top of page
Search

Europe's Hamburg Declaration: Deconstructing the Planned 100GW North Sea Grid

Offshore wind farm with turbines and platforms, connected by glowing lines, in a vast ocean under a clear blue sky near a city skyline.

Abstract 

On January 26, 2026, the energy landscape of Europe underwent a decisive transformation with the signing of the "Hamburg Declaration" at the third North Sea Summit. Hosted by the German Federal Government, this summit brought together heads of state and energy ministers from ten nations—the United Kingdom, Germany, Belgium, Denmark, France, Ireland, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, and Iceland—alongside high-level representatives from the European Commission and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO).1 The agreement formalizes a commitment to jointly develop an offshore wind power grid capable of delivering 100 gigawatts (GW) of capacity, a critical milestone toward the broader objective of 300 GW by 2050.4

This report offers an exhaustive technical and policy analysis of this transnational infrastructure project. It explores the shift from radial to meshed High-Voltage Direct Current (HVDC) grids, the engineering challenges of multi-terminal systems, the regulatory friction of cross-border cost allocation, and the emerging imperative of critical infrastructure protection in the maritime domain. The analysis suggests that while the political will and technological foundations are in place, the project faces significant headwinds from supply chain bottlenecks, particularly in cable manufacturing and installation vessels, and complex environmental constraints regarding benthic and avian ecosystems.

1. Introduction: The Hamburg Summit of 2026

The North Sea has long been a theatre of energy extraction, first as a prolific oil and gas basin and now as the locus of the world's most ambitious renewable energy experiment. The convening of the North Sea Summit in Hamburg represents the culmination of a decade of diplomatic maneuvering and technological maturation. The summit's primary output, the Hamburg Declaration, is not merely a statement of targets but a blueprint for the physical integration of European electricity markets through the "clean energy reservoir" of the North Sea.3

1.1 The Context of Ambition

The urgency driving the Hamburg Declaration is multifaceted. Primary among the drivers is the climate imperative, codified in the European Green Deal and national net-zero legislation. However, the geopolitical volatility of the 2020s, characterized by the weaponization of energy supplies and the sabotage of critical infrastructure, has elevated energy independence to a matter of national security. The UK Energy Secretary, Ed Miliband, explicitly framed the agreement as a means to exit the "fossil fuel rollercoaster," positioning the offshore grid as a shield against volatile international gas markets.3

The target of 100 GW is staggering in its scale. To contextualize, 100 GW is roughly equivalent to the generation capacity required to power 143 million homes.4 It represents a massive industrial mobilization, requiring the installation of thousands of turbines, thousands of kilometers of subsea cabling, and the construction of artificial islands and converter platforms. This infrastructure will not only serve the littoral states but will also act as a balancing mechanism for the entire European grid, utilizing the diverse wind regimes of the North Sea and the potential storage capabilities of Nordic hydro-reservoirs.6

1.2 The Coalition of the Willing

The signatories, known as the "North Seas Energy Cooperation" (NSEC) members plus the UK, represent a unique coalition.

  • The Littoral Core: The UK, Germany, Netherlands, Denmark, Belgium, France, and Norway form the geographic ring around the basin. These nations host the physical assets—the wind farms and the landing points.

  • The Strategic Periphery: Ireland, while geographically distinct in the Atlantic/Celtic Sea, is integrated via interconnectors and shared regulatory frameworks. Iceland, included for the first time, brings the prospect of the "IceLink" interconnector and its vast geothermal and hydro resources.1

  • The Financial Partner: Luxembourg, a landlocked state, participates through the renewable energy financing mechanism, purchasing statistical transfers of renewable energy to meet its own targets while funding development in the North Sea.2

The participation of NATO marks a paradigm shift. Following the sabotage of the Nord Stream pipelines and disruptions to Baltic infrastructure in previous years, the security of the 100 GW grid—comprising thousands of kilometers of unmonitorable subsea assets—has become a defense priority. NATO's role involves the coordination of surveillance and the integration of "security-by-design" principles into the infrastructure rollout.1

2. The Physics of the Supergrid: Why AC fails and DC prevails

To understand the engineering architecture proposed in Hamburg, one must first appreciate the physical constraints of transmitting electricity across the North Sea. The transition from point-to-point connections to a meshed grid is driven by the physics of electromagnetism.

