Strength Without Meat: How the Mammalian Body Adapts Regardless of Diet

Abstract

The enduring debate regarding the efficacy of plant-based versus omnivorous diets in supporting athletic performance, particularly skeletal muscle remodeling and strength acquisition, has recently culminated in a landmark 2025 investigation. This pivotal study, published in the journal Nutrition, observed 83 participants—comprising both habitual omnivores and vegans—over a 16-week resistance training intervention. Contrary to the longstanding "anabolic resistance" hypothesis, which posits that plant proteins are inferior due to lower leucine content and bioavailability, the study demonstrated that resistance training significantly improved muscle strength regardless of diet type. This report provides an exhaustive, multi-dimensional analysis of these findings, situating them within the broader context of muscle physiology, nutritional biochemistry, and previous controlled trials. By synthesizing data from the 2025 study with antecedent research by Hevia-Larraín (2021) and Monteyne (2023), we explore the decoupling of hypertrophy and strength, the malleability of the leucine threshold, and the overriding influence of mechanical tension on the adaptive response. The analysis suggests that in free-living, habitual contexts, the mammalian biological system possesses sufficient redundancy to optimize strength adaptations independent of protein source, challenging the necessity of animal-derived nutrition for athletic progression.

1. Introduction: The Meat-Protein Paradigm and the Omnivore’s Advantage

1.1 The Historical Context of Nutritional Dogma

For the better part of the 20th and early 21st centuries, the field of sports nutrition has been anchored by a singular, pervasive dogma: the superiority of animal-derived proteins for muscle anabolism. This perspective was not merely a cultural artifact but was rooted in early biochemical assays that established the "biological value" of proteins. Animal tissues—meat, eggs, and dairy—possess amino acid profiles that are remarkably homologous to human skeletal muscle. Consequently, they were deemed the "gold standard" for supporting the repair and growth of muscle tissue following the catabolic stress of exercise.¹

The prevailing narrative suggested that plant-based proteins were chemically insufficient. They were characterized as "incomplete," often lacking sufficient quantities of essential amino acids (EAAs) such as lysine (in grains) or methionine (in legumes). Furthermore, the presence of anti-nutritional factors like phytates and tannins in plants was believed to inhibit protein digestibility, thereby reducing the net amino acid availability for muscle protein synthesis (MPS). This biochemical disadvantage led to the hypothesis of "anabolic resistance" in vegetarian and vegan athletes—a theoretical ceiling on their potential for strength and hypertrophy compared to their omnivorous counterparts.¹

1.2 The Shifting Landscape of Dietary Ethics and Science

However, the socio-cultural landscape of nutrition has undergone a radical transformation. Driven by concerns over climate change, animal welfare, and chronic disease epidemiology, a significant portion of the global population has transitioned to plant-based diets. Epidemiological data consistently demonstrates that vegan populations exhibit the lowest rates of total cancer and improved cardiovascular health indices compared to omnivores.³ Yet, the question remained: does this longevity come at the cost of physical robustness?

Athletes and recreational exercisers have long feared that removing animal products would compromise their "gains"—the physiological adaptations to resistance training. This fear was reinforced by acute metabolic studies in the late 2000s, which showed that whey protein (derived from milk) stimulated a greater acute rise in MPS than soy or casein. However, these acute snapshots failed to capture the complexity of long-term physiological adaptation. They measured protein synthesis over hours, not strength gains over months.

1.3 The Emergence of the 2025 Cohort Study

Into this arena steps the 2025 study, a rigorous 16-week intervention involving 83 habitual omnivores and vegans.⁵ Unlike previous trials that artificially "clamped" protein intake to supranormal levels to level the playing field, this study embraced the ecological validity of habitual diets. It asked a fundamental question: If regular people, eating their regular diets, undergo a standardized resistance training program, does the source of their protein dictate their progress?

