Where Industrial Growth Collides with Ecology: The Technical Stakes in 2026 Swing States

Introduction - 2026 Midterm Scientific Policy Landscape in Swing States

The 2026 United States midterm elections represent a critical juncture for both federal and state governance, with control of a closely divided Congress and numerous pivotal governorships at stake¹. Within the closely watched swing states—including Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, North Carolina, Georgia, Arizona, and Iowa—the political discourse is increasingly underpinned by complex scientific and technological challenges³. While public debates frequently focus on the economic and social ramifications of these issues, the underlying scientific realities dictate the absolute boundaries of policy feasibility.

In the upcoming electoral cycle, candidates must navigate a landscape where industrial expansion collides with ecological limits. For instance, the revitalization of domestic semiconductor manufacturing is directly constrained by the hydrological physics of drought in the American Southwest⁵. Similarly, the explosive growth of artificial intelligence data centers is pushing regional electrical grids to their thermodynamic limits⁷. In the realms of public health and agriculture, state legislators are grappling with the toxicokinetics of persistent synthetic pollutants, the biochemistry of maternal diagnostics, and the biogeochemistry of agricultural greenhouse gas emissions⁹.

This report provides an advanced, multi-disciplinary analysis of the core scientific phenomena driving policy debates in these pivotal states. By examining the mechanics of these issues, this analysis elucidates the technical realities that state and federal legislators must navigate in the upcoming legislative term.

Energy Infrastructure: Grid Reliability, Data Center Loads, and Advanced Conductors

In the industrial and technological corridors of the Midwest and Mid-Atlantic—specifically Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Michigan—electrical grid reliability has emerged as a paramount concern³. The PJM Interconnection, a regional transmission organization coordinating the movement of wholesale electricity across 13 states, is currently experiencing unprecedented systemic stress⁸.

Historically, domestic electricity consumption experienced a flat growth rate of under one percent annually⁷. However, the proliferation of hyperscale data centers, driven by the computational demands of artificial intelligence, has fundamentally altered load forecasting. PJM projects an additional 30 gigawatts of data center demand by 2030, which threatens to create severe capacity shortfalls as early as the summer of 2027⁷. Independent market monitors attribute approximately 63 percent of recent wholesale power price increases directly to this surging data center load, translating to billions in extra costs absorbed by ratepayers⁸.

This supply-demand imbalance recently culminated in historic price spikes during the PJM capacity auctions. Capacity markets function to ensure that sufficient generation resources are financially incentivized to remain available during peak demand events. For the 2026 to 2027 delivery year, the capacity price reached a regulatory ceiling of 329.17 dollars per megawatt-day, representing a massive increase from the 28.92 dollars per megawatt-day recorded just two cycles prior⁷. In response, state executives, such as Pennsylvania's governor, have intervened through the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to secure price caps and floors, aiming to shield consumers from localized rate shocks while maintaining grid stability¹².

Delivery Year	Market Segment	Clearing Price (Dollars per Megawatt-day)
2024 to 2025	Grid Capacity Market	28.92
2025 to 2026	Grid Capacity Market	269.92
2026 to 2027	Grid Capacity Market	329.17
2027 to 2028	Grid Capacity Market	333.44

Table 1: PJM Grid Infrastructure Capacity Auction Clearing Prices demonstrating exponential growth driven by structural undersupply⁷

The scientific and engineering bottleneck exacerbating this crisis is the interconnection queue backlog. As of late 2025, over 130 gigawatts of capacity-eligible generation projects—predominantly wind, solar, and battery storage—were stalled in the PJM queue, with average wait times extending beyond eight years¹⁵. The grid's inability to integrate these resources stems from the physical limitations of existing transmission infrastructure.

To mitigate these constraints without enduring the decade-long delays associated with permitting new transmission corridors, electrical engineers are turning to advanced conductor technologies¹⁷. Traditional transmission lines rely on steel-reinforced aluminum conductors. These traditional lines are limited by thermal degradation; as electrical current increases, resistive heating causes the metal to expand¹⁸. This thermal expansion results in line sag, which can eventually lead to catastrophic ground faults if the energized line contacts trees or terrain¹⁸.

