reaching up to 120 degrees Fahrenheit in some localities⁵⁹.

The impacts of these heat domes are insidious and widespread. Extreme heat remains the leading cause of weather-related fatalities in the United States, disproportionately affecting vulnerable populations, the elderly, and those lacking access to adequate cooling infrastructure⁵⁷. Furthermore, the continuous heat exacerbates drought conditions, accelerating evaporation from reservoirs and parching agricultural lands.

Attribution studies analyzing the heatwaves of 2025 and early 2026 concluded that human-induced climate change has fundamentally altered the probability of such events. Utilizing observational data and climate modeling, researchers found that heatwaves of this magnitude have become approximately 4 degrees Celsius warmer⁵⁷. Furthermore, conditions that would have been virtually impossible in a pre-industrial climate now have a return period of roughly once every 500 years—a frequency that is expected to continue shrinking as global background temperatures rise⁵⁷. The June 2025 heat event alone was estimated to be three to five times more likely to occur due to current anthropogenic warming⁵⁹.

Conclusion

The meteorological events of 2025 and early 2026 vividly illustrate the escalating consequences of atmospheric thermodynamics operating within a progressively warming global climate. The data reveals a distinct shift from isolated, highly seasonal anomalies to compounding, multi-hazard crises that disregard traditional climatological calendars. Tornado outbreaks of historic magnitude—such as the unprecedented EF-5 in Indiana during early March—demonstrate how enhanced low-level moisture and atmospheric instability are shifting the geography and seasonality of severe convection. Similarly, the catastrophic WUI fires in winter-season Los Angeles and the explosive hydrological response in the Texas Hill Country underscore the perilous reality of hydroclimate whiplash, where regions oscillate violently between extreme saturation and extreme desiccation.

Furthermore, the persistence of macro-scale drivers, such as Super El Nino conditions and polar vortex disruptions, implies that baseline atmospheric circulation is becoming increasingly conducive to highly amplified, stagnant, or rapidly intensifying pressure systems. The traditional boundaries of what constitutes "average" weather have been fundamentally altered, as evidenced by shifting baseline metrics and the necessity of new comparative indices.

For the scientific and civic communities, these findings necessitate a fundamental paradigm shift. Predictive modeling must continue to evolve beyond historical analogs, incorporating machine learning and high-resolution ensemble forecasting to anticipate events without modern precedent. Infrastructure—ranging from municipal stormwater systems in urban environments to continental power grids—must be hardened against the reality of compressed disaster timelines, where the interval between billion-dollar events is measured in days rather than months. As the United States navigates the expanding parameters of this new climatological regime, proactive adaptation, rigorous atmospheric monitoring, and enhanced community resilience will remain paramount in mitigating future catastrophic losses.

Works cited

1. U.S. Billion-Dollar Weather and Climate Disasters in 2025, https://www.climatecentral.org/US_Billion-Dollar_Disasters_2025.pdf

2. 2025 in Review: U.S. Billion-Dollar Disasters - Climate Central, https://www.climatecentral.org/climate-matters/2025-in-review

3. New Analysis Confirms Growing Trend of Billion-Dollar, Extreme Weather Disasters Amid Trump Administration's Ongoing Cuts to Climate Research and Emergency Response, https://www.ucs.org/about/news/new-analysis-confirms-growing-trend-billion-dollar-extreme-weather-disasters-amid-trump

4. U.S. Billion-Dollar Weather and Climate Disasters - 2025 in Review - AMS supported meetings, https://ams.confex.com/ams/106ANNUAL/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/473421

5. Extreme Weather Disasters Cost the U.S. $115 Billion in 2025 - TIME, https://time.com/7344568/2025-billion-dollar-climate-disasters/

6. Billion-Dollar Weather and Climate Disasters | United States Summary, https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/billions/state-summary/US

7. Billion-Dollar Weather and Climate Disasters | National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) - NOAA, https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/billions/risk

8. U.S. Weather and Climate Disasters Could Cause Over $1 Trillion in Damage in Next Five Years, https://climate.uchicago.edu/news/u-s-weather-and-climate-disasters-could-cause-over-1-trillion-in-damage-in-next-five-years/

9. Driven by climate change, sudden swings between wet and dry create “hydrologic whiplash” | PNAS, https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2617960123

