top of page

Mapping the Hawaiian Mega Blob: Uncovering the Deep-Earth Anomaly That Anchors the Pacific's Famous Island Hotspot

Cross-section of Earth showing a vibrant red-orange lava flow from a volcano, set against a blue, oceanic surface. Dynamic and vivid.

Introduction

The Hawaiian Paradox and the Plume Hypothesis

For over a century, the Hawaiian Islands have stood as a geological enigma. In the mid-20th century, as the theory of plate tectonics coalesced to explain the chaotic motion of Earth's crust, the majority of the world's volcanism was neatly categorized. Volcanoes erupted where tectonic plates pulled apart, such as the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, or where they crashed together, as seen in the fiery Ring of Fire encircling the Pacific. Yet, Hawaii defied these categories. Situated nearly three thousand kilometers from the nearest plate boundary, in the tranquil center of the massive Pacific Plate, the Hawaiian archipelago spewed lava with a vigor that seemed to mock the rigid rules of the new tectonic paradigm.1

The solution to this paradox, proposed by geophysicist J. Tuzo Wilson in 1963 and refined by W. Jason Morgan, was the "hotspot" hypothesis. They envisioned a plume of superheated rock rising not from the shallow crust, but from the profound depths of the mantle, potentially as deep as the boundary with the Earth's core. This thermal anomaly, fixed in position relative to the moving plates, acted like a blowtorch aimed at the lithosphere. As the Pacific Plate drifted northwestward over millions of years, the stationary plume punched a succession of holes through the crust, creating a linear chain of volcanic islands and seamounts stretching all the way to the Aleutian trench.1

While the geometry of the hotspot track provided compelling evidence for the plume theory, the physical nature of the "plume root" remained obscured by nearly three thousand kilometers of solid rock. What exactly anchors such a long-lived thermal system? For decades, the prevailing mental image was one of a simple thermal upwelling—a fountain of hot, buoyant rock. However, as seismological techniques have advanced, peering deeper and with greater clarity into the Earth's interior, the picture has grown far more complex. We now know that the base of the mantle is not a featureless boundary but a landscape as varied and dramatic as the Earth's surface, dominated by colossal structures and chemical anomalies.3

Among these deep-earth structures are the Large Low Shear Velocity Provinces (LLSVPs), continent-sized regions of slow seismic velocity beneath Africa and the Pacific. But nestled within and around these giants are smaller, more extreme features known as Ultra-Low Velocity Zones (ULVZs). These patches, often only a few tens of kilometers thick, exhibit such drastic reductions in seismic wave speed that they have baffled scientists since their discovery. The traditional consensus was that these zones represented pockets of partial melt—essentially "gooey" blobs of silicate magma generated by the searing heat of the underlying core.5

However, a landmark study published in 2022 by Zhi Li and colleagues has fundamentally challenged this "gooey" hypothesis. Utilizing high-resolution seismic imaging and advanced 3D modeling, they revealed that the "mega-blob" beneath Hawaii is likely not a pocket of melt at all. Instead, the data points to a massive accumulation of solid, iron-rich rock—a "rust pile" of sorts—that is chemically distinct from the surrounding mantle.7 This report explores the depths of this discovery, unraveling the seismic methods used to see the invisible, the mineral physics that explains how rock can be solid yet act as a seismic brake, and the profound implications this has for our understanding of Earth's thermal history and the origins of the land on which we live.

The Deep Earth Microscope: Seismology’s Quest for Resolution

To understand the magnitude of the discovery beneath Hawaii, one must first appreciate the difficulty of the observation. Geologists cannot drill to the core-mantle boundary (CMB); the deepest boreholes barely scratch the upper crust. Our only window into the deep Earth is seismology, the study of elastic waves generated by earthquakes. When the Earth shakes, it sends energy rippling through the planet in the form of Primary (P) waves and Secondary (S) waves. P-waves are compressional, pushing material forward and back, and can travel through solids, liquids, and gases. S-waves are shear waves, moving material side-to-side, and crucially, they can only travel through solids. A liquid has no shear strength and thus stops an S-wave dead in its tracks.10

