top of page
Search

The New Space Hierarchy: Why the First Martian Rock Will Likely Be Returned by China

Mars rover and lander on a dusty, reddish Martian landscape surrounded by mountains. The rover collects samples with its robotic arm.

Abstract

The robotic exploration of Mars has entered a defining era characterized by a stark divergence in strategy and fortune between the world's two preeminent spacefaring nations. For over two decades, the United States, through the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), has pursued a methodical, multi-mission campaign to return pristine samples from the Red Planet, viewing this objective as the "Holy Grail" of planetary science. This effort, crystallized in the Mars Sample Return (MSR) program, was intended to be the crowning achievement of the Mars 2020 Perseverance mission. However, a convergence of technical complexity, ballooning cost estimates exceeding eleven billion dollars, and severe fiscal contraction has led to the effective cancellation of the program's return architecture in the 2025 and 2026 United States federal budgets. As of the current fiscal landscape, there is no allocated funding for the retrieval of the samples currently sitting in Jezero Crater. Conversely, the People's Republic of China, emboldened by the success of its Tianwen-1 and Chang'e-5 missions, has accelerated the timeline for its Tianwen-3 sample return mission. Targeting a launch in 2028 and a return by 2031, China employs a "grab-and-go" architecture featuring deep-drilling capabilities that may offer superior potential for recovering biosignatures shielded from cosmic radiation. This report provides an exhaustive analysis of this geopolitical and scientific inflection point, contrasting the stalled American effort with the ascending Chinese program, and examining the profound implications for the search for extraterrestrial life.

1. The Holy Grail of Planetary Science: Martian Rocks

1.1 The Scientific Imperative

The allure of Mars has always been rooted in the question of habitability. Since the first grainy images returned by the Mariner probes, humanity has sought to determine whether our neighbor planet, now a frozen desert, once harbored life. While the Viking landers of the 1970s provided ambiguous results regarding surface chemistry, subsequent missions—Spirit, Opportunity, Curiosity, and Perseverance—have painted a definitive picture of a wet, habitable past. We have found ancient riverbeds, deltaic deposits, and minerals that only form in the presence of liquid water.

However, the confirmation of life—the detection of complex organic molecules, cellular fossils, or isotopic fractionations unique to biological metabolism—remains elusive. This is not due to a lack of effort but a limitation of physics. The instruments that can be packed into a rover are constrained by mass, power, and data transmission limits. A mass spectrometer on a rover, while a marvel of miniaturization, cannot match the sensitivity or resolution of a facility-sized instrument on Earth. Terrestrial laboratories can measure isotopic ratios with precision to the parts-per-billion level, utilize synchrotrons to map elemental distribution at the nanometer scale, and repeat experiments endlessly.

Thus, the return of samples has been the highest priority of the United States National Academies’ Planetary Science Decadal Survey for two consecutive decades. It is the consensus of the global scientific community that the "life question" cannot be definitively answered in situ; the rocks must come home.

1.2 The Limits of In-Situ Exploration

To understand the necessity of sample return, one must appreciate the limitations of current rovers. NASA's Curiosity rover, for instance, carries the Sample Analysis at Mars (SAM) suite. SAM has detected organic molecules, but it cannot definitively determine their origin—whether they are biological, abiotic (formed by geological processes), or exogenous (delivered by meteorites).

Furthermore, the "clocks" needed to understand Martian history—radioactive isotopes used for geochronology—are difficult to measure remotely. Determining the precise age of a Martian rock surface is currently done by crater counting, a method fraught with uncertainties. Returning samples would allow scientists to use potassium-argon or uranium-lead dating techniques to pin down the age of the Martian surface with an error margin of mere millions of years, rather than billions. This would not only calibrate the Martian timeline but serve as a "Rosetta Stone" for dating surfaces across the entire inner solar system.

1.3 The Decadal Priority

The 2011 Planetary Science Decadal Survey, Visions and Voyages, identified Mars Sample Return as the single most important flagship mission for the decade 2013-2022. The subsequent survey, Origins, Worlds, and Life (2023-2032), reaffirmed this, urging NASA to complete the program "as soon as is practicably possible." This consistent prioritization reflects the scientific community's belief that we have learned all we can from "scratching and sniffing" the surface; the next quantum leap in understanding requires physical samples.

2. The Architecture of the American Dream

The architecture developed by NASA and the European Space Agency (ESA) to achieve this goal was a masterpiece of systems engineering, designed to maximize scientific return through a "relay" of multiple spacecraft.

