Thinking Robots: The Rise of Cognitive Intelligence in the Operating Room

Introduction: The Fourth Era of Surgery

The trajectory of surgical science can be delineated into three distinct historical epochs. The first was the era of open surgery, defined by direct manual intervention, large incisions, and the physician's tactile immersion in the patient's anatomy. The second, emerging in the late 20th century, was the laparoscopic revolution, which decoupled the surgeon’s hands from the patient's body, mediating the interaction through rigid instruments and video monitors to reduce trauma. The third era, inaugurated by the approval of the da Vinci Surgical System at the turn of the millennium, introduced the concept of "master-slave" teleoperation, restoring dexterity and 3D visualization to minimally invasive procedures.¹

We are now crossing the threshold into the fourth era: Surgery 4.0. This paradigm is characterized not merely by mechanical refinement, but by the fundamental integration of cognitive intelligence, hyper-connectivity, and extreme miniaturization. In the years 2024 and 2025, surgical robotics has ceased to be solely about better tools for human hands; it has shifted toward systems that possess varying degrees of autonomy, robots that can operate across continents via satellite links, and microscopic agents that navigate the vascular system to deliver molecular payloads.

This report provides an exhaustive analysis of the current state of surgical robotics. It synthesizes data from over one hundred recent research outputs to construct a comprehensive picture of a field in rapid metamorphosis. We will explore the graduation of robots from passive tools to active partners, the geopolitical expansion of robotic platforms beyond the Western monopoly, the physics of soft and continuum robotics, and the ethical frameworks struggling to keep pace with autonomous decision-making in the operating room.

Part I: The Global Proliferation of Robotic Platforms

For two decades, the surgical robotics market was largely synonymous with a single company and a single architecture. However, the 2024-2025 landscape reveals a dramatic diversification. The expiration of key patents and the maturation of underlying technologies have catalyzed a global explosion of new platforms, each targeting specific clinical niches or economic realities.

The Evolution of the Incumbent: da Vinci 5 and the Restoration of Touch

Intuitive Surgical’s release of the da Vinci 5 represents the culmination of the "master-slave" archetype. While previous generations (X and Xi) focused on multi-quadrant access and vision, the defining feature of the da Vinci 5 is the integration of force feedback. Historically, robotic surgeons relied on "visual haptics"—inferring tension by watching tissue deform. The new platform employs integrated sensors to measure tip forces, translating this data into physical resistance in the surgeon's hand controllers. This development addresses a longstanding criticism of robotic surgery: the loss of haptic sensation, which is critical for judging tissue fragility and preventing inadvertent trauma during dissection.²

The implications of this re-sensitization are profound. Preliminary data suggests that haptic feedback reduces the total force exerted on tissue, which correlates with reduced inflammation and faster postoperative recovery. Furthermore, the system acts as a data recorder, capturing not just video, but the kinematic and kinetic history of the procedure—how much force was used, how fast instruments moved—creating a "digital exhaust" that can be used to train future AI algorithms.³

The Asian Innovation Surge

A significant trend in the 2024-2025 period is the rise of Asian manufacturers, challenging the historical dominance of Western technology. This shift is driven by a combination of government support, increasing healthcare demands in the Asia-Pacific region, and a strategic focus on cost-effectiveness.

The Hinotori Surgical Robot System (Japan): Developed by Medicaroid, the Hinotori system has gained significant traction in Japan and is expanding into Singapore and Malaysia. It is the first Japanese-made robotic assisted surgery system. The system is designed specifically to integrate with the compact operating rooms typical of Japanese hospitals. In 2024-2025, the Hinotori was the subject of rigorous validation studies for remote surgery, aligning with the Japanese Remote Surgery Guidelines. These studies tested the system's stability under varying network conditions, establishing its reliability for domestic telesurgery.⁵

The Toumai Laparoscopic Surgical Robot (China): Manufactured by MicroPort MedBot, the Toumai robot has achieved notable milestones, including European Union (CE Mark) certification. It mirrors the multi-arm architecture of the da Vinci but has been aggressively pushed as a platform for ultra-long-distance telesurgery. As detailed in later sections, the Toumai has been used to set world records for remote operation distance, leveraging China's extensive 5G infrastructure.⁶