The answer—that strength improved significantly regardless of diet type—marks a paradigm shift. It suggests that the "biological value" of protein, while chemically real, may be physiologically irrelevant in the context of chronic mechanical loading and adequate caloric intake.⁴ This report aims to dissect why this is the case, exploring the cellular mechanisms that allow the vegan body to adapt just as effectively as the omnivorous one.

2. The Biological Imperative: Mechanisms of Skeletal Muscle Adaptation

To fully appreciate the findings of the 2025 study, one must first understand the biological machinery that drives muscle growth (hypertrophy) and strength. The human body is an adaptation machine, designed to conserve energy and only build expensive tissue (muscle) when survival demands it.

2.1 The Stimulus-Recovery-Adaptation (SRA) Cycle

Resistance training acts as a stressor. When an individual lifts a heavy load, they impose mechanical tension on the muscle fibers. This tension is detected by mechanosensors within the sarcolemma (the cell membrane of the muscle fiber), such as the focal adhesion kinases. This mechanical signal is transduced into a chemical signal, initiating the Stimulus-Recovery-Adaptation (SRA) cycle.

1. Stimulus: Mechanical disruption of the myofibrils (the contractile units) and metabolic accumulation of waste products (lactate, hydrogen ions).

2. Recovery: The immune system mobilizes to repair the damage. Satellite cells (muscle stem cells) are activated, proliferate, and fuse to the existing muscle fiber, donating their nuclei to support the larger cytoplasmic volume.⁷

3. Adaptation: The muscle cell synthesizes new contractile proteins (actin and myosin), laying them down in parallel to increase the fiber's cross-sectional area (hypertrophy). Simultaneously, the nervous system improves its efficiency, learning to recruit more muscle fibers simultaneously (strength).⁵

Crucially, the 2025 study found that strength improved equally in both groups, even if mass gains were statistically insignificant or variable.⁴ This distinction is vital. Strength is a skill; it is a neurological adaptation. Hypertrophy is a structural adaptation. The fact that vegans gained strength at an equal rate implies that the neural drive—the brain's ability to command the muscle—is completely independent of the source of dietary protein.

2.2 The Molecular Master Switch: mTORC1

At the heart of the muscle cell lies the Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 1 (mTORC1). This protein complex acts as the cell's "general contractor," deciding when to build. It integrates four primary signals:

1. Mechanical Tension: From exercise.

2. Growth Factors: Such as Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 (IGF-1) and Insulin.

3. Energy Status: Sensed via the AMP-to-ATP ratio (AMPK pathway).

4. Nutrient Availability: Specifically, the presence of amino acids.⁸

When mTORC1 is activated, it phosphorylates downstream targets like Ribosomal Protein S6 Kinase (S6K1) and 4E-Binding Protein 1 (4E-BP1). This releases the "brake" on protein translation, allowing ribosomes to assemble amino acids into new muscle proteins.⁸

The controversy in vegan nutrition centers on the fourth signal: Nutrient Availability. Specifically, mTORC1 is highly sensitive to the amino acid leucine. Animal proteins are rich in leucine; plant proteins are generally poor in it. The "Leucine Threshold Hypothesis" suggests that a specific intracellular concentration of leucine is required to trigger mTORC1. If a meal doesn't provide enough leucine (e.g., a plant-based meal), the switch theoretically remains "off," and no muscle is built.¹⁰

The 2025 study results challenge this binary view. They suggest that resistance training (Signal 1) is so potent that it can sensitize the cell to whatever amino acids are available (Signal 4), effectively lowering the threshold required to flip the anabolic switch.

2.3 Ribosome Biogenesis and Translational Capacity

Beyond simply activating existing machinery, chronic resistance training increases the number of ribosome factories—a process called ribosome biogenesis.⁷ This increases the cell's "translational capacity." Even if a vegan diet provides a slower stream of amino acids, an adapted muscle cell with more ribosomes can perhaps capture and utilize those amino acids more efficiently over a 24-hour period.

This "efficiency hypothesis" may explain why habitual vegans—those adapted to the diet for over 6 months, as selected in the 2025 study—perform better than someone who switched diets yesterday. Their bodies may have upregulated amino acid transporters or ribosome density to maximize the utility of their plant-based intake.