2.1 The Perseverance Campaign

The first leg of the relay began with the landing of the Mars 2020 Perseverance rover in Jezero Crater. Unlike its predecessors, Perseverance was designed primarily as a sample cache mechanist. It carries the Adaptive Caching Assembly, a complex system of drill bits and titanium tubes.

Perseverance selects rocks based on extensive context. Before a core is taken, the rover uses its SuperCam (laser spectroscopy) and PIXL/SHERLOC (X-ray and UV spectroscopy) instruments to map the chemical composition of the target. This ensures that the samples are not random "grab bags" but are carefully chosen to represent specific geological environments—a river delta, a crater floor, a hydrothermal vein. As of 2024, Perseverance has successfully collected and sealed over 30 sample tubes, depositing a backup cache at the "Three Forks" depot and retaining the primary set on board.

2.2 The Sample Retrieval Lander (SRL)

The second planned mission was the Sample Retrieval Lander. This massive spacecraft would land near Perseverance (or the Three Forks depot). In the original concept, it would deploy a "fetch rover," built by ESA, to scurry out, pick up the tubes, and return them to the lander. Later revisions, acknowledging Perseverance's longevity, suggested the main rover could simply drive up to the lander and hand off the samples directly. The lander would be equipped with a robotic arm to transfer the tubes into a containment canister inside the ascent vehicle.

2.3 The Mars Ascent Vehicle (MAV)

The most technically audacious component of the plan is the Mars Ascent Vehicle. No rocket has ever launched from the surface of another planet. The challenges are immense:

  • Mass Constraints: Every gram of the rocket must be carried to Mars, landed softly, and then launched.

  • Environment: The rocket must survive the deep thermal cycling of Mars (swinging from minus 100 degrees Celsius to near freezing) for months before use.

  • Autonomy: The launch must be automated, as light-speed delays prevent real-time joystick control from Earth.

The baseline design selected by NASA was a two-stage solid-propellant rocket. Solid fuels are stable and storable, but they have lower specific impulse (efficiency) than liquids and are sensitive to cold temperatures, requiring heavy insulation or active heating.

2.4 The Earth Return Orbiter (ERO)

The final leg involved the Earth Return Orbiter, a massive spacecraft built by ESA. The ERO would wait in Martian orbit, scanning for the basketball-sized Orbiting Sample (OS) container released by the MAV. Using a complex system of optical navigation and LiDAR, it would rendezvous with the OS, capture it, seal it inside a biocontainment system (to break the chain of contact with Mars dust), and fly it back to Earth for a landing in the Utah desert.

3. The Collapse of the Paradigm (2023-2025)

By 2023, the sheer weight of this multi-mission architecture began to fracture the program's foundation. What was scientifically elegant became fiscally untenable.

3.1 The Independent Review Board Findings

In late 2023, the second Mars Sample Return Independent Review Board (MSR IRB-2) released a devastating assessment. The board, led by former NASA administrator Orlando Figueroa, found that the program's cost had ballooned from an initial estimate of roughly 4-5 billion dollars to a "probable cost range" of 8 to 11 billion dollars.1

The report cited several drivers for this explosion:

  • Complexity: The number of interfaces between NASA centers, ESA, and contractors was unmanageable.

  • Schedule Unrealism: The target launch dates were technically impossible, driving inefficient "marching army" costs.

  • Inflation and Supply Chain: The post-pandemic economic environment escalated aerospace material costs.

Crucially, the board concluded that the current architecture had a "near-zero chance" of meeting its schedule constraints. The mission threatened to "cannibalize" the entire planetary science portfolio, forcing the cancellation or delay of other high-priority missions like the Uranus Orbiter or the Dragonfly mission to Titan.2

3.2 The Budgetary Guillotine: FY2025 and FY2026

The political reaction was swift. In the United States, space policy is ultimately determined by the congressional appropriations process. Faced with an 11-billion-dollar price tag, Congress balked.

Analysis of the fiscal year 2025 and 2026 budgets reveals a systematic dismantling of the program. The enacted budget for FY2026 contains "no financial provisions" for the MSR mission.3 While the budget lines for "Planetary Science" remain, the specific allocation for "Mars Sample Return" was zeroed out, marked as "Canceled" or "Delayed Indefinitely" in appropriations tables.2

The House and Senate appropriations committees did provide a small sum (approximately 110 million dollars) for "Mars Future Missions," but the accompanying language explicitly stated this was "not for the Mars Sample Return (MSR) mission specifically".4 This funding is intended to keep the lights on at JPL and fund basic research, but it does not support the bending of metal for a flight vehicle.