The Revo-i (South Korea) and Mantra (India): The democratization of robotic surgery is further evidenced by South Korea's Revo-i and India's Mantra systems. The Revo-i has secured approvals in diverse markets including Uzbekistan, Morocco, and Russia, positioning itself as an accessible alternative for developing healthcare systems. similarly, the Mantra system has expanded from India into Indonesia and the UAE. These platforms often compete on a "good enough" performance metric at a significantly lower price point, aiming to penetrate markets where million-dollar capital equipment costs are prohibitive.⁶

Modular and Specialized Platforms for the Operating Room

Beyond general surgery, the market is seeing a divergence into specialized form factors.

Modular Systems: The CMR Surgical Versius and Medtronic Hugo systems utilize a modular approach. Instead of a single massive cart holding all arms, these systems use individual carts for each arm. This allows surgical teams to position arms as needed for different procedures and easily move the equipment between operating rooms, addressing the logistical rigidity of older systems.⁵

Specialized Niches:

• Moon Surgical Maestro: This system focuses on "laparoscopy assistance." It does not replace the surgeon's hands entirely but acts as a "third hand," holding cameras or retractors in stable positions. This targets the high-volume market of standard laparoscopy where a full robot is too expensive but human fatigue is a factor.⁵

• Distal Motion Dexter: This hybrid robot allows the surgeon to switch seamlessly between robotic control and direct laparoscopic control, remaining sterile and at the bedside. It targets the "intermediate" complexity procedures where full immersion in a console might be unnecessary.⁵

Comparative Specifications and Market Authorization Status

System Name	Manufacturer	Origin	Key Features	Primary Markets/Approvals
da Vinci 5	Intuitive	USA	Force Feedback, High Computing Power	Global (FDA, CE, etc.)
Hinotori	Medicaroid	Japan	Compact footprint, Telesurgery-ready	Japan, Singapore, Malaysia
Toumai	MicroPort	China	5G Telesurgery optimization	China, EU (CE Mark)
Revo-i	Meere Company	S. Korea	Cost-effective, Open console	Korea, Russia, Uzbekistan
Mantra	SS Innovations	India	Affordable Multi-arm	India, UAE, Indonesia
Ottava	Johnson & Johnson	USA	Table-integrated, Zero-footprint (Upcoming)	FDA Submission (2024/25)

⁵

Part II: The Cognitive Shift – Intelligent Autonomy and AI

The most profound technological shift in this period is the migration of intelligence from the surgeon to the machine. We are moving from "Level 0" (no autonomy) to "Level 2" and "Level 3" (task autonomy and conditional autonomy). This transition is powered by advancements in computer vision, reinforcement learning, and data-driven modeling.

The Smart Tissue Autonomous Robot (STAR) and the Soft Tissue Challenge

Navigating soft tissue is exponentially more difficult than navigating bone. Bones are rigid; once registered in a CT scan, their position is static. Soft tissues—intestines, blood vessels, organs—deform, breathe, and shift. The Smart Tissue Autonomous Robot (STAR), developed by researchers at Johns Hopkins University, addresses this "deformable registration" problem.¹¹

In 2024 and 2025, the STAR system demonstrated the ability to perform intestinal anastomosis—suturing two ends of a bowel together—without human hands. The core technology enabling this is a Plenoptic Three-Dimensional Endoscope combined with Machine Learning-Based Tissue Tracking. The system projects Near-Infrared Fluorescence (NIRF) markers onto the tissue. As the tissue moves (due to peristalsis or breathing), the robot's vision system tracks these markers in real-time, updating the surgical plan at high frequency.¹²

The Challenge of Vascular Anastomosis:

While intestinal suturing is a milestone, connecting small blood vessels (vascular anastomosis) remains the "holy grail." The margin for error is sub-millimetric. STAR’s current structured light vision system lacks the resolution for vessels smaller than a few millimeters. To bridge this gap, researchers introduced the Microvascular Anastomosis Positioning System (MAPS). This robotic device acts as a "smart clamp," holding and rotating the vessel to present the optimal angle to the suturing robot. The integration of MAPS moves the field away from "scripted" workflows (where the robot follows a pre-set path that fails if the tissue moves) to "adaptive" workflows where the robot senses the vessel's orientation and adjusts its needle trajectory dynamically.13

Reinforcement Learning: The Training Ground for Robots

How does a robot learn the "feel" of suturing? Hard-coding the physics of tissue interaction is nearly impossible due to the variability of biological material. Instead, researchers are turning to Reinforcement Learning (RL).