10. Super El Niño 2026–27: What NOAA's Forecast Means - StormBag, https://stormbag.co/blogs/stormbag-flood-protection-blog/super-el-nino-2026-27-what-noaas-off-the-charts-forecast-means-for-the-year-ahead

11. NOAA Declares El Nino Has Arrived, Likely to Be Amongst Strongest on Record, https://www.dtnpf.com/agriculture/web/ag/news/article/2026/06/11/noaa-declares-el-nino-arrived-likely

12. You Asked: What Exactly Is a 'Super' El Niño? - State of the Planet, https://news.climate.columbia.edu/2026/06/09/you-asked-what-exactly-is-a-super-el-nino/

13. Special update: Rising odds of a strong-to-historic El Niño event in 2026 | Piedmont Exedra, https://piedmontexedra.com/2026/06/special-update-rising-odds-of-a-strong-to-historic-el-nino-event-in-2026

14. El Niño strength, NOAA update 14 May 2026 — 82% chance for onset of El Niño with Weak-to-Moderate strength in May-June-July 2026. Peak chance 72% for El Niño with Moderate-to-Strong strength in ASO 2026. Peak chance 37% for El Niño with Very Strong strength in - Reddit, https://www.reddit.com/r/climatechange/comments/1tei8ch/el_ni%C3%B1o_strength_noaa_update_14_may_2026_82/

15. CPC declares El Nino conditions are present : r/hurricane - Reddit, https://www.reddit.com/r/hurricane/comments/1u34rk3/cpc_declares_el_nino_conditions_are_present/

16. January–February 2026 North American cold wave - Grokipedia, https://grokipedia.com/page/JanuaryFebruary_2026_North_American_cold_wave

17. 2025–26 North American winter - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025%E2%80%9326_North_American_winter

18. One year after the 2025 Los Angeles Fires: What has changed, what have we learned, and what actions must still happen? - Moody's, https://www.moodys.com/web/en/us/insights/insurance/one-year-after-the-2025-los-angeles-fires.html

19. The Meteorology of the January 2025 Los Angeles Wildfires - ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/401502710_The_Meteorology_of_the_January_2025_Los_Angeles_Wildfires

20. January 2025 Southern California wildfires - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/January_2025_Southern_California_wildfires

21. Eaton Fire & the Impact on the Altadena Community - ArcGIS StoryMaps, https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/8a2c0714dacd457283dafcbfdfdc8108

22. 'Literally off the charts': LA's critically dry conditions stun scientists as fires rage - CalMatters, https://calmatters.org/environment/wildfires/2025/01/dry-danger-zone-california-fires-climate-change/

23. Climate change increased the likelihood of wildfire disaster in highly exposed Los Angeles area - World Weather Attribution, https://www.worldweatherattribution.org/climate-change-increased-the-likelihood-of-wildfire-disaster-in-highly-exposed-los-angeles-area/

24. Jan 2025 Southern California Wildfires - Satellite Liaison Blog - WordPress.com, https://satelliteliaisonblog.wordpress.com/2025/01/08/jan-2024-southern-california-wildfires/

25. Palisades Fire - LAFD.org, https://lafd.org/sites/default/files/pdf_files/Palisades_AARR_10_08_2025_final.pdf

26. NOAA Satellites Monitor Severe Weather Outbreak, https://www.nesdis.noaa.gov/news/noaa-satellites-monitor-severe-weather-outbreak

27. Strengthening America's Resilience to Extreme Weather - ArcGIS StoryMaps, https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/014ec5dbf31a41b8bd015ff17f88b7c6

28. Tracking Tornadoes from Space | NASA Applied Sciences, https://appliedsciences.nasa.gov/our-impact/story/tracking-tornadoes-space

29. March 2026 Tornado Outbreak: 10 Significant Tornadoes Including an EF5 | DisasterAWARE, https://www.disasteraware.com/news-event/march-2026-tornado-outbreak-10-significant-tornadoes-ef5

30. March 10-11, 2026 - 6 Tornadoes, Severe Storms - National Weather Service, https://www.weather.gov/ilx/2026_03_10_severeweather

31. NWS damage survey confirms EF-3 tornado that killed two in Lake Village, Indiana, https://watchers.news/2026/03/12/nws-damage-survey-confirms-ef-3-tornado-that-killed-two-in-lake-village-indiana/