3. The Biochemical Battleground: Dissecting Protein Quality

The core argument against veganism in athletics has always been biochemical. To understand the significance of the 2025 study's "non-finding" (i.e., finding no difference), we must explore the biochemical hurdles the vegan group theoretically overcame.

3.1 The Leucine Threshold and Amino Acid Kinetics

Leucine is unique among amino acids. It is not just a building block; it is a signaling molecule. It binds to Sestrin2, a sensor that regulates mTORC1. As noted in the literature, older adults often require higher doses of leucine (~3.0g) to overcome "anabolic resistance" and trigger MPS, while young adults are more sensitive (~2.0g).¹³

• Whey Protein: Rapidly digested, flooding the blood with leucine. High "peak" amplitude.

• Plant Protein: Slowly digested (due to fiber matrix), lower leucine content. Lower "peak" amplitude.¹

The 2025 study participants maintained habitual diets. A typical vegan meal of beans and rice might deliver protein slowly over 4-5 hours. Theoretically, this should fail to trigger the "peak" required for the Leucine Threshold. However, the outcomes show strength gains were not compromised.⁶

Insight: This suggests that the "Area Under the Curve" (total protein exposure over time) is more important than the "Peak Amplitude" (how high amino acid levels spike in 30 minutes). If the muscle sees amino acids for 5 hours, even at lower concentrations, the cumulative anabolic signal may be sufficient when paired with the heavy mechanical stimulus of training.

3.2 The Myth of the "Incomplete" Protein

The concept of "incomplete" plant proteins stems from the Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Score (DIAAS). It is true that grains are low in lysine and legumes are low in methionine. However, the human liver maintains a pool of free amino acids. It does not require all EAAs to arrive in the exact same mouthful.

The 83 participants in the 2025 study had been vegan for at least 6 months.⁶ They likely naturally engaged in "protein complementation"—eating varied sources like lentils, grains, nuts, and seeds throughout the day. This habitual variation effectively creates a "complete" amino acid profile over a 24-hour window, rendering the DIAAS limitation of single foods irrelevant in a whole-diet context.¹

3.3 Antinutrients and the Microbiome Adaptation

Plants contain phytates, lectins, and fiber, which can bind to protein and reduce digestion rates. Historically, this was viewed as a negative. However, the 2025 cohort's success suggests a potential adaptive mechanism involving the gut microbiome.

A plant-based diet promotes a microbiome rich in Prevotella and other fiber-fermenting bacteria, which produce Short-Chain Fatty Acids (SCFAs).¹⁶ These SCFAs, particularly butyrate, improve gut barrier integrity and reduce systemic inflammation. Lower systemic inflammation is anabolic; inflammation triggers catabolic pathways (like ubiquitin-proteasome degradation). It is plausible that the vegan group's improved gut health created a systemic environment more favorable to recovery, offsetting the slightly lower bioavailability of their protein sources.

4. Precursors to the 2025 Study: A Comparative Literature Review

The 2025 study did not occur in a vacuum. It rests on the shoulders of two major antecedent studies that set the stage by controlling variables that the 2025 study left free.

4.1 The "High-Protein Clamp": Hevia-Larraín et al. (2021)

Study Design:

Published in Sports Medicine, this study recruited 38 young men (19 vegans, 19 omnivores). Crucially, the researchers intervened in the diet. They supplemented the vegans with Soy Isolate and the omnivores with Whey to ensure both groups hit a high protein target of 1.6 grams per kilogram of body weight per day (g/kg/d).5

Findings:

• Lean Mass: Both groups gained ~1.2 kg of lean leg mass.

• Strength: Both groups increased leg press 1RM significantly (Veg: +97kg, Omni: +117kg - statistically comparable).

• Muscle Fiber Size: Both groups saw increases in Type I and Type II fiber cross-sectional area (CSA).