RL involves an agent (the robot) learning to make decisions by performing actions in an environment and receiving a "reward" or "penalty." In the context of surgical suturing, the reward function might be defined by:

1. Accuracy: Distance of the needle exit point from the target.

2. Smoothness: Minimizing jerk or tremor in the arm movement.

3. Tissue Trauma: Minimizing the forces applied to the tissue surface.

Sim-to-Real Transfer:

Training a robot on a live patient is unethical and dangerous. Therefore, training occurs in simulation (Sim). However, a simulation never perfectly matches reality (Real). This "Sim-to-Real gap" is a major hurdle. In 2024, researchers utilized Domain Randomization, where the simulation parameters (lighting, tissue stiffness, friction coefficients) are randomly varied during training. This forces the AI to learn robust policies that can handle the unpredictability of the real world. Once trained, these policies are transferred to the physical robot, allowing it to perform tasks like knot-tying with a success rate and consistency that rivals or exceeds novice surgeons.14

Imitation Learning:

Another potent technique is Apprenticeship Learning, where the robot learns by watching. By feeding the system video data of expert surgeons, the AI learns the "grammar" of surgery—the sequence of movements, the angle of approach, and the handling of errors. This approach, combined with RL, is accelerating the development of autonomous sub-routines.17

Computer Vision and the "Transformer" Revolution

For a robot to be autonomous, it must "see" and "understand" the scene. This is the domain of Surgical Video Segmentation—identifying which pixels correspond to the liver, which to the tool, and which to the nerve.

In 2024, the architecture of choice for these tasks shifted from Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) to Transformers—the same architecture underpinning Large Language Models (LLMs). The Multi-Scale Transformers for Surgical Phase Recognition (MuST) represent a significant leap. Unlike CNNs, which often look at frames in isolation or short clips, Transformers utilize "attention mechanisms" to understand long-range temporal dependencies. They can contextualize that a specific tool (e.g., a stapler) is usually followed by a specific action (e.g., resection), improving the robot's ability to predict and prepare for the next step.¹⁹

The Overseer and Re-Prompting:

A critical weakness of AI foundation models (like the Segment Anything Model, or SAM) is that they can lose track of objects when the camera moves rapidly or smoke obscures the view. To counter this, new systems employ a "Re-prompting" mechanism guided by an "Overseer" model. The Overseer is a lightweight, specialized AI that constantly monitors the main model's output. If it detects that the segmentation has failed (e.g., the tool "disappeared"), it automatically generates new prompts (e.g., "look for the metal object in the lower quadrant") to re-initialize the tracking. This ensures the temporal consistency required for safety in a live operating room.20

Part III: The Collapse of Distance – Telesurgery and Connectivity

Telesurgery—the ability to operate on a patient remotely—has been a theoretical possibility since the Lindbergh Operation in 2001. However, it remained a novelty constrained by the speed of light and the reliability of networks. In the 2024-2025 period, the convergence of 5G Standalone (SA) networks, Fiber Optics, and Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites has turned telesurgery into a clinical reality.

The Latency Threshold and Jitter Management

The fundamental constraint of telesurgery is latency. The time it takes for a signal to travel from the surgeon's hand to the robot, and for the video to travel back to the surgeon's eyes, constitutes the "Round Trip Latency" (RTL).

• Safety Threshold: Clinical consensus suggests that an RTL below 200 milliseconds is safe for most procedures.