The speed at which these waves travel is dictated by the physical properties of the rock: its density and its elasticity (resistance to deformation). By measuring how long it takes for waves to travel from an earthquake in Tonga to a seismometer in California, scientists can infer the properties of the rock along the path. This technique, known as seismic tomography, is analogous to a medical CT scan. However, unlike a medical scanner that rotates around a stationary patient, seismologists must wait for earthquakes to occur in specific locations and hope that a recording station is placed on the other side of the planet to catch the waves.1

For decades, global tomography models provided a blurry, low-resolution view of the mantle. They could resolve features thousands of kilometers across—like the massive LLSVPs—but smaller, sharper features like ULVZs were smeared out or invisible. The waves used in these global studies had long wavelengths, often hundreds of kilometers long. Trying to see a thin, twenty-kilometer-high patch of rock at the core-mantle boundary with such long waves is like trying to read braille while wearing oven mitts; the fine texture is lost.4

The breakthrough achieved by Li and his team came from utilizing "high-frequency" seismic waves—those with periods of roughly ten to twenty seconds. These waves have shorter wavelengths, allowing them to interact with and resolve much smaller structures. Specifically, they focused on a phenomenon known as core diffraction. When a seismic wave hits the core-mantle boundary at a shallow angle, it doesn't just bounce off; it grazes along the interface, diffracting around the curve of the core before travelling back up to the surface. These diffracted waves () are the "spies" of the deep Earth, spending significant time hugging the very boundary where ULVZs reside, gathering detailed information about the texture and composition of the region.1

The Seismic Discovery

Watching Waves Bend and Slow

The study centered on a specific geometry of seismic observation ideally suited for interrogating the root of the Hawaiian plume. The researchers analyzed seismic data generated by deep earthquakes in the Tonga-Fiji region of the South Pacific. Deep earthquakes (those occurring hundreds of kilometers below the surface) are prized in seismology because they produce clean, sharp signals, free from the chaotic scattering caused by the complex geology of the Earth's shallow crust. The seismic energy from these quakes radiates outward, traveling down through the mantle, grazing the core-mantle boundary beneath the Central Pacific—directly under Hawaii—and then rising up to be recorded by the dense network of seismometers across the United States.1

In a standard model of the Earth, the diffracted S-wave would arrive as a single, clean pulse of energy. However, as the researchers examined the seismograms recorded across North America, they noticed something peculiar. The wave arrival was not simple. It was followed by a second, smaller pulse of energy—a "postcursor"—that arrived seconds later. This delayed signal was the smoking gun. It indicated that a portion of the wave energy had been trapped in a "slow lane" at the base of the mantle. As the main wavefront sped through the normal mantle rock, a fraction of the energy was snagged by a region of extremely low velocity, bouncing around inside this slow structure before finally exiting and continuing its journey to the surface, arriving late to the party.1

The Postcursor Phenomenon and Frequency Dependence

The existence of a postcursor alone confirms the presence of a low-velocity anomaly, but the Li et al. study went further by analyzing the character of this delayed signal. They discovered that the delay time was frequency-dependent. In simple terms, the "bass notes" of the seismic song (low-frequency waves) were delayed by a different amount than the "treble notes" (high-frequency waves). This phenomenon, known as dispersion, is critical evidence. It implies that the slowing structure is not a uniform block, but has internal complexity—likely a gradient where the velocity changes with depth.12

The observation of these high-frequency postcursors was made possible by the "USArray," a massive scientific initiative that deployed a transportable grid of seismometers across the continental United States. This dense array acted like a giant antenna, allowing the researchers to amplify the faint signals from the core-mantle boundary and filter out noise. By stacking (averaging) the signals from hundreds of stations, the subtle postcursor emerging from the Hawaiian depths became undeniable.1

Modeling the Invisible: The Shift to 3D

Historically, interpreting such seismic anomalies relied on simplified "ray theory," which treats seismic waves as infinite, pencil-thin lines. While computationally cheap, ray theory fails to capture the complex physics of diffraction and scattering that occurs when waves encounter small, sharp obstacles like a ULVZ. It assumes the wave just passes through or bends slightly, missing the rich tapestry of wave interference that actually occurs.

