The Martian Moons eXploration (MMX) Mission: System Architecture, Orbital Dynamics, and Planetary Science Objectives

Introduction to the Martian System and the Quest for Origins
The exploration of the Martian planetary system is scheduled to advance significantly with the launch of the Martian Moons eXploration mission. Managed by the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency in collaboration with the European Space Agency, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the French space agency, and the German Aerospace Center, this robotic probe aims to execute an inaugural sample return from the Martian sphere1. Scheduled to launch on October 19, 2026, from the Tanegashima Space Center, the spacecraft will transit to Mars, perform detailed remote sensing of its two moons, Phobos and Deimos, and ultimately land on Phobos to collect surface material for return to Earth in 20311.
Despite decades of orbital and surface exploration of Mars, its two moons remain poorly understood. The central scientific dilemma surrounding Phobos and Deimos is their origin, a subject that has divided planetary scientists and astrophysicists1. The academic community generally debates three primary hypotheses regarding their formation3.
The first hypothesis posits that Phobos and Deimos are captured asteroids, likely originating from the outer main asteroid belt or beyond. This is supported by their spectral characteristics, which share similarities with primitive, carbon-rich D-type or P-type asteroids, which are notably dark and featureless in the visible spectrum5. If they are captured bodies, their composition will provide a record of the primordial solar system, clarifying how volatile compounds such as water and organic matter were transported across planetary orbits to the inner solar system5.
The second leading hypothesis suggests a giant impact origin, akin to the formation of Earth's Moon. In this scenario, a massive celestial body collided with a young Mars, ejecting a substantial volume of planetary crust and impactor debris into a circum-Martian disk. Over time, this disk accreted into the moons observed today. If this hypothesis is accurate, the regolith of Phobos will contain a mixture of early Martian material and impactor remnants, offering a preserved geological record of the conditions on young Mars before its atmosphere was heavily depleted by solar wind5.
The third hypothesis, often considered a variation of the impact or capture models, involves co-accretion, wherein the moons formed alongside Mars from the same initial planetary nebula, though this struggles to explain the moons' current orbital inclinations and specific densities3. Furthermore, planetary scientists estimate that up to a small percentage of the surface dust currently on Phobos may consist of modern Martian ejecta, blasted onto the moon by subsequent meteorite strikes on the planet below6. This phenomenon essentially provides samples of the Martian crust without the extreme energetic costs associated with a planetary surface ascent6.
By successfully retrieving at least ten grams of material from the surface of Phobos, the mission seeks to provide the ground-truth data necessary to definitively resolve this debate, while simultaneously establishing the foundational technologies required for future crewed exploration of the Mars system4.
Launch Parameters and Spacecraft Architecture
The spacecraft will be injected into a Mars transfer trajectory using the H3 launch vehicle in its maximum payload configuration, designated H3-24L3. This configuration utilizes two liquid-fueled core engines paired with four solid rocket boosters and a long payload fairing. Lifting the 4,480-kilogram wet mass of the spacecraft represents the most demanding planetary payload the H3 series has been tasked with placing into a deep-space trajectory3. The primary launch window opens at 04:41 Japan Standard Time on October 20, 2026, corresponding to 19:41 Coordinated Universal Time on October 191. A backup launch window extends through November 7, 2026, accommodating the narrow orbital geometry that allows for efficient Earth-Mars transfers once every twenty-six months3.
The physical design of the spacecraft relies on a highly integrated, three-module architecture comprising a propulsion module, an exploration module, and a return module4.
Spacecraft Module | Mass Allocation | Primary Functions |
Propulsion Module | 1,800 kilograms (dry) | Houses the primary chemical propellant tanks, guidance navigation systems, and orbital maneuvering engines. Responsible for interplanetary transit and Mars orbit insertion4. |
Exploration Module | 150 kilograms | Serves as the primary lander and science platform. Equipped with landing legs, dual sampling systems, remote sensing instruments, and the Idefix rover4. |
Return Module | 1,050 kilograms | Self-contained vehicle featuring a high-gain dish antenna, solar arrays, and the sample return capsule. Tasked with departing Mars and executing Earth atmospheric reentry4. |
The propulsion module serves as the primary transport mechanism during the outbound journey. It houses a chemical propulsion system anchored by a 500-Newton class orbital maneuvering engine5. This primary engine is responsible for the massive velocity changes required for Mars orbit insertion and the subsequent transfers to the orbit of Phobos. Attitude control, precise pointing, and the delicate station-keeping maneuvers required in the vicinity of the moon are managed by a secondary reaction control system utilizing 20-Newton class thrusters5.