• Performance Degradation: Between 200ms and 300ms, surgeons must adopt a "move-and-wait" strategy, significantly slowing the procedure. Above 300ms, the risk of error escalates exponentially as the cognitive load becomes unmanageable.²²

However, the average speed is less important than the consistency. Jitter—the variation in latency—is the true enemy. If latency spikes from 50ms to 150ms unpredictably, the surgeon cannot adapt. To combat this, modern telesurgery platforms utilize AI-driven Jitter Buffering. These algorithms predict packet arrival times and smooth out the video stream. Furthermore, Predictive Control algorithms on the robot side can anticipate the surgeon's trajectory. If a packet is lost, the robot continues the motion along the predicted vector for a few milliseconds, smoothing the movement until the connection stabilizes.⁷

The 12,000 Kilometer Milestone

In late 2024, the field witnessed a historic achievement: the world’s longest intercontinental telesurgery. A surgeon in Shanghai, China, operated on a patient in Casablanca, Morocco, utilizing the MicroPort Toumai robot. The distance covered was over 12,000 kilometers (30,000 km signal path).

The Procedure: The surgery was a radical prostatectomy, a complex procedure requiring the dissection of delicate neurovascular bundles to preserve urinary continence and sexual function.

The Network: The connection utilized a high-speed fiber optic backbone with a 5G backup. The system achieved an average RTL of approximately 181.4 milliseconds, keeping it within the safety zone.

The Outcome: The surgery was successful with no reported complications, and the patient was discharged two days later. This validated the feasibility of trans-continental surgical care, proving that with optimized codecs and routing, physical distance is no longer a barrier to expert intervention.9

The Satellite Frontier: LEO vs. GEO

While fiber connects cities, it does not reach remote islands, battlefields, or rural clinics. This is the domain of satellite internet.

• Geostationary (GEO): Satellites at 36,000 km altitude have a minimum physics-based latency of ~500ms round trip, making them unsuitable for dynamic surgery.

• Low Earth Orbit (LEO): Constellations like Starlink orbit at ~550 km. In 2025, researchers demonstrated liver tumor resections using the Toumai robot connected via LEO satellites. The one-way latency was kept under 60 milliseconds, a breakthrough that opens the door to mobile surgical units that can be deployed anywhere on Earth, independent of local infrastructure.²⁶

Part IV: Miniaturization and Soft Robotics – The "In Vivo" Revolution

Concurrent with the expansion of large systems is a movement toward extreme miniaturization. The goal is to reduce the "invasiveness" of surgery to zero, entering the body through natural orifices or single small incisions.

The MIRA System: Portability and Triangulation

The Miniaturized In vivo Robotic Assistant (MIRA) by Virtual Incision represents a paradigm shift from "mainframe" robotics to "mobile" robotics. The device weighs approximately two pounds and is small enough to be stored in a standard sterilization tray.

Mechanism of Action: MIRA is inserted through a single umbilical incision. Once inside the abdominal cavity, it deploys two arms and a camera. The key innovation is Internal Triangulation. In standard laparoscopy, surgeons must make incisions far apart to create angles (triangulation) to manipulate tissue. MIRA creates these angles inside the patient. The robot’s arms can rotate and articulate to grasp and cut tissue with the same dexterity as a large robot, but without the external footprint. This allows the system to be used in any operating room without specialized infrastructure, addressing the cost and space constraints of smaller hospitals.²⁷

Concentric Tube Robots (CTRs): Navigating the Unreachable

For reaching deep, confined spaces—such as the pituitary gland at the base of the skull or the distal airways of the lung—rigid links are unsuitable. Concentric Tube Robots offer a solution. These are "continuum" robots, meaning they curve continuously like a snake rather than bending at discrete joints.

The Mechanics: A CTR consists of nested tubes made of super-elastic Nitinol, each with a pre-set curvature. By rotating and translating these tubes relative to each other at the base, the robot's shape changes. The mechanics are modeled using Cosserat Rod Theory, which accounts for the bending, torsion, and friction of the material. This allows the robot to "tentacle" its way through tortuous paths, entering through the nose to perform skull base surgery without facial incisions.³⁰

Soft Robotics: Compliance and the "Vine" Robot

Biological tissues are soft; traditional robots are rigid. This mismatch is a source of injury. Soft Robotics utilizes compliant materials (silicones, textiles) to match the impedance of the body.