2.1 The Limitations of Alternating Current (AC)

On land, high-voltage alternating current (HVAC) is the standard for transmission. It is easily transformed up or down in voltage, and the technology is mature. However, subsea cables present a unique challenge known as capacitance.

A subsea cable consists of a copper or aluminum conductor surrounded by insulation and a conductive sheath, all buried in the conductive seawater. This structure effectively forms a giant capacitor. When AC flows through the cable, the current reverses direction 50 times per second (50 Hz). With every reversal, this capacitor must be charged and discharged. This charging current, also known as reactive power, consumes the thermal capacity of the cable.

  • The Critical Length: For subsea cables, the critical length is often around 80 to 100 kilometers. Beyond this distance, the reactive current is so high that there is no room left in the cable to carry the useful active power (the electricity that lights homes). While reactive compensation (reactors) can be placed at the ends of the cable, they cannot be easily placed mid-sea without expensive platforms.9

2.2 The HVDC Solution

High-Voltage Direct Current (HVDC) overcomes this limitation. In a DC system, the current flows in one direction. The cable capacitance is charged once upon energization and then stays charged. No reactive current flows during steady-state operation. This means the only losses are resistive (heat), which are relatively low. Consequently, HVDC allows for the transmission of massive amounts of power over hundreds or even thousands of kilometers, making it the only viable technology for connecting wind farms located far from shore or for interconnecting countries across the North Sea.9

2.3 Voltage Source Converters (VSC): The Technological Enabler

The 100 GW grid relies specifically on Voltage Source Converter (VSC) technology. Older HVDC systems used Line Commutated Converters (LCC), which relied on the stability of the AC grid at the connection point to switch (commutate) the current. LCCs are ill-suited for offshore wind because wind farms are "weak" grids with variable output.

VSC technology uses advanced transistors (Insulated-Gate Bipolar Transistors - IGBTs) that can be switched on and off at will by a control signal, independent of the grid voltage. This provides several critical advantages for the North Sea grid:

  1. Black Start Capability: If the onshore grid blacks out, a VSC system can energize it. It acts as a voltage source, essentially "booting up" the grid.11

  2. Independent Power Control: VSC allows operators to control active power (watts) and reactive power (vars) independently. This is crucial for stabilizing the voltage at the offshore connection point.10

  3. Footprint: VSC converter stations are more compact than LCC stations, a vital factor when building expensive offshore platforms.9

3. Engineering the Meshed Grid: A Paradigm Shift

The "Hamburg Declaration" moves beyond the traditional "radial" connection model. In a radial model, a wind farm connects to shore via a single cable. If the wind isn't blowing, that cable sits idle. If the cable breaks, the wind energy is trapped.

3.1 The Mesh Concept

The new vision is a Meshed Grid. In this topology, wind farms are connected to each other and to multiple countries. A wind farm in the Dutch sector might be connected to the Netherlands, the UK, and Germany.

  • Redundancy: If the cable to the Netherlands breaks, power can be routed to the UK.

  • Market Efficiency: If the wind is blowing but demand in the Netherlands is low, power can be exported to Germany where prices might be higher.

  • Asset Utilization: When the wind is calm, the cables can be used to trade power between countries (e.g., UK importing Norwegian hydro power), maximizing the utilization of the expensive copper infrastructure.4

3.2 The Protection Challenge: Taming the DC Fault

Creating a mesh introduces a formidable engineering challenge: protection against faults.

In an AC grid, the grid has impedance (resistance to changes in current). If a short circuit occurs, the current rises, but the impedance slows the rise enough for mechanical circuit breakers to open (taking about 50-100 milliseconds).

In a DC grid, resistance is negligible. If a cable is cut or shorted, the current rises to thousands of amperes in mere microseconds. This sudden drain of energy collapses the voltage of the entire connected DC grid almost instantly.

