Mapping the "Space Brain": How Microgravity Physically Reshapes Us

Introduction: The Neurological Cost of Spaceflight

For the vast majority of human history, our species has evolved under the unrelenting, constant influence of a single geophysics force: gravity. It is the silent architect of our anatomy, dictating the density of our bones, the strength of our muscles, and the complex hydraulics of our cardiovascular system. We are, in every physiological sense, creatures of 1G. The human body is designed to push against the pull of Earth; our veins contain valves to prevent blood from pooling in our feet, our vestibular system is calibrated to a constant downward acceleration, and our internal organs are tethered to withstand the compressive force of our own weight.

However, as humanity transitions from the era of low-Earth orbit habitation to the prospective colonization of the Moon and Mars, we are forcing this terrestrial biology into an environment for which it has no evolutionary blueprint. The concept of the "Overview Effect"—the cognitive shift reported by astronauts upon viewing Earth from space—is well documented as a psychological phenomenon. Yet, as recent research has dramatically highlighted, the shift is not merely philosophical. It is physical, structural, and potentially pathological.

In January 2026, a landmark study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) by a collaborative team from the University of Florida, NASA, and other institutions provided the most detailed map to date of the "space brain." This research, led by Dr. Rachael Seidler, confirmed that the human brain does not merely float in the microgravity environment; it undergoes significant, non-linear structural deformations, shifting upward and backward within the cranial vault.¹ These findings, when viewed alongside the growing body of literature on Spaceflight Associated Neuro-ocular Syndrome (SANS) and glymphatic clearance, suggest that the neuroanatomical toll of spaceflight is one of the most significant hurdles to deep space exploration.

This report offers an exhaustive examination of these 2026 findings, situating them within the broader context of space physiology. By synthesizing data from astronaut MRI scans, terrestrial microgravity analogs, and fluid dynamic modeling, we explore the mechanisms of the "cephalad shift," the resultant compression of neural tissue, and the functional consequences for the men and women who leave our world behind. We will delve into the specific deformation of the posterior insula and its link to balance disorders, the expansion of the ventricular system that persists for years after landing, and the paradoxical differences between male and female astronauts in their physiological adaptation to weightlessness.

The Physics of Physiology: Hydrostatics in a Vacuum

To understand the profound structural changes observed in the brains of astronauts, one must first dismantle the terrestrial understanding of fluid mechanics. On Earth, the human body acts as a hydrostatic column. When standing upright, the pressure in the blood vessels of the feet is significantly higher than in the head due to the weight of the fluid column above. This is governed by the hydrostatic pressure equation, where pressure equals the product of fluid density, gravity, and height.

In the microgravity environment of the International Space Station (ISS), the gravity variable in this equation effectively drops to zero relative to the spacecraft frame. The hydrostatic gradient vanishes. The blood and interstitial fluid that gravity normally pulls into the lower extremities—a volume estimated at nearly two liters—are no longer anchored there. Instead, they migrate upward, seeking a new equilibrium. This phenomenon, known as the "cephalad fluid shift," is the primary driver of the initial physiological adaptations to spaceflight.³

The Unloading of the Venous System

The immediate visible consequence of this shift is the "puffy face, bird leg" syndrome, where astronauts’ faces swell and their legs atrophy. However, the internal consequences are far more severe. The venous system of the brain, which relies on gravity to assist drainage through the jugular veins, becomes congested. In a terrestrial upright posture, venous return from the head is facilitated by gravity. In space, this assist is lost. Research has even documented cases of stagnant or reversed blood flow in the internal jugular veins of crew members during long-duration missions.³

This venous congestion creates a domino effect. The cranium is a rigid container with a fixed volume (the Monro-Kellie doctrine). It contains three primary components: brain tissue, arterial and venous blood, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). If the volume of venous blood increases due to impaired drainage, and the volume of the skull cannot expand, the other components must compensate, or pressure will rise. The 2026 Seidler study suggests that the brain itself becomes the moving part in this pressurized equation. The increased fluid volume at the base of the skull, combined with the loss of the brain's own effective weight, creates a hydraulic force that physically lifts the brain upward.¹

The Waterbed Effect

One can visualize the brain in microgravity not as a floating object, but as a body resting on a filling waterbed. As fluids accumulate in the lower cranial compartments (the basal cisterns) and the venous plexuses swell, the brain is pushed superiorly. The top of the skull, the calvarium, offers no room for escape. The brain is thus compressed against the inner table of the skull vertex, closing off the subarachnoid space where CSF normally flows and is reabsorbed.⁶ This mechanical shift is the fundamental mechanism underlying the complex deformations quantified in the recent 2026 analysis.