Eversion (Vine) Robots: These robots move by "growing." A soft tube everts from its tip, like a sock being turned inside out. Because the material is laid down rather than sliding, there is zero friction against the vessel or colon wall. This is ideal for colonoscopy, where friction from the scope can cause painful looping and perforation. In 2024, prototypes were developed that combine this eversion mechanism with pneumatic artificial muscles for steering, allowing the robot to navigate the colon with minimal distension.³³

The SFSA Hydraulic System:

A notable innovation from UNSW in 2024 is the Soft Fibrous Syringe Architecture (SFSA). This system is electricity-free, driven entirely by hydraulics. It uses fluid-filled syringes to actuate artificial muscles within a flexible arm. The advantage is two-fold:

1. MRI Compatibility: With no metal motors or electric currents, it is safe for use inside MRI scanners.

2. Intrinsic Sensing: The fluid pressure provides feedback. If the arm hits an obstacle, the pressure spikes, allowing the surgeon to "feel" the obstruction without complex electronic sensors.³⁴

Part V: The Micro and Nano Scale – Agents of Precision

At the limits of miniaturization, we leave mechanical linkages behind and enter the realm of untethered microrobots and molecular machines.

Magnetic Millirobots: Multimodal Locomotion

Millimeter-scale robots ("millibots") are designed to swim through the bloodstream to treat thrombosis (blood clots). The challenge is that the environment varies from stagnant veins to high-flow arteries. To adapt, researchers have developed Magnetic Shaftless Propellers.

Actuation: These robots are powered by external magnetic fields generated by coils around the patient. By changing the frequency and direction of the oscillating field, the robot can switch modes:

• Rolling: Moving along the vessel wall (better for traction against flow).

• Swimming: Spinning like a turbine in the center of the vessel (better for speed).

• Tumbling: Flipping over obstacles.This "multimodal" capability ensures the robot can reach the clot regardless of the hemodynamic conditions. Once at the target, the spinning motion can mechanically disrupt the clot or pump a concentrated thrombolytic drug directly into it.35

DNA Nanorobots: The Molecular Kill Switch

In a groundbreaking development published in Nature Nanotechnology (2024/2025), researchers at the Karolinska Institutet unveiled DNA Nanorobots for cancer therapy.

Structure and Mechanism: These robots are built using DNA Origami, folding DNA strands into a hexagonal cage. Inside this cage lies a "weapon"—a peptide chain that triggers cell death.

The Kill Switch: The cage is engineered to be pH-sensitive. The microenvironment of a solid tumor is typically acidic (pH ~6.5) due to the Warburg effect (cancer cells producing lactic acid). When the nanorobot encounters this acidity, the DNA latch unlocks, exposing the lethal peptide. In healthy tissue (pH ~7.4), the weapon remains hidden. This provides a level of specificity that traditional chemotherapy cannot match, effectively turning the cancer's own metabolic signature against it.38

Part VI: The Digital Interface – Twins, Haptics, and Planning

Surgery 4.0 is not just about the physical robot; it is about the digital environment in which the robot operates.

Digital Twins and Predictive Simulation

A Digital Twin is a virtual replica of a specific patient's anatomy, created from CT or MRI data. In 2025, the use of digital twins transitioned from research to reimbursed clinical practice (with new codes like HCPCS C8001 covering the cost of segmentation).