Implication:

Hevia-Larraín proved that Quantity Trumps Quality. If you pour enough water into the bucket (1.6 g/kg), it doesn't matter if the hose (plant protein) is slightly smaller than the firehose (animal protein). The threshold is met. This study debunked the idea that plants cannot build muscle, provided protein intake is high.

4.2 The "Whole Food Matrix": Monteyne et al. (2023)

Study Design:

Published in the Journal of Nutrition, this study took 22 participants and compared an omnivorous diet to a vegan diet rich in Mycoprotein (fungal protein, e.g., Quorn) over 10 weeks.19 Unlike soy isolate powder, mycoprotein is a whole food with fiber and a complex fungal matrix.

Findings:

• Hypertrophy: Vegans gained +3.1 kg lean mass vs. Omnivores +2.6 kg (statistically equivalent).

• Mechanism: Myofibrillar protein synthesis rates were identical between groups.

Implication:

Monteyne showed that you don't need refined powders. Whole food, non-animal sources are bioavailable enough to support robust hypertrophy.

4.3 The Critical Divergence of 2025: Ecological Validity

The 2025 study differs from Hevia-Larraín and Monteyne in one critical aspect: Dietary Control.

• Hevia-Larraín/Monteyne: Forced high protein (1.6 g/kg+).

• 2025 Study: Habitual diet (participants maintained their own diets).

This makes the 2025 study's finding—that strength improved equally—far more impressive for the average person. It implies that even without the artificial "protein clamping" of a clinical trial, vegans naturally consume enough nutrients to support strength adaptations. However, this comes with a caveat regarding muscle mass, which we will explore next.

Feature	Hevia-Larraín et al. (2021)	Monteyne et al. (2023)	The 2025 Study (Nutrition)
Duration	12 Weeks	10 Weeks	16 Weeks
Sample Size	38 (19 vs 19)	22	83
Diet Protocol	Supplemented to 1.6 g/kg	Mycoprotein-rich	Habitual / Free-Living
Primary Outcome	Strength & Hypertrophy	MPS & Hypertrophy	Strength
Mass Gains	Significant (+1.2 kg)	Significant (+3.1 kg)	Insignificant / Variable
Conclusion	Equivalent if protein is high	Equivalent	Equivalent in habitual state

5. Detailed Analysis of the 2025 Cohort Study

5.1 Methodology and Participant Demographics

The 2025 study, referenced as S0899900725003648 in the Nutrition journal, represents the largest cohort to date in this specific niche.⁶

Participants:

• N = 83. This sample size provides greater statistical power than previous studies, reducing the likelihood of Type II errors (false negatives).

• Dietary Tenure: >6 months. This washout period is essential. The gut microbiome takes weeks to shift. A new vegan might suffer from bloating and poor absorption; a 6-month vegan has adapted. This ensures the study measured the steady state of the diet, not the transition phase.⁶

Intervention:

• Training: 16 weeks of resistance training. This duration allows for the observation of distinct phases of adaptation: neural learning (weeks 1-6) and structural hypertrophy (weeks 6-16).

• Diet: No strict dietary guidelines other than maintaining the current ethical choice (vegan or omnivore). This is "real world" science.²¹

5.2 The "Strength vs. Mass" Paradox

A critical detail emerged in the reception and analysis of the 2025 data. While the abstract confirms that "Training significantly improved muscle strength regardless of diet type" ⁵, commentary on the full text notes that "no significant changes in musculoskeletal mass were observed in any group".⁴

This stands in stark contrast to Hevia-Larraín (who saw +1.2kg mass) and Monteyne (who saw +3kg mass). Why?

The "Habitual" Variable:

In Hevia-Larraín and Monteyne, protein was forced to 1.6 g/kg. This is the optimal dose for hypertrophy. In the 2025 study, participants ate habitually. The average person, even a meat-eater, often consumes closer to 0.8 - 1.2 g/kg unless they are intentionally "bulking."

• Insight: Muscle mass requires a surplus of building blocks (protein) and energy (calories). Muscle strength largely requires neural practice and sufficient energy for fueling.