Factor	Terrestrial Physiology (1G)	Microgravity Physiology (0G)
Hydrostatic Gradient	Strong (high pressure in feet, low in head)	Absent (uniform pressure distribution)
Fluid Distribution	Pooled in lower extremities	Shifted cranially (Cephalad Fluid Shift)
Venous Drainage	Gravity-assisted via Jugulars	Impeded; reliance on pressure differentials
Brain Position	Settles inferiorly due to weight	Shifts superiorly and posteriorly
Intracranial Pressure	Variable with posture	Consistently elevated relative to upright 1G

³

The 2026 Seidler Study: Mapping the Neural Drift

While previous studies had hinted at morphological changes in the astronaut brain, the study published in January 2026 by Seidler et al. represents a watershed moment in space neuroscience due to its methodological rigor and sample size. Analyzing structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data from 26 astronauts and comparing them to 24 terrestrial controls in a bed-rest analog, the researchers were able to isolate the specific effects of the spaceflight environment from general fluid shifts.¹

Methodology: The Rigid Body Registration

The challenge in measuring brain shift is finding a stable reference point. If the brain is moving, what are we measuring it against? The researchers utilized a technique called rigid body registration, using the skull itself as the immutable reference frame. By aligning the pre-flight and post-flight MRI scans based on the bony anatomy of the cranium, they could quantify the precise translational and rotational movements of the brain tissue within.²

This approach revealed that the brain does not expand uniformly like a balloon. Instead, it behaves as a viscoelastic solid subjected to directional forces. The study identified a consistent pattern of movement: the brain shifts upward (superiorly) and backward (posteriorly), while simultaneously undergoing a pitch rotation.¹

The Topography of Deformation

The 2026 findings provide a detailed topographical map of this shift. The movement is not subtle; it is statistically significant and anatomically disruptive.

1. Superior Compression: As the brain translates upward, the gyri of the frontal and parietal lobes are pressed against the skull. This results in a flattening of the cortical sulci (the grooves on the brain's surface) at the vertex. This "crowding" of the cortex is a direct physical manifestation of the fluid forces acting from below.⁶

2. Inferior Expansion: Conversely, the upward shift creates a vacuum-like effect at the base of the skull. The space between the brainstem and the clivus (the bone at the base of the skull) widens. The cranial nerves, the pituitary stalk, and the vascular structures that tether the brain to the skull base are placed under tension. They are effectively being stretched as the brain mass migrates away from its anchor points.⁵

3. The Backward Tilt: The "pitch rotation" identified in the study describes a movement where the frontal lobes lift and rotate posteriorly. This suggests that the center of buoyancy of the brain changes in microgravity, or that the fluid accumulation is more pronounced in the anterior basal regions, leveraging the front of the brain upward.¹

Non-Linear Lateral Deformations

Perhaps the most nuanced finding of the 2026 report is the identification of non-linear lateral deformations. The brain is not a homogeneous block; it is composed of grey matter (cell bodies) and white matter (axons), each with different material properties. The study found that different regions deform at different rates. The superior portions of the brain experience compression, while the inferior portions experience distraction (stretching). This differential movement creates shear forces within the deep brain structures.⁶

These shear forces are of critical concern. The white matter tracts act as the communication cables of the brain. If the brain is twisting or shearing, these tracts could be subjected to micro-structural damage, potentially affecting signal transmission speed and fidelity. The study noted that these deformations differed significantly between the upper and lower brain, highlighting a complex internal strain map that was previously unappreciated.²

Spaceflight Associated Neuro-ocular Syndrome (SANS): The Ocular Consequence

The upward shift of the brain described in the 2026 Seidler study serves as the "smoking gun" for understanding Spaceflight Associated Neuro-ocular Syndrome (SANS). Formerly known as VIIP (Visual Impairment Intracranial Pressure), SANS is widely considered the top medical risk for long-duration human spaceflight, affecting approximately 70% of astronauts on long missions.¹⁰

The Clinical Presentation of SANS

SANS presents as a collection of ocular deformities that would be alarming in a clinical setting on Earth. Astronauts return with:

• Globe Flattening: The posterior aspect of the eyeball is physically pushed inward, shortening the axial length of the eye.