Following a year-long interplanetary cruise, the spacecraft will arrive at Mars in August 20271. The mission architecture utilizes international infrastructure to maintain precise navigational control during this transit. The European Space Agency provides deep-space communication equipment, including an advanced transponder and power amplifier, and leverages its Estrack ground station network to ensure continuous telemetry and command capabilities3. Upon arrival, the propulsion module will execute a critical deceleration maneuver to achieve Mars orbit insertion3. From this elliptical orbit, the spacecraft will perform a series of adjustments to match the orbital plane and altitude of Phobos, which circles Mars at an average distance of roughly 9,400 kilometers3.
Astrodynamics of the Quasi-Satellite Orbit
Navigating in the immediate vicinity of Phobos presents a unique astrodynamical challenge due to the moon's negligible mass. Phobos is a small, irregularly shaped body with a mean diameter of roughly 22 kilometers. Its gravitational field is so weak that its Hill sphere—the region where its gravitational pull dominates over that of the primary planetary body—is virtually non-existent4. Consequently, it is dynamically impossible for a spacecraft to enter a traditional, stable Keplerian orbit around Phobos. Any attempt to do so would quickly be perturbed by the overwhelming tidal forces exerted by Mars, causing the spacecraft to either collide with the moon or be ejected into an independent Martian orbit.
To operate safely in this environment, mission designers utilize a specialized trajectory known as a Quasi-Satellite Orbit4. Rather than orbiting Phobos directly, the spacecraft orbits Mars at the exact same semi-major axis and orbital period as Phobos, but with slight variations in eccentricity and inclination. When viewed from a rotating reference frame centered on Phobos, the spacecraft's relative motion traces a closed loop around the moon, creating the functional equivalent of a retrograde orbit8.
Maintaining this relative trajectory requires active orbital management. The resonant dynamics of the Quasi-Satellite Orbit are highly sensitive to perturbations from Martian gravity harmonics, solar radiation pressure, and the irregular gravity field of Phobos itself, meaning the spacecraft will experience orbital drift over time. To counteract this, the spacecraft must perform periodic station-keeping maneuvers13. Station-keeping involves executing highly precise thruster burns to correct the relative velocity and position of the spacecraft, ensuring it does not drift out of its designated observational slot13. The mission architecture designates different altitude bands of these relative orbits, ranging from high-altitude observations to low-altitude hovering, each requiring specific delta-velocity budgets and cadences of station-keeping burns to maintain stability while conducting remote sensing operations4.
Spacecraft Payload and Remote Sensing Configuration
To maximize the scientific yield before, during, and after the sampling event, the exploration module is outfitted with a suite of eleven scientific instruments3. Seven of these are integrated into the main spacecraft, designed to characterize the Martian moons, analyze the Martian atmosphere, and map the surface of Phobos to select the optimal sampling site.
Instrument | Full Name | Lead Contributor | Scientific Function |
TENGOO | TElescopic Nadir imager for GeOmOrphology | Rikkyo University | A narrow-angle telescopic camera capable of capturing surface images at a resolution of roughly 40 centimeters. Vital for mapping geomorphology and surveying landing sites for safety hazards14. |
OROCHI | Optical RadiOmeter composed of CHromatic Imagers | Rikkyo University | A wide-angle multiband camera observing topography and material composition on a global scale. It captures visible light across multiple wavelengths to identify hydrated materials14. |
LIDAR | Light Detection And Ranging | Chiba Institute of Technology | A laser altimeter mapping surface elevation and albedo. By measuring the time-of-flight of reflected laser pulses, it generates high-precision topographical maps necessary for autonomous navigation14. |
MIRS | MMX InfraRed Spectrometer | CNES / LESIA | A near-infrared spectrometer operating in the 0.9 to 3.6 micrometer spectral band. Maps the distribution of hydrous minerals and organic matter, heavily influencing the final choice of the sampling location7. |
MEGANE | Mars-moon Exploration with Gamma Ray and NEutrons | NASA / JHUAPL | A spectrometer suite containing a high-purity germanium crystal and helium isotope sensors to detect gamma rays and cosmic-ray-generated neutrons. Provides an elemental composition map of the moon's near-surface16. |
CMDM | Circum-Martian Dust Monitor | JAXA | Measures the dust environment in circum-Martian space to understand the distribution of micrometeorites and ejecta dynamics around the planetary system14. |
MSA | Mass Spectrum Analyzer | JAXA | Analyzes the ion environment around Mars and its moons, contributing to the understanding of atmospheric loss mechanisms and solar wind interactions4. |
This suite of instruments is designed to operate in high synergy. For example, the MIRS instrument will scan the surface for spectral signatures of water-bearing minerals, while TENGOO provides the high-resolution visual context of those specific regions14. Concurrently, LIDAR maps the physical terrain profile, ensuring that the scientifically desirable site is devoid of boulders or steep slopes that could jeopardize the landing and sampling sequence14. The MEGANE instrument provides a deeper view, looking beneath the immediate optical surface to ascertain elemental bulk composition, which will aid in determining whether the regolith resembles primitive asteroidal material or processed planetary crust16.