Advanced alternatives, such as Aluminum Conductor Composite Core wires, utilize a high-strength, low-weight carbon and glass fiber core instead of steel²⁰. These composite materials exhibit a significantly lower coefficient of thermal expansion, allowing the lines to operate at much higher temperatures. Consequently, they can carry up to twice the electrical current with drastically reduced thermal sag¹⁷. However, deploying these conductors requires careful engineering, as altering the physical properties of the line can shift the waveform and propagation constant of traveling waves, which in turn affects the calibration of fault detection and relay protection equipment¹⁷. Despite these engineering hurdles, reconductoring existing infrastructure with advanced materials is projected to reduce the frequency and severity of line transfer limit violations by over 90 percent in modeled transmission systems, providing a critical stopgap for states like Ohio and Pennsylvania¹⁷.

Hydrological Deficits and the Microelectronics Water Nexus

In the arid Southwest, particularly the battleground state of Arizona, the intersection of climate-altered hydrology and advanced industrial manufacturing presents a profound resource management challenge⁶. Arizona's economic strategy heavily relies on the expansion of domestic semiconductor manufacturing, anchored by massive foreign and domestic investments from companies like Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company and Intel⁶. However, this industrial boom coincides with structural deficits in the Colorado River basin, which supplies over one-third of the state's water and is subject to stringent federal apportionment reductions beginning in 2027⁶.

Recent climatological and hydrological modeling reveals that anthropogenic warming has fundamentally decoupled precipitation from water availability in the basin. For every one degree Celsius of regional warming, runoff efficiency—the percentage of snowmelt and precipitation that actually reaches the river network—decreases by approximately 8.1 percent²⁵. This phenomenon is driven by a persistent soil moisture deficit²⁶. Following abnormally hot and dry autumns, parched soils act as a hydrologic tax; spring snowmelt is absorbed by the depleted soil profile before it can contribute to streamflow or recharge reservoirs like Lake Mead²⁶.

Consequently, modeling indicates a persistent risk of Lake Mead falling toward critical operating elevations. A drop to 1,038 feet above sea level introduces severe mechanical risks to the dam's intake structures, including vortexing and cavitation—where rapid changes in fluid pressure create shockwaves that can severely damage hydroelectric turbines²⁸. Reaching these elevations triggers severe Tier 3 mandatory apportionment reductions, deeply impacting agricultural and industrial allocations²⁸. Furthermore, groundwater over-extraction in areas like Pinal County, Arizona, has resulted in irreversible aquifer compaction and severe land subsidence, physically manifesting as massive earth fissures that threaten infrastructure³⁰.

Semiconductor fabrication is highly water-intensive due to the requirement for ultrapure water used to rinse microscopic residue from silicon wafers during the photolithography and etching processes²². A single leading-edge fabrication plant can consume 10 to 20 million gallons of water daily²². Producing ultrapure water requires extensive processing, including deionization and multiple passes of reverse osmosis, where 1,400 to 1,600 gallons of municipal tap water are needed to yield just 1,000 gallons of ultrapure water²².

User Segment / Metric	Approximate Daily Water Demand (Gallons)	Primary Source / Application
Large Semiconductor Fabrication Plant	10 to 20 Million	Municipal / Ultrapure Water generation
Hyperscale AI Data Center	Up to 19 Million	Municipal / Evaporative Cooling
Arizona Agriculture Sector	> 70 percent of state total	Surface and Groundwater / Irrigation
Reverse Osmosis Recovery Yield	1,000 gallons per 1,500 input	Photolithography rinsing

Table 2: Comparative Hydrological Demands in the Desert Southwest⁶

To reconcile these immense industrial demands with a contracting water supply, engineers are implementing highly advanced water reuse and recycling systems, targeting facility recovery rates between 65 and 90 percent⁶. A primary technical hurdle in achieving near-zero liquid discharge is the concentration of silica and dissolved minerals in the reverse osmosis reject stream³³. In conventional crosslinked polyamide thin-film composite membranes, these concentrated minerals rapidly scale and foul the membrane surface³³.