• Conclusion: The 2025 study demonstrates that habitual diets (likely lower in protein than the 1.6g/kg optimization threshold) are sufficient for strength (neural adaptation) but perhaps suboptimal for maximal hypertrophy (mass gain), regardless of whether that diet is vegan or omnivorous. The limiting factor was likely the quantity of protein/calories across the board, not the source (plant vs. animal).

5.3 Grip Strength and Statistical Noise

Secondary analyses of the 2025 data revealed inconsistencies, such as the vegan group showing higher right-hand grip strength but lower left-hand grip strength compared to omnivores.⁴

• Interpretation: Such lateral asymmetries are classic statistical noise in small sub-measurements. They underscore the importance of focusing on systemic, whole-body metrics (like leg press or squat strength) rather than isolated, skill-dependent variables like dynamometry. These variances do not undermine the primary finding of global strength parity.

6. Sociological and Psychological Dimensions

Physiology does not exist in a vacuum. The 2025 study, and the discourse surrounding it, highlights significant psychological variables that influence training outcomes.

6.1 The "Masculinity Threat" and Motivation

Research indicates that meat consumption is strongly coded as "masculine" in many cultures. Men often perceive veganism as a "threat" to their masculinity.²² This creates a unique psychological environment for the male vegan athlete.

• The "Chip on the Shoulder" Effect: Vegan participants in athletic studies often exhibit higher intrinsic motivation. They are not just training for themselves; they are training to "prove" the validity of their lifestyle against skepticism. This psychological drive can lead to higher intensity of effort (Pushing closer to failure) during training sessions.

• Impact on Results: Since training intensity is the primary driver of strength adaptation, a highly motivated vegan group might naturally train harder than a complacent omnivore group, potentially masking any small physiological disadvantages of their diet.

6.2 The Placebo and Nocebo Effects

Conversely, the "Nocebo" effect could harm omnivores who believe they need meat. If an omnivore is placed in a "control" group or believes the study is testing the viability of veganism, they might subconsciously doubt their own potential compared to the "novel" group. However, in the 2025 study, both groups maintained their habitual diets, minimizing this effect compared to crossover trials where participants are forced to switch.

7. Practical Applications: The New Rules of Lifting

Based on the synthesis of the 2025 study with the rigorous controls of Hevia-Larraín and Monteyne, we can formulate updated guidelines for athletes and coaches.

7.1 For the Strength-Focused Athlete (Powerlifters, General Population)

Goal: Get stronger, stay healthy.

Verdict: Diet type is irrelevant.

Guideline: The 2025 study confirms that habitual vegan diets support strength gains just as well as omnivorous ones. You do not need to obsess over protein timing or "complete" proteins at every meal. Focus on:

• Consistent progressive overload in the gym.

• Adequate caloric intake to fuel sessions.

• Basic variety in plant food sources (grains + legumes) over the course of the day.¹

7.2 For the Hypertrophy-Focused Athlete (Bodybuilders)

Goal: Maximize muscle mass accretion.

Verdict: Diet type is irrelevant if protein is high.

Guideline: The discrepancy between the 2025 study (no mass gain on habitual diet) and Hevia-Larraín (mass gain on high protein) teaches a valuable lesson. To build mass, you cannot just "eat intuitively." You likely need to hit the 1.6 g/kg threshold.

• Vegans: Supplement with a plant-based isolate (pea/rice blend or soy) or prioritize high-protein whole foods (seitan, tofu, mycoprotein) to ensure you hit that quantitative target. Once the quantity is there, the quality difference vanishes.¹⁷

7.3 For the Aging Population (Sarcopenia Prevention)

Goal: Prevent muscle loss and frailty.

Verdict: Resistance training is the key, not the steak.

Guideline: Sarcopenia is a crisis of inactivity, not just malnutrition. The 2025 findings suggest that older adults can safely adopt plant-based diets for heart health without fearing they will become too weak to function, provided they engage in resistance training.23 The mechanical signal of exercise is strong enough to protect their muscle mass, even if their protein intake is plant-based.