• Hyperopic Shift: As the eye shortens, the focal point moves behind the retina, causing a shift toward farsightedness. Astronauts often require "space glasses" to read procedures.

• Optic Disc Edema: The optic nerve head, where the nerve enters the eye, becomes swollen, a sign typically associated with raised intracranial pressure.

• Choroidal Folds: Physical wrinkles appear in the vascular layer of the eye, indicating mechanical stress.¹⁰

The Mechanical Link: Brain Shift and Optic Nerve Traction

The 2026 findings provide the mechanical explanation for these symptoms. The optic nerve is not a peripheral nerve; it is a direct extension of the central nervous system, ensheathed in dura mater and bathed in cerebrospinal fluid. The subarachnoid space of the brain communicates directly with the subarachnoid space surrounding the optic nerve.⁷

As the brain shifts upward and fluid pressure redistributes, two things happen:

1. Compartmentalization: The communication between the intracranial CSF and the optic nerve CSF may be pinched off. The upward movement of the brain may compress the entrance to the optic canal. This creates a "cul-de-sac" in the optic nerve sheath where fluid becomes trapped.

2. Pressure Transfer: The trapped fluid, unable to drain back into the cranium, exerts local hydrostatic pressure on the back of the eye. This pressure flattens the globe and causes the optic nerve head to bulge forward (edema).⁷

Essentially, the SANS phenomenon is a localized manifestation of the global brain shift. The eye acts as a pressure relief valve for the cranial fluid shifts.¹²

The Gender Paradox: Fluid vs. Structure

A fascinating divergence emerged in recent analyses regarding biological sex. The research indicates that while male astronauts are significantly more prone to the structural deformities of SANS (globe flattening and optic disc edema), female astronauts actually exhibit greater fluid shifts and reductions in fluid volume at the vertex.¹¹

This presents a paradox: Why do women, who have more severe fluid redistribution, suffer less ocular damage?

The leading hypothesis, supported by the 2026 literature, points to connective tissue compliance. It is suggested that female astronauts may possess more elastic vascular and dural tissues. When fluid pressure builds in the female cranium, the tissues may expand to accommodate the volume, buffering the pressure. In contrast, the male anatomy may be more rigid or less compliant. Without the ability to expand, the pressure is transmitted directly to the path of least resistance: the back of the eye. Thus, while women experience the fluid shift (the cause), men suffer the mechanical deformation (the effect).¹¹ This finding is critical for crew selection and the development of personalized countermeasures for Mars missions.

The Ventricular System: The Brain's Hydraulic Buffer

Deep within the brain lie the lateral and third ventricles, fluid-filled cavities that produce and circulate cerebrospinal fluid. The behavior of these ventricles in space provides one of the most striking examples of neuroplasticity—and one of the most concerning markers for long-term health.

Massive Expansion and the "Three-Year" Rule

The Seidler study and concurrent research have consistently documented a massive expansion of the ventricular system during spaceflight. The lateral ventricles have been observed to increase in volume by 11% to 25% following six-month missions.¹⁵ This is not a subtle change; it is visually apparent on MRI scans without the need for complex quantification.

The mechanism for this expansion is twofold:

1. Obstructive: The upward shift of the brain compresses the superior sagittal sinus and the arachnoid granulations (the drainage drains of the brain). This impedes the resorption of CSF, causing a "backup" that dilates the ventricles.⁵

2. Compensatory: As the brain tissue compresses and shifts, the ventricles may expand to fill the void, maintaining intracranial volume equilibrium.¹⁷

Most distinctively, the 2026 data solidified the "Three-Year Recovery Rule." Longitudinal tracking of astronauts revealed that while the positional brain shift begins to reverse upon return to Earth, the ventricles remain enlarged for an extended period. It takes approximately three years post-flight for ventricular volume to fully return to baseline.¹⁸

The Cumulative Danger for Career Astronauts

This slow recovery poses a significant operational risk. If an astronaut participates in a standard rotation, flying every 12 to 18 months, they are returning to space before their brain has recovered from the previous journey. They launch with ventricles that are already enlarged and compliant. This "cumulative effect" could reduce the brain's ability to buffer the next round of fluid shifts, potentially accelerating structural damage or increasing the risk of SANS.¹⁸ The "viscoelastic creep" of the ventricular walls implies a permanent remodeling of the brain's internal architecture in repeat flyers.