  • The Solution: DC Circuit Breakers: To operate a reliable mesh, the grid requires high-speed DC circuit breakers capable of interrupting massive fault currents within 2 to 5 milliseconds. This technology has been a major research focus and is now reaching commercial maturity, enabling the isolation of a faulted line while keeping the rest of the grid operational.11

3.3 Interoperability and InterOPERA

A significant barrier to the mesh is interoperability. Historically, HVDC systems were proprietary. A Siemens converter station could not easily "talk" to a Hitachi Energy station on the same DC line due to different control software and protection protocols. The EU-funded "InterOPERA" project is addressing this by defining standard control interfaces. The goal is to make HVDC systems "plug-and-play," ensuring that converters from different manufacturers can operate on the same meshed grid without destabilizing each other. This "interoperable by design" approach is a prerequisite for the multi-vendor environment of the North Sea.13

3.4 Grid Forming (GFM) Capabilities

As the grid transitions away from heavy rotating machines (coal/gas turbines) to inverter-based resources (wind/solar), the grid loses inertia. Inertia is the tendency of heavy spinning objects to keep spinning, which stabilizes the grid frequency. To compensate, the new generation of offshore converters must operate in Grid Forming (GFM) mode. Unlike "Grid Following" inverters that lock onto an existing frequency, GFM inverters use control algorithms to create their own voltage and frequency reference. They act as "Virtual Synchronous Machines," providing synthetic inertia to stabilize the grid against disturbances. This capability is explicitly required in the technical specifications for new North Sea projects.15

4. Nodes of the Network: Infrastructure Deep Dive

The physical realization of the 100 GW grid is taking shape through massive infrastructure projects. These "Hub-and-Spoke" projects serve as the anchors of the new mesh.

4.1 Princess Elisabeth Island (Belgium)

Belgium is pioneering the energy island concept with the Princess Elisabeth Island. Located 45 km off the coast, this is the world's first artificial energy island.

  • Construction: Unlike steel platforms on jackets, this island is built from 23 massive concrete caissons, each weighing 22,000 tonnes. These are constructed onshore, towed to site, and ballasted with sand. The use of low-carbon cement reduces the embodied carbon footprint.18

  • Function: The island will aggregate 3.5 GW of offshore wind capacity. Crucially, it serves as the landing point for the Nautilus interconnector (to the UK) and the Triton Link (to Denmark). This dual function—wind collection and interconnection—defines it as a hybrid asset.18

4.2 The North Sea Wind Power Hub (NSWPH)

A consortium of TenneT (Netherlands/Germany), Energinet (Denmark), and Gasunie is developing the North Sea Wind Power Hub. This concept envisions a series of hubs (islands or platforms) connected by "spokes" to wind farms and onshore grids.

  • Hydrogen Integration: A key innovation of the NSWPH is the integration of Power-to-Gas (PtG). When wind generation exceeds the capacity of the electrical cables, or when power prices are negative, electrolyzers on the hub can convert excess electricity into green hydrogen. This hydrogen can be transported to shore via repurposed gas pipelines, which is often cheaper than building additional electrical transmission capacity.17

4.3 LionLink (UK-Netherlands)

LionLink (formerly the Multi-Purpose Interconnector) represents the first cross-border direct connection of this type. It connects a Dutch offshore wind farm directly to the UK grid via a subsea cable.

  • Capacity: Designed for up to 2 GW (likely 1.8 GW operational), it allows the wind farm to export to the Netherlands or the UK, while also facilitating trade between the two nations.

  • Location: The UK landfall is proposed for East Suffolk, connecting to the Friston substation. This has been a point of local planning friction but is deemed essential for the project's viability.23

4.4 IceLink (UK-Iceland)

While less advanced than the North Sea projects, IceLink remains a strategic component of the wider vision. A proposed 1.0 - 1.2 GW HVDC cable would connect the UK to Iceland.

  • The Battery Concept: Iceland’s grid is dominated by hydro and geothermal power. IceLink would allow the UK to import stable baseload power from Iceland. Conversely, when UK wind output is high, power could potentially flow to Iceland to conserve hydro reservoirs, effectively using Iceland as a "green battery" for the North Sea. However, the project faces technical hurdles regarding the extreme cable length (over 1000 km) and deep-water installation challenges in the Atlantic.6

5. Economic Frameworks and Regulatory Alignment

Building the physical grid is only half the battle. The financial and regulatory architecture required to support it is equally complex.