Dual Sampling Strategy in Microgravity
One of the most complex engineering challenges of the mission is the physical acquisition of surface material in an environment where gravity is roughly two thousand times weaker than on Earth. In such microgravity, the simple act of pressing a mechanical tool into the ground generates enough reactive force to push the spacecraft away from the surface. To mitigate the risks associated with sampling an unknown regolith—which could range from hard, cohesive rock to highly porous, uncompacted dust—the mission utilizes two distinct sampling architectures: the Coring Sampler and the Pneumatic Sampler14.
The Coring Sampler, developed by Japanese engineers, relies on a sophisticated robotic arm equipped with a cylindrical corer14. Upon touchdown, the arm extends and drives a soil tube down to a depth of at least two centimeters into the subsurface7. This mechanical method is designed to capture a vertically stratified core of regolith, retaining the geological context of the material. Once the core is secured, the robotic arm retracts by swinging upward and away from the surface, subsequently inserting the sample tube directly into the sample return capsule via a specialized gripping mechanism14.
Complementing the mechanical approach is the Pneumatic Sampler, contributed by NASA and developed by Honeybee Robotics14. This system represents an alternative paradigm for microgravity sample acquisition. Rather than using mechanical force to penetrate the soil, it utilizes pressurized nitrogen gas to fluidize and loft the regolith into a collection canister2. The instrument is mounted along the leg of the spacecraft and features a sampling funnel equipped with three distinct sets of nozzles: excavation nozzles, transport nozzles, and retro-thrust nozzles19.
The fluid dynamics of the pneumatic system are intricately balanced. The excavation nozzles point downward, releasing high-pressure gas to agitate and fluidize the soil particles. Simultaneously, the transport nozzles create a directional flow that carries the lofted material up through a tube and into the sample canister19. Crucially, to counteract the upward reactive force generated by the downward gas jet, the retro-thrust nozzles fire in the exact opposite direction. This momentum cancellation is vital in the miniscule gravity well of Phobos, ensuring that the brief, high-energy burst of gas does not alter the spacecraft's attitude or cause it to rebound prematurely from the surface19.
Extensive terrestrial testing under simulated low-gravity and vacuum conditions demonstrated the efficiency of the pneumatic system. The device can secure a sample in a fraction of a second and has proven capable of lofting material even when positioned up to ten centimeters above the surface, providing a critical margin of error in the event of an uneven or lopsided landing over rocky terrain19. The entire surface operation—from touchdown to the deployment of both sampling systems, and the subsequent preparation for ascent—is aggressively scheduled to be completed within a maximum of 2.5 hours3. Depending on the volume of material acquired and initial safety assessments, mission controllers may attempt a second touchdown at a different location to diversify the geological yield3.
The Idefix Rover: Milligravity Locomotion and Terramechanics
Prior to the main spacecraft's descent to the surface, the mission will deploy the Idefix rover in early 20291. Jointly developed by the French and German space agencies, this robotic explorer is tasked with providing ground-truth data to calibrate the orbital observations and assessing the mechanical stability of the surface regolith ahead of the primary sampling event3.