To overcome this limitation in high-recovery indirect potable reuse and industrial recycling systems, facilities are deploying vibratory shear enhanced processing technologies³⁵. These advanced systems apply high-frequency torsional shear directly to the membrane surface³⁵. The intense vibratory motion disrupts the boundary-layer concentration polarization, effectively preventing localized supersaturation and inhibiting the nucleation of silica scale³⁵. This thermodynamic intervention allows the recycling systems to operate at significantly higher recovery thresholds without succumbing to mineral fouling, preserving the regional aquifer while sustaining multi-billion-dollar industrial throughput.

Environmental Toxicology: The Mechanisms of PFAS Accumulation

Water quality and environmental toxicology occupy a central position in the electoral discourse of states like North Carolina, Michigan, and Wisconsin, driven by the pervasive contamination of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)³⁶. Characterized by extremely strong carbon-fluorine bonds, these synthetic surfactants possess unique hydrophobic and lipophobic properties, making them highly resistant to metabolic, thermal, and environmental degradation³⁶.

In April 2024, the United States Environmental Protection Agency finalized unprecedented, legally enforceable Maximum Contaminant Levels for drinking water, fundamentally shifting the regulatory landscape. The agency set stringent limits of 4.0 parts per trillion for legacy long-chain compounds, specifically perfluorooctanoic acid and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid⁴⁰. Furthermore, the agency instituted a 10 parts per trillion limit for hexafluoropropylene oxide dimer acid (commonly known as GenX), a short-chain replacement chemical prominently associated with severe contamination of the Cape Fear River watershed originating from the Chemours Fayetteville Works plant in North Carolina⁴⁰.

PFAS Compound	Regulatory Limit (Parts per Trillion)	Primary Biological Targets
Perfluorooctanoic acid	4.0	Hepatic, Immune, Lipid Metabolism
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid	4.0	Hepatic, Developmental, Thyroid
Hexafluoropropylene oxide dimer acid (GenX)	10.0	Hepatic, Biliary Transport
Perfluorohexane sulfonic acid	10.0	Hepatic, Endocrine

Table 3: Key PFAS Regulatory Limits and Biological Targets⁴⁰

Initially, short-chain alternatives like GenX were engineered by the fluorochemical industry under the assumption that their reduced molecular weight and shorter carbon-chain length would lead to faster physiological elimination and lower bioaccumulative potential⁴⁵. However, advanced toxicokinetic research demonstrates that these compounds still exhibit significant hepatotoxicity and persistence¹⁰.

The mechanism of bioaccumulation is heavily mediated by transport proteins in the liver, specifically the organic anion transporting polypeptides such as OATP1B1 and OATP1B3, as well as the sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide¹⁰. These basolateral membrane proteins actively uptake both legacy and short-chain PFAS from the blood plasma into hepatocytes⁴⁶. Once inside the liver, the compounds interfere with lipid metabolism and cholesterol regulation, often mimicking endogenous fatty acids and interacting with nuclear receptors like the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha¹⁰. The active transport into the liver, combined with subsequent biliary excretion and intestinal reabsorption, subjects the chemicals to robust enterohepatic circulation¹⁰. Furthermore, evidence indicates that PFAS impairs the structural integrity of the intestinal epithelium by down-regulating junctional proteins such as claudins and occludins, increasing paracellular permeability and systemic exposure⁴⁵.

In battleground states like Wisconsin, the policy response requires navigating complex regulatory frameworks that govern agricultural biosolids³⁸. Municipal wastewater treatment plants serve as passive receivers of industrial effluents, inadvertently concentrating PFAS into nutrient-rich sludge that is subsequently applied to agricultural lands as fertilizer⁴⁹. The transport of PFAS from these amended soils into groundwater and the agricultural food chain presents a distinct vector for human exposure⁴⁹. To manage the environmental fallout without paralyzing the agricultural sector, the Wisconsin legislature passed measures like Act 201, which creates specialized liability exemptions under the state's Spills Law for farmers acting as passive receivers, while establishing grants for municipal testing and remediation³⁸. However, broader groundwater quality standards remain stalled by partisan gridlock over administrative rulemaking procedures, highlighting the tension between environmental toxicology and legislative action⁴⁹.