8. Limitations and Future Directions

While the 2025 study is a robust addition to the literature, it is not without flaws.

1. Dietary Quantificaton: The study lacked detailed quantitative assessment of dietary intake.²¹ We do not know exactly how much protein the vegans ate. It is possible they were "super-vegans" eating 150g of protein a day, or "junk-food vegans" eating 40g. This lack of granularity prevents us from establishing a minimum protein threshold for the strength gains observed.

2. Novice Effect: The lack of significant mass gains in either group suggests the training volume might have been low, or the participants were true novices who gained strength purely through neural learning. Future studies should replicate this "habitual" design with intermediate/advanced lifters who require more precise nutritional support to adapt.

3. Micronutrient Status: While 16 weeks is long for a hypertrophy study, it is short for developing micronutrient deficiencies (e.g., B12 or Iron anemia). Long-term longitudinal studies (1-2 years) are needed to ensure that the vegan strength gains don't plateau due to gradual depletion of iron or zinc stores.⁴

9. Conclusion

The 2025 investigation of 83 omnivores and vegans serves as a powerful corrective to decades of nutritional absolutism. By observing that resistance training confers equivalent strength benefits to habitual vegans and omnivores alike, the study effectively deconstructs the "meat myth."

The physiological reality revealed by this data is one of redundancy and resilience. The human body possesses multiple pathways to achieve adaptation. While the "Leucine Threshold" and "Protein Quality" scores are valid biochemical concepts, their influence is washed out by the overwhelming potency of the mechanical stress signal provided by lifting weights.

For the ethical vegan, the environmentalist, or the health-conscious individual, the message is scientifically sound: Your diet is not a handicap. The barbell does not discriminate based on the source of the amino acids repairing the tissue. Whether fueled by lentils or livestock, the adapted human muscle is capable of profound strength, proving that in the gym, effort remains the great equalizer.

Works cited

1. Are plant-based and omnivorous diets the same for muscle hypertrophy? A narrative review of possible challenges of plant-based diets in resistance-trained athletes - DOKUMEN.PUB, accessed January 11, 2026, https://dokumen.pub/are-plant-based-and-omnivorous-diets-the-same-for-muscle-hypertrophy-a-narrative-review-of-possible-challenges-of-plant-based-diets-in-resistance-trained-athletes-j-6319131.html

2. Are plant-based and omnivorous diets the same for muscle hypertrophy? A narrative review of possible challenges of plant-based - dokumen.pub, accessed January 11, 2026, https://dokumen.pub/download/are-plant-based-and-omnivorous-diets-the-same-for-muscle-hypertrophy-a-narrative-review-of-possible-challenges-of-plant-based-diets-in-resistance-trained-athletes-s-8735105.html

3. /r/Vegan - the largest vegan community online! - Reddit, accessed January 11, 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/vegan/rising/

4. 83 omnivores and vegans who had maintained their diet for at least 6 months were placed into resistance training or control groups for 16 weeks. Training significantly improved muscle strength regardless of diet type, suggesting that a vegan diet did not compromise adaptations to strength training. - Reddit, accessed January 11, 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/vegan/comments/1qa2c8n/83_omnivores_and_vegans_who_had_maintained_their/

5. Vegan and Omnivorous High Protein Diets Support Comparable Daily Myofibrillar Protein Synthesis Rates and Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy in Young Adults - PubMed Central, accessed January 11, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10308267/

6. Reddit Science, accessed January 11, 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/science/new/

7. Molecular Mechanisms of Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed January 11, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8075408/

8. The Translational Regulation in mTOR Pathway - MDPI, accessed January 11, 2026, https://www.mdpi.com/2218-273X/12/6/802

9. The role of mTORC1 in the regulation of skeletal muscle mass - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed January 11, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9720898/

10. Identification of a leucine-mediated threshold effect governing macrophage mTOR signaling and cardiovascular risk - PMC - NIH, accessed January 11, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11448845/