Despite containing essentially all the components of a planetary rover, stringent mass constraints led to a highly integrated design, capping the rover's mass at just 25 kilograms, with a scientific payload mass of 2.5 kilograms10. The dimensions of the rover body are highly compact, measuring 231 by 376 by 415 millimeters10. On the surface of Phobos, due to the extreme lack of gravity, the rover will exert a downward force equivalent to merely 15 grams on Earth1. This milligravity environment dictates every aspect of the rover's design.
The deployment sequence involves releasing the rover from the hovering exploration module, allowing it to free-fall to the surface. Given the irregular shape of Phobos and the unpredictable dynamics of a free-fall landing, the rover is engineered as a rectangular box equipped with four deployable legs. Upon coming to rest, regardless of its final orientation, the rover executes an autonomous self-righting sequence, utilizing its articulated legs to flip itself onto its wheels21.
Locomotion in a regime where weight is practically negligible poses a severe terramechanical problem. Conventional rovers on Mars or the Moon rely on gravity to generate the necessary friction between the wheel and the soil to propel the vehicle forward. On Phobos, a standard smooth wheel would simply spin in place, excavating a trench without generating forward momentum. To achieve safe locomotion at a targeted speed of approximately one millimeter per second, engineers developed highly specialized, lightweight mechatronic wheels10. Each wheel weighs a mere 190 grams, utilizing topology optimization to create a mesh-like structure that minimizes mass while retaining structural rigidity22.
The defining feature of these wheels is the implementation of specialized blades, known as grousers. Each wheel is fitted with nine pronounced grousers22. In the absence of friction-inducing gravity, these grousers must physically interlock with the granular regolith, capturing a volume of sand and pushing it backward to generate forward thrust24. Unlike earlier rover designs, the grousers on the Idefix wheels are not straight; they utilize chevron features, drawing heritage from the structural geometry used on the Mars Curiosity rover25. The chevron pattern specifically prevents sideways slippage during point turns and traverse operations. By analyzing telemetry and visual data of how these grousers interact with the soil, engineers can deduce critical bulk mechanical properties of the moon's surface, such as friction angles, cohesion, and bearing capacity, providing a highly accurate risk assessment for the impending touchdown of the heavy main spacecraft26.
Energy management and communications are equally optimized for the small form factor. Power is generated by solar panels measuring 4 by 415 by 363 millimeters, capable of producing at least 60 watt-hours per 7-hour Phobos day10. The nominal operation plan dictates that the rover will conduct scientific activities and drive every three Phobos days (approximately one Earth day), utilizing the intervening time strictly for battery charging28.
Communications between the rover and the orbiting mothercraft are handled by a dedicated radio frequency subsystem utilizing the S-band spectrum29. The rover is equipped with an EWC31 transceiver and specialized antennas designed to maintain a robust link even when subjected to signal reflection from the solar panels. The forward link from the orbiter to the rover operates at a low data rate of 32 kilobits per second to ensure high reliability, while the return link can scale up to 512 kilobits per second to transmit heavy image data29. Link budgets indicate that this configuration can maintain stable communications up to a range of 2 kilometers with a 10-decibel margin, allowing for approximately 140 seconds of continuous visibility per orbital pass29.
Rover Scientific Payload
During its 100-day operational lifespan, the rover will traverse the terrain using a suite of miniaturized instruments aimed at detailed surface characterization7.
Rover Instrument | Developer | Scientific Function |
RAX | DLR / JAXA / INTA | A highly compact Raman spectrometer weighing under 1.5 kilograms. Utilizes a 532-nanometer green laser autofocus mechanism to excite surface samples, measuring the scattered light to definitively identify mineral groups, organic phases, and water-bearing minerals directly beneath the rover chassis22. |
miniRAD | DLR | A miniaturized radiometer with heritage from the InSight and Rosetta missions. It features six sensors with a 45-degree field of view to measure surface radiance across multiple spectral bands, determining thermal inertia, emissivity, and the microscopic porosity of the regolith10. |
NavCams | CNES / 3DPLUS | Twin navigation cameras mounted on the front panel, equipped with white LEDs for nighttime observation. They provide stereoscopic vision for path planning, hazard avoidance, and structural context22. |
WheelCams | CNES | Specialized cameras designed to monitor the interaction between the wheels and the regolith. Capable of resolving particles down to 100 micrometers, they allow scientists to determine particle size distribution, morphology, and the cohesive strength of the dust22. |
Operations will be jointly managed by control centers in Toulouse and Cologne, with all telemetry routed through the orbiting main spacecraft22. By marrying the macroscopic data from the orbital instruments with the microscopic, in-situ chemical and physical analyses from the rover, the mission achieves an unprecedented depth of planetary characterization.