Clinical Application: Before a complex liver resection, the surgeon can practice on the digital twin. The simulator can model blood flow and tissue deformation. The surgeon can test different cut angles to see which one maximizes the remnant liver function. This allows for "risk-free" trial and error. Siemens Healthineers and others are scaling this to create "functional twins" that model the electrical activity of the heart, allowing for the simulation of pacemaker placement outcomes before the lead is ever implanted.⁴⁰

The Role of Haptics

As mentioned with the da Vinci 5, haptics are returning. But beyond force feedback, researchers are exploring Cutaneous Haptics. Teams at UC San Diego have developed stretchable polymers that can be worn on the surgeon's fingertips, delivering electrical signals that mimic the sensation of texture. This could allow a robotic surgeon to "feel" the difference between a smooth cyst and a rough tumor, a diagnostic capability currently lost in robotic surgery.³

Part VII: Economics, Ethics, and the Future

Cost-Effectiveness: The ongoing Debate

The economic viability of robotic surgery remains a contentious subject. Systematic reviews from 2024-2025 indicate that for routine procedures like cholecystectomy, robotics offers no significant clinical advantage over laparoscopy yet incurs higher costs.⁴³

However, for complex oncology, the equation shifts. A study in China on cervical cancer demonstrated that while robotic surgery cost approximately 1 million RMB more than laparoscopy, it provided significantly higher Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs), particularly in elderly patients who suffer more from the complications of open surgery. The "cost" is thus dependent on the timeframe: high upfront capital expenditure vs. long-term savings in length of stay and complication management.⁴⁴

The Ethical Minefield of Autonomy

As robots gain autonomy, legal frameworks are failing to keep pace.

• Liability: If an autonomous suturing robot (like STAR) tears a vessel, who is liable? The surgeon supervising? The manufacturer? The developer of the Reinforcement Learning algorithm? Current legal thought leans toward maintaining the surgeon as the "human-in-the-loop" for liability, but this may become untenable as the black-box nature of AI decision-making deepens.⁴⁵

• De-skilling: There is a genuine fear that residents trained on autonomous systems will lose the manual dexterity required to save a patient if the robot fails. The "art" of surgery risks being replaced by the "management" of systems.⁴⁷

• Equity: The digital divide is real. With systems like Toumai and da Vinci 5 costing millions, and digital twins requiring advanced computing, there is a risk of a two-tiered healthcare system: precision AI-driven care for the wealthy, and manual standard-of-care for the rest. The rise of cheaper platforms like Revo-i and Mantra is a critical counter-force to this trend.⁶

Conclusion

The advances in surgical robotics during 2024 and 2025 represent a convergence of disciplines: mechanical engineering, data science, telecommunications, and molecular biology. We are witnessing the birth of a new surgical ecosystem.

1. Platforms are diversifying, breaking the Western monopoly and offering specialized solutions for every budget.

2. Intelligence is evolving from teleoperation to supervised autonomy, driven by Transformer models and Reinforcement Learning.

3. Connectivity is erasing distance, allowing expertise to be teleported via 5G and satellite.

4. Scale is shrinking, from room-sized robots to DNA cages that hunt cancer.

The surgeon of the future will not just be a pair of hands. They will be the architect of a multi-agent intervention, orchestrating digital twins, autonomous arms, and molecular nanobots to cure disease with a precision previously unimaginable.

¹

Works cited

1. An Overview of the Surgical Robotics Market - Medical Device and Diagnostic industry, accessed January 12, 2026, https://www.mddionline.com/robotics/surgical-robotics-market-explodes-to-56b-by-2034-as-hospitals-embrace-ai-powered-precision-systems

2. 3 Ways Robotic Surgery Is Changing Health Care This Year | AHA, accessed January 12, 2026, https://www.aha.org/aha-center-health-innovation-market-scan/2025-03-04-3-ways-robotic-surgery-changing-health-care-year

3. Feel the Precision: Next-Gen Robotic Surgery With Haptic Feedback - PubMed, accessed January 12, 2026, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40031533/

4. Haptic Feedback in Surgical Robotics, accessed January 12, 2026, https://r2surgical.com/blogs/news/haptic-feedback-in-surgical-robotics

5. 2025 Surgical Robotics Review with robotics expert Steve Bell - YouTube, accessed January 12, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynwpaFGok3o

6. New Robots for Urologic Surgery in Asia - AUANews, accessed January 12, 2026, https://auanews.net/issues/articles/2025/march-2025/new-robots-for-urologic-surgery-in-asia

7. Toward safe clinical deployment of remote robotic surgery in Japan: five-year validation of the hinotori™ system using 5G wireless communication - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed January 12, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12644112/