The Li et al. study represented a methodological leap by employing advanced 3D full-waveform modeling. They utilized powerful supercomputers to simulate the entire physics of wave propagation through the Earth. Instead of drawing lines, they solved the wave equation in a three-dimensional grid, allowing them to simulate how a wavefront would wrap around, scatter off, and travel through various hypothetical shapes of "blobs" at the core-mantle boundary. They generated thousands of synthetic seismograms for different scenarios—cylindrical blobs, dome-shaped blobs, chemically graded blobs—and compared these simulations to the actual data recorded by the USArray.9

To manage the immense number of possibilities, the team used a Bayesian inversion framework. In science, we often look for the "best fit" model, but in the deep Earth, many different shapes can produce similar signals. Bayesian inversion is a statistical technique that explores the entire "probability space." Instead of saying "this is the shape," it allows scientists to say "this family of shapes is highly probable, while these others are unlikely." This rigorous approach allowed them to place tight constraints on the dimensions and properties of the Hawaiian anomaly with a level of confidence previously unattainable.14

Anatomy of the Hawaiian Mega-Blob

A Giant in the Deep

The structure revealed by this high-resolution imaging is colossal. While typical ULVZs identified elsewhere in the mantle might be a few tens of kilometers across, the feature beneath Hawaii belongs to a rare class of "Mega-ULVZs." The study indicates that the broad zone of anomalous material spans a width of approximately 900 kilometers (roughly 560 miles). To put this in perspective, if this structure were placed on the surface of the Earth, it would cover the entire length of the United Kingdom or the state of California. It is a continent-sized feature hidden at the center of the planet.6

Despite its immense width, the structure is surprisingly thin vertically. The modeling constrains the height of the main velocity anomaly to roughly 20 to 25 kilometers.14 This creates a geometry similar to a massive pancake or a thin lens resting on the core-mantle boundary. This high "aspect ratio"—being very wide but relatively thin—is a crucial clue to its nature. A pocket of liquid (melt) would struggle to maintain such a shape over geological timescales without pooling or dispersing, whereas a solid pile of dense rock could theoretically maintain this topography for billions of years.5

Table 1: Dimensions of the Hawaiian Mega-ULVZ

Dimension

Measurement

Comparison

Width (Diameter)

~900 km

Length of Great Britain

Height (Thickness)

~20 - 25 km

Twice the cruising altitude of a jetliner

Depth

~2,900 km

Boundary between Mantle and Core

Location

Southwest of Hawaii

Offset from the surface hotspot

The Gradient of Slowing

The most startling revelation from the study was the magnitude of the seismic slowdown. In standard models of the mantle, velocity variations are usually small—a few percent here or there. Even in previously identified ULVZs, velocity drops of 10% to 20% were considered extreme. The Hawaiian Mega-Blob, however, shattered these expectations.

The modeling revealed that the shear wave velocity does not drop uniformly. Instead, the structure possesses a strong internal velocity gradient. At the top of the layer, the velocity reduction is moderate, perhaps 10-20% lower than the surrounding mantle. But as one goes deeper into the layer, towards the core-mantle boundary, the velocity plummets, reaching a reduction of up to 40% at the base.9

This gradient suggests that the blob is not a homogeneous tank of material but is likely chemically stratified. The concentration of the anomalous material—the "heavy stuff"—increases with depth. This profile is consistent with a heavy, dense material settling under gravity, creating a pile that is densest at the bottom. The extreme nature of the 40% reduction is difficult to explain with standard silicate rocks, even at high temperatures, and it forces geophysicists to reconsider the very composition of the structure.12

The Matter of the Mantle

The Gooey Hypothesis: A Melt-Based Paradigm

For decades, the dominant hypothesis for ULVZs was that they were regions of partial melt. The logic was straightforward and compelling. We know the outer core is liquid iron, and its temperature (estimated at around 4000 Kelvin) is likely higher than the melting point of the mantle rock above it. It seemed natural that the bottommost layer of the mantle would partially melt, forming a "mush" of solid crystals and liquid magma.