NASA Administrator Bill Nelson summarized the situation bluntly: "An $11 billion budget is too expensive, and a 2040 return date is too far away".5 This statement signaled the formal end of the baseline program.

3.3 The "Stranded" Samples of Jezero

The tragedy of this cancellation is the "stranded" scientific capital currently on Mars. Perseverance continues to operate flawlessly. In July 2024, the rover discovered a rock named "Cheyava Falls," which contains "leopard spots"—chemical structures involving iron and phosphate that are potential biosignatures.6

This sample, now cached in a tube named "Sapphire Canyon," represents the most compelling evidence for life ever found on Mars. Yet, without the retrieval lander and MAV, it is effectively a message in a bottle with no ocean to carry it. The rover cannot analyze it further with its onboard tools; the verification requires Earth labs. As of now, the most valuable rock in the solar system is sitting in a titanium tube on a dusty plain, with no ride home.

4. The Rise of the Red Dragon: Tianwen-3

While NASA's program collapses under its own weight, the China National Space Administration (CNSA) is executing a methodical, accelerated campaign to seize the sample return milestone.

4.1 Lessons from Tianwen-1 and Chang'e-5

China’s confidence stems from two recent successes.

  1. Tianwen-1 (2021): This mission successfully placed an orbiter around Mars and landed the Zhurong rover. It demonstrated China's mastery of Mars Entry, Descent, and Landing (EDL)—specifically the use of a supersonic parachute and a variable-thrust engine for a soft touchdown.

  2. Chang'e-5 (2020): This lunar mission demonstrated the complete "robotic return" chain: landing, sampling, launching from the surface, autonomous rendezvous in orbit, and high-speed reentry.

Tianwen-3 is essentially a fusion of these two missions: the EDL capability of Tianwen-1 combined with the sampling and rendezvous architecture of Chang'e-5, scaled up for Mars.

4.2 The Tianwen-3 Mission Profile (2028-2031)

CNSA has officially announced that Tianwen-3 is scheduled for launch around 2028, with a return to Earth targeted for 2031.9 This timeline is aggressive but feasible given China's rapid development cycles.

The mission has three primary scientific objectives:

  1. Search for potential signs of life (biomarkers, fossils).

  2. Study the evolution of Martian habitability.

  3. Investigate geological structure.9

4.3 The Dual-Launch Architecture

To bypass the payload limitations of a single rocket, Tianwen-3 utilizes two Long March 5 heavy-lift launch vehicles.

  • Launch 1: Carries the Lander-Ascender Combination. This stack lands on the surface, performs the sampling, and houses the ascent vehicle.

  • Launch 2: Carries the Orbiter-Return Combination. This stack waits in Mars orbit to capture the samples and return them to Earth.9

This "dual-launch" approach simplifies the design constraints on each individual spacecraft, allowing for a heavier lander and a more capable orbiter.

5. Technological Divergence: The Battle for the Subsurface

A critical, often overlooked distinction between the US and Chinese approaches lies in how they sample. This difference could determine which nation actually finds life.

5.1 The Radiation Barrier and Organic Preservation

The surface of Mars is a hostile environment for organic chemistry. It is bombarded by:

  • Ultraviolet (UV) Radiation: Breaks down surface bonds immediately.

  • Galactic Cosmic Rays (GCRs): High-energy particles that penetrate meters into the rock.

  • Solar Energetic Particles (SEPs): Bursts of radiation from the sun.

Research indicates that GCRs can degrade complex organic molecules (biosignatures) down to a depth of 1-2 meters over geological timescales (billions of years).12 The top few centimeters—the "skin" of Mars—is effectively sterilized of complex fossil evidence. While simple molecules or isotopic patterns might survive, fragile structures like lipids or amino acid chains are likely destroyed in the top 10 cm.

5.2 The Strategic Advantage of the Two-Meter Drill

NASA's Perseverance uses a rotary-percussive coring drill that penetrates only about 6 to 8 centimeters into the rock. This samples the "radiation zone." Perseverance relies on finding rocks that have been recently exposed by wind erosion, hoping they haven't been cooked by radiation for too long.

China's Tianwen-3, however, is equipped with a deep drill capable of reaching 2 meters into the subsurface.9 This capability is derived from the Chang'e-5 lunar drill. By accessing depths of 2 meters, Tianwen-3 bypasses the worst of the cosmic ray damage. The regolith above acts as a shield, preserving the chemical history of the ancient past.