Analyzing Regolith Migration and Surface Dynamics
Understanding the surface of Phobos requires analyzing dynamic forces over geological timescales. The mission utilizes advanced modeling to create a surface atlas that predicts how regolith migrates across the moon. Because Phobos is tidally locked to Mars, orbiting incredibly close to the planet, the surface is subjected to a complex interplay of forces: the weak self-gravity of the moon, the immense tidal pull of Mars, and the centrifugal forces resulting from the moon's rapid orbital period of just 7.65 hours28.
When these forces are combined in high-resolution vector maps, researchers can identify distinct zones of dynamic instability. The regolith does not simply sit passively; instead, thermal cycling, micrometeorite impacts, and gravitational gradients cause the granular material to slowly flow, creating preferred regolith transport routes across the surface31. The friction angles of the particles, both static and dynamic, determine how easily material starts moving and how far it travels before coming to rest.
Understanding these migration pathways is crucial for interpreting the context of the sampling operations. The material collected by the pneumatic and coring samplers will likely have flowed from different geological regions of the moon over millions of years. Consequently, a ten-gram sample gathered from a single topographic depression could contain a highly diverse aggregate of materials originating from various distinct geological formations higher up the local gravity gradient. This regolith mixing vastly multiplies the scientific value of the return capsule, as a single sample could provide a representative cross-section of the entire moon's geological history31.
Planetary Protection and the Return Phase
Once the surface operations conclude and the samples are securely stowed, the mission enters its final phase. In 2030, the return module will separate from the exploration module, utilizing its own propulsion capabilities to break out of the Martian gravity well and initiate a year-long transit back to Earth5. The exploration and propulsion modules will remain in the Martian system, their hardware serving as long-term artificial satellites.
The sample return capsule is scheduled to re-enter the Earth's atmosphere in 2031, with a targeted landing in the Woomera desert of South Australia3. This landing zone provides a vast, unpopulated area for recovery operations and mirrors the successful recovery profiles utilized by the Hayabusa and Hayabusa2 sample return missions.
A critical component of this return architecture is adherence to planetary protection protocols. Phobos and Deimos are currently classified in a planetary protection gray zone32. Because it is possible that the moons harbor unsterilized ejecta from the Martian surface, the mission must be designed to prevent both forward contamination of the Martian system and backward contamination of Earth. The hardware designed for Earth return undergoes stringent sterilization, and the sample capsule itself is engineered to survive the immense thermal and kinetic stresses of atmospheric re-entry without breaching, ensuring the returned material remains entirely isolated until it can be opened within a specialized bio-containment facility in Japan1.
Conclusion
The impending launch of the Martian Moons eXploration probe represents a pinnacle of international robotic spaceflight and planetary science. By combining high-resolution orbital remote sensing, the complex milligravity surface operations of the Idefix rover, and a dual-mechanism sample return architecture, the mission is poised to deliver definitive answers regarding the origin of the Martian moons. Whether Phobos is a captured relic of the primordial solar system, a coagulated disk of ancient Martian crust, or a combination thereof, the physical samples returned to the Australian desert in 2031 will provide invaluable insights into planetary formation models. Beyond the immediate scientific return, the technological validation of deep-space chemical propulsion, quasi-satellite orbit management, and pneumatic sample acquisition will cement the navigational and operational capabilities required for humanity's eventual expansion into the Martian sphere.