5.1 Cross-Border Cost Allocation (CBCA)

The "Beneficiary Pays" principle is the cornerstone of EU infrastructure planning, but defining the beneficiary in a meshed grid is difficult.

  • The Dilemma: If a wind farm in the Danish EEZ connects to a German hub, Germany benefits from the power. However, if Denmark pays for the infrastructure, Danish consumers are subsidizing German energy security.

  • The Mechanism: The EU's TEN-E regulation and ACER guidelines provide a framework for Cross-Border Cost Allocation (CBCA). This involves detailed Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) modeling to quantify socio-economic welfare, security of supply, and carbon reduction benefits for each state. Based on these models, costs are allocated proportionally. The "Hamburg Declaration" commits signatories to streamlining these negotiations to prevent delays.27

5.2 Offshore Bidding Zones (OBZ)

To manage congestion and ensure efficient dispatch, the grid may require the creation of Offshore Bidding Zones.

  • Current State: Offshore wind farms are typically part of their home country's bidding zone (e.g., a Dutch wind farm gets the Dutch price).

  • Future State: In a mesh, the offshore hub might become its own price zone. If the cable to the Netherlands is congested but the cable to the UK is free, the price in the offshore zone would decouple from the Dutch price, incentivizing flow to the UK. This theoretical efficiency is controversial among developers, who prefer the certainty of their home market price. The NSEC is working to define the governance of these zones.21

5.3 Financing and the CEF

The scale of investment requires public support to de-risk private capital. The Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) is the primary EU instrument for this. By designating these grids as Projects of Common Interest (PCI), developers gain access to grants for studies and works, as well as favorable lending terms from the European Investment Bank (EIB). The "Hamburg" projects are prime candidates for this funding stream.30

6. The Supply Chain Bottleneck: A Crisis of Capacity

The political ambition of 100 GW collides with the industrial reality of the mid-2020s. The supply chain for offshore wind is severely constrained, threatening the timelines set out in the Hamburg Declaration.

6.1 The HVDC Cable Crunch

The demand for high-voltage subsea cables has exploded globally. There are only a limited number of manufacturers (e.g., NKT, Nexans, Prysmian, LS Cable) capable of producing 525kV HVDC cables.

  • Production Limits: Manufacturing these cables is a slow, continuous extrusion process. Factories are running at full capacity, with order books filled well into 2028-2030.

  • Material Shortages: The industry faces shortages of high-purity copper and aluminum. Furthermore, the specialized XLPE (Cross-linked polyethylene) insulation requires high-grade materials produced by only a few chemical plants globally. Any disruption in this upstream supply chain cascades into project delays.32

6.2 The Vessel Gap

Installing 15 MW+ turbines and heavy converter platforms requires specialized vessels.

  • Foundation Installation Vessels (FIV): These ships need massive cranes to lift the steel monopiles or jackets. The current fleet is aging and undersized for the new generation of mega-turbines.

  • Cable Laying Vessels (CLV): The meshed grid requires thousands of kilometers of cable. The global fleet of CLVs is insufficient to meet the simultaneous demands of the North Sea, the Baltic, the US East Coast, and Asia.

  • Availability: Reports indicate a critical shortage of these vessels peaking between 2026 and 2028. Developers must book slots years in advance, driving up installation costs.34

6.3 Electrical Equipment Lead Times

The lead time for large power transformers and HVDC converter valves has extended dramatically, reaching up to 4 years (210 weeks) in some cases. This "hardware bottleneck" means that even if the wind farm is built, it may sit idle waiting for the grid connection equipment.37

7. Security in a Hybrid Threat Environment

The security context of the North Sea has changed irrevocably. The infrastructure is no longer just a commercial asset; it is a critical vulnerability.

7.1 The Threat Landscape

The sabotage of the Nord Stream pipelines and the Balticconnector gas pipe demonstrated the vulnerability of subsea infrastructure to "grey zone" warfare. A meshed grid with hundreds of nodes and thousands of kilometers of cable presents a massive attack surface.

  • Seabed Warfare: Adversaries can use autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) or "research" vessels to map, tap, or sever cables.