This gives Tianwen-3 a "quality over context" advantage. Even if the landing site is less geologically diverse than Jezero Crater, a sample taken from 2 meters deep might have a fundamentally higher probability of containing intact biosignatures than a surface core from the best delta on Mars.

5.3 Surface Sampling: Drones and Robot Dogs

Tianwen-3 is not relying solely on the drill. The mission includes a mobile sampling component to expand its reach beyond the lander's immediate vicinity. Reports and technical papers describe a "Mars surface cruise drone system"—potentially a foldable helicopter or a quadcopter similar to NASA's Ingenuity, but with a grabber.9 Other sources suggest a quadrupedal robot (a "robot dog") or a six-legged crawler.16

This mobile agent is designed to collect surface samples from "several hundred meters" away.9 This mitigates the risk of landing in a boring spot. The drone can fly/walk to a nearby crater rim or rock outcrop, grab a stone, and bring it back to the ascent vehicle. This adds a layer of "context" to the mission, though likely less sophisticated than Perseverance's decade-long survey.

6. The Context vs. Preservation Debate

The scientific community is currently debating the relative merits of these two sampling philosophies.

6.1 The Value of Geological Context (NASA)

The American philosophy emphasizes context. A rock's value is determined by its environment. Perseverance has spent years mapping the stratigraphy of Jezero. When it takes a core, scientists know it came from the "upper fan" or the "marginal carbonate unit." This allows them to reconstruct the environment—pH, temperature, flow rate—of the ancient water. This context is crucial for understanding habitability.

6.2 The Value of Depth (China)

The Chinese philosophy (aligned with ESA's ExoMars strategy) emphasizes preservation. If the goal is to find life (biosignatures), not just habitability, then protecting the sample from radiation is paramount. A sample from 2 meters deep in a generic flood plain (like Chryse Planitia or Utopia Planitia 11) might be more valuable than a surface sample from a delta, simply because the organics haven't been destroyed by billions of years of cosmic ray bombardment.

6.3 The "Cheyava Falls" Biosignature Dilemma

This debate is exemplified by the "Cheyava Falls" sample found by Perseverance. It has "leopard spots" that look biological. However, because it was found on the surface, skeptics can argue that abiotic radiation chemistry created the spots. If Tianwen-3 pulled a similar sample from 2 meters down, the "abiotic radiation" argument would be much weaker, making a biological interpretation more robust.

7. NASA's "Rapid Mission Design" Pivot

Faced with the total loss of the MSR program in the budget, NASA initiated a desperate "Rapid Mission Design" study in April 2024. The goal: find a way to return the samples for under $3 billion (down from $11 billion) and before 2040.5

7.1 The Industry Call to Arms

NASA awarded 90-day fixed-price contracts to ten industry partners to propose radical new architectures.18 These partners included:

  • Lockheed Martin

  • SpaceX

  • Aerojet Rocketdyne (L3Harris)

  • Northrop Grumman

  • Blue Origin

  • Quantum Space

  • Whittinghill Aerospace

7.2 The "Heritage" Solution: Lockheed Martin's InSight

Lockheed Martin’s proposal focuses on heritage. They suggest reusing the design of the InSight lander, which successfully landed on Mars in 2018. The InSight chassis is proven, cheap, and available. By stripping off the seismic instruments and bolting on a small MAV and a simple arm, Lockheed argues they can build a "good enough" lander for a fraction of the cost of the custom-built SRL.17 This concept relies on Perseverance doing the driving—the rover would drive up to the static lander and drop the tubes, removing the need for a fetch rover.

7.3 The Propulsion Revolution: Aerojet's Liquid MAV

Aerojet Rocketdyne focused on the MAV problem. The baseline solid rocket was too heavy. Aerojet proposed a "High-Performance Liquid Mars Ascent Vehicle".18 Liquid fuels (like hydrazine/monomethylhydrazine) are more energetic. A liquid MAV could be lighter, smaller, and potentially Single-Stage-To-Orbit (SSTO). This reduces the mass the lander has to carry, which reduces the size of the parachute and heat shield needed, cascading savings through the whole design.19

7.4 The Heavy Lift Wildcard: SpaceX and Starship

SpaceX proposed "Enabling Mars Sample Return With Starship".18 The Starship vehicle is so massive that it renders the "mass constraint" irrelevant. A Starship could theoretically land on Mars, open its bay doors, pick up the Perseverance rover entirely, and fly it back to Earth. Or, more modestly, it could deliver a massive return vehicle. However, this relies on Starship achieving operational status, including on-orbit refueling and Mars landing, within the relevant timeframe—a high-risk proposition given the developmental hurdles remaining.