The Glymphatic System and Perivascular Spaces

Connected to the ventricular issues is the expansion of Perivascular Spaces (PVS). These microscopic channels surrounding blood vessels are key components of the glymphatic system, the brain's waste clearance network that flushes out metabolic byproducts like amyloid-beta and tau proteins during sleep.

The 2026 literature, building on work by Barisano et al., confirms that PVS volume increases significantly in astronauts, particularly in the white matter and basal ganglia.²⁰ The enlargement of these spaces is clinically associated on Earth with aging, dementia, and small vessel disease. It suggests that the PVS are becoming congested.

If spaceflight impairs glymphatic clearance—due to the lack of gravity-assisted drainage or the compression of outflow pathways—astronauts could face a heightened long-term risk of neurodegenerative diseases. The brain is effectively unable to "take out the trash" as efficiently in orbit. Interestingly, studies noted that NASA astronauts exhibited greater PVS enlargement than Roscosmos cosmonauts.²⁰ This discrepancy has been attributed to differences in exercise protocols (the type of resistive exercise used) or the specific countermeasures employed on the US versus Russian segments of the ISS, suggesting that how an astronaut exercises might influence their brain's waste management system.²²

Functional Consequences: The Mind in Motion

The structural reshaping of the brain is not merely an anatomical curiosity; it has tangible, functional impacts on astronaut performance. The 2026 Seidler study was pivotal in moving beyond description to correlation, linking specific brain shifts to specific performance deficits.

The Posterior Insula and the Balance Connection

One of the most robust findings was the correlation between the displacement of the posterior insula and post-flight balance control. The posterior insula is a cortical hub for multisensory integration; it processes vestibular (inner ear) signals, visual inputs, and proprioceptive (body position) data to create a coherent sense of "self" in space.²

The study found that the magnitude of the leftward shift of the posterior insula was significantly predictive of balance declines (measured by Sensory Organization Tests) upon return to Earth.² Astronauts with greater insular displacement stumbled more, had more difficulty maintaining upright posture with eyes closed, and showed greater "vestibular ataxia."

This suggests a "hardware" problem. It is not just that the inner ear is sending confusing signals (which it is, due to the lack of gravity); it is that the physical processing center in the brain has moved. The neural networks responsible for balance are physically distorted, potentially altering synaptic efficiency or connectivity.²³

Novice vs. Experienced: The Role of Neuroplasticity

Does experience protect the brain? The research offers a nuanced "yes and no."

• No: The mechanical shift (upward and backward movement) appears to be a universal response to physics. Gravity does not care if you have flown before; the fluids will shift, and the brain will move.

• Yes: Experienced astronauts often show less severe functional degradation (less motion sickness, faster recovery of balance) despite similar structural changes. This suggests a form of functional neuroplasticity where the brain "learns" to reweight sensory inputs more quickly.⁶

However, the 2026 data indicated that even in experienced flyers, the structural recovery is slow. The brain shift occurs regardless of flight history, implying that while the software (function) can adapt, the hardware (structure) is at the mercy of the environment.⁶

"Space Stupids" and Cognitive Fog

While the term is colloquial, "Space Stupids" refers to the cognitive slowing and brain fog reported by some crew members. The structural compression of the superior parietal lobules and frontal regions—areas critical for executive function, spatial working memory, and attention—provides a potential anatomical basis for these complaints. If the cortical tissue is compressed against the skull, local perfusion (blood flow) may be altered, subtly impacting cognitive processing speed. While the Seidler study focused on sensorimotor outcomes, the deformation maps overlap with key cognitive networks, warranting further investigation into the link between cortical crowding and executive performance.²⁴

Analog Studies: Simulating the Shift on Earth

To validate their findings, the Seidler team compared astronauts to participants in the AGBRESA (Artificial Gravity Bed Rest Study) project. In this analog, terrestrial subjects spent 60 days in Head-Down Tilt (HDT) bed rest.