Melting rock is an incredibly effective way to slow down seismic waves. Shear waves, in particular, are sensitive to the presence of fluid. Even a small fraction of liquid between solid grains acts as a lubricant, drastically reducing the material's rigidity (shear modulus) and causing the wave velocity to drop. A layer of 5% to 30% partial melt could easily explain velocity drops of 10% to 30%, which matched earlier, lower-resolution observations.17 Consequently, ULVZs were widely popularized as "magma chambers" at the base of the mantle, the gooey roots from which mantle plumes drew their heat and material.

However, the "gooey" hypothesis faced significant challenges when confronted with the new data from Hawaii.

  1. Dynamic Stability: Liquid melt is typically less dense than the solid rock from which it forms. In the intense gravity field of the deep Earth, a melt layer should be buoyant. It would tend to rise into the mantle rather than sit as a stable, 20-kilometer-thick pile. Conversely, if the melt were enriched in iron to make it dense, it would likely drain downwards, forming a microscopically thin film on the core rather than a mountain-sized pile. Maintaining a coherent "blob" of melt that is 900 km wide and 20 km high is geodynamically difficult; the "slush" would tend to flatten out or disperse.6

  2. Seismic Ratios: The physics of rock elasticity dictates that melt affects shear waves much more than compressional waves . The ratio of the velocity reductions is often used as a diagnostic tool. Pure melt models typically predict a ratio of roughly 3:1. The data for some ULVZs, including the new modeling for Hawaii, allows for ratios closer to 2:1, which is harder to reconcile with a simple melt model but fits well with solid-state compositional changes.19

The Solid Iron Alternative

The Li et al. (2022) study proposes a radical alternative: the Mega-Blob is solid rock. Specifically, it is a rock composed of standard mantle minerals that are heavily enriched in iron.

The deep mantle is primarily composed of two minerals: bridgmanite (magnesium silicate perovskite) and ferropericlase (magnesium-iron oxide). In the normal mantle, the iron content is relatively low—roughly 10-20% of the magnesium is replaced by iron. The authors argue that the ULVZ represents a region where the iron concentration is drastically higher. They point to a mineral known as magnesiowüstite (or iron-rich (Mg,Fe)O) as the culprit.9

The Physics of Heavy Rock

How can solid rock slow down seismic waves as effectively as magma? The answer lies in the atomic physics of iron.

  1. The Mass Effect: Iron is a heavy element (atomic mass ~56) compared to magnesium (atomic mass ~24). Replacing magnesium atoms with iron atoms in the crystal lattice significantly increases the density of the rock. As the denominator in the equation increases, the velocity decreases. This is a "mass effect"—heavy things vibrate slower.10

  2. Elastic Softening: Beyond just adding weight, high concentrations of iron can change the stiffness of the mineral lattice. Iron-rich ferropericlase is more compliant (softer) than its magnesium-rich counterpart. This reduction in stiffness (the numerator in the equation) further drives down the wave speed.21

  3. Electronic Transitions: At the crushing pressures of the lowermost mantle, iron atoms undergo changes in their electron configuration, known as "spin transitions." The switch from a high-spin state to a low-spin state can induce anomalies in the bulk modulus and shear modulus of the mineral, contributing to further velocity reductions.19

By combining these effects, a solid assemblage containing significantly enriched magnesiowüstite can produce the extreme 40% velocity reduction observed under Hawaii without requiring a single drop of liquid melt. This "solid iron" hypothesis solves the stability problem: a dense, solid pile is mechanically stable. It sits on the core like a heavy sediment, resistant to being swept away by mantle currents, explaining why the structure has persisted for potentially billions of years.6

Table 2: Comparison of Hypotheses

Feature

Partial Melt Hypothesis (Gooey)

Iron-Rich Solid Hypothesis (Rock)

State of Matter

Liquid/Solid Slush

Solid Crystalline Rock

Seismic Velocity Source

Liquid lubrication of grain boundaries

High density (Mass) + Lattice softening

Stability

Unstable (Buoyant or Draining)

Stable (Dense Anchor)

Supported by Li et al.

No

Yes

Origin

Thermal melting by core

Primordial chemical remnant

Chemical Fingerprints

Echoes of the Early Earth

The identification of the Hawaiian ULVZ as a solid, iron-rich body is not just a triumph of seismology; it solves a major puzzle in geochemistry. For decades, geochemists studying the lavas erupting from Hawaiian volcanoes have noted something strange. The chemical composition of Hawaiian basalt is distinct from the basalt that erupts at mid-ocean ridges.