8. Latest advances in the soft tissue robotic market: what you need to know, accessed January 12, 2026, https://fg.bmj.com/content/early/2025/10/08/flgastro-2024-103022

9. MedBot™'s Toumai® Robot Sets New World Record for Intercontinental Telesurgery, Spanning Over 12,000 km - MicroPort, accessed January 12, 2026, https://microport.com/news/medbot-s-toumai-robot-sets-new-world-record-for-intercontinental-telesurgery-spanning-over-12-000-km

10. Upcoming multi-visceral robotic surgery systems: a SAGES review - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed January 12, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11615118/

11. Autonomous Robot Surgery: What is This Crucial New Technology? - Liv Hospital, accessed January 12, 2026, https://int.livhospital.com/autonomous-robot-surgery-what-is-this-crucial-new-technology/

12. Robot performs first realistic surgery without human help - JHU Hub, accessed January 12, 2026, https://hub.jhu.edu/2025/07/09/robot-performs-first-realistic-surgery-without-human-help/

13. Autonomous Robotic System with Optical Coherence Tomography Guidance for Vascular Anastomosis - arXiv, accessed January 12, 2026, https://arxiv.org/html/2410.07493v1

14. An Automated Machine Learning Framework for Surgical Suturing Action Detection under Class Imbalance This research was fully funded by EPSRC, UK. With the Grant Reference EP/Y017307/1. * Corresponding Author - arXiv, accessed January 12, 2026, https://arxiv.org/html/2502.06407v1

15. Optimizing Robotic Automatic Suturing Through VR-Enhanced Data Generation for Reinforcement Learning Algorithms - IEEE Xplore, accessed January 12, 2026, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10445574/

16. Reinforcement Learning for Robotic-Assisted Surgeries: Optimizing Procedural Outcomes and Minimizing Post-Operative Complications - ResearchGate, accessed January 12, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/389988476_Reinforcement_Learning_for_Robotic-Assisted_Surgeries_Optimizing_Procedural_Outcomes_and_Minimizing_Post-Operative_Complications

17. AI brings autonomous procedures closer, but surgeons still key - JHU Hub, accessed January 12, 2026, https://hub.jhu.edu/2024/11/07/autonomous-robotic-surgery-briefing/

18. Exploring the Role of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Driven Training in Laparoscopic Suturing: A Systematic Review of Skills Mastery, Retention, and Clinical Performance in Surgical Education - NIH, accessed January 12, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11898934/

19. MuST: Multi-Scale Transformers for Surgical Phase Recognition | MICCAI 2024, accessed January 12, 2026, https://papers.miccai.org/miccai-2024/557-Paper3730.html

20. SASVi: segment any surgical video - PMC - NIH, accessed January 12, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12226634/

21. Surgical Scene Segmentation using a Spike-Driven Video Transformer with Real-Time Potential - arXiv, accessed January 12, 2026, https://arxiv.org/html/2512.21284

22. Telesurgery: current status and strategies for latency reduction - PubMed, accessed January 12, 2026, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40220039/

23. Telemedicine network latency management system in 5G telesurgery: a feasibility and effectiveness study | springermedizin.de, accessed January 12, 2026, https://www.springermedizin.de/telemedicine-network-latency-management-system-in-5g-telesurgery/26565400

24. Chinese robotic surgery breaks distance record with 30000km prostate cancer operation, accessed January 12, 2026, https://www.medbotsurgical.com/en/news/253.html

25. The era of telesurgery: insights from ultra-long-distance Asia to Middle East human telesurgery robotic assisted radical prostatectomy - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed January 12, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11893634/

26. MicroPort® MedBot™'s Toumai® Performs World's First LEO Satellite-Based Remote Robotic Surgery Using Mobile Platform, accessed January 12, 2026, https://microport.com/news/microport-medbot-s-toumai-performs-worlds-first-leo-satellite-based-remote-robotic-surgery-using-mobile-platform

27. MIRA Surgical System - A SAGES Technology and Value Assessment, accessed January 12, 2026, https://www.sages.org/publications/tavac/mira-surgical-system/