Maternal Diagnostics and Rural Healthcare Infrastructure

In Georgia and North Carolina, the structural collapse of rural healthcare networks intersects directly with an escalating maternal mortality crisis, creating a highly salient issue for voters evaluating health policy⁵³. Georgia currently experiences maternal mortality rates nearly twice the national average, heavily exacerbated by the rapid expansion of "maternity care deserts"—defined as counties completely lacking obstetric hospitals, birth centers, or specialized obstetric providers⁵³. Over 40 percent of Georgia's 159 counties currently meet this classification, a direct result of negative operating margins forcing the widespread closure of rural labor and delivery units over the past decade⁵³. Spatial optimization analysis suggests that eliminating these deserts would require a 67 percent increase in the number of obstetric facilities statewide⁵⁶.

Consequently, the burden of managing high-risk pregnancies falls upon a regionalized hub-and-spoke model anchored by Regional Perinatal Centers⁵⁹. These tertiary care facilities rely on the timely interhospital transport of pregnant patients experiencing acute complications⁵⁹. However, the physical distance between rural populations and these specialized centers inherently increases the risk of adverse outcomes, necessitating highly accurate diagnostic tools to predict complications before they become critical emergencies.

Preeclampsia, a severe multisystem hypertensive disorder of pregnancy, remains a leading driver of maternal morbidity in these underserved regions⁹. Traditional diagnostic criteria—relying on maternal blood pressure readings and proteinuria—demonstrate low positive predictive values for identifying which patients will rapidly progress to severe disease characterized by end-organ damage, pulmonary edema, and cerebral swelling⁶¹.

Recent breakthroughs in biochemical diagnostics have revolutionized the risk stratification of this condition. The pathophysiology of preeclampsia is fundamentally an angiogenic imbalance⁹. Hypoxic stress in the developing placenta triggers the excessive cellular release of an anti-angiogenic protein known as soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1)⁹. This protein acts as a decoy receptor in the maternal bloodstream, binding and neutralizing pro-angiogenic proteins like placental growth factor (PlGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor⁹. The resulting deprivation of PlGF and vascular endothelial growth factor leads to widespread maternal endothelial dysfunction, hypertension, and subsequent organ damage⁹.

In early 2025, the Food and Drug Administration granted 510(k) clearance for the Roche Elecsys sFlt-1 to PlGF ratio test, providing a highly specific, automated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay for clinical use⁶¹. By quantifying the exact ratio of these two biomarkers in maternal serum, clinicians can predict the onset of severe preeclampsia with remarkable statistical accuracy. Clinical trials, including the pivotal PRAECIS study, demonstrated that an sFlt-1 to PlGF ratio greater than 38 yields a negative predictive value of over 94 percent, meaning that a hospitalized patient with a ratio below this threshold is highly unlikely to develop severe preeclampsia within the following two weeks⁶¹.

Predictive Metric	Ratio Threshold	Performance Percentage	Clinical Timeframe
Negative Predictive Value	Less than 38	> 94.0	2 Weeks
Positive Predictive Value	Greater than 38	65.0 - 79.0	2 Weeks
Sensitivity (Rule-in)	Greater than 38	91.0 - 94.0	2 Weeks

Table 4: Clinical Performance Characteristics of the sFlt-1 to PlGF Biomarker Ratio for Preeclampsia Risk Assessment⁶¹

The deployment of this biochemical assay is vital for states managing expanding maternity care deserts. By accurately ruling out imminent severe preeclampsia, rural providers can safely avoid unnecessary, high-risk maternal transports and mitigate the rates of iatrogenic premature deliveries. Conversely, patients identified with critically elevated biomarker ratios can be prioritized for immediate transfer to Regional Perinatal Centers, optimizing the allocation of scarce medical resources and potentially lowering the state's maternal mortality metrics⁵⁹.

Agricultural Biogeochemistry and Carbon Verification

In the agricultural strongholds of the Midwest and rust belt, particularly Iowa and Pennsylvania, the debate surrounding climate-smart commodities and the energy transition requires rigorous scientific validation of greenhouse gas emissions⁶⁷. Agricultural soils, notably the deep, carbon-rich Mollisols of the Corn Belt, hold immense theoretical potential to act as a terrestrial carbon sink, removing atmospheric carbon dioxide through improved land management practices like no-till farming and cover cropping¹¹. However, realizing this potential—and monetizing it through agricultural carbon offset markets—requires incredibly precise Monitoring, Reporting, and Verification frameworks¹¹.