Mid-ocean ridge basalts (MORB) are chemically "depleted." They represent the upper mantle, which has been churned and melted for billions of years, losing its volatile elements and ancient gases. Hawaiian basalts, however, are "enriched." They carry isotopic signatures that look primordial—like a time capsule from the Earth's formation 4.5 billion years ago.22

The Isotope Link

The primary evidence comes from noble gases, specifically Helium-3. Helium-3 is a primordial isotope; it was trapped in the Earth during the planet's accretion from the solar nebula. It is not produced by radioactive decay (unlike Helium-4). Therefore, a reservoir with a high ratio of Helium-3 to Helium-4 implies that the material has never been "degassed" or processed by surface volcanism. It has remained isolated in the deep Earth since the beginning of time.24

Hawaiian lavas have some of the highest Helium-3 to Helium-4 ratios on the planet. They also show anomalies in Neon-22 (indicating solar nebula gas) and Tungsten-182. Tungsten-182 is particularly revealing because it is the product of the decay of Hafnium-182, an isotope that went extinct within the first 50 million years of the solar system. An anomaly in Tungsten-182 confirms that the source of the Hawaiian lava separated from the rest of the mantle almost immediately after the Earth formed.23

The discovery of the solid, iron-rich Mega-Blob provides a physical location for this "undegassed reservoir."

  • Basal Magma Ocean (BMO) Remnants: How does a massive pile of iron-rich rock form? The leading theory is that in the Hadean Eon, the early Earth was covered by a global magma ocean. As this ocean cooled and crystallized, dense iron-rich crystals settled to the bottom, forming a layer at the core-mantle boundary. Over billions of years, mantle convection swept this dense layer into piles—the ULVZs we see today. The Hawaiian Mega-Blob is essentially a fossil of the Earth's birth.11

  • Entrainment: If the ULVZ is the source of the primordial signature, how does it get to the surface? The ULVZ itself is too heavy to rise. However, the hot mantle plume rising from the LLSVP can "entrain" or drag small amounts of material from the ULVZ. Like a rising column of smoke dragging dust upward, the Hawaiian plume pulls filaments of this ancient, iron-rich rock 2,900 kilometers to the surface. The lava we see erupting at Kilauea contains microscopic tracers of this deep, solid "rust pile".25

This connection is strengthened by a global correlation: the hotspots with the strongest primordial signatures (Hawaii, Iceland, Samoa, Galapagos) are the exact same locations where seismologists have detected these "Mega-ULVZs." This one-to-one mapping strongly supports the idea that these blobs are the geochemical roots of the world's major mantle plumes.6

Table 3: The Geochemical Connection

Isotope

Significance

Observation in Hawaii

Connection to ULVZ

Helium-3

Primordial (Big Bang/Solar)

High Excess

ULVZ is ancient, isolated residue

Tungsten-182

Formed in first 50 Myr

Anomalous

ULVZ formed during core differentiation

Neon Isotopes

Solar Nebula signature

Solar-like

ULVZ trapped ancient atmospheric gases

Geodynamic Consequences

Anchoring the Plume

The headline of the LiveScience article suggested the blob might "fuel" the hotspot. In scientific terms, this "fueling" is less about combustion and more about thermal and dynamic stability. The presence of a dense, solid ULVZ at the base of the mantle plume acts as an anchor.

Mantle plumes are transient features in fluid dynamics; they can be blown sideways by "mantle wind" (convection currents). However, the Hawaiian hotspot has been remarkably long-lived, creating a seamount chain that stretches thousands of kilometers, representing over 80 million years of continuous activity. The dense ULVZ helps explain this stability. The heavy pile of rock resists being swept away by mantle flow. It creates a stationary root for the thermal upwelling. The heat from the core conducts through this iron-rich pile, warming the lighter mantle rock above it, which then becomes buoyant and rises as the plume. The blob doesn't rise itself; it is the "burner" on the stove that stays put while the "water" (mantle rock) boils upward.17