8. Geopolitical Implications and the New Space Race

The divergence in MSR fortunes has created a high-stakes geopolitical narrative.

8.1 The Prestige of the "First Return"

Space exploration is a proxy for national power. For decades, the US has monopolized the surface of Mars. If China returns samples first, it will be a "Sputnik moment" for the 21st century.3 It would demonstrate that China can execute the most complex robotic mission in history faster and cheaper than the US. This would signal a shift in technological leadership, influencing alliances and soft power dynamics globally.

8.2 Planetary Protection and Bio-Safety

The return of samples also raises the issue of Planetary Protection—the prevention of "back contamination" (bringing Martian bugs to Earth). Both NASA and China have pledged strict adherence to COSPAR (Committee on Space Research) protocols.9 However, the race mentality introduces risk. If a nation cuts corners on the containment facility or the Earth entry capsule design to beat a timeline, the consequences could be catastrophic (though the probability of dangerous Martian pathogens is considered extremely low). China has outlined plans for a dedicated curation facility to handle the samples, mirroring NASA's plans for a Sample Receiving Facility (SRF).21

8.3 The Future of International Collaboration

NASA’s MSR was a partnership with Europe (ESA). The collapse of the US budget puts ESA in a difficult position. Their Earth Return Orbiter is in development, but without a NASA lander to send something up to it, it has no mission. This strains the transatlantic alliance. Meanwhile, China has explicitly opened Tianwen-3 to international collaboration, allocating payload mass for foreign instruments.22 This could draw scientific partners away from the US sphere and toward the Chinese program, further isolating NASA.

9. Conclusion

9.1 Summary of the Current Standoff

The dream of Mars Sample Return, nurtured for fifty years, is at a crossroads.

  • NASA: Possesses the samples (Perseverance), the context, and the history, but lacks the funding, the architecture, and the timeline. The "Cheyava Falls" biosignatures sit waiting in Jezero Crater, stranded by a budget crisis that has zeroed out the return mission.

  • China: Possesses the funding, the timeline (2028-2031), and a scientifically potent architecture (deep drilling), but has yet to launch.

9.2 The Verdict on Funding

It must be stated explicitly: As of the fiscal year 2026 enacted budget, the United States has no allocated funding for a Mars Sample Return mission. The program is effectively paused, surviving only through small "future mission" stipends and industry studies, while the hardware required to get the rocks off the planet does not exist and is not being built.

9.3 Final Outlook

Unless the "Rapid Mission Design" studies yield a miraculous, low-cost solution that Congress is willing to fund immediately, the most likely outcome is that the first pieces of Mars to arrive on Earth will come from the Tianwen-3 mission. These samples, drilled from the protected subsurface, may well provide the first definitive evidence of extraterrestrial life. The United States, having done the hard work of identifying the most promising rocks in Jezero Crater, risks watching from the sidelines as another nation crosses the finish line, ushering in a new era of Martian science under a different flag.

Table 1: Mission Architecture Comparison

Feature

NASA MSR (Original Baseline)

China Tianwen-3

Status

Canceled / Unfunded (FY26)

Active / Funded

Target Return

~2040 (Original Estimate)

~2031

Sampling Method

Surface Rover (Perseverance)

Scoop + Deep Drill + Drone

Drill Depth

~6-8 cm (Surface)

~200 cm (Subsurface)

Launch Strategy

Multi-Launch Relay (SLS/Commercial)

Dual-Launch (Long March 5)

Scientific Focus

Geological Context & Diversity

Biosignature Preservation & Depth

Sample Mass

~500g (30+ tubes)

>500g

Table 2: NASA Industry Study Participants (Rapid Mission Design)

Company

Proposed Focus

Strategic Advantage

Lockheed Martin

InSight-based Lander

Low cost, high heritage, proven landing system.

Aerojet Rocketdyne

Liquid Propulsion MAV

Higher efficiency, lower mass, potential single-stage.

SpaceX

Starship Architecture

Massive payload capacity, potentially return rover.

Northrop Grumman

Solid/Liquid Propulsion

Mature propulsion technologies.