The quantification of soil organic carbon fluxes across highly heterogeneous landscapes is notoriously difficult. Traditional physical soil sampling is labor-intensive, expensive, and lacks the temporal resolution necessary to track dynamic, seasonal carbon cycles¹¹. To bridge this gap, federal programs heavily utilize the COMET-Farm platform, a biogeochemical modeling tool that functions at the Tier 3 level of complexity¹¹. This system applies the DayCent process-based model to simulate carbon and nitrogen dynamics based on highly localized meteorological data, inherent soil physical properties, and specific farm management activity data¹¹.

To validate these bottom-up models and prevent the overestimation of carbon credits, scientists are increasingly relying on top-down micrometeorological techniques like eddy covariance¹¹. Eddy covariance towers measure the covariance between high-frequency vertical wind velocity fluctuations and the atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide and other trace gases. This provides highly accurate, continuous measurements of the net ecosystem exchange of carbon over a specific spatial footprint, effectively ground-truthing the algorithmic output of models like COMET-Farm¹¹.

The integration of advanced atmospheric monitoring is also reshaping the scientific understanding of other critical greenhouse gases in these rural economies. In agricultural systems, the application of synthetic nitrogen fertilizers and manure triggers the microbial process of nitrification, wherein chemoautotrophic bacteria, such as Nitrosomonas and Nitrosospira, oxidize ammonium to nitrite⁶⁹. This metabolic pathway frequently results in the off-gassing of nitrous oxide, a greenhouse gas with a global warming potential nearly 300 times greater than carbon dioxide⁶⁹. Understanding and mitigating these nitrogen fluxes, particularly from tile-drained fields, is essential for accurately calculating the true net-carbon footprint of biofuel feedstocks like corn and soybeans grown in Iowa⁶⁹.

Similarly, advanced satellite monitoring has revealed significant discrepancies in the quantification of methane emissions from the energy sector, a massive economic driver in the Marcellus shale regions of Pennsylvania and Ohio⁷⁴. Historically, bottom-up greenhouse gas inventories compiled by the Environmental Protection Agency rely on standardized emission factors applied to equipment counts and activity data, estimating total national methane losses from the natural gas supply chain at roughly 6 teragrams per year⁷⁶.

However, recent top-down data acquired by the TROPOMI instrument aboard the Sentinel-5P satellite has revolutionized atmospheric monitoring in this domain⁷⁶. TROPOMI provides high-resolution (5.5 by 7 kilometer pixel), daily global coverage of atmospheric methane columns by analyzing shortwave infrared solar backscatter⁷⁸. Data derived from the Marcellus and Delaware basins consistently demonstrate that top-down, measurement-based emissions are significantly higher than bottom-up inventory estimates—often underestimating actual fluxes by a factor of 2.5 to 6⁷⁶.

This severe discrepancy is largely attributed to the presence of "super-emitters." These are infrequent, highly anomalous equipment failures or blowouts that release massive volumes of methane, fundamentally skewing the statistical emission distribution⁷⁴. For example, satellite data quantified a single well blowout in Ohio releasing approximately 120 metric tons of methane per hour, an event completely missed by traditional bottom-up accounting methodologies⁷⁸. As lawmakers design policies to regulate emissions and support rural economies, integrating these highly sophisticated, top-down observational technologies will be necessary to ensure environmental protocols reflect actual atmospheric conditions rather than theoretical engineering estimates.

Conclusion

The political viability of platforms in the 2026 midterm elections across battleground states is intrinsically bound to complex, highly advanced scientific principles. From the thermodynamic limitations of composite electrical transmission lines in the Midwest to the molecular toxicokinetics of fluorinated compounds in the Great Lakes and Eastern seaboard, accurate legislative decision-making requires a firm grasp of empirical realities.

In Arizona, balancing economic growth with severe hydrological constraints mandates the implementation of advanced fluid dynamics and membrane filtration technologies capable of defying mineral supersaturation. In Georgia, overcoming the geographical inequities of rural healthcare infrastructure necessitates the integration of cutting-edge biochemical assays to predict severe maternal pathologies. Finally, in the broader agricultural and energy-producing heartland, the economic viability of carbon markets depends entirely on the rigorous biogeochemical validation provided by satellite remote sensing and micrometeorological sensors. As the electorate weighs competing visions for the future, the success of subsequent legislative policies will ultimately be dictated by their strict alignment with these foundational scientific mechanisms.