32. March 10-11 Severe Weather and Tornadoes, https://www.weather.gov/iwx/03102026_severeweather

33. March 10, 2026: Several Tornadoes in the Kankakee River Valley and Record Large Hail - National Weather Service, https://www.weather.gov/lot/2026_03_10_Severe_Weather

34. Preliminary Summary: April 17, 2026 Tornadoes - National Weather Service, https://www.weather.gov/grb/041726_tornadoes

35. 2026 Cream-Montana tornado, https://tornadoes-tornado-events.fandom.com/wiki/2026_Cream-Montana_tornado

36. Tornado outbreak of April 17–18, 2026 - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tornado_outbreak_of_April_17%E2%80%9318,_2026

37. The Tornado Outbreak of April 17 2026 - National Weather Service, https://www.weather.gov/arx/apr1726

38. Tornado outbreak of April 17–18, 2026, https://tornadoes-tornado-events.fandom.com/wiki/Tornado_outbreak_of_April_17%E2%80%9318,_2026

39. 2026 Ringle tornado, https://tornadoes-tornado-events.fandom.com/wiki/2026_Ringle_tornado

40. List of United States tornadoes from May to June 2026 - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_tornadoes_from_May_to_June_2026

41. July 2025 Central Texas Floods - Cotality, https://www.cotality.com/insights/articles/july-2025-central-texas-floods

42. Central Texas floods of 2025 | Causes, Location, Deaths, & Facts | Britannica, https://www.britannica.com/event/Central-Texas-floods-of-2025

43. July 2025 Central Texas floods - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/July_2025_Central_Texas_floods

44. 2025/07/04 Texas Floods - ClimaMeter, https://www.climameter.org/20250704-texas-floods

45. Meteorological Overview of the July 2025 Texas Floods - ArcGIS StoryMaps, https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/b2fc22b8fe464beab1a9148ce249bfb8

46. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/July_2025_Central_Texas_floods#:~:text=First%20flash%20flood%20warning%20issued,fell%20on%20the%20Guadalupe%20River.

47. Quick Summary of the Winter Storms Impacting California During 15–19 February - CW3E, https://cw3e.ucsd.edu/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/24Feb2026_Quick_Summary.pdf

48. CW3E AR Update: 20 February 2026 Outlook - Center for Western Weather and Water Extremes, https://cw3e.ucsd.edu/cw3e-ar-update-20-february-2026-outlook/

49. Atmospheric Rivers, Flooding, and the Changing Climate in the San Diego Region, https://www.sandiego.gov/sites/default/files/2026-03/item-8a-atmospheric-rivers.pdf

50. 2026/01/24-25 North American Winter Storm - ClimaMeter, https://www.climameter.org/20260124-25-north-american-winter-storm

51. February 2026 North American blizzard - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/February_2026_North_American_blizzard

52. Blizzard of 2026 | CIRA Satellite Library | Weather Climate Imagery, https://satlib.cira.colostate.edu/event/blizzard-of-2026/

53. February 2026 Summary: Tenth Snowiest on Record - Blue Hill Observatory, https://bluehill.org/february-2026-summary-tenth-snowiest-on-record/

54. US Faces Triple Threat of Climate Crisis, Economic Hardship, and Donald Trump, https://www.sierraclub.org/sierra/us-faces-triple-threat-climate-crisis-economic-hardship-and-donald-trump

55. Danger season is here again, with triple the danger for 2026 - PreventionWeb.net, https://www.preventionweb.net/news/danger-season-here-again-triple-danger-2026

56. Assessing the U.S. Climate in June 2025 | News | National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/news/national-climate-202506

57. Record-shattering March temperatures in Western North America virtually impossible without climate change - World Weather Attribution, https://www.worldweatherattribution.org/record-shattering-march-temperatures-in-western-north-america-virtually-impossible-without-climate-change/

58. Maps Show Path of Widespread US Heat Wave as Warnings Issued: 'Dangerous', https://www.newsweek.com/united-states-heat-wave-maps-temperatures-warnings-forecast-12049950

59. Hot Summer 2025 Could Be the Coolest for the Rest of Our Lives: 6 Things to Know, https://blog.ucs.org/erika-spanger-siegfried/hot-summer-2025-could-be-the-coolest-for-the-rest-of-our-lives-6-things-to-know/