28. MIRA® Surgical Robot - Compact Robotic Technology - Virtual Incision, accessed January 12, 2026, https://virtualincision.com/mira/

29. For Surgeons - Explore the MIRA® Surgical Platform - Virtual Incision, accessed January 12, 2026, https://virtualincision.com/surgeons/

30. Continuum Robots for Medical Interventions - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed January 12, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9231641/

31. A Starter's Kit for Concentric Tube Robots - arXiv, accessed January 12, 2026, https://arxiv.org/html/2407.06943v1

32. Concentric Tube Robot Design and Optimization Based on Task and Anatomical Constraints - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed January 12, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4569019/

33. A Soft Growing Robotic Endoscope for Painless and Strain-Free Insertion - PubMed, accessed January 12, 2026, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40833842/

34. New electricity-free soft robot could aid precise surgery - UNSW Sydney, accessed January 12, 2026, https://www.unsw.edu.au/newsroom/news/2024/09/New_electricity_free_soft_robot_aid_precise_surgery

35. Magnetic Shaftless Propeller Millirobot with Multimodal Motion for Small-Scale Fluidic Manipulation - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed January 12, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11903028/

36. (PDF) Magnetic Shaftless Propeller Millirobot with Multimodal Motion for Small-Scale Fluidic Manipulation - ResearchGate, accessed January 12, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388592832_Magnetic_Shaftless_Propeller_Millirobot_with_Multimodal_Motion_for_Small-Scale_Fluidic_Manipulation

37. Magnetic shaftless propeller millirobot with multimodal motion for small-scale fluidic manipulation | EurekAlert!, accessed January 12, 2026, https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1084330

38. Nanorobot with hidden weapon kills cancer cells - | Karolinska Institutet, accessed January 12, 2026, https://news.ki.se/nanorobot-with-hidden-weapon-kills-cancer-cells

39. Nanorobot to target cancer cells and spare healthy ones - IBSA Foundation, accessed January 12, 2026, https://www.ibsafoundation.org/en/blog/nanorobot-against-cancer

40. Digital Twins in Healthcare | From Simulation to Clinical Transformation | A3, accessed January 12, 2026, https://www.automate.org/robotics/blogs/digital-twins-in-healthcare-from-simulation-to-clinical-transformation

41. Reimbursing Your Digital Twin: A New Era In Patient-Specific Surgery - MedCity News, accessed January 12, 2026, https://medcitynews.com/2025/11/reimbursing-your-digital-twin-a-new-era-in-patient-specific-surgery/

42. Digital Twins in Healthcare: Revolutionizing Patient Care at Duke, accessed January 12, 2026, https://comphealth.duke.edu/digital-twins-in-healthcare-revolutionizing-patient-care-at-duke/

43. Laparoscopic versus robotic cholecystectomy: a systematic review with meta-analysis to differentiate between postoperative outcomes and cost-effectiveness - Translational Gastroenterology and Hepatology, accessed January 12, 2026, https://tgh.amegroups.org/article/view/8479/html

44. Cost-effectiveness of robotic surgery compared to conventional laparoscopy for the management of early-stage cervical cancer: a model-based economic evaluation in China - NIH, accessed January 12, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11580275/

45. Legal Liability When an Autonomous AI Robot is Your Medical Provider - University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository, accessed January 12, 2026, https://repository.law.miami.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1456&context=umblr

46. Robotic Surgery and its Legal Implications - Moritz College of Law, accessed January 12, 2026, https://moritzlaw.osu.edu/sites/default/files/2025-12/Katelyn%20Oswalt%20Blog%204.pdf

47. 2025 Harvard Surgical Ethics Conference: "Implementation of AI in Surgery - YouTube, accessed January 12, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DqxLKCpmwrQ

48. The ethical considerations of integrating artificial intelligence into surgery: a review - Oxford Academic, accessed January 12, 2026, https://academic.oup.com/icvts/article/40/3/ivae192/8042349

49. The rise of robotics and AI-assisted surgery in modern healthcare - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed January 12, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12181090/