  • Cyber Warfare: The digitization of the grid, with GFM converters relying on complex software, introduces cyber risks. A hacked converter could destabilize the grid or cause physical damage through resonance.1

7.2 NATO's Role and Response

The presence of NATO at the Hamburg Summit signals the integration of energy defense into the alliance's posture.

  • Surveillance: The agreement includes provisions for sharing security data. This involves using military-grade sonar, satellite monitoring, and patrols to secure the energy corridors.

  • Resilience by Design: The meshed topology itself is a defense. Unlike a centralized pipeline, a mesh is resilient. If one cable is cut, power can be rerouted. This redundancy is a form of deterrence by denial—attacking one node does not yield a strategic blackout.

  • Dual-Use Infrastructure: New platforms are being designed with dual-use capabilities, hosting sensors that monitor not just the weather but also underwater acoustic signatures to detect unauthorized submarine activity.39

8. Environmental Impact Assessment

The industrialization of the North Sea on this scale raises profound ecological questions. The "Green Power Plant" must coexist with a fragile marine ecosystem.

8.1 Benthic Ecology and EMF

The seabed (benthic zone) is the foundation of the marine food web.

  • Electromagnetic Fields (EMF): DC cables emit a static magnetic field. Many marine species, including elasmobranchs (sharks, rays) and eels, use the Earth's magnetic field for navigation. Strong local fields from cables can disorient these species or create "barriers" they refuse to cross. Mitigation involves burying cables to a depth of 1-3 meters, but this is not always possible in rocky or mobile sediment areas.41

  • Thermal Effects: HVDC cables dissipate heat. In soft sediments, this can raise the local temperature, potentially altering the chemical reaction rates in the sediment and changing the species composition of benthic communities.44

  • Reef Effect: Conversely, the hard structures of turbine foundations and cable protection (rock dumping) act as artificial reefs. This can increase local biodiversity by providing habitat for mussels, crabs, and fish. However, this replaces the natural sandy-bottom ecosystem with a hard-substrate ecosystem, which is a significant ecological shift.45

8.2 Avian Impacts

The North Sea is a critical flyway for millions of migratory birds.

  • Collision Risk: Historical concerns focused on birds colliding with rotor blades. However, recent studies using radar and AI cameras (e.g., by BioConsult SH) show that many species, such as gannets and divers, exhibit strong avoidance behavior, detecting turbines from kilometers away and diverting their flight paths. While this reduces direct mortality, it increases energy expenditure and causes habitat loss (displacement).46

  • Cumulative Impact: The primary concern is now the Cumulative Impact. A bird avoiding one wind farm might fly directly into the path of another. The sheer density of the 100 GW plan requires basin-wide spatial planning to leave "flight corridors" open. The Netherlands' "Framework for Assessing Ecological and Cumulative Effects" (KEC) is a pioneering tool attempting to model these interactions to determine the ecological carrying capacity of the North Sea.48

9. Conclusion

The Hamburg Declaration of 2026 marks the beginning of a new era for Europe. The commitment to build a 100 GW offshore grid is a bold assertion of energy sovereignty and climate leadership.

Technologically, the project validates the transition to a meshed VSC-HVDC architecture, pushing the boundaries of what is possible in power electronics and marine engineering. Economically, it challenges nations to overcome protectionist instincts and embrace a shared, interdependent energy market. Politically, it redefines the North Sea as a shared security asset, protected by the combined weight of NATO and the EU.

However, the path to 2050 is fraught with challenges. The supply chain crisis threatens to derail timelines, the regulatory friction of cost allocation tests the unity of the coalition, and the environmental impacts require a delicate balancing act between green energy and blue ecology. The success of the "Green Power Plant" will depend not just on the steel in the water, but on the durability of the cooperation forged in Hamburg.