Works cited

1. United States Congress elections, 2026 - Ballotpedia, https://ballotpedia.org/United_States_Congress_elections,_2026

2. 2026 Midterm Election Results: Senate, House and Governor Races, https://apnews.com/projects/elections-2026/

3. 2026 midterm election races to watch - CBS News, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/2026-midterm-election-races/

4. States with both gubernatorial and U.S. Senate elections in 2026, https://ballotpedia.org/States_with_both_gubernatorial_and_U.S._Senate_elections_in_2026

5. Climate change induced water stress and future semiconductor, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10826299/

6. Arizona chip boom faces water cuts from 2027, raising alarm for, https://www.digitaltoday.co.kr/en/view/103159/arizona-chip-boom-faces-water-cuts-from-2027-raising-alarm-for-tsmc-intel-expansions

7. PJM Grid Infrastructure 2026, $3.5B Talen Energy Deal - Enki.AI, https://enkiai.com/data-center/pjm-grid-constraints-data-centers/

8. PJM Power Prices Up 76% From Data Centers: CRE Guide, https://www.theaiconsultingnetwork.com/blog/pjm-data-center-power-76-percent-cre-investors-2026

9. sFlt-1/PlGF Ratio as a Central Biomarker for Preeclampsia ... - PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12986349/

10. Effects of PFAS on human liver transporters: implications for health, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11285162/

11. Chapter 10 - Measuring and monitoring soil carbon sequestration, https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.5555/20220534960

12. PJM Announces Expensive Energy Changes in 2026, https://www.integrityenergy.com/resources/about-us/news-media/pjm-announces-expensive-energy-changes-in-2026/

13. Electricity Price Impact of AI Data Centers 2026 | Presenc AI, https://presenc.ai/research/electricity-price-impact-of-ai-datacenters-2026

14. Gov. Shapiro's Legal Action To Impose Price Cap On PJM, http://paenvironmentdaily.blogspot.com/2026/07/gov-shapiros-legal-action-to-impose.html

15. PJM Interconnection Queue Tracker 2026 | 130+ GW Backlog Analysis, https://gpuleaseindex.com/readiness/pjm-queue-analysis

16. S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC, https://adms.apps.lara.state.mi.us/Mpsc/ViewCommissionOrderDocument/27293

17. Advanced Conductors | GridLab, https://gridlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/2025-10-16-BPA-Advanced-Conductors-with-cover.pdf

18. What is Thermal Degradation and How Does It Impact Conductor, https://tsconductor.com/blog/what-is-thermal-degradation-and-how-does-it-impact-conductor-performance/

19. TRANSMISSION LINE DESIGN HANDBOOK BY BRIAN C WADELL, https://lin2.onecollective.org/document/T3p4DI703428/Transmission-Line-Design-Handbook-By-Brian-C-Wadell

20. Analysis of ACCC failure of composite core glass transition, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362862729_Analysis_of_ACCC_failure_of_composite_core_glass_transition_temperature_reduction_due_to_brittle_damage

21. ACSR vs ACCC Conductor: Performance, Cost & Application, https://www.hnzdcable.com/acsr-vs-accc-conductor/

22. Chip manufacturing consumes an astonishing amount of water, https://www.easelinkelec.com/News/489.html

23. How much water does Phoenix's TSMC chipmaker use? - YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BbhphH34lm4

24. r/technology - Arizona's lifeline for chip manufacturing is drying up, https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/1wen5k2/arizonas_lifeline_for_chip_manufacturing_is/

25. Aridification of Colorado River Basin's Snowpack Regions Has, https://npshistory.com/publications/glca/wrr-v59-2023.pdf

26. What the 2026 "Warm Drought" Means for Fire Season - CRV Science, https://www.crvscience.com/post/the-west-s-vanishing-snowpack-what-the-2026-warm-drought-means-for-fire-season

27. ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY May 2025 Integrating Observations, https://keep.lib.asu.edu/system/files/c7/Ghimire_asu_0010N_25001.pdf