The Limits of Simulation

The comparison revealed that while bed rest does induce a cephalad fluid shift and some upward brain movement, it does not perfectly replicate the spaceflight phenotype. The magnitude of the shift and the specific non-linear deformations were less pronounced in the bed rest group.¹

This discrepancy highlights the unique nature of true microgravity. In bed rest, gravity is still present; it is just acting on a horizontal body. The otoliths (gravity sensors in the ear) still sense the 1G vector. In space, the otoliths are completely unloaded. The 2026 study suggests that the "unloading" of the vestibular system itself may contribute to neuroplastic changes that cannot be fully mimicked on Earth. Furthermore, the bed rest study tested the use of artificial gravity (AG) via a centrifuge for 30 minutes daily. The results were sobering: this intermittent AG was insufficient to prevent the brain changes.⁹ This implies that short bursts of gravity are not enough to counteract the 23.5 hours of fluid shifting; we may need continuous or long-duration artificial gravity to protect the brain.

Future Implications: The Mars Imperative

The findings of the 2026 report are a "go/no-go" metric for the Mars architecture. A mission to Mars involves a 6-to-9 month transit in microgravity, a stay on the surface (0.38G), and a return trip.

The Transit Risk

If the brain continues to shift and compress throughout the 9-month transit, astronauts will arrive at Mars with significant neuroanatomical distortion. They will then be expected to pilot a spacecraft into the Martian atmosphere and function autonomously on the surface. If their posterior insula is displaced and their vestibular processing is compromised, the risk of piloting errors or falls upon landing is high.²⁶

Furthermore, the "Three-Year Recovery Rule" for ventricles suggests that the Mars surface stay (typically planned for 30 to 500 days) may not be long enough for the brain to recover before the return trip initiates. Astronauts could be launching for home with compounded ventricular expansion, raising the specter of irreversible neurological damage or chronic hydrocephalus.¹⁸

Countermeasure Development

The research underscores the urgent need for engineering solutions:

1. Lower Body Negative Pressure (LBNP): Devices like the "Chibis" suit or modern LBNP chambers create a vacuum around the lower body, physically sucking fluids away from the head. These are showing promise in reversing the acute fluid shift, but their ability to reverse the structural brain shift remains to be proven in long-duration trials.

2. Continuous Artificial Gravity: The failure of intermittent centrifugation in the AGBRESA study suggests that future spacecraft may need to rotate continuously to provide a constant background gravity (even if partial, like 0.3G) to anchor the brain and fluids.

3. Pharmacological Interventions: Drugs that reduce CSF production (like acetazolamide) or improve venous tone are being investigated, though the side effects in an operational environment are a concern.⁵

Conclusion

The January 2026 publication by Seidler and colleagues serves as a definitive atlas of the human brain in the extraterrestrial environment. It confirms that the spaceflight environment induces a significant, upward, and backward shift of the brain, causing regional compressions that correlate directly with functional declines in balance and orientation.

These findings dismantle the romantic notion of the astronaut's body as an infinitely adaptable entity. Instead, they reveal a biological system under mechanical siege. The fluids that sustain life on Earth become a compressive force in space, reshaping the very organ responsible for consciousness, memory, and control. The persistence of ventricular expansion for years post-flight and the potential impairment of the glymphatic clearance system raise profound ethical and medical questions for the era of commercial and interplanetary spaceflight.

As humanity stands on the precipice of becoming a multi-planetary species, this research highlights a critical hurdle. The engineering challenges of propulsion and life support are being solved, but the biological engineering of the human preservation system remains a work in progress. The "space brain" is plastic, yes, but it is not elastic; it does not simply snap back. Understanding the limits of this plasticity—measured in millimeters of shift and milliliters of fluid—is the key to ensuring that when our descendants finally step onto the rusted sands of Mars, they possess not only the courage to explore, but the physiological integrity to survive.