Table 1: Key Infrastructure Projects and Technical Specifications

Project / Initiative

Capacity

Technology

Status (2026)

Key Partners

Hamburg Declaration Goal

100 GW (2050 target: 300 GW)

Meshed HVDC Grid

Signed Jan 2026

10 Nations + EU

Princess Elisabeth Island

3.5 GW Hub

Artificial Island (Concrete Caissons)

Under Construction

Belgium (Elia), Jan De Nul, DEME

LionLink

~1.8 - 2.0 GW

Multi-Purpose Interconnector

Development

UK (NGV), Netherlands (TenneT)

TenneT 2GW Program

2 GW per platform

525kV VSC-HVDC

Rollout

Netherlands, Germany

Nautilus

~1.4 GW

Hybrid Interconnector

Planning

UK, Belgium

IceLink

~1.0 - 1.2 GW

HVDC Interconnector

Feasibility

UK, Iceland

Data derived from research snippets.1

Table 2: Supply Chain & Technical Constraints

Component

Constraint

Implication

Mitigation Strategy

HVDC Cables

Production capacity for 525kV subsea cable is fully booked for years.

Delays in grid connection; rising costs.

Long-term framework agreements; investment in new factories.

Installation Vessels

Shortage of FIVs and CLVs capable of handling next-gen turbines/cables.

Bottlenecks in construction; competition with other regions.

New build programs; standardizing vessel interfaces.

Transformers

Lead times up to 4 years (210 weeks).

Critical path delays.

Strategic stockpiling; standardization of designs.

Protection

Lack of commercial DC Circuit Breakers for mesh protection.

Risk of grid-wide blackout from single fault.

Deployment of hybrid DC breakers; pilot projects.

Data derived from research snippets.11

Works cited

  1. North Sea countries plan joint offshore wind projects and security measures, accessed January 25, 2026, https://www.windtech-international.com/industry-news/north-sea-countries-plan-joint-offshore-wind-projects-and-security-measures

  2. News Content Hub - North Seas countries to commit to 100 GW of joint offshore wind projects, accessed January 25, 2026, https://www.rivieramm.com/news-content-hub/north-sea-summit-could-see-commitment-to-100-gw-of-joint-offshore-wind-projects-87529

  3. UK among 10 countries to build 100GW wind power grid in North ..., accessed January 25, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2026/jan/26/uk-among-10-countries-to-build-100gw-wind-power-grid-in-north-sea

  4. UK among 10 countries to build 100GW wind power grid in North Sea - OpenExO, accessed January 25, 2026, https://openexo.com/feed/item/uk-among-10-countries-to-build-100gw-wind-power-grid-in-north-sea

  5. Download the Ostend declaration - Belgian Federal Government · North Sea Summit II, accessed January 25, 2026, https://northseasummit23.be/en/ostend-declaration/

  6. Atlantic SuperConnection: Laying the FID groundwork for subsea interconnector to ply UK with geothermal and hydroelectric electricity while doling out wind power to Iceland - Offshore-Energy.biz, accessed January 25, 2026, https://www.offshore-energy.biz/atlantic-superconnection-laying-the-fid-groundwork-for-subsea-interconnector-to-ply-uk-with-geothermal-and-hydroelectric-electricity-while-doling-out-wind-power-to-iceland/

  7. Icelink - Wikipedia, accessed January 25, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Icelink

  8. International North Sea Summit 2026 in Germany | Federal Government - Bundesregierung, accessed January 25, 2026, https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-en/news/north-sea-summit-2026-2401316

  9. Offshore Wind Transmission Technical Review - Maine.gov, accessed January 25, 2026, https://www.maine.gov/energy/sites/maine.gov.energy/files/inline-files/Maine%20OSW%20DNV%20Offshore%20Wind%20Transmission%20Technical%20Review%20Final%20Report.pdf

  10. HVDC technology for offshore wind is maturing | News center - ABB, accessed January 25, 2026, https://new.abb.com/news/detail/8270/hvdc-technology-for-offshore-wind-is-maturing

  11. Multi-Terminal HVDC Networks for Offshore Energy Integration: Technical Challenges and Grid Interfacing Strategies - MDPI, accessed January 25, 2026, https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/24/6383

  12. NSWPH MT HVDC Functional Requirements - North Sea Wind Power Hub, accessed January 25, 2026, https://northseawindpowerhub.eu/knowledge/nswph-mt-hvdc-functional-requirements

  13. EU and Industry launch new project charting the way for interconnected offshore wind farms and energy islands - WindEurope, accessed January 25, 2026, https://windeurope.org/news/eu-and-industry-launching-new-project-charting-the-way-for-interconnected-offshore-wind-farms-and-energy-islands/