The Li et al. study noted that the ULVZ is slightly offset to the southwest of the main hotspot track. This offset is consistent with geodynamic models where the plume root is anchored by the heavy ULVZ, but the rising conduit is tilted by the flow of the mantle, much like smoke from a chimney is tilted by the wind. The ULVZ provides the necessary boundary condition to keep the plume generated in the same relative location for eons.26

Core-Mantle Interaction and the Geodynamo

The implications of a solid, iron-rich ULVZ extend beyond volcanism to the very heart of the planet's magnetic field. The Earth's magnetic field is generated by the geodynamo—the churning motion of the liquid iron outer core. This motion is driven by heat loss across the core-mantle boundary.

If ULVZs were melt, they would likely act as thermal insulators, trapping heat in the core. However, if they are solid iron-rich oxides, their thermal and electrical conductivity is different. Some mineral physics studies suggest that magnesiowüstite is highly conductive electrically.27 The presence of massive, conductive piles like the Hawaiian Mega-Blob could influence the flow patterns of the liquid core beneath them. They might create "preferred paths" for heat flow or alter the electromagnetic coupling between the core and mantle.

Furthermore, the chemical gradient observed by Li et al. suggests ongoing interaction. The iron enrichment increasing towards the core implies that the ULVZ might be "feeding" off the core, or conversely, that the core is leaking material into the mantle. This chemical exchange at the boundary is a fundamental process in the evolution of the planet, regulating the cooling rate of the core and the chemistry of the mantle over geological time.12

Conclusion

The seismic revelation of the "enormous mega-blob" beneath Hawaii marks a pivotal shift in our understanding of the deep Earth. For decades, the simple intuition that "hot equals melt" guided our interpretation of the core-mantle boundary. The discovery by Zhi Li and his colleagues, empowering the lens of seismology with the rigor of supercomputing, has dismantled that assumption. We now see the roots of the Hawaiian plume not as gooey pockets of slush, but as monumental piles of solid, iron-heavy rock—ancient sentinels that have stood guard at the core-mantle boundary since the dawn of the planet.

This "Solid Iron" hypothesis offers a unifying theory that elegantly connects the physics of seismic waves, the chemistry of volcanic isotopes, and the dynamics of mantle plumes. It explains why the waves slow down so drastically (mass and lattice softening), why the structure is stable (density), and why the lavas of Hawaii taste of the primordial solar nebula (entrainment of ancient residue).

The "blob" is more than just a geological curiosity. It is a physical link between the surface world of islands and sunlight and the alien, high-pressure world of the deep interior. It reminds us that the ground beneath our feet is dynamic, that the history of the Earth is preserved in the deep freeze of the mantle, and that the fires of Hawaii are fueled by the very rust of creation, anchored by a mountain of iron hidden three thousand kilometers below the waves.



Works cited

  1. Digging in to deep Earth - Oxford Academic, accessed February 2, 2026, https://academic.oup.com/astrogeo/article-pdf/65/1/atae012/56452037/atae012.pdf

  2. Origin and Evolution of Earth: Research Questions for a Changing Planet, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.geokniga.org/bookfiles/geokniga-originevolutionearth2008.pdf

  3. High Resolution Imaging Reveals Puzzling Features Deep in Earth's Interior - Geology In, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.geologyin.com/2022/05/high-resolution-imaging-reveals.html

  4. One of The Hot, Dense Blobs Deep Inside Earth Has Been Revealed With New Imaging, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.sciencealert.com/high-resolution-imaging-reveals-one-of-the-hot-dense-blobs-wrapping-around-earth-s-core

  5. Seismic Observation of a New ULVZ Beneath the Southern Pacific - ResearchGate, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379406379_Seismic_Observation_of_a_New_ULVZ_Beneath_the_Southern_Pacific

  6. The root to the Galápagos mantle plume on the core-mantle boundary | Seismica, accessed February 2, 2026, https://seismica.library.mcgill.ca/article/view/197/265

  7. Live Science | Latest science news and articles for those with curious minds, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.livescience.com/

  8. Geology: News, features and articles | Live Science, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.livescience.com/planet-earth/geology

  9. Kilometer-scale structure on the core–mantle boundary near Hawaii - Apollo, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/items/562f1a13-18cd-476c-8adc-aa1f02425935