Blue Origin

Artemis Synergy

Leveraging lunar transport tech for Mars.

Report finalized and synthesized from current aerospace data as of early 2026.

Works cited

  1. MSR IRB Report Final Copy - NASA, accessed January 19, 2026, https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/msr-irb-report-final-copy-v3.pdf

  2. You just saved NASA's budget | The Planetary Society, accessed January 19, 2026, https://www.planetary.org/articles/advocacy-success-fy2026-nasa-budget

  3. Mars Sample Return Faces Collapse. NASA Runs Out of Money - Holistic News, accessed January 19, 2026, https://holistic.news/en/mars-sample-return-faces-collapse-nasa-runs-out-of-money/

  4. Great News for NASA in the House-Senate FY2026 Appropriations Report, accessed January 19, 2026, https://spacepolicyonline.com/news/great-news-for-nasa-in-the-house-senate-fy2026-appropriations-report/

  5. NASA Sets Path to Return Mars Samples, Seeks Innovative Designs, accessed January 19, 2026, https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-sets-path-to-return-mars-samples-seeks-innovative-designs/

  6. Could China return the Perseverance rover's possible biosignature sample from Mars?, accessed January 19, 2026, https://www.space.com/astronomy/mars/could-china-return-the-perseverance-rovers-possible-biosignature-sample-from-mars

  7. NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year, accessed January 19, 2026, https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/nasa-says-mars-rover-discovered-potential-biosignature-last-year/

  8. Scientists detected a potential biosignature on Mars – an astrobiologist explains what these traces of life are, and how researchers figure out their source - The Current - TheCurrentGA.org., accessed January 19, 2026, https://thecurrentga.org/2025/09/13/scientists-detected-a-potential-biosignature-on-mars-an-astrobiologist-explains-what-these-traces-of-life-are-and-how-researchers-figure-out-their-source/

  9. Chinese scientist details first planned Mars sample-return mission Tianwen-3, accessed January 19, 2026, https://english.www.gov.cn/news/202507/23/content_WS68803af3c6d0868f4e8f45d3.html

  10. Tianwen-3 - Wikipedia, accessed January 19, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tianwen-3

  11. Tianwen 3 - Chinese Mars sample return - NASA Spaceflight Forum, accessed January 19, 2026, https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=56585.20

  12. From the Top of Martian Olympus to Deep Craters and Beneath: Mars Radiation Environment Under Different Atmospheric and Regolith, accessed January 19, 2026, https://e-docs.geo-leo.de/server/api/core/bitstreams/1427ba88-85bd-44c8-a5f5-68d1116c5d01/content

  13. Catalytic/Protective Properties of Martian Minerals and Implications for Possible Origin of Life on Mars - PubMed Central, accessed January 19, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6315534/

  14. HKU Astrobiologist Joins National Effort to Map Out China's Tianwen-3 Mars Sample Return Mission - All News - Media, accessed January 19, 2026, https://hku.hk/press/news_detail_28427.html

  15. China develops prototype Mars helicopter, accessed January 19, 2026, https://www.marsdaily.com/reports/China_develops_prototype_Mars_helicopter_999.html

  16. China just might add a helicopter and 6-legged robot to Mars sample-return mission - Space, accessed January 19, 2026, https://www.space.com/china-mars-helicopter-sample-return-plans

  17. Mars Sample Return | Lockheed Martin, accessed January 19, 2026, https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/capabilities/space/deep-space-exploration/mars/mars-sample-return.html

  18. NASA Exploring Alternative Mars Sample Return Methods, accessed January 19, 2026, https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-exploring-alternative-mars-sample-return-methods/

  19. Evaluation of Liquid Propulsion MAV Concepts for Mars Sample Return - AIAA, accessed January 19, 2026, https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/pdf/10.2514/6.2025-4000

  20. L3Harris Proprietary, accessed January 19, 2026, https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/mepagnov2024/presentations/Wednesday/1200_Reynolds.pdf

  21. Mars Sample Return: From collection to curation of samples from a habitable world - NIH, accessed January 19, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11745348/

  22. Announcement of Opportunities for International Collaboration of Mars Sample Return Mission (Tianwen-3), accessed January 19, 2026, https://www.cnsa.gov.cn/english/n6465645/n6465648/c10652198/part/10652214.pdf

  23. China invites int'l partners on Tianwen-3 Mars sample-return mission, accessed January 19, 2026, https://english.spacechina.com/n17212/c4320441/content.html

Comments

bottom of page