Works cited
Mars moon lander set to launch on 19 October, https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Space_Science/Mars_moon_lander_set_to_launch_on_19_October
One week until the launch window opens for JAXA (Japan, https://www.facebook.com/blueorigin/posts/one-week-until-the-launch-window-opens-for-jaxa-japan-aerospace-exploration-agen/1409167417997605/
Japan’s MMX Launches Oct. 19 to Collect First Soil From Mars Moon Phobos, https://www.techtimes.com/articles/328725/20261007/japans-mmx-launches-oct-19-collect-first-soil-mars-moon-phobos.htm
Martian Moons eXploration - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martian_Moons_eXploration
ESA - MMX factsheet - European Space Agency, https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Space_Science/MMX_factsheet
Launching on 19 October, JAXA (Japan Aerospace Exploration, https://www.facebook.com/EuropeanSpaceAgency/posts/launching-on-19-october-jaxa-japan-aerospace-exploration-agencys-martian-moons-e/1545623617599719/
MMX - CNES, https://cnes.fr/en/projects/mmx
Mission Overview/Mission Flow | MMX - Martian Moons eXploration, https://www.mmx.jaxa.jp/en/mission/
Japan unveils Mars moon sample-return spacecraft ahead of Oct. 19, https://www.space.com/astronomy/mars/japan-unveils-mars-moon-sample-return-spacecraft-ahead-of-oct-19-launch-photos
Facts and Figures - Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), https://www.dlr.de/en/research-and-transfer/projects-and-missions/mmx/facts-and-figures
Martian Moons eXploration (MMX) | Spacecraft | ISAS, https://www.isas.jaxa.jp/en/missions/spacecraft/developing/mmx.html
Science operation plan of Phobos and Deimos from the MMX, https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-414828/v1_stamped.pdf
Orbital station-keeping - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orbital_station-keeping
Science | MMX - Martian Moons eXploration, https://www.mmx.jaxa.jp/en/science/
TELESCOPIC CAMERA (TENGOO) AND WIDE-ANGLE, https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2019/pdf/2292.pdf
MEGANE | Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, https://www.jhuapl.edu/destinations/instruments/megane
Let's go to Mars! NASA contributed a gamma-ray and neutron, https://www.facebook.com/nasamars/posts/lets-go-to-marsnasa-contributed-a-gamma-ray-and-neutron-spectrometer-instrument-/1441749554666989/
New Japanese spacecraft aims to explore the mysterious moons of, https://www.space.com/mars-moons-phobos-jaxa-mmx-mission
Pneumatic Sampler (P-Sampler) for the Martian Moons Exploration, https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20210022478/downloads/ASCEND-Space_Automation_and_Robotics-MMX_Pneumatic_Sampler_v4.pdf
Honeybee Robotics Ships Phobos Mining System to JAXA, https://www.blueorigin.com/news/honeybee-robotics-ships-phobos-mining-system-to-jaxa
Off to the moons of Mars – MMX mission and Idefix® rover ready for, https://www.dlr.de/en/latest/news/2026/off-to-the-moons-of-mars-mmx-mission-and-idefix-rover-ready-for-launch
Idefix (rover) - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idefix_(rover)
Intelligent wheels – safe locomotion on unknown terrain, https://www.dlr.de/en/research-and-transfer/projects-and-missions/mmx/intelligent-wheels-safe-locomotion-on-unknown-terrain
Diagram of a wheeled rover with assistive grouser mechanism, https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Diagram-of-a-wheeled-rover-with-assistive-grouser-mechanism-a-Assistive-grouser-angle_fig1_308181447
Diagram of a Curiosity wheel | The Planetary Society, https://www.planetary.org/space-images/diagram-of-a-curiosity-wheel
Assessing Mars Curiosity Rover Wheel Damage - JPL Robotics, https://www-robotics.jpl.nasa.gov/media/documents/fmwi-rankin-2022-0225-final.pdf
The WheelCams on the IDEFIX rover - PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12259770/
ROVING ON PHOBOS: CHALLENGES OF THE MMX ROVER FOR, https://elib.dlr.de/128408/1/__rm-samba01_USERDIR_project_RST_Projekte_MMX_S.3a_14.10_Bertrand.pdf
[SSC24-S1-11] - USU Digital Commons, https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6089&context=smallsat
RAX: The Raman Spectrometer for the MMX Phobos Rover, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/364196900_RAX_The_Raman_Spectrometer_for_the_MMX_Phobos_Rover
A New Surface Atlas of Phobos Will Help JAXA's MMX Mission, https://www.universetoday.com/articles/a-new-surface-atlas-of-phobos-will-help-jaxas-mmx-mission-collect-its-samples
(PDF) Mission analysis for the Martian Moons Explorer (MMX) mission, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323801829_Mission_analysis_for_the_Martian_Moons_Explorer_MMX_mission




Comments