  10. Understanding the Building Blocks of the Planet - Geo Prose, accessed February 2, 2026, https://geo-prose.com/pdfs/building_blocks.pdf

  11. Unlocking Earth's deep secrets - DSpace, accessed February 2, 2026, https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/438462/atad064.pdf?sequence=1

  12. Kilometer-scale structure on the core-mantle boundary near Hawaii - PubMed, accessed February 2, 2026, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35589765/

  13. Kuangdai Leng's research works | Science and Technology Facilities Council and other places - ResearchGate, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/scientific-contributions/Kuangdai-Leng-2115835763

  14. Mapping structures on the core–mantle boundary using Sdiff postcursors: Part II. Application to the Hawaiian ULVZ - Oxford Academic, accessed February 2, 2026, https://academic.oup.com/gji/article/235/3/2399/7263255

  15. Mapping structures on the core–mantle boundary using Sdiff postcursors: Part I. Method and Validation | Geophysical Journal International | Oxford Academic, accessed February 2, 2026, https://academic.oup.com/gji/article/235/3/2385/7258818

  16. Illustration of wavefront refraction for the long-period (black) and... - ResearchGate, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Illustration-of-wavefront-refraction-for-the-long-period-black-and-short-period-green_fig2_360723797

  17. Conceptual cartoons of the Hawaiian ultra-low velocity zone (ULVZ)... - ResearchGate, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Conceptual-cartoons-of-the-Hawaiian-ultra-low-velocity-zone-ULVZ-structure-A-ULVZ-on_fig5_360723797

  18. Unlocking Earth's deep secrets - ResearchGate, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377879161_Unlocking_Earth's_deep_secrets

  19. Evaluating the Role of Iron-Rich (Mg,Fe)O in Ultralow Velocity Zones - MDPI, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.mdpi.com/2075-163X/9/12/762

  20. Sound velocity and density of magnesiowstites: Implications for ultralow-velocity zone topography - CalTech GPS, accessed February 2, 2026, https://web.gps.caltech.edu/~jackson/pdf/Wicks2017_GRL.pdf

  21. Modeling viscosity of (Mg,Fe)O at lowermost mantle conditions - CalTech GPS, accessed February 2, 2026, https://web.gps.caltech.edu/~jackson/pdf/Reali2019_ViscosityFpMw_PEPI.pdf

  22. Scientists 'see' puzzling features deep in Earth's interior - University of Cambridge, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/scientists-see-puzzling-features-deep-in-earths-interior

  23. The root to the Galápagos mantle plume on the core-mantle boundary - EarthArXiv, accessed February 2, 2026, https://eartharxiv.org/repository/view/3440/

  24. Mapped ULVZs and ocean island basalt isotopic signatures. Previous... | Download Scientific Diagram - ResearchGate, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Mapped-ULVZs-and-ocean-island-basalt-isotopic-signatures-Previous-suggested-locations-of_fig5_365405598

  25. High Resolution Imaging Reveals Puzzling Features Deep in Earth's Interior - SciTechDaily, accessed February 2, 2026, https://scitechdaily.com/high-resolution-imaging-reveals-puzzling-features-deep-in-earths-interior/

  26. The moving mantle beneath Hawaii: A new look at an old bend - PNAS, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2524801122

  27. Sound velocity and density of magnesiowüstites: Implications for ultralow-velocity zone topography - OSTI, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1355031

  28. Extensive iron–water exchange at Earth's core–mantle boundary can explain seismic anomalies - IDEAS/RePEc, accessed February 2, 2026, https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v15y2024i1d10.1038_s41467-024-52677-9.html

  29. Science News: Recent scientific discoveries and expert analysis, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.livescience.com/news

  30. Evaluating the Role of Iron-Rich (Mg,Fe)O in Ultralow Velocity Zones (Journal Article) - OSTI, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.osti.gov/pages/biblio/1596133

  31. Hematite formation by oxygenated groundwater more than 2.76 billion years ago | Request PDF - ResearchGate, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240410405_Hematite_formation_by_oxygenated_groundwater_more_than_276_billion_years_ago

Comments


bottom of page