28. A critical year is ahead for the nation's two largest reservoirs, with no, https://www.facebook.com/WWLP22News/posts/a-critical-year-is-ahead-for-the-nations-two-largest-reservoirs-with-no-relief-a/1474420124716409/

29. Simple Approaches to Examine Economic Impacts of Water, https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1920&context=jcwre

30. LAND SUBSIDENCE AND EARTH FISSURES IN ARIZONA, https://data.azgs.arizona.edu/api/v1/collections/AGCR-1552429799769-786/CR-07-C_Dec07.pdf

31. Ultrapure Water (UPW) for Fabs - SemiconductorX, https://semiconductorx.com/fab-water.html

32. A massive chip factory in the Arizona desert? Here is how it actually, https://www.facebook.com/TaiwanPlusMedia/videos/%EF%B8%8F-a-massive-chip-factory-in-the-arizona-desert-here-is-how-it-actually-workseven/3294773250707860/

33. Reverse Osmosis Membranes Market Size, Share & Growth Report, https://www.snsinsider.com/reports/reverse-osmosis-membranes-market-5609

34. PDF - The University of Arizona, http://erc.arizona.edu/members/Teleseminars/2008/JimBaygents_6-26-08.pdf

35. Direct & Indirect Potable Reuse | VSEP for Municipal Water Reuse, https://www.vsep.com/industries/indirect-potable-reuse/

36. United States Environmental Protection Agency's Perfluorooctanoic, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10408444.2024.2415893

37. PFAS Monitoring in North Carolina - Internet of Water, https://internetofwater.org/blog/data-stories/pfas-monitoring-in-north-carolina

38. PFAS - Wisconsin DNR, https://dnr.wisconsin.gov/topic/PFAS

39. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl ether acids in well water and blood serum, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377298303_Per-_and_polyfluoroalkyl_ether_acids_in_well_water_and_blood_serum_from_private_well_users_residing_by_a_fluorochemical_facility_near_Fayetteville_North_Carolina

40. PFAS in Drinking Water: Everything You Need To Know, https://mytapscore.com/blogs/tips-for-taps/the-ultimate-guide-to-pfas

41. United States Environmental Protection Agency's Perfluorooctanoic, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10408444.2024.2446453

42. Hexafluoropropylene Oxide (HFPO) Dimer Acid (CASRN 13252-13, https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2022-06/drinking-water-genx-2022.pdf

43. Predicting PFAS Exposure Risks from Rural Private Wells Using, https://pubs.acs.org/esthag/article/60/30/20999/5224843/Predicting-PFAS-Exposure-Risks-from-Rural-Private

44. Federal PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels - Wisconsin DNR, https://dnr.wisconsin.gov/topic/DrinkingWater/FederalPFASMCLs.html

45. From Exposure to Dysfunction: The Intestinal Toxicity of Per - PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12846221/

46. Organic Anion Transporting Polypeptides Contribute to the, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311908762_Organic_Anion_Transporting_Polypeptides_Contribute_to_the_Disposition_of_Perfluoroalkyl_Acids_in_Humans_and_Rats

47. Toxicokinetics and Perfluorooctanesulfonic Acid-Induced Liver, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392561952_Toxicokinetics_and_Perfluorooctanesulfonic_Acid-Induced_Liver_Protein_Expression_Are_Markedly_Altered_in_Mice_Lacking_Albumin

48. Models and challenges for studying forever chemicals and their, https://journals.biologists.com/dmm/article/18/11/dmm052320/369526/Models-and-challenges-for-studying-forever

49. New PFAS Legislation in Wisconsin | von Briesen & Roper, s.c., https://www.vonbriesen.com/legal-news/8135/new-pfas-legislation-in-wisconsin

50. Biosolids | US EPA, https://www.epa.gov/biosolids

51. EPA Suggests Health Risk From Foods Grown on Land Fertilized by, https://www.food-safety.com/articles/10068-epa-suggests-health-risk-from-foods-grown-on-land-fertilized-by-pfas-contaminated-biosolids

52. State and Federal Regulations for PFAS, https://midwestadvocates.org/pfas-regulations/

53. More than 40% of Georgia's counties are maternity care deserts, https://www.ajc.com/news/health-news/more-than-40-of-georgias-counties-are-maternity-care-deserts/YTIJE6RD5ZHEFNKXU3XDQHBSXY/