  14. Letter to the Northeast States Collaborative on HVDC Transmission Standards - ACORE, accessed January 25, 2026, https://acore.org/resources/letter-to-the-northeast-states-collaborative-on-hvdc-transmission-standards/

  15. Small-signal Stability Analysis of an Offshore Wind Farm with Two Grid-Forming HVDC Terminals - IEEE Xplore, accessed January 25, 2026, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11180457/

  16. NSWPH Hybrid System Model Grid Forming Studies - North Sea Wind Power Hub, accessed January 25, 2026, https://northseawindpowerhub.eu/files/media/document/NSWPH%20Optional%20work%205.1%20report%20%28final%29.pdf

  17. Hubs-and-spokes - North Sea Wind Power Hub, accessed January 25, 2026, https://northseawindpowerhub.eu/files/media/document/North%20Sea%20Wind%20Power%20Hub_Vision%20Paper%202024.pdf

  18. PRINCESS ELISABETH ISLAND - European Investment Bank, accessed January 25, 2026, https://www.eib.org/en/projects/all/20230946

  19. ECOPlanet grounds the world's first 'energy island' - Holcim, accessed January 25, 2026, https://www.holcim.com/who-we-are/our-stories/princess-elisabeth-island

  20. Progress on world's first artificial energy island revealed - Riviera Maritime Media, accessed January 25, 2026, https://www.rivieramm.com/news-content-hub/news-content-hub/progress-on-worlds-first-artificial-energy-island-revealed-80634

  21. CROSS-BORDER COST ALLOCATION FOR ELECTRICITY TRANSMISSION NETWORKS - cerre, accessed January 25, 2026, https://cerre.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/CERRE_Infrastructure_Final-report.pdf

  22. News | North Sea Wind Power Hub, accessed January 25, 2026, https://northseawindpowerhub.eu/news

  23. UK's National Grid updates plans for LionLink interconnector with Netherlands, accessed January 25, 2026, https://globaltransmission.info/uks-national-grid-updates-plans-for-lionlink-interconnector-with-netherlands/

  24. LionLink - National Grid, accessed January 25, 2026, https://www.nationalgrid.com/document/151106/download

  25. LionLink FAQs | National Grid, accessed January 25, 2026, https://www.nationalgrid.com/national-grid-ventures/lionlink/frequently-asked-questions

  26. IceLink (Interco Iceland-UK) Interconnector | TGS 4C - 4C Offshore, accessed January 25, 2026, https://www.4coffshore.com/transmission/interconnector-icelink-(interco-iceland-uk)-icid48.html

  27. Cross-border cost allocations for multipurpose solutions - North Sea Wind Power Hub, accessed January 25, 2026, https://northseawindpowerhub.eu/knowledge/cross-border-cost-allocations-multipurpose-solutions

  28. Cross-border cost allocation and cost-sharing for investment supporting the Energy Transition - Florence School of Regulation, accessed January 25, 2026, https://fsr.eui.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/240209_WS-Cross-border-cost_Programme_no-name.pdf

  29. Communication from the Commission – Guidance on collaborative investment frameworks for offshore energy projects - EUR-Lex, accessed January 25, 2026, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:C_202404277

  30. Financing cross border cooperation - Energy - European Commission, accessed January 25, 2026, https://energy.ec.europa.eu/topics/renewable-energy/financing/financing-cross-border-cooperation_en

  31. CEF Energy: Connecting Europe for an Affordable, Secure, and Green Future, accessed January 25, 2026, https://cinea.ec.europa.eu/cef-energy-connecting-europe-affordable-secure-and-green-future_en

  32. Navigating the power cable supply crunch - Inverto, accessed January 25, 2026, https://inverto.com/en/insights/navigating-the-power-cable-supply-crunch/

  33. High Voltage Direct Current (HVDC) Cable Market Size, Trends | Report [2035], accessed January 25, 2026, https://www.marketgrowthreports.com/market-reports/high-voltage-direct-current-hvdc-cable-market-113602

  34. Offshore wind vessels availability until 2030 - WindEurope, accessed January 25, 2026, https://windeurope.org/data/product/offshore-wind-vessels-availability-until-2030/