Statistic	Value	Implication
Ventricular Expansion	+11% to +25%	Indicates fluid backup/tissue compression
Recovery Time (Ventricles)	~3 Years	Cumulative risk for repeat flyers
SANS Prevalence	~70% (Long Duration)	High risk of vision loss/impairment
Brain Shift Direction	Superior & Posterior	Compression of parietal/frontal cortex
Key Correlation	Post. Insula Shift vs Balance	Structural change drives functional loss

¹

Works cited

1. 'Backward and upward and tilted': Spaceflight causes astronauts' brains to shift inside their skulls, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.space.com/space-exploration/human-spaceflight/backward-and-upward-and-tilted-spaceflight-causes-astronauts-brains-to-shift-inside-their-skulls

2. Brain displacement and nonlinear deformation following human spaceflight - PNAS, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.2505682122

3. (PDF) Spaceflight Associated Neuro-Ocular Syndrome (SANS) - ResearchGate, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373043969_Spaceflight_Associated_Neuro-Ocular_Syndrome_SANS

4. Spaceflight Associated Neuro-Ocular Syndrome (SANS) - Encyclopedia.pub, accessed January 13, 2026, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/47862

5. Spaceflight associated neuro-ocular syndrome: connections with terrestrial eye and brain disorders - PMC - NIH, accessed January 13, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11525009/

6. Brain displacement and nonlinear deformation following human spaceflight - PNAS, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.2505682122

7. Spaceflight associated neuro-ocular syndrome: proposed pathogenesis, terrestrial analogues, and emerging countermeasures - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed January 13, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10359702/

8. Astronaut Brains Change Shape in Space, accessed January 13, 2026, https://nautil.us/astronaut-brains-change-shape-in-space-1261144/

9. Brain displacement and nonlinear deformation following human spaceflight - PNAS, accessed January 13, 2026, https://pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2505682122

10. Future research directions to identify risks and mitigation strategies for neurostructural, ocular, and behavioral changes induced by human spaceflight: A NASA-ESA expert group consensus report - PubMed Central, accessed January 13, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9387435/

11. Spaceflight alters brain fluid more in women, while men face higher vision risks - PsyPost, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.psypost.org/spaceflight-alters-brain-fluid-more-in-women-while-men-face-higher-vision-risks/

12. Spaceflight associated neuro-ocular syndrome - Wikipedia, accessed January 13, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spaceflight_associated_neuro-ocular_syndrome

13. Full article: Does Long-Duration Exposure to Microgravity Lead to Dysregulation of the Brain and Ocular Glymphatic Systems? - Taylor & Francis Online, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.2147/EB.S354710

14. Men experience greater eye changes from spaceflight, while brain differences between sexes are subtle - UF News, accessed January 13, 2026, https://news.ufl.edu/2025/10/space-eye-brain-changes/

15. Case Report: No Evidence of Intracranial Fluid Shifts in an Astronaut Following an Aborted Launch - Frontiers, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neurology/articles/10.3389/fneur.2021.774805/full

16. MRI-Visible Perivascular Space (PVS) Changes with Long-Duration Spaceflight | bioRxiv, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.26.457870.full

17. The Impact of 6 and 12 Months in Space on Human Brain Structure and Intracranial Fluid Shifts - PubMed Central, accessed January 13, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7446230/

18. Space Travel Causes Brain Damage | TIME, accessed January 13, 2026, https://time.com/6285631/space-travel-brain-damage/

19. Impacts of Spaceflight Experience on Human Brain Structure - bioRxiv, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.02.09.479297v1.full-text

20. The effect of long-duration spaceflight on perivascular spaces within the brain | PNAS, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2207724119

21. The effect of prolonged spaceflight on cerebrospinal fluid and perivascular spaces of astronauts and cosmonauts | PNAS, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2120439119

22. The effect of prolonged spaceflight on cerebrospinal fluid and perivascular spaces of astronauts and cosmonauts - PNAS, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.2120439119

23. Challenges to the central nervous system during human spaceflight missions to Mars | Journal of Neurophysiology | American Physiological Society, accessed January 13, 2026, https://journals.physiology.org/doi/full/10.1152/jn.00476.2019

24. Effect of spaceflight experience on human brain structure, microstructure, and function: systematic review of neuroimaging studies - PubMed Central, accessed January 13, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11582179/

25. Monitoring the Impact of Spaceflight on the Human Brain - MDPI, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/12/7/1060

26. Dream of going to Mars? Pioneering spaceflight kinesiologist to speak April 4 on preserving human health in space | Research & Innovation Office, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.colorado.edu/researchinnovation/2024/02/28/dream-going-mars-pioneering-spaceflight-kinesiologist-speak-april-4-preserving-human