54. Map reveals maternity care deserts in Georgia - 11Alive.com, https://www.11alive.com/article/news/investigations/mothers-matter/maternity-healthcare-deserts-in-georgia/85-c825a49e-4407-4ce7-88c6-669ba73e24b1

55. Implementing a self-monitoring application during pregnancy and, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9295984/

56. The implications of using maternity care deserts to measure ... - PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11137923/

57. Rural Hospital Closures & Care-Access Crisis | 2025 State of the State, https://www.chartis.com/insights/2025-rural-health-state-state

58. Expanding Access to Obstetric Care in Georgia: Challenges and, https://www.gatech.edu/news/2024/07/12/expanding-access-obstetric-care-georgia-challenges-and-strategies

59. Perinatal Transport and Levels of Care* | Clinical Gate, https://clinicalgate.com/2015/06/03/perinatal-transport-and-levels-of-care/

60. Time-to-Delivery after Maternal Transfer to a Tertiary Perinatal Centre, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3976911/

61. Elecsys® sFlt-1/PIGF ratio aids laboratories, clinicians in predicting, https://diagnostics.roche.com/us/en/article-listing/elecsys-sflt-1-pigf-ratio-aids-laboratories-clinicians-in-predicting-the-risk-of-severe-preeclampsia.html

62. Roche Elecsys sFlt-1/PlGF ratio for preeclampsia receives FDA 510, https://diagnostics.roche.com/us/en/news-listing/2025/roche-elecsys-sflt-1-plgf-ratio-for-preeclampsia-receives-fda-510k-clearance.html

63. A Second Trimester Prediction Algorithm for Early-Onset ... - PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11049313/

64. DEVELOPING A BEDSIDE TEST FOR PREECLAMPSIA - PMC - NIH, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11316904/

65. Placental Growth Factor (PlGF)– Based Biomarker Testing to Help, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10241193/

66. Serum Tests for Preeclampsia Risk Assessment, https://www.amerihealthcaritasvipcare.com/content/dam/amerihealth-caritas/vip-care/pdf/fl/provider/resources/clinical/policies-202607/ccp1557-Serum%20Tests%20for%20Preeclampsia%20Risk%20Assessment.pdf.coredownload.inline.pdf

67. A new soil-based approach for empirical monitoring of enhanced, https://www.remineralize.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/A-new-soil-based-approach-for-empirical-monitoring.pdf

68. Partnerships for Climate-Smart Commodities Project Summaries, https://www.usda.gov/partnerships-climate-smart-commodities-project-summaries

69. Soil Fertility (Part III) - Properties and Management of Soils in the, https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/properties-and-management-of-soils-in-the-tropics/soil-fertility/F428D9C894CD65D4D0D9185C62EE4F44

70. Transformative Investment in Climate-Smart Agriculture, https://usfarmersandranchers.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/USFRA-Transformative-Investment-Report.pdf

71. A five-stage protocol for systematic measuring soil carbon and, https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/540011/1/N540011JA.pdf

72. COMET2.0—Decision Support System for Agricultural Greenhouse, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279429264_COMET20-Decision_Support_System_for_Agricultural_Greenhouse_Gas_Accounting

73. In Silico Evaluation of Plant Nitrification Suppression Effects on, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.02.28.482267.full

74. Spatial and Temporal Variability in Atmospheric Emissions from Oil, https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/16/9/1048

75. Importance of Superemitter Natural Gas Well Pads in the Marcellus, https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.8b06965

76. Reconciling Top-down and Bottom-up Methane Emissions, https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202312.0866

77. A comparison of bottom-up, measurement-based and EPA inventory, https://chemrxiv.org/doi/pdf/10.26434/chemrxiv.15007855

78. Satellite observations reveal extreme methane leakage from ... - PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6936547/

79. Quantifying national, state, and oil/gas field methane emissions and, https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/10629/2026/

80. (PDF) Top‐Down Versus Bottom‐Up Atmospheric Emission, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/397534899_Top-Down_Versus_Bottom-Up_Atmospheric_Emission_Estimates_From_Oil_and_Natural_Gas_Operations