  35. Demand for foundation installation vessels could exceed supply in three years' time, accessed January 25, 2026, https://www.rivieramm.com/news-content-hub/news-content-hub/demand-for-foundation-installation-vessels-could-exceed-supply-in-three-years-time-74876

  36. Global Installation Vessel Fleet Could Enable Up to 400 GW of Offshore Wind by 2030, but More Newbuilds Needed Outside China – Study, accessed January 25, 2026, https://www.offshorewind.biz/2026/01/22/global-installation-vessel-fleet-could-enable-up-to-400-gw-of-offshore-wind-by-2030-but-more-newbuilds-needed-outside-china-study/

  37. High-Voltage Equipment Market Projected to Reach US$ 281.88 Billion by 2035, Supported by European Transmission Investments Says Astute Analytica - GlobeNewswire, accessed January 25, 2026, https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2026/01/12/3216656/0/en/High-Voltage-Equipment-Market-Projected-to-Reach-US-281-88-Billion-by-2035-Supported-by-European-Transmission-Investments-Says-Astute-Analytica.html

  38. North Sea nations map out 100GW of offshore wind by 2050, accessed January 25, 2026, https://www.4coffshore.com/news/north-sea-nations-map-out-100gw-of-offshore-wind-by-2050-nid32393.html

  39. NATO security spending can turn offshore wind into European security assets, new report urges - E3G, accessed January 25, 2026, https://www.e3g.org/news/north-sea-offshore-wind-into-security-assets/

  40. NATO security spending can turn offshore wind into European security assets, accessed January 25, 2026, https://www.windtech-international.com/industry-news/nato-security-spending-can-turn-offshore-wind-into-european-security-assets

  41. Electromagnetic fields from subsea power cables: A risk driver for biodiversity changes of offshore wind? - SINTEF, accessed January 25, 2026, https://www.sintef.no/globalassets/project/eera-deepwind-2024/posters/environmental_bjorn-henrik_hansen_emfposter.pdf

  42. A review of potential impacts of submarine power cables on the marine environment, accessed January 25, 2026, https://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/357253.pdf

  43. SEER Educational Research Brief: Electromagnetic Field Effects on Marine Life - Tethys, accessed January 25, 2026, https://tethys.pnnl.gov/sites/default/files/summaries/SEER-Educational-Research-Brief-Electromagnetic-Field-Effects-on-Marine-Life.pdf

  44. Wires and Wildlife: Offshore Transmission Development and the Benthos, accessed January 25, 2026, https://www.nwf.org/-/media/Documents/PDFs/NWF-Reports/2024/Wires-and-Wildlife-Offshore-Transmission-Development-and-the-Benthos.pdf

  45. Biodiversity Series Assessment of the environmental impacts of cables 2009 - The Quality Status Report 2010, accessed January 25, 2026, https://qsr2010.ospar.org/media/assessments/p00437_Cables.pdf

  46. Study finds migratory birds largely avoid wind turbines - Windtech International, accessed January 25, 2026, https://www.windtech-international.com/industry-news/study-finds-migratory-birds-largely-avoid-wind-turbines

  47. Press release: Study shows: Migratory birds almost completely avoid wind turbines – BWO, accessed January 25, 2026, https://bwo-offshorewind.de/en/pressemitteilung-studie-zeigt-zugvoegel-meiden-windenergieanlagen-fast-vollstaendig/

  48. Framework for Assessing Ecological and Cumulative Effects (KEC) | Noordzeeloket UK, accessed January 25, 2026, https://noordzeeloket.nl/en/functions-use/offshore-energy-transition/offshore-wind-energy/ecology/offshore-wind-ecological-programme-wozep/framework-assessing-ecological-cumulative-effects/

  49. Netherlands Launches Tender for Expert Assessment of Offshore Wind Farms' Ecological Impact | Windpowernl, accessed January 25, 2026, https://windpowernl.com/2025/11/03/netherlands-launches-tender-for-expert-assessment-of-offshore-wind-farms-ecological-impact/

  50. The North Sea as Europe's green power plant - Reinhausen, accessed January 25, 2026, https://www.reinhausen.com/impulses/standard-compliant-grid-integration-of-wind-and-solar-power/the-north-sea-as-europes-green-power-plant

Comments

bottom of page