11. Protein Considerations for Optimising Skeletal Muscle Mass in Healthy Young and Older Adults - PMC - NIH, accessed January 11, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4848650/

12. mTOR function in skeletal muscle hypertrophy: increased ribosomal RNA via cell cycle regulators - American Physiological Society Journal, accessed January 11, 2026, https://journals.physiology.org/doi/10.1152/ajpcell.00165.2005

13. Impacts of protein quantity and distribution on body composition - Frontiers, accessed January 11, 2026, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/nutrition/articles/10.3389/fnut.2024.1388986/full

14. Whey protein supplementation and muscle mass: current perspectives - Dove Medical Press, accessed January 11, 2026, https://www.dovepress.com/whey-protein-supplementation-and-muscle-mass-current-perspectives-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-NDS

15. Differential effect of two dietary protein sources on time course response of muscle anabolic signaling pathways in normal and insulin dysregulated horses - Frontiers, accessed January 11, 2026, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/veterinary-science/articles/10.3389/fvets.2022.896220/full

16. Researchers took 22 healthy young adults and split them into an omnivorous or plant-based group with the same protein and calories. After 10 weeks of training, the plant-based group had improved markers of cardiometabolic health (compared to the omni group) without compromising micronutrient status. : r/science - Reddit, accessed January 11, 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/1p9nzec/researchers_took_22_healthy_young_adults_and/

17. High-Protein Plant-Based Diet Versus a Protein-Matched Omnivorous Diet to Support Resistance Training Adaptations: A Comparison, accessed January 11, 2026, https://r.jordan.im/download/protein/hevia-larra%C3%ADn2021.pdf

18. High-Protein Plant-Based Diet Versus a Protein-Matched Omnivorous Diet to Support Resistance Training Adaptations: A Comparison Between Habitual Vegans and Omnivores - PubMed, accessed January 11, 2026, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33599941/

19. Vegan protein supports muscle building as effectively as animal protein, according to study - University of Exeter News, accessed January 11, 2026, https://news.exeter.ac.uk/faculty-of-health-and-life-sciences/vegan-protein-supports-muscle-building-as-effectively-as-animal-protein-according-to-study/

20. Vegan and Omnivorous High Protein Diets Support Comparable Daily Myofibrillar Protein Synthesis Rates and Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy in Young Adults - UTMB Research Experts, accessed January 11, 2026, https://researchexperts.utmb.edu/en/publications/vegan-and-omnivorous-high-protein-diets-support-comparable-daily-/

21. 83 omnivores and vegans who had maintained their diet for at least 6 months were placed into resistance training or control groups for 16 weeks. Training significantly improved muscle strength regardless of diet type, suggesting that a vegan diet did not compromise adaptations to strength training. : r/science - Reddit, accessed January 11, 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/1q9zvts/83_omnivores_and_vegans_who_had_maintained_their/

22. /r/Vegan - the largest vegan community online! - Reddit, accessed January 11, 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/vegan/

23. Updates on Vegans and Resistance Training, accessed January 11, 2026, https://veganhealth.org/updates-on-vegans-and-resistance-training/

24. Similar effects between animal-based and plant-based protein blend as complementary dietary protein on muscle adaptations to resistance training: findings from a randomized clinical trial - Taylor & Francis Online, accessed January 11, 2026, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15502783.2025.2568047

25. Change to a Plant-Based Diet Has No Effect on Strength Performance in Trained Persons in the First 8 Weeks—A 16-Week Controlled Pilot Study - PMC - NIH, accessed January 11, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9914713/

26. High protein vegan or omnivorous diets support comparable myofibrillar protein synthesis rates and skeletal muscle hypertrophy in young adults - American Society for Nutrition, accessed January 11, 2026, https://nutrition.org/high-protein-vegan-or-omnivorous-diets-support-comparable-myofibrillar-protein-synthesis-rates-and-skeletal-muscle-hypertrophy-in-young-adults/